Health care professionals’ practices, perceptions, and awareness regarding breast self-examination.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (26_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14-14
Author(s):  
Kah Poh Loh ◽  
Eng Keong Tan ◽  
Owolabi Ogunneye ◽  
Jennifer Friderici ◽  
Reva Kleppel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Nurse Practitioners ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Self Examination

14 Background: In 2009, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) published the revised guidelines for breast cancer screening which recommended against teaching breast self-examination (BSE).The objective of this study was to assess healthcare professionals' practices, perceptions and knowledge in BSE as well as their adherence to the newly revised USPSTF guideline for BSE. Methods: A cross-sectional survey study was carried out in five medical and gynecological practices affiliated with a large academic teaching hospital in western Massachusetts. The survey was sent to all attending- and resident-physicians, nurse practitioners (NPs), physician assistants (PAs), and registered nurses (RNs) working in these medical practices.The survey collected demographic data and inquired about practitioners’ awareness and perceptions of the 2009 USPSTF guidelines. Results: The survey completion rate was 50.7%. Fewer than half of respondents correctly identified the 2009 USPSTF guidelines recommendations for BSE (41.4%). However, among 35 respondents who stated they were aware of USPSTF guidelines, only 37.1% adhered to them. Overall, 70% (95% CI 61.3%, 79.1%) stated that they do teach patients to perform BSE. The most frequent reasons cited for teaching BSE were: “early detection of cancer” (48.0%), and to “empower women”, (37.0%). In univariable analyses, female practitioners were significantly more likely than male practitioners to report teaching BSE (OR 2.64, 95% CI 1.11, 6.29). Other characteristics which showed an association without reaching statistical significance were: ≥ 5 years of practice (OR 1.67, 95% CI 0.70, 3.98); non-physician practitioner (OR 3.5, 95% CI 0.82, 14.93); US Med School (OR 2.20, 95% CI 0.84, 5.75); ever detecting a lump in a patient (OR 2.95, 95% CI 0.80, 10.87), and belief that BSE reduces morbidity and mortality (OR 2.12, 95% CI 0.84, 5.37). Conclusions: Knowledge of, and adherence to, the 2009 USPSTF guidelines related to BSE are relatively low. Despite being aware of the guidelines, some health professionals still taught BSE. Greater efforts should be made to educate healthcare professionals about the 2009 USPSTF guidelines on BSE.

scholarly journals P90 PERCEIVE: PrEdiction of Risk and Communication of outcome following major lower limb amputation - a collaboratIVE study

BJS Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Gwilym ◽  
C Waldron ◽  
E Thomas-Jones ◽  
P Pallmann ◽  
R Preece ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Lower Limb ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Collaborative Study ◽  
Lower Limb Amputation ◽  
Research Network ◽  
Limb Amputation ◽  
Prediction Tools

Abstract Introduction Major Lower Limb Amputation (MLLA) is a life changing event with significant morbidity and mortality. Inaccurate risk prediction can lead to poor decision making, resulting in delay to definitive surgery, or undertaking amputation when not in the patient’s best interest. We aim to answer: In adult patients undergoing MLLA for chronic limb threatening ischaemia or diabetes, how accurately do health care professionals prospectively predict outcomes after MLLA, and how does this compare to existing prediction tools? Methods A multicentre prospective observational cohort study is being delivered through the Vascular and Endovascular Research Network. Dissemination was via an existing network of contacts and social media. Consecutive data will be collected for seven months from site launch date, including demographic data and pre-operative outcome predictions from surgeons, anaesthetists, and allied healthcare professionals. Follow-up data will comprise 30-day (mortality, morbidity, MLLA revision, surgical site infection, and blood transfusion) and 1-year (mortality, MLLA revision and ambulation). The accuracy of surgeons’ predictions will be evaluated and compared to pre-existing risk prediction scoring tools. Results PERCEIVE launched on 01/10/2020 with 23 centres (16 UK, 7 international) registered to collect data. 50 other centres (27 UK, 23 international) have expressed interest/are pursuing local audit/ethical approval. We aim to collect data on clinicians estimate of outcomes for over 500 patients. Discussion This study will utilise a trainee research network to provide data on the accuracy of healthcare professionals’ predictions of outcomes following MLLA and compare this to the utility of existing prediction tools in this patient cohort.

