Does hospital academic status impact colon cancer care value?

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (30_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6-6
Author(s):  
Christine Marie Veenstra ◽  
Andrew J Epstein ◽  
Craig Evan Pollack ◽  
Katrina Armstrong
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Care ◽  
Cost Of Care ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Academic Status ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Academic Hospitals ◽  
Significant Difference

6 Background: Given the high cost of cancer care, delivery of high-value care is crucial. The effect of hospital academic status on value of care for patients with stage II and III colon cancer is unknown. Methods: SEER-Medicare cohort study of 20,118 patients age 66+ with stage II or III colon cancer diagnosed 2000-2005 and followed through December 31, 2007. Patients were assigned to a treating hospital based on hospital affiliation of the primary oncologist. We constructed Kaplan-Meier curves to assess unadjusted overall survival. We estimated a Cox proportional hazards model to assess adjusted overall survival. To examine associations between hospital academic status and mean cost of care we estimated a generalized linear model (GLM) with log link and gamma family. We estimated quantile regression models to examine associations between hospital teaching status and cost at various quantiles (25th, 50th, 75th, 90th, 95th, 99th, 99.5th, 99.9th). Standard errors were adjusted to account for clustering of patients within hospitals. Results: 4449/20,118 (22%) patients received care from providers affiliated with academic hospitals. There was no significant difference in unadjusted median survival based on hospital academic status for patients with stage II (academic 6.4 yrs vs. non-academic 6.3 yrs, p=0.711) or stage III disease (academic 4.2 yrs vs. non-academic 4.2 yrs, p=0.81). After adjustment, treatment at academic hospitals was not associated with significantly reduced risk of death from colon cancer (stage II HR 1.05, 95% CI: 0.97 - 1.13; p=0.23; stage III HR 0.99, 95% CI: 0.94-1.07; p=0.98). Excepting stage III patients at the 99.9th percentile of costs, there were no significant differences in adjusted costs between academic and non-academic hospitals. Conclusions: We find no difference in overall survival for patients with stage II or stage III colon cancer based on academic status of the treating hospital. Furthermore, costs of care are similar between academic and non-academic hospitals across virtually the full range of the cost distribution. Most colon cancer patients do not receive cancer care at academic hospitals. Our findings indicate that for patients with stage II or III disease, this inequity does not impact the value of care.

The effect of chemotherapy on overall survival of stage II colon cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 625-625
Author(s):  
M. Omaira ◽  
M. Mozayen ◽  
K. Katato
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Disease Stage ◽  
Overall Survival Rate ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer

625 Background: Surgical resection of local colon cancer is the only curative treatment, at the same time adjuvant chemotherapy is clearly shown to be beneficial as the standard of care for node positive disease (stage III) colon cancer. However the role of chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer treatment is still conflicting. We aim to compare the overall survival rate of stage II colon cancer patient's with and without chemotherapy. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted from 1990-2006. Patients with stage II colon cancer were included. Patient's characteristics including age, gender, common site of involvement, histology patterns, overall survival rate and treatment with chemotherapy were recorded. Results: A total of 138 consecutive patients were identified from 1990-2006. The median age was 68 (21-91) year, males (44%), African Americans (47.6%). The most common sites of the primary tumor were sigmoid and cecum (22.4%) each. Adenocarcinoma being the most common pathology. Majority of the patients (86.2%) were found to have T 3 tumors. Of the patients that received chemotherapy (29/44) 66% had an overall survival rate of three years or more, whereas (53/94) 57% of the patients who did not receive chemotherapy had a survival rate of three years or more. The difference of survival rates between the two groups of patients was not statistically significant. Conclusions: The role of chemotherapy in stage II colon ancer is still controversial. There was no significant difference in overall survival between the two groups who did and did not receive chemotherapy; thus more studies are warranted to explore the factors that predict the survival of stage II colon cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Retrospective comparison of efficacy and safety of CAPOX and FOLFOX regimens as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III colon cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 47 (6) ◽  
pp. 2507-2515 ◽  
Author(s):  
Serkan Degirmencioglu ◽  
Ozgur Tanrıverdi ◽  
Atike Gokcen Demiray ◽  
Hande Senol ◽  
Gamze Gokoz Dogu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Mortality Rates ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference

