scholarly journals How shall we treat locally advanced triple negative breast cancer?

F1000Research ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1649
Author(s):  
Paulo Luz ◽  
David Dias ◽  
Ana Fortuna ◽  
Luis Bretes ◽  
Beatriz Gosalbez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Her 2 ◽  
Near Future

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been established that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) for certain aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, including HER-2 (over-expressed) and TNBC, provides an important surrogate marker for predicting long-term clinical response and survival outcomes. How to increase the number of patients that achieve pCR remains challenging. Platinum-based NACT seems to be part of the solution and capecitabine, an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but not a standard one in earlier stages may have found its place in the adjuvant setting. In the near future immunotherapy can play a role in early TNBC

scholarly journals How shall we treat locally advanced triple negative breast cancer?

F1000Research ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 1649
Author(s):  
Paulo Luz ◽  
David Dias ◽  
Ana Fortuna ◽  
Luis Bretes ◽  
Beatriz Gosalbez
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Surrogate Marker ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Number Of Patients ◽  
Her 2

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) has been shown to respond to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). It has been established that achieving pathological complete response (pCR) for certain aggressive subtypes of breast cancer, including HER-2 (over-expressed) and TNBC, provides an important surrogate marker for predicting long-term clinical response and survival outcomes. How to increase the number of patients that achieve pCR remains challenging. Platinum-based NACT seems to be part of the solution and capecitabine, an active drug in metastatic breast cancer, but not a standard one in earlier stages may have found its place in the adjuvant setting.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Therapy in Operable Breast Cancer: Application to Triple Negative Breast Cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Foluso O. Ademuyiwa ◽  
Matthew J. Ellis ◽  
Cynthia X. Ma
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Chemotherapy Resistance ◽  
Treatment Strategies ◽  
Surrogate Endpoint ◽  
Complete Response

Systemic treatment for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC: negative for the expression of estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor and HER2 amplification) has been limited to chemotherapy options. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy induces tumor shrinkage and improves the surgical outcomes of patients with locally advanced disease and also identifies those at high risk of disease relapse despite today’s standard of care. By using pathologic complete response as a surrogate endpoint, novel treatment strategies can be efficiently assessed. Tissue analysis in the neoadjuvant setting is also an important research tool for the identification of chemotherapy resistance mechanisms and new therapeutic targets. In this paper, we review data on completed and ongoing neoadjuvant clinical trials in patients with TNBC and discuss treatment controversies that face clinicians and researchers when neoadjuvant chemotherapy is employed.

Improving pathological response in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer: Comparison between CbD and AC-T regimens.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 585-585 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Enriquez ◽  
Nathaly Poma Nieto ◽  
Hugo Alejandro Fuentes ◽  
Henry Guerra ◽  
Rossana Esther Ruiz Mendoza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Tumor Size ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
Respondent Group

585 Background: Pathological complete response (pCR) is a well-known surrogate for DFS and OS in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). New approaches are being tested to increase pCR rate. We compared the standard of care (AC-T) vs Carboplatin/Docetaxel (CbD) for locally-advanced TNBC. Our objective is to determine whether CbD will increase the pCR rate, with PFS and OS as secondary objectives. Methods: A single arm phase II prospective trial with historical controls. 61 stage II-III TNBC patients were included between 2013-2014 at Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (Peru). 27 patients received Carboplatin 6AUC + Docetaxel 75mg/m2 q21d for 6cy, and 34pts, Adriamycin 60mg/m2 + Cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 q21d for 4cy followed by weekly paclitaxel 80mg/m2 for 12 weeks. The Miller and Payne method was used to evaluate pathological response after definitive surgery. Results: Median age was 47 years, most patients were premenopausal (55.7%), median tumor size was 61 mm (T3=32.8%, T4=50.8%) and most patients had LN+ve (77%). There was a significantly greater tumor size in the CbD arm (mean 72.8 vs 52.2mm, p=0.007), no toxicity differences were noted. Only pCR was independently associated with OS/PFS on multivariate analysis. pCR was achieved in 37% (n=10) and 23.5% (n=8) in the CbD and AC-T groups, respectively (p=0.44). Partial pathological response was achieved in 37% (n=10) and 38.2% (n=13) patients in AC-T and CbD respectively. No characteristics were associated to pCR on logistic regression. At 2-year follow-up, all patients with pCR were alive and without recurrence, while patients with partial response achieved a 2-year PFS of 75% and, 2-year OS of 83.5%. The non-respondent group had the worse outcomes (2-year PFS: 32.7%, 2-year OS: 58.7%). The CbD group had a better 2-year PFS and OS (73.1% and 84%, respectively) than the AC-T group (59.3% and 71%, respectively), however no-statistical difference was found. Conclusions: CbD is an effective and promising neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for TNBC. Despite a larger mean tumor size in the CbD group, a non-significant trend towards higher pCR rate and longer PFS and OS was observed and warrants further exploration.