scholarly journals Empowering Health Care Professionals: An Interprofessional Education Model Implementation and Evaluation

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jessica Shank Coviello
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Interprofessional Education ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
The United States ◽  
Healthcare Systems ◽  
World Health ◽  
Institute Of Medicine ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
Ensure Patient Safety

In 2016, the Institute of Medicine (IOM) reported medical error as the 3rd leading cause of death in healthcare systems in the United States. Effective communication of patient care needs across healthcare disciplines is critical to ensure patient safety, quality of care, and to improve operational efficiencies in healthcare systems. Ineffective collaboration and communication among healthcare professionals within the procedural areas increases the potential of harm as a patient moves from one healthcare professional to another. Health care systems are thus encouraged to train employees with a focus on interprofessional education (IPE) and collaborative practice. IOM and World Health Organization (WHO) recommend the use of IPE to help improve communication and collaboration. However the current educational structure in many institutions does not include IPE. As such, healthcare professionals work in silos, with little or no collaboration with one another, which may result in service duplication, increased service cost, and poor health outcomes for patients.

scholarly journals Knowledge and Awareness of Breast Self-Examination among Secondary School Girls in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 39-43
Author(s):  
Nur Anis Izzati Che Mut ◽  
Noor Hidayah Abu Bakar ◽  
Izdihar Kamal ◽  
Siti Aisyah Abdullah Suhaimi ◽  
Nurul Mawaddah Mohammad ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Secondary School ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Cross Sectional Study ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Level Of Knowledge ◽  
School Girls ◽  
Self Examination

Objective: Breast Self-Examination (BSE) is an early detection method of breast cancer. It is able to develop responsibility for breast health among women to always aware of any changes in the breast. Thus, secondary school girls age is the perfect age to start practice the BSE. The purpose of this study is to determine the level of knowledge and awareness on BSE among secondary school girls in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 502 secondary school girls using self-administered questionnaire covering socio-demographic data, knowledge and awareness of breast cancer and knowledge and awareness of BSE. Results: The mean age of the participants is 14.9 ± 0.06 years. The majority of the participants were Malays (86.5%). A total of 6.1% of the participants had a family history of breast cancer. Nine percent of participants had a good knowledge and 91.0% had poor knowledge regarding BSE. There is a significant difference between the age of participants with the level of knowledge and awareness (p = 0.014). Conclusion: The knowledge and awareness of BSE were poor among secondary school girls in Seremban, Negeri Sembilan.

scholarly journals ASSESSING THE IMPORTANCE OF BREAST SELF EXAMINATION AND BREAST CANCER AWARENESS AMONG HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS

2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (29) ◽  
pp. 4201-4208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tejaswi Vittal Pujar ◽  
Gayathri Linganagouda ◽  
Seema Benakanakondi ◽  
Linganagouda Patil ◽  
Sathyanand A ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Cancer Awareness ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Breast Cancer Awareness ◽  
Self Examination

scholarly journals Perception of Community Health Workers in Indonesia Toward Patients with Mental Disorders

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 27
Author(s):  
Shanti Wardaningsih ◽  
Takayuki Kageyama
Keyword(s):  
Mental Health ◽  
Mental Disorder ◽  
Community Health ◽  
Health Workers ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
General Social Survey ◽  
The United States ◽  
The Other ◽  
Survey Study ◽  
Young Generation

<span>In Indonesia, there are any community health volunteers called <em>Kader</em>. Although <em>Kaders</em> are members of mental health volunteer, they sometimes show negative attitude to psychotic persons, even they have already got some training about mental health. The aims of this study were to investigate 1) how is <em>Kaders</em>’s perception compare to the other countries, 2) how will they consult compare to the other countries 3) how is comparison of <em>Kaders’</em> perception to mental disorder person between trained and untrained,. The method of this research is a descriptive explorative using survey study. This study was held on June to September 2013. It was conducted in five districts of Yogyakarta area with 619 respondents. The Questionnaires used contained three sections are follows; Part A is about Demographic Data, Part B two case vignettes (taken from MacArthur Health Module of the 1996 general Social Survey) and Part C about <em>Kaders</em> experiences. The perception of Kader as part of the community is lower than the general residence in the United States and Japan. The comparison between trained and untrained <em>Kaders</em> shown that trained <em>Kaders</em> has better perception toward patient with mental disorder. These results suggest that actual experiences in meeting the cases contributed to the improvement of <em>Kaders’</em> perception better than the previous mental health training did. It might be <em>Kaders</em> with short experience are explored information <em>Kaders</em> should be trained with more structured curriculum and recruiting Kader is recommended to recruit the young generation. </span>