Objective This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety profile of capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) and 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) regimens as adjuvant treatment in patients with stage III colon cancer. Methods A total of 243 patients who received CAPOX and FOLFOX chemotherapy between 2014 and 2018 for stage III colon cancer in two centers were retrospectively studied. Among the patients, 106 (43.6%) and 137 (56.4%) were treated using CAPOX and FOLFOX regimens, respectively. Efficacy, treatment-related side effects, and overall survival rates with these two regimens were compared. Results The rate of disease progression was significantly higher in the presence of moderately/poorly differentiated histology, and KRAS and NRAS mutations. An increased number of metastatic lymph nodes and prolonged time from surgery to chemotherapy significantly increased disease progression. Patients who received CAPOX were significantly older than those who received FOLFOX. Disease progression, metastasis, and mortality rates were significantly higher in the FOLFOX arm than in the CAPOX arm. There was no significant difference in the overall survival rate between the two regimens. Conclusion The CAPOX regimen is preferred in older patients. Disease progression, metastasis, and mortality rates are higher with FOLFOX than with CAPOX.

Adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer in elderly patients: NCDB analysis.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 863-863
Author(s):  
Samip R. Master ◽  
Lawrence Shi ◽  
Chintan Shah ◽  
Runhua Shi
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Survival Difference ◽  
Multi Agent ◽  
Comorbidity Index

863 Background: Data on safety and efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II and III colon cancer in elderly patients is area of controversy as these patients are underrepresented in clinical trials. We did a retrospective analysis of Medicare patients aged 70 or older with stage II and stage III colon cancer to investigate the adjuvant chemotherapy effect on colon cancer patients’ survival. Methods: Data was analyzed from 110, 993 men and women (≥ 70 years of age) registered in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) who were diagnosed with AJCC Stage II and Stage III colon cancer between 2004 and 2012 and had follow-ups to end of 2013. The primary predictor variable was adjuvant chemotherapy received, and overall survival was the outcome variable. Only patients with Medicare insurance were investigate for ease of analysis. Additional variables addressed and adjusted included gender, age, race, Charlson Comorbidity Index, the level of education, income, grade of tumor, distance traveled, facility type and diagnosing/treating facility. Results: The mean age was 79.5 years and SD was 5.9 years. In multivariate analysis, after adjusting for secondary predictor variables, receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy was a statistically significant predictor of overall survival of the stage II and stage III colon cancer. Relative to patients who did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy, the patients who got single agent adjuvant chemotherapy had 47.7% and those who were treated with multi agent chemotherapy had 49.8% decreased risk of mortality. There was no significant survival difference between single agent and multi agent adjuvant chemotherapy. Among the factors analyzed, age, gender, race, comorbidity index, diagnosing /treating facility and grade of tumor were found to be significant predictors of survival. Conclusions: Among the patients aged 70 years or older with stage II and stage III colon cancer, adjuvant chemotherapy lead to improved survival outcomes. However, survival difference between single agent vs multi agent adjuvant chemotherapy was not statistically significant.

Evaluating the prognostic significance of lymphovascular invasion in stage II and III colon cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 685-685 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dorotea Mutabdzic ◽  
Shalana BL O'Brien ◽  
Elizabeth A. Handorf ◽  
Karthik Devarajan ◽  
Sanjay S. Reddy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Lymphovascular Invasion ◽  
Lymph Node Involvement ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Node Involvement

