Impact of relative dose intensity on the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 508-508 ◽  
Author(s):  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Takahiro Asada ◽  
Naomi Hayashi ◽  
Chie Tanaka ◽  
Suguru Yamada ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Relative Dose Intensity ◽  
Lower Group ◽  
Delivered Dose

508 Background: Relative dose intensity (RDI) is the ratio of delivered dose intensity of chemotherapy to standard dose intensity. There is established evidence supporting the significance of RDI in patients with various cancer, however data in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) are limited. In this study, we evaluate the significance of RDI of irinotecan and oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy on the outcome of mCRC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of mCRC patients entered into two prospective clinical trials, testing FOLFIRI (CCOG-0502) and mFOLFOX6 (CCOG-0704), was performed. RDI was calculated as the delivered dose intensity divided by standard dose intensity calculated for each regimen and compared to objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The median RDI of irinotecan in FOLFIRI and oxaliplatin in mFOLFOX6 were 80% and 79%. ORRs In higher RDI (>median) group and lower RDI (<median) group were 64.7% and 5.9% of irinotecan (p=0.001), and 46.7% and 33.3% of oxaliplatin (p=0.456). DCRs in higher and lower group were 100% and 41.2% in FOLFIRI (p=0.003), and 100 and 73.3% in mFOLFOX6 (p=0.032). PFS in higher and lower group were 9.9 and 5.6 months in FOLFIRI (p=0.002), and 8.5 and 6.2 months in mFOLFOX6 (p=0.064). Conclusions: RDI of key cytotoxic agents is a significant predictor of disease control in patients with mCRC, especially in irinotecan-based regimen. Dose reductions and treatment delays could be minimized to achieve an RDI of at least 80%.

Addition of bevacizumab to compensate for the negative influence of attenuated relative dose intensity of cytotoxic agents on the outcome in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14614-e14614
Author(s):  
Goro Nakayama ◽  
Naomi Hayashi ◽  
Chie Tanaka ◽  
Tsutomu Fujii ◽  
Yuichi Ando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Negative Influence ◽  
Cytotoxic Agents ◽  
Relative Dose Intensity ◽  
Concomitant Therapy ◽  
The Impact

e14614 Background: We reported that relative dose intensity (RDI) of key cytotoxic agents, irinotecan (IRI) and oxaliplatin (OX), is a significant predictor of disease control in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, in concomitant therapy with bevacizumab (BEV), the influence of adding BEV on the relation between RDI of cytotoxic agents and outcomes are unclear. In this study, we evaluate the impact of BEV on RDI of IRI and OX-based chemotherapy on the outcome of mCRC. Methods: A retrospective analysis of mCRC patients entered into three prospective clinical trials, testing FOLFIRI (CCOG-0502), mFOLFOX6 (CCOG-0704), FOLFIRI plus BEV and mFOLFOX6 plus BEV (CCOG-0801), was performed. RDI was calculated as the delivered dose intensity divided by standard dose intensity calculated for each regimen and compared to response rate (RR), disease control rate (DCR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: In FOLFIRI therapy, higher RDI (IRI, >median: 80%) group achieved significant better RR, DCR and PFS than lower RDI (<median) group (RR: 65 vs. 6% [p=0.001], DCR: 100 vs. 41% [p=0.003] and PFS: 9.9 vs. 5.6 months [p=0.002]). The other hand, in FOLFIRI plus BEV therapy, there were no difference between higher and lower RDI (IRI, median: 76%) group in ORR, DCR and PFS (RR: 31 vs. 27% [p=0.779], DCR: 75 vs. 53% [p=0.208] and PFS: 6.2 vs. 7.3 months [p=0.903]). In mFOLFOX6 therapy, higher RDI (OX, >median: 79%) group achieved better disease control than lower RDI group (RR: 47 vs. 33% [p=0.456], DCR: 100 vs. 73% [p=0.032] and PFS: 8.5 vs. 6.2 months [p=0.064]). In addition of BEV, there were no difference between higher and lower RDI (OX, median: 76%) group in any outcomes (RR: 54 vs. 74% [p=0.159], DCR: 88 vs. 91% [p=0.672] and PFS: 11.6 vs. 11.7 months [p=0.797]). Conclusions: RDI of key cytotoxic agents is a significant predictor of disease control, especially in IRI-based regimen. Nevertheless, in concomitant therapy with BEV, there were no relations between RDI of cytotoxic agents and outcomes. These results suggest that BEV could have ‘covering effect’ to reduce the influence of dose modification of cytotoxic agents in mCRC patients.

Regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors in Chinese patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair proficient metastatic colorectal cancer: A real-world study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15585-e15585
Author(s):  
Kaili Yang ◽  
Lu Han ◽  
Yun-Bo Zhao ◽  
Yang Ge ◽  
Qin LI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Liver Metastases ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Real World ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Chinese Patients ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

e15585 Background: A previous phase 1b trial has shown encouraging efficacy of regorafenib plus nivolumab in patients with microsatellite stable/mismatch repair proficient (MSS/pMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this regimen in Chinese patients in the real world. Methods: We retrospectively identified patients with MSS/pMMR mCRC who received at least one dose of programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors plus regorafenib from 5/2019 to 2/2021 in 10 Chinese medical centers. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR) and the safety. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified. Liver metastases were presented in 35 patients (67%). A total of 48 patients (92%) received regorafenib plus a PD-1 inhibitor as the third or later line treatment. At the data cut-off, 11 patients (21%) were still on treatment. Other patients terminated treatment because of progressive disease (45%), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) (14%) or treatment-unrelated deaths (6%). The median treatment cycle was 3 (range, 1-18). At a median follow-up of 4.9 months, the median OS was 17.3 months (95% CI, 10.2-NR) and the median PFS was 3.1 months (95%CI, 2.5-6.0). Baseline liver metastases were associated with inferior PFS (2.7 versus 6.3 months, p <0.05), but not OS (17.3 months versus NR, p =0.6). Among 38 patients evaluable for response, two patients (5%) achieved partial response, and 17 patients (45%) experienced stable disease as the best response. The DCR was 50% (95%CI, 5.0-NR) and was similar among different PD-1 inhibitors (Table). TRAEs were observed in 30 patients (58%). Fatigue (21%), hand-foot syndrome (19%) and rash (13%) were the most common TRAEs. Eight patients (15%) experienced grade 3-4 TRAEs, including rash (n=3), hand-foot syndrome (n=2), hypertension (n=1), myocardial enzyme elevation (n=1) and visual field loss (n=1). No treatment-related death occurred. Conclusions: The combination of regorafenib plus PD-1 inhibitors was generally tolerated and exhibited potential benefit in terms of OS and DCR. The presence of baseline liver metastases was predictive for shorter PFS but requires further investigation. Disease control rate of different PD-1 inhibitors.[Table: see text]

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
S. Yuki ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
M. Yoshida ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
S. Utsunomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

561 Background: Weekly cetuximab and irinotecan is a standard regimen in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated MCRC harboring wild-type KRAS. Methods: Patients with wild- type KRAS MCRC that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included in this study. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m2 biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in five patients. Results: From May, 2009 to February, 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 assessable patients, ECOG PS was 0 in 12, 1 in 16, and 2 in two patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-49.4), and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95%CI, 61.4-92.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.4-7.3). Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10%), and treatment related death due to pneumonia occurred in one patient. Conclusions: The efficacy data are similar to those of standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan is effective for pretreated metastatic wild-type KRAS MCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3595-3595
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Heavily Pretreated

3595 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with fluoropyrimidines-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing regimens. Methods: 36 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 19 females (53%), median age 57 (28-72), 30 EOGO PS 0-1 (83%). S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was 5 (range 1-9), ORR was 16.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-28.9%) and disease control rate was 61.1% (95% CI 45.2-77.0%) with 6 partial responses and 16 stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 5.8 months (95% CI 4.1-7.5 months). Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months (95% CI 2.2-5.2 months) and median overall survival was 10.0 months (95% CI 7.4-12.7 months). Grade 3-4 toxicities were rare (neutropenia 12%, anemia 11%, leucopenia 6%, thrombocytopenia 3% and diarrhea 3%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was a convenient, well tolerated and efficacious for heavily pre-treated pts with mCRC. This regimen warrants further evaluation in pts with good PS but no further treatment options.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 488-488 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Hee Kyung Ahn ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Ecog Ps

488 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: 34 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 17 (50%) females, median age 57 years (28-72), 28 (82%) ECOG PS 0-1. S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was four (range 1-9). ORR was 14.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8-26.6) and disease control rate was 58.8% (95% CI 42.2-75.3) with five partial responses and fifteen stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 5.1 months (95% CI 3.3-7.0). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 2.3-4.1) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 7.0-16.5). Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (12%), anemia (12%), thrombocytopenia (3%) and diarrhea (3%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was well tolerated and efficacious for heavily pre-treated mCRC pts, and could be an alternative for pts with good PS but no further treatment options.