scholarly journals HERBAL MEDICINES QUESTIONNAIRE AND EVALUATION OF ATTITUDE, PERCEPTIONS AND SELF-USE AMONG HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS IN RAK, UAE: PILOT STUDY

2019 ◽  
pp. 86-90
Author(s):  
AMAD M. AL-AZZAWI ◽  
NEHAD MEHDI ◽  
ALYAA G. AL-JUBOORI ◽  
ANAM EJAZ ◽  
HANEEN ALI ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Herbal Medicine ◽  
Health Care Providers ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Healthcare Professionals ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Herbal Medicines ◽  
Care Providers ◽  
Item Questionnaire

Objective: The aim of this study was to assess the perceptions of different healthcare professionals towards HM. Methods: The 16-item questionnaire on the belief of health care professionals in herbal medicine was designed by the interdisciplinary task force. Eligible participants were health care providers who were English-and Arabic-literate. The response rate was 78% of participants (781 of 1000) were respondents. In total, 553 out of 781 (71%) participants indicated that they had previously used herbal medicines. The remaining 228 participants did not believe in herbal medicine due to lack of scientific evidence, ineffectiveness and other reasons. Results: The findings of this study indicate that health care professionals including pharmacists believe they have a responsibility to provide information on HM to their patients. However, the current consensus among the respondents is that current HM-focused knowledge is inadequate for such an application. Conclusion: Health care professionals believe in using HM for their needs and have a responsibility to provide information on HM to their patients.

The Prevalence of Dysphagia among Adults in the United States

2014 ◽  
Vol 151 (5) ◽  
pp. 765-769 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neil Bhattacharyya
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Health Care ◽  
National Health ◽  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Seek Health Care ◽  
Swallowing Problems ◽  
Care Survey

Objective To determine the prevalence of dysphagia, reported etiologies, and impact among adults in the United States. Study Design Cross-sectional analysis of a national health care survey. Subjects and Methods The 2012 National Health Interview Survey was analyzed, identifying adult cases reporting a swallowing problem in the preceding 12 months. In addition to demographic data, specific data regarding visits to health care professionals for swallowing problems, diagnoses given, and severity of the swallowing problem were analyzed. The relationship between swallowing problems and lost workdays was assessed. Results An estimated 9.44 ± 0.33 million adults (raw N = 1554; mean age, 52.1 years; 60.2% ± 1.6% female) reported a swallowing problem (4.0% ± 0.1%). Overall, 22.7% ± 1.7% saw a health care professional for their swallowing problem, and 36.9% ± 0.1.7% were given a diagnosis. Women were more likely than men to report a swallowing problem (4.7% ± 0.2% versus 3.3% ± 0.2%, P < .001). Of the patients, 31.7% and 24.8% reported their swallowing problem to be a moderate or a big/very big problem, respectively. Stroke was the most commonly reported etiology (422,000 ± 77,000; 11.2% ± 1.9%), followed by other neurologic cause (269,000 ± 57,000; 7.2% ± 1.5%) and head and neck cancer (185,000 ± 40,000; 4.9% ± 1.1%). The mean number of days affected by the swallowing problem was 139 ± 7. Respondents with a swallowing problem reported 11.6 ± 2.0 lost workdays in the past year versus 3.4 ± 0.1 lost workdays for those without a swallowing problem (contrast, +8.1 lost workdays, P < .001). Conclusion Swallowing problems affect 1 in 25 adults, annually. A relative minority seek health care for their swallowing problem, even though the subjective impact and associated workdays lost with the swallowing problem are significant.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document