A multicenter, phase II trial of preoperative gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for resectable pancreas cancer: The AGITG GAP study.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 387-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Barbour ◽  
Nicholas O'Rourke ◽  
Jaswinder S. Samra ◽  
Koroush S Haghighi ◽  
James Kench ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Tumor Regression ◽  
Operative Therapy ◽  
Tumor Regression Grade ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Phase 2 Trial ◽  
Central Pathology ◽  
Grade 3

387 Background: Pancreatic cancer (PC) outcomes remain poor, recent series show approximately 37% of patients achieve R0 resection (all margins ≥ 1mm) for resectable disease. Recent data in metastatic disease shows that nab-paclitaxel (nab-PC) and gemcitabine (GEM) chemotherapy (CX) is an active regimen. We aimed to determine the feasibility and R0 resection rate with peri-operative nab-PC and GEM for resectable PC. Methods: A multicentre, single arm, phase 2 trial. Patients with operable PC received 2 cycles of neo-adjuvant GEM 1000mg/m2 and nab-PC 125mg/m2CX on days 1, 8 and 15 of a 28 day cycle followed by surgical resection and then 4 cycles of post-operative CX. The primary endpoint was R0 resection with the aim to assess if a rate of 85% could be achieved. Secondary endpoints included feasibility, toxicity, pathological response (College of American Pathologists Cancer Reporting Protocol for Exocrine Pancreatic Cancer, 2009), recurrence and survival. Results: Forty-one patients were enrolled from 2012-14. Median age was 65 (range 43-79), 41% male, 49% stage I and 51% stage II. Twenty nine (71%) patients underwent resection with evaluable cancer: 1 did not have proven cancer on central pathology review; 5 did not go to surgery (2 disease progression, 2 refused surgery, 1 due to cholangitis); and in 6 patients surgery was abandoned (unresectable disease). No deaths were surgery-related. Median tumor size was 27.5mm (IQR = 25-35). Pre-operative GEM and nab-PC produced an R0 rate of 52% (15/29) (95% CI 34-69%). 15/29 (52%) of resected tumors showed grade 0-2 tumor regression grade. Twenty-nine patients (71%) experienced >1 grade 3/4 toxicities (total 52 events) during pre-operative CX, neutropenia (46%) being most frequent with 8% febrile neutropenia. 39/41 (95%) patients received 2 cycles of pre-operative CX. Conclusions: Peri-operative GEM and nab-PC CX is feasible and well tolerated. The pre-operative regimen was associated with an R0 resection rate comparable or higher than surgical series without pre-operative therapy, although the primary endpoint of 85% could not be met. The value of this regimen will also depend on longer term outcomes related to recurrence and survival. Clinical trial information: 12611000848909.

Phase II trial of neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: Interim results of JASPAC05.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4107-4107 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Takahashi ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Masaru Konishi ◽  
Tatsushi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy

4107 Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) has a high probability of a positive surgical margin and poor prognosis because the tumor interacts with surrounding arteries or veins. Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 has shown favorable activity in locally advanced pancreatic cancer. This study was designed to assess S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy in a neoadjuvant setting to determine whether it increases R0 resection rate for BRPC. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm phase II study. Patients with BRPC received S-1 (40 mg/m2 BID) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery if they fulfilled any of the following: (1) bilateral impingement of superior mesenteric vein or portal vein; (2) tumor contact with superior mesenteric artery ≤180°; or (3) tumor contact with common hepatic artery or celiac axis ≤180°. Primary endpoint was R0 resection rate in BRPC confirmed by central review. At least 40 patients were required, with one-sided α = 0.05 and β = 0.05, with an expected and a threshold values for primary endpoint of 30% and 10%. Results: Fifty-two patients were eligible between December 2012 and May 2016. CRT was completed in 50 patients (96%) and was safe, with mostly grade 1 or 2 adverse events. Protocol treatment was withdrawn before surgery in 12 patients because of progressive disease diagnosed by computed tomography, and in one because of treatment refusal. Ten patients received exploratory laparotomy, or palliative/noncurative resection. In the rest of 29, R0 resection was conducted in 27, and R1 and RX in 1 patient each. This gave an R0 resection rate of 52% in all 52 eligible patients. In the 41 cases of BRPC confirmed by central review, R0 was confirmed in 26 (63%). Destruction of > 50% of tumor cells was confirmed pathologically in 10 (32%). Postoperative grade III/IV adverse events according to Clavien–Dindo classification were observed in 6 (15%). Conclusions: S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy were well tolerated and found to be effective in BRPC. A randomized controlled trial comparing neoadjuvant CRT and chemotherapy, including gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel, for BRPC is under planning. Clinical trial information: NCT02459652.