A phase II trial of salvage treatment with gemcitabine and S-1 combination in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14137-e14137
Author(s):  
Sun Jin Sym ◽  
Junshik Hong ◽  
Minkyu Jung ◽  
Jinny Park ◽  
Eun Kyung Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Number Of Cycles

e14137 Background: We conducted a phase II trial of gemcitabine with S-1 to evaluate the activity and toxicity of such a combination in heavily pre-treated patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) who have progressed after treatment with 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan. Methods: Between Dec 2009 and Nov 2011, 23 pts were enrolled, with the following characteristics: 12 males and 11 females, median age 57 years (28-72). S-1 was given orally (30 mg/m2) b.i.d for 14 consecutive days and gemcitabine (1000 mg/m2) was given on days 1 and 8, every 21 days, until disease progression and for a maximum of 9 cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). Results: The median number of cycles was four (range 1-9). OR was 8.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0-20.2) and disease control rate was 56.5% (95% CI 36.4-76.9) with two partial responses and eleven stable diseases. Median duration of disease control was 8.5 months (95% CI 3.8-13.2). Median progression-free survival was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.9-4.5) and median overall survival was 11.8 months (95% CI 4.0-19.5). Grade 3-4 toxicities were neutropenia (8%) and thrombocytopenia (4%). Conclusions: Combination chemotherapy with gemcitabine and S-1 was well tolerated and efficacious for refractory mCRC pts.

Apatinib monotherapy for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, prospective study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3527-3527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Wang ◽  
Shubin Wang ◽  
Xia Yuan ◽  
Jun Jia ◽  
Xiaoxia Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Free Survival

3527 Background: Apatinib is an oral highly-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). This exploratory study evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm, prospective study, 48 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed at least two lines standard chemotherapies including fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan were recruited from 14 centers in Guangdong, China. Apatinib at a 500mg dose was administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 4 weeks (28 days). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. Results: A total of 48 patients was enrolled in the study from September 3, 2015 to June9, 2017. Four patients achieved a partial response, and 22 achieved stable disease, representing a response rate of 8.3% and a disease control rate of 60.4%. Median follow-up time was 10.3 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of evaluable patients (n=41) were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.9) and 9.7 months (95% CI 5.9-13.6). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) were hypertension (12.5%), hand-foot syndrome (10.4%), thrombocytopenia (10.4%), proteinuria (8.3%) and mucositis oral (6.3%). Conclusions: Apatinib monotherapy shows promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Further phase 3 trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900020503.

FOLFOX-4 vs. FOLFIRI vs. IROX as first line chemotherapy for metastatic colon cancer: efficacy and toxicity

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13541-13541
Author(s):  
D. L. Stanculeanu ◽  
R. Matache ◽  
L. Minea ◽  
A. Cringeanu ◽  
R. Anghel
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Disease Rate ◽  
Metastatic Colon Cancer ◽  
First Line

13541 Background: The combination of OXA or IRI with 5FU-LV are accepted as standard treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the right sequence in first or second line is still under debate. We developed a non-randomised prospective study in first line metastatic colorectal cancer comparing the efficacy and the toxicity of three different chemotherapy regimens - FOLFOX-4 vs. FOLFIRI vs. IROX. Methods: From January 2004 to January 2005 we included in the study 57 patients with metastatic non-resectable colon cancer - 22 in FOLFOX arm, 18 in FOLFIRI arm and 17 in IROX arm. In the FOLFOX arm patients received OXA 85 mg/m2 d1, LV 200 mg/m2 d1,2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus d1,2, 5FU 600 mg/m2 as 22 hours CI d1,2 q15d; in the FOLFIRI arm - IRI 180 mg/m2, LV 400 mg/m2, 5FU 400 mg/m2 bolus and 5FU 2400 mg/m2 as 46 hours CI, q15d; in the IROX arm - IRI 300 mg/m2 d1, OXA 85 mg/m2 d2, q3w. The main patients characteristics were: median age 60 vs 62 vs 59; number of metastatic sites ≥ 2: 41% vs 33.33% vs 35.3%; performance status ECOG 0–1: 86.3% vs 83.3% vs 88.2%. The primary end-point was the objective response rate (CR + PR) and the secondary end-points was the toxicity. The objective response was evaluated every 3 months; at disease progression patients were offered to switch to a comparator regimen. Results: The objective response was 63.6% in FOLFOX arm (with a CR of 9%), 44% in FOLFIRI arm (CR - 5.5%) and 53% in IROX arm (CR - 11,7%); the stable disease rate - 27.3% in FOLFOX arm, 44.4% in FOLFIRI arm, 35.3% in IROX arm and the disease control rate - 91% in FOLFOX arm, 88.8% in FOLFIRI arm and 88.2% in IROX arm. The main grade 3–4 toxicities were: neutropenia - 22.7% vs 16.66% vs 29.4%; febrile neutropenia - 4.5% vs 5.5% vs 11.76%; diarrhea - 9% vs 22.2% vs 23.5%; nausea/vomiting - 4.5% vs 5.5% vs. 11.76%; neuropathy - 18.18% vs 0% vs 17.6%. No patients stoped the treatment because of side effects. Conclusions: All three regimens were well tolerated, with comparable results - with a slightly better disease control rate in the FOLFOX arm and a tendance of a better complete response rate in the IROX arm. The FOLFOX regimen had lower rates of nausea, vomiting, diarrhea; sensitive neuropathy and neutropenia were more common with regimens containing oxaliplatine. The IROX regimen had a higer incidence of adverse effects. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Intensive first-line FIr-C/FOx-C association of triplet chemotherapy plus cetuximab in RAS wild-type metastatic colorectal cancer patients: preliminary phase II data and prediction of individual limiting toxicity syndromes by pharmacogenomic biomarkers

