Prognostic factor of carcinoma of the ampulla of vater after surgery.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 270-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinjiro Tomiyasu ◽  
Eri Oda ◽  
Hiroshi Tanaka ◽  
Shinji Ishikawa ◽  
Hiroki Sugita ◽  
...  

270 Background: General rules for biliary tract cancer in Japan were revised and Stage of biliary tract cancer was compliant with the seventh UICC. Carcinoma of the Ampulla Vater (CAV) is relatively good prognosis among the biliary tract cancer, such as lymph node metastasis, pancreatic invasion and perineural invasion has been reported to be prognostic factors. We investigated the validity of TNM-Stage by examining the prognostic factors from the outcome of resection experienced. Methods: To evaluate prognostic factors after surgery based on a series of 70 patients of CAV from 1996 to 2014. Twenty-eight patients received pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), 25 patients received pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (PPPD) and 17 patients received subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy (SSPPD). We reviewed and analyzed the clinicopathologic data, surgical outcomes, recurrence and survival. Results: Actuarial disease-specific survival (DSS) was 65 % at five years. In univariate analysis, pancreatic invasion, lymph node metastasis and duodenal invasion are significantly poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, pancreatic invasion is the only poor prognostic factor (p = 0.0023, hazard ratio (HR) 5.31 [confidence interval (CI) 1.77-18.9 95%]); lymph node metastasis and duodenal invasion are not significantly different (p = 0.0672 and 0.8769, respectively). Also, in the study of relapse risk factors, pancreatic invasion and lymph node metastasis are significantly different. In TNM-Stage II, those of T3N0, 1 are poor prognosis than T1, 2N1 (p = 0.0334). Conclusions: Pancreatic invasion is an independent poor prognostic and recurrence risk factor. The Stage of Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery has reflect prognosis than TNM-Stage in carcinoma of the Ampulla Vater.

2008 ◽  
Vol 97 (5) ◽  
pp. 423-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Haruki Morimoto ◽  
Tetsuo Ajiki ◽  
Takashi Ueda ◽  
Hidehiro Sawa ◽  
Tsunenori Fujita ◽  
...  

Radiology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 290 (1) ◽  
pp. 90-98 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gu-Wei Ji ◽  
Yu-Dong Zhang ◽  
Hui Zhang ◽  
Fei-Peng Zhu ◽  
Ke Wang ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 122 (2) ◽  
pp. 184-194 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsuhiko Murakawa ◽  
Mitsuhiro Tada ◽  
Minoru Takada ◽  
Eiji Tamoto ◽  
Gaku Shindoh ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Koji Kitada ◽  
Naoyuki Tokunaga ◽  
Takamitsu Kato ◽  
Toru Narusaka ◽  
Ryosuke Hamano ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: The prognostic nutritional index, a marker of nutritional status and systemic inflammation, is a known biomarker for various cancers. However, few studies have evaluated the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with biliary tract cancer. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index and developed a risk-stratification system to identify prognostic factors in patients with biliary tract cancer.Methods: Between July 2010 and March 2021, 117 patients with biliary tract cancer were recruited to this single-center retrospective study. The relationship between clinicopathological variables, including the prognostic nutritional index and overall survival, was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results: The median age was 75 (range, 38–92) years. Thirty patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 29, gallbladder carcinoma; 28, distal cholangiocarcinoma; 16, ampullary carcinoma; and 13, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. R0 resection was achieved in 99 patients. In univariate analysis, the prognostic nutritional index (< 42), lymph node metastasis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (> 20 U/mL), preoperative cholangitis, tumor differentiation, operation time (≥ 360 minutes), and R1–2 resection were significant risk factors for overall survival. The prognostic nutritional index (P = 0.007), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.024), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.008) were independent prognostic factors in the multivariate analysis. A combined score of the prognostic nutritional index and pathological findings outperformed each marker alone, in terms of discriminatory power.Conclusions: The prognostic nutritional index, lymph node metastasis, and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic predictors after surgical resection in patients with biliary tract cancer. A combined prediction model using the prognostic nutritional index and pathological findings accurately predicted prognosis and can be applied as a novel prognostic indicator for patients with biliary tract cancer.


2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Utsumi ◽  
Koji Kitada ◽  
Naoyuki Tokunaga ◽  
Takamitsu Kato ◽  
Toru Narusaka ◽  
...  

