Updated results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin AUC 6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 149-149 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Kern ◽  
Hans C. Kolberg ◽  
Anne Kalisch ◽  
Rainer Kimmig ◽  
Dirk Pott ◽  
...  

149 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis unless a pathological complete response (pCR) is achieved or almost achieved (near-pCR). Treatment of TNBC remains a challenge as some patients fail to respond to the use of standard anthracyclin-based chemotherapy regimens. Phenotypic and molecular similarities between TNBC and BRCA1-associated breast cancer suggest that TNBC may share the same sensitivity to platinum analogues as tumors associated with BRCA1. Methods: 30 patients with primary, unilateral, non-metastasized TNBC (majority of them cT1 or cT2, two cT4) had to be unsuitable for standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. They received 6 cycles, respectively in two case sonly 5 cycles, of carboplatin AUC 6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m² q3w. Adverse effects were recorded according to CTCAE V4.07. Primary endpoint was pathological complete response (pCR) and near-pCR, secondary endpoint toxicity. Results: 70% (21/30) of patients had either a pathological complete response (55%; 15/27) or a near-complete response (20%; 6/30) - defined as pT1mic and ypT1a - both being associated with a good prognosis. Eight remaining patients had still good partial response, leaving only low residual cancer burden, which was specified as ypT1, in contrast only one ypT4 tumor. Treatment was well tolerated - grade IV toxicities were predominantly hematological side effects (especially concerning neutropenia) and in 2 cases grade IV edema and joint pain. Carboplatin dose reduction (to an AUC of 5) was required in 5 cases (because of limited renal function, hematological side effects or patient’s age). Conclusions: Our results demonstrate a high-anti-tumour activity of docetaxel 75mg/m² in combination with carboplatin AUC 6, promising high rates of tumour regression and pathological complete remission. The omission of exposure to anthracyclines in patients with considerable heart disease risks seems to be feasible with a good pCR-rate, the latter being a surrogate-marker for long-term survival. Survival data of this trial are currently being updated and will be presented on the Breast Cancer Symposium.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12616-e12616
Author(s):  
Petr Krivorotko ◽  
Elena Zhiltsova ◽  
Larisa Gigolaeva ◽  
Alexander Emelyanov ◽  
Roman Pesotskiy ◽  
...  

e12616 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT), Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) including anthracyclines and taxanes for early stages of TNBC, allows to achieve pathological complete response (pCR) in 25-36% of patients. Pathological complete response (pCR) significantly correlates with an increase in disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Methods: Randomized, monocentric trial was conducted in NN Petrov National Medical Research Center of Oncology from 2016 to 2019. 99 patients aged from 28 to 68 years with confirmed TNBC were included in trial: 96 had invasive ductal carcinoma G3, 3 - metaplastic cancer, negative BRCA mutations (a test for Founder mutations was performed).Patients were randomized in 3 groups, depending on the NCT regimen:1st subgroup (24 patients) - Eribulin in combination with Carboplatin AUC 5 x 4 cycles 2nd subgroup (37 patients) - Paclitaxel in combination with Carboplatin AUC 5 x 4 cycles 3rd subgroup (38 patients) –Carboplatin AUC5 + Doxorubicin + Paclitaxel x 6 cycles. Patients 1 and 2 subgroups in an adjuvant mode received 4 cycles of AC. Results: Clinical complete response (cCR) by physical examination (palpation) was achieved in 44 out of 99 patients (44.4%). Clinical complete response (cCR) by ultrasound and MG - in 27 (27.2%) patients. Miller-Payne V regression stage was achieved in 55 out of 99 cases (55.6%). In clinical cT1-T2 stage (n = 70), ypCR was achieved in 49 cases (70%), cT3-T4 (n = 29) ypCR in 6 patients (20.68%). Before NCT, 71 patients had status cN0-N1. Conversion to ypN0 occurred in 57 patients (80.2%). In 28 patients with cN2-N3 status, conversion to ypN0 occurred in 7 patients (25%). The median follow-up was 58 months. Progression was observed in 15.1% of patients, mortality – 6%. Local recurrence - 6 patients (6%), all patients were with residual tumor after NCT. Distant recurrence – 8 patients (8.1 %). Local recurrence rate and distant recurrence rate did not correlate with type of surgery (BCS or ME), but correlated with ypCR. Conclusions: NCT for TNBC is advisable both for locally advanced breast cancer and early breast cancer BC. De-escalation of BC surgery is possible in the future, especially in cT1-T2 stage patients (n = 70) where ypCR rate reaches 70%. It is planned to continue the trial with the vacuum aspiration biopsy of the tumor bed and SLNB after NCT.SLNB after NCT is advisable only in cN0-N1 group of patients (n = 71), since conversion to ypN0 was achieved in 57 patients - 80.2%.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 277-277 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Kern ◽  
H. C. Kolberg ◽  
A. Kalisch ◽  
C. Liedtke ◽  
F. Otterbach ◽  
...  

