Final overall survival analysis of EXAM, an international, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III trial of cabozantinib (Cabo) in medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC) patients with documented RECIST progression at baseline.

6019 Background: Anlotinib (AL3818) is a novel multi-target TKI, inhibiting tumor angiogenesis and proliferative signaling. Our previous single-arm phase 2 ALTN/MTC trial (NCT01874873) has demonstrated that anlotinib has a durable antitumor activity with a manageable adverse event profile in locally advanced or metastatic medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC). Here we report results of the phase IIB trial (ALTER01031, NCT02586350) of anlotinib for locally advanced or metastatic MTC with a larger samples. Methods: Between September 2015 and September 2018, 91 patients were enrolled in China. Eligible patients have diagnosed as phase IV MTC with relapsed and measurable disease and without antiangiogenetic target therapy. The patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive anlotinib or a matched placebo (12 mg QD from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle). Patients who have been diagnosed with disease progression by the Independent Imaging Committee could be unblinded and crossed to the treatment group if the patient previous treated by placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: 91 patients were randomized 62 to anlotinib arm and 29 to placebo arm. Until the data cutoff date (1 Feb 2019), median PFS was 20.67 months (95%CI, 14.03-34.63) in anlotinib arm vs 11.07 (95%CI, 5.82-14.32) months in placebo arm (HR 0.53, p = 0.0289). The OS data were not sufficiently mature for analysis. Considerable improvement in ORR was observed over the two arms (48.39% vs 3.45%, p < 0.0001). The adverse events (AEs) were 100% in anlotinib arm and 89.66% in placebo arm. The most common AEs in anlotinib arm were hand-foot syndrome, hypertension, hypertriglyceridemia and diarrhea. Conclusion: ALTER01031 met its primary endpoint of PFS shows that anlotinib treatment is effective and well tolerated. The safety profile was consistent and no new adverse events were identified. These data potentially extend the role of anlotinib monotherapy as a new therapy strategy for MTC patients. Clinical trial information: NCT02586350.

Download Full-text

NEJ026: Final overall survival analysis of bevacizumab plus erlotinib treatment for NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR-mutations.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.9506 ◽

2020 ◽

Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. 9506-9506 ◽

Cited By ~ 9

Author(s):

Makoto Maemondo ◽

Tatsuro Fukuhara ◽

Haruhiro Saito ◽

Naoki Furuya ◽

Kana Watanabe ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Overall Survival ◽

Survival Analysis ◽

Progression Free Survival ◽

Hazard Ratio ◽

Phase Iii ◽

Egfr Mutations ◽

Line Treatment ◽

Second Line ◽

Overall Survival Analysis

9506 Background: In NEJ026, a phase III trial comparing bevacizumab plus erlotinib (BE) to erlotinib monotherapy (E) for EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), we demonstrated the progression-free survival (PFS) of BE was significantly superior to E (Saito et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019 May;20(5):625-635.). However overall survival analysis were immature at the cutoff date. Methods: Chemotherapy-naïve pts with advanced non-squamous NSCLC harboring EGFR-mutation were randomly assigned to receive either combination with erlotinib (150 mg daily) plus bevacizumab (15 mg/kg iv q3w) or erlotinib (150 mg daily). The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints were OS, RR, safety, and QoL. Results: The 226 pts were assigned to BE (n=112) and E (n=114). For the follow-up OS analysis, the data cut-off date was 30 November 2019. Median follow up time was 39.2 months. Median OS was 50.7 months (95% CI, 37.3 months to not reached) with BE and 46.2 months (95% CI, 38.2 months to not reached) with E (hazard ratio, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.68 to 1.48). Twenty-nine patients (25.9%) in BE and twenty-six patients (23.2%) in E were treated by osimertinib as second line treatment. The median survival time between enrollment and progressive disease of second-line treatment (median PFS2) was 28.6 months (95% CI, 22.1 months to 35.9) with BE and 24.3 months (95% CI, 20.4 months to 29.1 months) with E (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.59 to 1.10). In both arms, the median OS of patients with osimertinib second-line treatment were longer than other second-line chemotherapy groups [50.7 months (95% CI, 38.0 months to 50.7 months) vs 40.1 months (95% CI, 29.5 months to not reached), (hazard ratio, 0.645; 95% CI, 0.40 to 1.03), respectively. Conclusion: The additional effect of bevacizumab on erlotinib monotherapy for NSCLC with EGFR mutations gradually decreased in the order of PFS2 and survival, with no significant differences. Clinical trial information: UMIN000017069 .

Download Full-text