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
pp. 175883591984642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gemma Bruera ◽  
Silvia Massacese ◽  
Francesco Pepe ◽  
Umberto Malapelle ◽  
Antonella Dal Mas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Rating Scale ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
First Line ◽  
Triplet Chemotherapy

Background: Intensive triplet chemotherapy/bevacizumab significantly increased metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC) outcome. This phase II study investigated the safety/activity of FIr-C/FOx-C triplet/cetuximab (CET) in first-line RAS wild-type and the prediction of individual limiting toxicity syndromes (LTS) by pharmacogenomic biomarkers. Methods: A Simon two-step design was used: p0 70%, p1 85%, power 80%, α5%, β20%; projected objective response rate (ORR) I step 14/19. FIr-C/FOx-C: 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 12h-timed flat infusion 900 mg/m2 d1–2, 8–9, 15–16, 22–23; irinotecan (CPT-11) 160 mg/m2 d1 and 15, oxaliplatin 80 mg/m2 d8 and 22; CET 400mg/m2 then 250 mg/m2 d1, 8, 15, 22; every 28 days. Toxicity, and individual LTS were evaluated, compared by a Chi-square test; and activity/efficacy by log-rank. 5-FU/CPT-11 pharmacogenomic biomarkers, 5-FU degradation rate (5-FUDR), single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) ABCB1, CYP3A4, DYPD, UGT1A1 were evaluated in patients with LTS and at a recommended dose. Results: A total of 29 patients <75 years, with a primary/intermediate Cumulative Index Rating Scale were enrolled; the median age was 59 years; there were 7 young-elderly (yE; 24%). Recommended CPT-11/5-FU doses were 120/750 mg/m2. In the intent-to-treat analysis, the ORR was 58.6%. The primary endpoint was met in patients who received the planned three treatment cycles: the objective response (OR) was 14/18 (78%). At a median follow up of 18 months, progression-free survival (PFS) was 12, and overall survival (OS) was 23 months. At the recommended doses (received dose intensity >80%), grade 3–4 toxicities were: diarrhea 23%, asthenia 15%, vomiting 8%, hypertransaminasemy 8%; LTS 19 (65.5%), with 83% in yE patients. LTS prevalently multiple (ms) versus single site were 59% versus 7% ( p = 0.006). The prevalence of reduced FUDR was 56%, SNPs CYP3A4 22%, UGT1A1 71%, and of >2 positive pharmacogenomics biomarkers was 78%, prevalently reported in patients who developed gastrointestinal LTS. Conclusions: FIr-C/FOx-C is highly active and tolerable at recommended doses in non-elderly RAS wild-type MCRC patients. LTS provided an evaluation of the toxicity burden in individual patients. Reduced FUDR, CYP3A4, and UGT1A1 SNPs may predict individual LTS-ms in patients at risk of limiting gastrointestinal toxicity. Trial registration: The trial was registered at Osservatorio Nazionale sulla Sperimentazione Clinica dei Medicinali (OsSC) Agenzia Italiana del Farmaco (AIFA) Numero EudraCT 2009-016793-32.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document