Abstract Background The prognostic nutritional index, a marker of nutritional status and systemic inflammation, is a known biomarker for various cancers. However, few studies have evaluated the predictive value of the prognostic nutritional index in patients with biliary tract cancer. Therefore, we investigated the prognostic significance of the prognostic nutritional index, and developed a risk-stratification system to identify prognostic factors in patients with biliary tract cancer. Methods Between July 2010 and March 2021, 117 patients with biliary tract cancer were recruited to this single-center, retrospective study. The relationship between clinicopathological variables, including the prognostic nutritional index, and overall survival was analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results The median age was 75 (range 38–92) years. Thirty patients had intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma; 29, gallbladder carcinoma; 27, distal cholangiocarcinoma; 17, ampullary carcinoma; and 13, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma. Curative (R0) resection was achieved in 99 patients. In univariate analysis, the prognostic nutritional index (< 42), lymph node metastasis, carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level (> 20 U/mL), preoperative cholangitis, tumor differentiation, operation time (≥ 360 min), and R1–2 resection were significant risk factors for overall survival. The prognostic nutritional index (P = 0.027), lymph node metastasis (P = 0.040), and tumor differentiation (P = 0.006) were independent prognostic factors in multivariate analysis. A combined score of the prognostic nutritional index and pathological findings outperformed each marker alone, in terms of discriminatory power. Conclusions The prognostic nutritional index, lymph node metastasis, and tumor differentiation were independent prognostic factors after surgical resection in patients with biliary tract cancer. A combined prediction model using the prognostic nutritional index and pathological findings accurately predicted prognosis, and can be used as a novel prognostic factor in patients with biliary tract cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 333-333
Author(s):  
Shinjiro Tomiyasu ◽  
Keita Sakamoto ◽  
Mitsuhiro Inoue ◽  
Masayoshi Iizaka ◽  
Nobuyuki Ozaki ◽  
...  

333 Background: Ampullay cancer (AC) is relatively good prognosis in the biliary tract cancer. Such as LN metastasis, pancreatic invasion is a prognostic factor in AC. On the other hand, Distal bile duct cancer (DBDC) is somewhat good prognosis in the biliary tract cancer. Such as ductal resection margin positive is a prognostic factor in DBDC. There are few papers considered to both difference. Therefore, we conducted this study to examine the difference of AC and DBDC. Methods: To evaluate Cancer-Specific Survival (CaSS), Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) and prognostic factors after pancreatoduodenectomy (including pylorus-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: PPPD, subtotal stomach-preserving pancreatoduodenectomy: SSPPD) based on a series of 80 patients of AC and 36 patients of DBDC from 1996 to 2015. We reviewed and analyzed the clinicopathologic data, recurrence and survival. Results: Five years CaSS and RFS of AC were 72.3% and 72.5%. In univariate analysis, pancreatic invasion, R1or R2 resection, duodenal invasion and lymph node metastasis are significantly poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, pancreatic invasion and R1or R2 resection are poor prognostic factors (pancreatic invasion, p = 0.0012, hazard ratio (HR) 5.65 [confidence interval (CI) 1.92-19.5 95%], R1or R2 resection, p = 0.0043, HR 6.22 [CI 1.68-40.2 95%]). On the other hand, five years CaSS and RFS of DBDC were 35.8% and 46.8%. In univariate analysis, pancreatic invasion (+) ≥ 5 mm in depth, and duodenal invasion are significantly poor prognosis. In multivariate analysis, duodenal invasion is the only poor prognostic factors (p = 0.0227, HR 2.90 [CI 1.16-7.39 95%]). Conclusions: DBDC is considerable poor prognosis compared with AC. Lymph node metastasis is not prognostic factor depends on D2 LN dissection in AC, than pancreatic invasion. Cancer cells invaded pancreatic parenchyma in AC; pancreatic invasion may be the most important prognostic factor by biology-like pancreatic cancer. Duodenal invasion in DBDC was prognostic factor reflects the degree of development of the cancer beyond pancreatic parenchyma. Further clinicopathological and biological studies are needed to confirm our findings.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lingxiao Qiu ◽  
Pan Song ◽  
Pingmei Chen ◽  
Huaqi Wang ◽  
Fangfang Li ◽  
...  