685 Background: Presence of lymphovascular invasion (LVI) is known to be a predictor of lymph node involvement in colon adenocarcinoma (CA). Lymph node involvement is associated with poorer prognosis necessitating adjuvant therapy. While some studies have suggested that LVI is a predictor of worse overall survival in early stage colon cancer, the significance of LVI on prognosis has not been tested in a comprehensive North American data set. Methods: Patients with stage II and III CA with LVI data available and those who received predefined standard of care treatment were identified from the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) from 2011 to 2015. The relationship between LVI and overall survival was tested using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after adjusting for relevant clinical and demographic variables. Hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals are reported along with median overall survival (OS) where available. Results: The dataset included 93,070 patients with stage II and 66,701 patients with stage III CA. The proportion of patients with LVI was 13% in stage II and 47% in stage III CA. After adjusting for age, sex, gender, race, comorbidities, socioeconomic status, T, and N stage, LVI was associated with worse OS in stage II, HR 1.2 (1.15-1.25, p < 0.001), and in stage III, HR 1.25 (1.21-1.30, p < 0.001), CA. Median OS was 6.51 years with LVI versus. 6.85 years without LVI in stage II compared with 6.57 years with LVI versus not reached without LVI in stage III CA. Of the stage II patients with LVI, 20% received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and median OS was 6.91 years for those who did versus 6.07 years for those who did not receive CT. Conclusions: Our data suggest that LVI is an important predictor of OS in stage II and III CA. There is evidence that adjuvant chemotherapy improves OS in advanced CA but there remains uncertainty as to the benefit in stage II. Despite this uncertainty, guidelines suggest consideration of adjuvant CT in patients with high-risk stage II disease. Our data support the recommendation that LVI be considered a high-risk feature in stage II disease. Further studies are necessary to examine whether the type or duration of CT should differ for patients with CA and LVI.

The influence of adjuvant chemotherapy dose intensity on overall survival in resected colon cancer: A multicenter retrospective analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 248-248
Author(s):  
Suganija Lakkunarajah ◽  
Daniel Adam Breadner ◽  
Hanbo Zhang ◽  
Jennifer L. Spratlin ◽  
Karen E. Mulder ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Developed Countries ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
N2 Disease

248 Background: Colorectal cancer remains the second leading cause of cancer death in developed countries. The benefit of using fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, such as FOLFOX (fluorouracil (5-FU), leucovorin, oxaliplatin) and CAPOX (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) is well established. The optimal dose intensity (DI) under which overall survival (OS) is inferior is not established. Methods: Patients (pts) treated with adjuvant chemotherapy between 2006 and 2011 for resected stage III colon cancer (CC) from four academic cancer centres in Canada were retrospectively analysed. Patients that received CAPOX and FOLFOX were examined for the relationship between DI and OS. Results: A total of 625 pts with resected high risk stage II or stage III CC that received adjuvant chemotherapy were analysed. The median age was 63. Pts with T4 and N2 disease comprised 35.4% and 29.9% of pts, respectively. Median follow-up was 3.2 years. There was available survival data for 319 pts. The median oxaliplatin DI was 70%. The frequency of pts reaching an oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was 43%, while 76.6% of pts had a dose intensity of > 80% for their FU component. An oxaliplatin DI of > 80% was associated with a significant improvement in survival, HR = 0.42 (95%CI 0.21 – 0.81, p < 0.01). Achieving a DI of > 80% for capecitabine or 5-FU did not improve OS. Other factors associated with inferior OS included T4 (HR = 3.5, p = 0.03) and N2 (HR = 5.27, p = 0.0005) subgroups. The improvement in OS was not significant when restricting the analysis to pts with non-T4 and non-N2 disease (n = 144), HR = 0.16 (0.02 – 1.26; p = 0.08). Conclusions: Oxaliplatin DI of > 80% is associated with improved OS in patients receiving chemotherapy for high risk stage II and stage III CC.

scholarly journals Mortality by Stage for Right- Versus Left-Sided Colon Cancer: Analysis of Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results–Medicare Data

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (33) ◽  
pp. 4401-4409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Weiss ◽  
Patrick R. Pfau ◽  
Erin S. O'Connor ◽  
Jonathan King ◽  
Noelle LoConte ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Lower Mortality ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Primary Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Colon Cancers ◽  
Medicare Data ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
End Results