Final results of JASPAC05: Phase II trial of neoadjuvant S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy followed by surgery in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4127-4127 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shinichiro Takahashi ◽  
Izumi Ohno ◽  
Masafumi Ikeda ◽  
Masaru Konishi ◽  
Tatsushi Kobayashi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Concurrent Radiotherapy

4127 Background: Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is frequently associated with positive surgical margins and a poor prognosis when treated with upfront surgery. This study was designed to assess whether neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with S-1 increases the R0 resection rate. Methods: This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study. Patients with BRPC received S-1 (40 mg/m2 bid) and concurrent radiotherapy (50.4 Gy in 28 fractions) before surgery if they fulfilled any of the following: (1) bilateral impingement of the superior mesenteric vein or portal vein; and (2) tumor contact ≤180° with the superior mesenteric artery, common hepatic artery, or celiac axis. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate in BRPC confirmed by central review. Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RECISTv1.1), pathological response rate, surgical morbidity (Clavien–Dindo classification), and toxicity (CTCAEv4.0). At least 40 patients were required, with one-sided α = 0.05 and β = 0.05, with an expected and threshold value for the primary endpoint of 30% and 10%. Results: Fifty-two patients were eligible, of whom 41 had BRPC by central review. CRT was completed in 50 (96%) patients and was well tolerated. The rate of grade 3/4 toxicity with CRT was 43%. The R0 resection rate was 52% (95% CI, 37.6%–66.0%) in 52 eligible patients and 63% (95% CI, 46.9%–77.9%) in 41 patients with BRPC. The radiological response rate was 5.8%, while destruction of > 50% of tumor cells was shown microscopically in 32% of patients. Postoperative grade III/IV adverse events were observed in 7.5% of operated patients. Among the 52 eligible patients, the 2-year OS rate, median OS, and median PFS were 51%, 25.8 mo, and 6.7 mo. Of the 41 patients with BRPC, the 2-year OS rate, median OS, and median PFS were 58%, 30.8 mo, and 10.4 mo. Conclusions: S-1 and concurrent radiotherapy appear to be feasible and effective at increasing the R0 resection rate with encouraging survival rates in BRPC. A phase II/III trial evaluating this treatment is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02459652.

Tolerability and efficacy of modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) in patients with borderline-resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) and locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer (LAURPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 275-275 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marlo A. Blazer ◽  
Christina Sing-Ying Wu ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Gary S. Phillips ◽  
Carl Richard Schmidt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Initiation Of Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

275 Background: FOLFIRINOX exhibits a meaningful improvement in outcome measures in metastatic pancreatic cancer, making it an interesting regimen for BRPC and LAURPC. However, its use remains prohibitive due to toxicity. In this study, we examine the outcomes of mFOLFIRINOX as a neoadjuvant strategy for patients with BRPC and LAURPC. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of patients who received mFOLFIRINOX for BRPC or LAURPC at Ohio State University. mFOLFIRINOX is as follows: irinotecan at 165 mg/m2; oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil (5FU) at 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 hours and pegfilgrastim on day 4 of each 2-week cycle. Cases were thoroughly reviewed by a multidisciplinary team prior to initiation of therapy and at each restaging scan. The primary outcomes of this analysis were resection rate and grade 3/4 (G3/4) toxicities. Results: Since 1/1/2011, 43 patients (20 BRPC; 23 LAURPC) have received mFOLFIRINOX. Patients received gemcitabine-based chemoradiation (36 Gy in 15 fractions) only if their best response was stable disease after 4 months of mFOLFIRINOX. At the time of this abstract, 39 patients are evaluable for primary outcome. Overall resection rate was 53.8% including 45% of patients with initially unresectable disease. R0 resection was achieved in 85.7% of the surgeries. See table for more results. The rate of G3/4 toxicity was remarkably low with no episodes of febrile neutropenia, G3/4 neutropenia or thrombocytopenia. Toxicities lead to dose reductions in 46% of patients. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant mFOLFIRINOX is an effective, well-tolerated regimen as part of an integrated, multimodality strategy in BRPC and LAURPC leading to high resection rates and high R0 resection frequency. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Phase II Study of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With S-1 Plus Oxaliplatin for Gastric Cancer Clinical T4 or N2-3

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
AKIKO SERIZAWA ◽  
Hidekazu Kuramochi ◽  
Kiyoaki Taniguchi ◽  
Masaho Ota ◽  
Satoshi Katagiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Pathological Response ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
One Year