277 Background: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is associated with a poor prognosis unless a pathological complete response is achieved (Liedtke C et al. 2008: J Clin Oncol 26:1275-1281) or almost achieved (Symmans WF. 2007: J Clin Oncol 25:4414-4422). Sensitivity to platin compounds has been demonstrated in BRCA1-positive settings (Byrski T et al. 2010: J Clin Oncol 20:28:375-9; Silver DP. 2010: J Clin Oncol 28:1145-1153) with only limited numbers of patients (Byrski T et al. 2010: J Clin Oncol 20:28:375-9) or in sporadic breast cancer with heterogeneous cohorts (Sikov WM et al 2009: J Clin Oncol 27:4693-4700; Chang HR et al. 2010: Cancer 15; 116:4227-4237). Methods: This pivotal trial was to assess the efficacy of platinum and taxane-based combination therapy without the use of anthracyclines. 27 patients with primary TNBC (majority of them cT2, two cT3 and one cT4a) had to be unsuitable for standard anthracycline-based chemotherapy. They received 6 cycles, respectively in two cases only 5 cycles, of carboplatin AUC 6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q3w. The primary endpoint was the pCR-rate, secondary endpoint toxicity. Results: 20 out of 27 (74%) patients had pathological complete response (52%) or near-complete response (22%)—ypT1mic and ypT1a—both being associated with a good prognosis. Seven remaining patients had still good partial response, leaving only low residual cancer burden, which was defined as ypT1. Treatment was well-tolerated: grade III and IV toxicities were neutropenia, thrombopenia, oedema, nausea, joint pain, nail changes, fatigue, hypertension, and alopecia. Conclusions: These results show a high efficacy of carboplatin AUC6 and docetaxel 75 mg/m2 q3w and good feasibility as primary chemotherapy for TNBC with a pCR- and near-pCR-rate of 74% and total response rate of 100%. The incorporation of anthracyclines and parp-inhibitors into further trial designs could enhance the efficacy of these compounds. The omission of exposure to anthracyclines in patients with considerable heart disease risks seems to be feasible with a good pCR-rate, the latter being a surrogate-marker for long-term survival.


F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1649
Author(s):  
Paulo Luz ◽  
David Dias ◽  
Ana Fortuna ◽  
Luis Bretes ◽  
Beatriz Gosalbez

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been established that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) for certain aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, including HER-2 (over-expressed) and TNBC, provides an important surrogate marker for predicting long-term clinical response and survival outcomes. How to increase the number of patients that achieve pCR remains challenging. Platinum-based NACT seems to be part of the solution and capecitabine, an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but not a standard one in earlier stages may have found its place in the adjuvant setting. In the near future immunotherapy can play a role in early TNBC


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2648
Author(s):  
Bruna Cerbelli ◽  
Simone Scagnoli ◽  
Silvia Mezi ◽  
Alessandro De Luca ◽  
Simona Pisegna ◽  
...  

Pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) can predict better survival outcomes in patients with early triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), and Cluster of Differentiation 73 (CD73) are immune-related biomarkers that can be evaluated in the tumor microenvironment. We investigated if the contemporary expression of these biomarkers combined in a tissue immune profile (TIP) can predict pCR better than single biomarkers in TNBC. Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs), CD73 expression by cancer cells (CC), and PD-L1 expression by immune cells (IC) were evaluated on pre-NACT biopsies. We defined TIP positive (TIP+) as the simultaneous presence of TILS ≥ 50%, PD-L1 ≥ 1%, and CD73 ≤ 40%. To consider the effects of all significant variables on the pCR, multivariate analysis was performed. Akaike information criterion (AIC) and Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used for model selection. We retrospectively analyzed 60 biopsies from patients with TNBC who received standard NACT. Pathological complete response was achieved in 23 patients (38.0%). Twelve (20.0%) cases resulted to be TIP+. The pCR rate was significantly different between TIP+ (91.7%) and TIP− (25.0%) (p < 0.0001). Using a multivariate analysis, TIP was confirmed as an independent predictive factor of pCR (OR 49.7 (6.30–392.4), p < 0.0001). Finally, we compared the efficacy of TIP versus each single biomarker in predicting pCR by AIC and BIC. The combined immune profile is more accurate in predicting pCR (AIC 68.3; BIC 74.5) as compared to single biomarkers. The association between TIP+ and pCR can be proposed as a novel link between immune background and response to chemotherapy in TNBC, highlighting the need to consider an immunological patients’ profile rather than single biomarkers.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document