Purpose Recent studies have reported increased mortality for right-sided colon cancers but had limited adjustment for patient characteristics and conflicting results by stage. We examined the relationship between colon cancer location (right- v left-side) and 5-year mortality by stage. Patients and Methods We identified Medicare beneficiaries from 1992 to 2005 with American Joint Commission on Cancer stages I to III primary adenocarcinoma of the colon who underwent surgery for curative intent through Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) –Medicare data. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs for predictors of all-cause 5-year mortality were obtained by using Cox proportional hazards regression. Results Of 53,801 patients, 67% had right-sided colon cancer. Patients with right-sided cancer were more likely to be older, to be women, to be diagnosed with a more advanced stage, and to have more poorly differentiated tumors. Adjusted Cox regression showed no significant difference in mortality between right- and left-sided cancers for all stages combined (HR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.98 to 1.04; P = .598) or for stage I cancers (HR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.88 to 1.03; P = .211). Stage II right-sided cancers had lower mortality than left-sided cancers (HR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.87 to 0.97; P = .001), and stage III right-sided cancers had higher mortality (HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.06 to 1.18; P < .001). Conclusion When analysis was adjusted for multiple patient, disease, comorbidity, and treatment variables, no overall difference in 5-year mortality was seen between right- and left-sided colon cancers. However, within stage II disease, right-sided cancers had lower mortality; within stage III, right-sided cancers had higher mortality.

scholarly journals Impact of Patient Factors on Recurrence Risk and Time Dependency of Oxaliplatin Benefit in Patients With Colon Cancer: Analysis From Modern-Era Adjuvant Studies in the Adjuvant Colon Cancer End Points (ACCENT) Database

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
pp. 843-853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manish A. Shah ◽  
Lindsay A. Renfro ◽  
Carmen J. Allegra ◽  
Thierry André ◽  
Aimery de Gramont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Time Course ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Post Treatment ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
The Impact

Purpose Fluorouracil plus leucovorin (FU + LV) adjuvant chemotherapy reduced the risk of recurrence and death across all time points in a pooled analysis of 20,898 patients with colon cancer from 18 randomized studies. The impact of oxaliplatin added to FU + LV on the time course of recurrence and survival remains unknown. Patients and Methods A total of 12,233 patients enrolled to the randomized trials C-07, C-08, N0147, MOSAIC (Adjuvant Treatment of Colon Cancer), and XELOXA (Adjuvant XELOX) were pooled to examine the impact of oxaliplatin and tumor-specific factors on the time course of recurrence and death. For each end point, continuous-time risk was modeled over 6 years post treatment in all oxaliplatin-treated patients and patients concurrently randomized to FU + LV with or without oxaliplatin; the latter analyses supported time-dependent treatment comparisons. Results Addition of oxaliplatin significantly reduced the risk of recurrence within the first 14 months post treatment for patients with stage II disease and within the first 4 years for patients with stage III disease. Oxaliplatin also significantly reduced risk of death from 2 to 6 years post treatment for patients with stage III disease, with no differences in timing of outcomes between treatment groups (ie, oxaliplatin did not simply postpone recurrence or death compared with FU + LV alone). Patients with stage II disease receiving oxaliplatin did not exhibit a significant reduction in risk of death in the first 6 years post treatment. Recurrence risk peaked near 14 months for both treatments, and risk of recurrence and death increased with increased tumor and nodal burden. Conclusions These analyses support the addition of oxaliplatin to fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant therapy in patients with stage III disease and underscore the need for adequate surveillance of patients with colon cancer during the first 3 years after adjuvant therapy.

scholarly journals The Discriminatory Ability of the R-ISS Is Equivalent to the ISS in a Large Cohort of Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Patients

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 46-47
Author(s):  
Anaïs Schavgoulidze ◽  
Valerie Lauwers-Cances ◽  
Aurore Perrot ◽  
Herve Avet-Loiseau ◽  
Jill Corre
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Intensive Treatment ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Discriminatory Ability ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Significant Difference