BackgroundPrimary pulmonary mucoepidermoid carcinoma (PMEC) is an extremely rare malignancy. Its clinical characteristics and prognosis are not fully understood. This study evaluated clinical characteristics and prognostic factors of PMEC and established a nomogram to predict its 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates.MethodsIn the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2016, patients pathologically diagnosed with PMEC were identified. Kaplan–Meier analysis and Cox regression were performed to evaluate the CSS stratified by different covariates. A predictive nomogram model was built and validated by the concordance index (C-index) and calibration curves.ResultsA total of 585 PMEC patients were identified. A total of 408 (70%) of patients were placed into the training cohort, and 177 (30%) patients were placed into the validation cohort. The 5- and 10-year CSS rates of stage I–II PMEC patients were 91.4 and 88.9, respectively. The 1-, 3- and 5-year CSS rates of stage III–IV PMEC were 56.5, 39.45, and 32.1%, respectively. Survival curves showed that older age, large tumor size, poor differentiation, and high TNM stage were associated with a significantly worse prognosis. CSS outcomes were significantly better in patients who received surgical treatments (surgical alone, surgery plus radiation and/or chemotherapy). Patients who received radiation and/or chemotherapy had the worst prognosis. Multivariate Cox results revealed that covariates, including age, tumor laterality, tumor sizes, pathological differentiation, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage and therapy, were independent prognostic factors for PMEC. These factors were used to construct a nomogram. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.921. The calibration curve presented favorable consistency between the predicted CSS and actual observations. This nomogram was validated by the validation cohort. The C-index of the validation cohort was 0.968.ConclusionAge, bilateral tumors, tumor size, pathological differentiation grade, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, TNM stage and therapy were independent prognostic factors of PMEC patients. The first nomogram for predicting the CSS of PMEC was built and validated, showing its potential value in practice.


1994 ◽  
Vol 31 (1) ◽  
pp. 119
Author(s):  
Young Soo Do ◽  
Byung Hee Lee ◽  
Kie Hwan Kim ◽  
Soo Yil Chin ◽  
Ah Ra Lee

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Lili Huang ◽  
Yan Zhou ◽  
Qiuwei Sun ◽  
Lei Cao ◽  
Xueguang Zhang

BACKGROUND and OBJECTIVE: Gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC) is one of the most common malignancies. Increasing data have indicated a correlation between soluble B7-H3 (sB7-H3) levels and tumor malignancies. In this study, we aim to investigate the level of soluble B7-H3 in serum of GAC patients. Further, we analyze the correlation between sB7-H3 level and tissue B7-H3 expression and explore the clinical evaluation value of sB7-H3 associated with pathological characteristics and prognosis of GAC patients. METHODS: One hundred and twenty-eight serum and tissue samples of GAC 20 serum and tissue samples of gastritis patients and 77 serum, 5 tissue samples of healthy controls were collected. The serum levels of sB7-H3 were detected by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), while the expression of membrane B7-H3 (mB7-H3) and Ki67 were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between sB7-H3 and mB7-H3, sB7-H3 and Ki67, sB7-H3 or mB7-H3 and clinical features were analyzed by Pearson’s Chi-square test. RESULTS: Both serum level of sB7-H3 and tissue B7-H3 of GAC patients were significantly higher than those of gastritis patients and healthy controls. sB7-H3 level was correlated with total B7-H3 expression in tissues (r= 0.2801, P= 0.0014). Notably, the concentration of sB7-H3 was correlated with its expression of membrane form in tumor cells (r= 0.3251, P= 0.002) while not in stromal cells (r= 0.07676, P= 0.3891). Moreover, the levels of sB7-H3 in patients with TNM stage III/IV or with Infiltration depth T3/T4 or with lymph node metastasis were significantly higher than those of patients with TNM stage I/II (P= 0.0020) or with Infiltration depth T1/T2 (P= 0.0169) or with no lymph node metastasis (P= 0.0086). Tumor B7-H3 score, but not stromal B7-H3 score, in patients with TNM stage III/IV or with lymph node metastasis was significantly higher than those with TNM stage I/II (P= 0.0150) or with no lymph node metastasis (P= 0.182). CONCLUSIONS: Soluble B7-H3 level may reflect the tissue B7-H3 expression on tumor cells of GAC tissues. Elevated level of sB7-H3 in serum suggests poor clinical pathological characteristics of GAC patients.


2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 4327-4333 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomonari Cho ◽  
Eisuke Shiozawa ◽  
Fumihiko Urushibara ◽  
Nana Arai ◽  
Toshitaka Funaki ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document