Ixabepilone efficacy and tolerability in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients in a real-world setting.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13067-e13067
Author(s):  
Tara Hyder ◽  
Margaret Q. Rosenzweig ◽  
Adam Brufsky
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Sensory Neuropathy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Real World Setting

e13067 Background: Ixabepilone is a microtubule stabilizing agent that was approved as monotherapy and in combination with capecitabine for the treatment of refractory metastatic or locally advanced breast cancer. With limited options for refractory MBC, especially in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), ixabepilone has demonstrated an increase in progression free survival (PFS) in randomized control trials. We assess the effectiveness and safety of the drug in a real-world setting. Methods: A large, ongoing clinical database of over 1800 women (1999 to present) was used to identify 91 patients who had received ixabepilone during their treatment course. Clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed utilizing descriptive and comparative statistics. Results: Treatment was late in the disease course; median line of treatment was 5.3. At the time of receiving ixabepilone, the patients PFS was 3.5 months with n = 4 patients attaining a PFS > 12 months. Overall survival (OS) was 11.3 months. A subset of patients that had triple negative breast cancer (N = 37) had similar PFS, 3.6 months, and OS, 10.2 months, as the total population. Most common adverse events of any grade were fatigue (37%), nausea (32%), and peripheral sensory neuropathy (28%). Grade 3 or higher anemia was present in 10% of the patients. Conclusions: Ixabepilone has demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of patients with MBC, including the challenging population of TNBC patients in this real-world example. It is also well tolerated. These findings make ixabepilone a reasonable chemotherapeutic agent for refractory MBC and TNBC patients. [Table: see text]

Triple Negative Breast Cancer Pathologic Diagnosis and Current Chemotherapy Treatment Options

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (01) ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bernardo L Rapoport ◽  
Simon Nayler ◽  
Georgia S Demetriou ◽  
Shun D Moodley ◽  
Carol A Benn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Hormone Receptors ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Metastatic Setting

Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) comprises 12–20 % of all breast cancers and are a heterogeneous group of tumours, both clinically and pathologically. These cancers are characterised by the lack of expression of the hormone receptors oestrogen receptor (OR) and progesterone receptor (PR), combined with the lack of either overexpression or amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) gene. Conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and DNA damaging agents continue to be the mainstay of treatment of this disease in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic setting. The lack of predictive markers in identifying potential targets for the treatment of TNBC has left a gap in directed therapy in these patients. Platinum agents have seen renewed interest in TNBC based on an increasing body of preclinical and clinical data suggesting encouraging activity. However, comparisons between chemotherapy regimens are mostly retrospective in nature and the best agents or drug combinations for TNBC have not been established in prospective randomised trials. Numerous studies have now shown that TNBC has significantly higher pathological complete response (pCR) rates compared with hormone receptor positive breast cancer when treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pCR correlates well with better outcomes for these patients. Patients with TNBC account for a larger number of deaths in the setting of metastatic breast cancer. There is no preferred treatment for the first-line metastatic setting. Although individual agents are recommended, given the often aggressive nature of TNBC and the presence of extensive visceral disease, the use of a combination of drugs, rather than a single agent, is often advocated. This review article will outline the pathological diagnosis of TNBC and the treatment options available to these patients in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant and metastatic setting, including an assessment of future directions of treatment.

Survival of patients with locally advanced triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant platinum-containing chemotherapy: Experience of a single institute.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 274-274
Author(s):  
E. A. Ibrahim
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathological Complete Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Biological Entity ◽  
Breast Cancers

274 Background: Primary systemic chemotherapy is a standard approach to treating women with locally advanced breast cancers, with higher survival rates reported among patients who attain a pathologic complete response. Triple-negative breast cancer is a special biological entity that remains major challenge to oncologist. Around 12%-20% of breast cancers are triple negative. The current phase II study was conducted to evaluate the pathological complete response (pCR) using cis-platinum containing regimen as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced triple negative breast cancer. Methods: Eighteen women with stage III triple negative breast cancer who were recruited between July 2007 and February 2010 at King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisted of 4 cycles of AC or FEC 100, followed by 4 cycles consisted of docetaxel-cisplatin every 3 weeks. Primary end point was pathological complete response. Results: Median age: 49 y (24-70); premenopausal: 16; 25% were below 35 years of age; Median tumor size: 9 cm (3.5-19); Grade III: 15; Stage IIIA: 3, IIIB:14, IIIC:1; all but 2 had positive nodes at diagnosis (89%). Clinical evaluation of response by RECIST criteria pre surgery: OR: 17/18 (94%), CR: 9 (50%); PR: 8 (44%).The second sequence with D-Cis-T doubled the rate of clinical CR obtained with AC/FEC. One patient was not operated due to disease progression. Pathological assessment, revealed that 8 (47%) pts had no residual invasive carcinoma in the breast; 3 (18%) had residual occasional scattered tumor cells less than 5 mm (pT1a); 10 (59%) had negative nodes; 8 achieved CpR and 2 nCpR. Patients with residual invasive component and/or nodal involvement had high baseline Ki 67 level. After a median follow up of 24 months, cumulative overall survival at 24 months is 88.9% for whole group. Cumulative overall survival in relation to response was 100% for patients who achieved pCR while overall cumulative survival rate for patients without pCR was 83.3% without statistical significance. Conclusions: This cisplatin based neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen was well tolerated and achieved a high rate of pCR/npCR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document