Background In the era of personalized treatment in multiple myeloma, high-risk (HR) patients must be defined accurately more than ever. The International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) recommends to use the Revised International Staging System (R-ISS) to identify HR patients. This score combines ISS, abnormal serum LDH level and 3 high risk chromosomal abnormalities (CA): del(17p), t(4;14) and t(14;16). However, with the advent of new tools in genomics, assessing only 3 abnormalities seems to be limited. Moreover, LDH level is impacted by various medical conditions; its relevance in the score is questionable. Aims The main purpose of our work was to assess the R-ISS on a multi-center cohort of transplant-eligible patients (1180 patients). To our knowledge, this is the first large scale study in Europe. Methods Data were collected from NDMM patients enrolled in 3 clinical trials implemented by the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome. All patients were eligible to an intensive treatment. The overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using the stratified log-rank test. The hazard ratio (HR) for progression or death were estimated by a multivariate Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex and therapy. Discrimination was assessed by the Harrell's concordance index (C-index) which estimates the proportion of all pairs of patients in whom prediction and outcome are concordant and takes values from 0.5 (no discrimination) to 1.0 (perfect discrimination). Results Altogether, 1180 patients with MM were analysed. Median age of our cohort was 58 years. The majority of patients (78%) received an intensive treatment followed by an autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). Median follow-up was 94 months for OS. Forty-three percent of patients had ISS stage I, 39% had ISS stage II and 18% had ISS stage III. In the multivariable Cox model, the risk of death was increased for ISS stage II versus I (HR, 1.8; P &lt; 0.001), as well for R-ISS stage III versus I (HR, 2.1; P &lt; 0.001). Thirty percent of patients had R-ISS stage I, 62% had R-ISS stage II and 8% had R-ISS stage III. In the multivariable Cox model, the risk of death was 1.8 times higher for R-ISS stage II versus I and 3.0 times higher for R-ISS stage III versus I. Then we compared patients between their couple ISS/R-ISS. Thirty-one percent of the patients from ISS I were upgraded in R-ISS II; 55% of ISS III patients were reclassified in R-ISS II. Patients from the ISS I/R-ISS II couple didn't have a higher risk of progression (HR, 1.02; P = 0.893) or death (HR, 1.36; P = 0.115) than patients in the ISS I/R-ISS I subgroup. We also focused on the patients classified in R-ISS stage II (736 patients). We compared several subgroups: high risk CA (defined by R-ISS) versus standard risk, del(17p) vs. no del(17p), t(4;14) vs. no t(4;14) and high LDH vs. normal LDH. In the multivariable Cox model for OS, the risk of death was increased for patients with del(17p) (HR, 2.14; P &lt; 0.001), t(4;14) (HR, 2.06; P &lt; 0.001) and any of the high risk CA (HR, 2.15; P &lt; 0.001). Conversely, high LDH didn't have an impact neither on PFS (HR, 1.10; P = 0.333) nor OS (HR, 1.09; P = 0.540). Finally, we assessed the performance of the different prognostic models for discriminating patients who progressed from those who didn't (PFS) and patients who died from those who survived (OS) with the Harrell's C-index. The C-index for the R-ISS was the same than the ISS one for both PFS (0.56) and OS (0.61). R-ISS didn't give an additional prognostic value to the ISS. For every models, C-index were the same with or without LDH level; a LDH level upper than the upper limit of normal range didn't bring predictive gain on PFS or OS. C-index was better when we assessed each criteria of the R-ISS independently; this system presents the advantage of considering different prognostic weights and also different associations. Conclusion Our study confirms a significant difference for both PFS and OS between R-ISS stages I, II and III, but importantly, we show that the discriminatory ability of the R-ISS, assessed by the Harrell C-index, is equivalent to the ISS. Moreover, patients in stage R-ISS II have different prognosis depending on their cytogenetic while LDH level doesn't give any difference. Combining ISS, high risk CA and LDH level in only 3 categories induces a loss in the prognosis assessment. A model which assesses all the parameters in an independent way would be better. Figure 1 Disclosures Perrot: Amgen, BMS/Celgene, Janssen, Sanofi, Takeda: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding.

Predictive factors for the underutilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer in Southwestern Sydney

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6070-6070
Author(s):  
W. L. Ng ◽  
G. Gabriel ◽  
E. Moylan
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Predictive Factors ◽  
Predictive Factor ◽  
Treatment Guidelines ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Utilization Rate ◽  
Co Morbidity ◽  
Significant Difference

6070 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in stage III and high risk stage II colon cancers and is therefore recommended in current treatment guidelines. Despite this, retrospective studies demonstrate that utilization rates remain suboptimal in Australia and other countries. In this study we aimed to identify predictive factors for adjuvant chemotherapy underutilization in the Southwestern Sydney Area Health Service (SWSAHS). Methods: We examined data collected on all patients with a diagnosis of stage II or III colon and rectosigmoid cancers from SWSAHS colorectal database between 1997 and 2003. Follow-up and survival were calculated until October 2005. SPSS was used for statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier for survival analysis. Results: 704 patients were identified. The overall adjuvant chemotherapy utilization rate was 48% (68% for stage III and 26% for stage II). Overall 5 year survival was 69% for patients who received adjuvant chemotherapy compared with 39% for those who did not receive chemotherapy (p<0.001). The main predictive factor identified for not receiving chemotherapy in both stages was increasing age. Rates of utilization of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer were 90% (<50 yrs), 81% (50–69 yrs) and 50% (70+ yrs). The trend was similar for stage II patients with corresponding utilization rates of 69%, 37% and 10%, respectively. The difference in chemotherapy utilization by age groups is highly significant (p<0.001). Other factors including sex, health insurance status, site of primary colon cancer and index of relative socioeconomic disadvantage did not show significant difference in chemotherapy usage. We were unable to evaluate the effect of co-morbidity on chemotherapy use from our database. Conclusions: Increasing age is the single most important predictive factor in the underutilization of adjuvant chemotherapy in colon cancer despite evidence that the elderly can accrue the same benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy as their younger counterparts. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk in stage II colon cancer.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
Taiwo Adesoye ◽  
Chung-Yuan Hu ◽  
Amanda Cuddy ◽  
Amanda B. Francescatti ◽  
Jessica R. Schumacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Recurrence Rate ◽  
Recurrence Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
The Impact

533 Background: Although clinical guidelines recommend consideration of adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage II colon cancer, the impact on recurrence risk and cancer related survival is unclear. Furthermore, among Medicare patients, adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with improved survival. We examine the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on recurrence risk and overall survival in a diverse cohort. Methods: 6,095 patients who underwent surgery for stage II-III colon cancer (2006-2007) were randomly selected from facilities reporting to the National Cancer Data Base for additional abstraction of tumor information, 5 year recurrence and survival. Death or second cancer within 6 months were excluded. Patients were classified as high or low risk using standard pathologic factors. Multivariate Cox regression with propensity score weighting was performed to compare recurrence risk and overall survival. Results: Of 3,423 patients with stage II colon cancer, 26.9% (n = 883) received chemotherapy compared to 76.2% (n = 1,839) of stage III patients. Among stage II patients, 47.8% (n = 1,636) had at least one high risk feature and 30.8% (n = 481) of these received chemotherapy. Five year recurrence rate in stage II patients was 13% (n = 392), greater in high risk compared to non-high risk patients (13.3% vs 9.3% p < 0.0001) and 24.4% (n = 874) in stage III patients. Chemotherapy did not improve recurrence risk in stage II patients regardless of risk status (High risk: hazard ratio [HR] 1.37; 95% CI 0.96 - 1.97; Non-high risk: HR 1.39; 95% CI 0.91 - 2.11). Chemotherapy was associated with a significant improvement in recurrence risk in stage III patients (HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.63 - 0.96). However, chemotherapy was associated with improved overall survival in both high (HR 0.69; 95% CI 0.51 - 0.92) and non-high risk stage II patients (HR 0.76; 95% CI 0.55 - 1.04), and also in stage III patients (HR 0.47; 95% CI 0.41 - 0.54). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with a lower recurrence rate among stage II colon cancer patients. The observed survival benefit associated with chemotherapy is likely attributable to non-oncologic factors such as patient selection. Decision-making regarding chemotherapy use in this cohort should be carefully approached.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document