Abstract Background: In Japan, the standard treatment for stage II or III gastric cancer is D2 gastrectomy followed by administration of S-1 for one year. However, patients with stage III disease have unsatisfactory survival rates. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of S-1 and oxaliplatin for advanced gastric cancer.Methods: Patients with cT4 or cN2–3 gastric cancer were scheduled to receive two courses of chemotherapy (130 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on Day 1, 80 mg/m2 S-1 per day twice daily for 14 days) followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was the R0 resection rate. The secondary endpoints were rates of completion of protocol treatment, pathological response, and adverse events; and 3-year overall survival, 5-year overall survival, and 5-year recurrence-free survival.Results: Between May 2016 and March 2019, 30 patients were enrolled in the study, all of whom completed the protocol treatment. The R0 resection rate (primary endpoint) was 93.3% (95% confidence interval: 77.9–99.2). The pathological response rate was 63.3%. Grade 3–4 toxicities included anemia (3.3%), anorexia (6.7%), and fatigue (3.3%). Relative dose intensities were 91.2% and 94.2% for S-1 and oxaliplatin, respectively.Conclusions: Neoadjuvant S-1 and oxaliplatin is highly effective, achieving an acceptable R0 resection rate with relatively few severe toxicities and good compliance. Trial registration information:Registry name: A prospective intervention study on the availability of preoperative SOX therapy for T4 or N2-3 gastric cancerTrial ID: UMIN: UMIN000024656URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000028365

NeoFLOT: Multicenter phase II study of perioperative chemotherapy in resectable adenocarcinoma of the gastroesophageal junction or gastric adenocarcinoma.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4072-4072
Author(s):  
Christoph Schulz ◽  
Frank Kullmann ◽  
Volker Kunzmann ◽  
Wolfgang Schepp ◽  
Michael Geissler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Preoperative Treatment ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Multicenter Phase ◽  
Grade 3

4072 Background: The rationale of the NeoFLOT-trial was the intensification of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) by prolongation of preoperative treatment. This strategy is based on the notion that while perioperative treatment is notably beneficial in locally advanced gastroesophageal cancer (GEC), postoperative chemotherapy can only be applied in a fraction of patients (pts). Methods: Pts with T3, T4 and/or N+ adenocarcinoma (GEC) were eligible for this multicenter phase II trial. NACT consisted of 6 cycles of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 and docetaxel 50 mg/m2 (FLOT) applied q 2 wks. Staging was performed after 3 cycles to select pts with progressive disease (PD) for immediate surgery. Primary endpoint was the R0-resection rate. Secondary endpoints included the pathological complete response rate (pCR), histologic tumor regression grade (Becker 2003), safety, and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: From 10/2009 to 06/2011, 59 pts were enrolled of whom 58 pts were assessable for safety. Median age was 61 years (range: 32-79), 58.6% (34/58) had tumors of the gastroesophageal junction. 50 pts underwent surgery and were assessable for the primary endpoint. R0-resection rate was 86.0% (43/50). pCR was achieved in 20.0% (10/50) of pts. During NACT, 6.9% (4/58) of pts developed progressive disease. Dose reduction was performed in 43.1% (25/58) of pts resulting in a median dose intensity of 89.2%. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 29.3% (17/58) of pts, febrile neutropenia grade 3/4 in 1.7% (1/58). Common grade 3/4 non-hematologic adverse events were diarrhea (13.8% (8/58)) and mucositis (6.9% (4/58)). Treatment related mortality was 3.4% (2/58) with 2 cases of sepsis. After a median follow-up of 9.1 months, median PFS and OS have not been reached. Conclusions: These data indicate that NACT with 6 cycles FLOT is well-tolerated and highly effective in resectable GEC.

scholarly journals Added Value of Radiotherapy Following Neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Quisette P. Janssen ◽  
Jacob L. van Dam ◽  
Isabelle G. Kivits ◽  
Marc G. Besselink ◽  
Casper H. J. van Eijck ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Added Value ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

Abstract Background The added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX chemotherapy in patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer ((B)RPC) is unclear. The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone or combined with radiotherapy. Methods A systematic literature search was performed in Embase, Medline (ovidSP), Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane, and Google Scholar. The primary endpoint was pooled median overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included resection rate, R0 resection rate, and other pathologic outcomes. Results We included 512 patients with (B)RPC from 15 studies, of which 7 were prospective nonrandomized studies. In total, 351 patients (68.6%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX alone (8 studies) and 161 patients (31.4%) were treated with FOLFIRINOX and radiotherapy (7 studies). The pooled estimated median OS was 21.6 months (range 18.4–34.0 months) for FOLFIRINOX alone and 22.4 months (range 11.0–37.7 months) for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy. The pooled resection rate was similar (71.9% vs. 63.1%, p = 0.43) and the pooled R0 resection rate was higher for FOLFIRINOX with radiotherapy (88.0% vs. 97.6%, p = 0.045). Other pathological outcomes (ypN0, pathologic complete response, perineural invasion) were comparable. Conclusions In this meta-analysis, radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX was associated with an improved R0 resection rate as compared with neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX alone, but a difference in survival could not be demonstrated. Randomized trials are needed to determine the added value of radiotherapy following neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with (B)PRC.

A phase 1 study of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation with gemcitabine, sorafenib, and vorinostat in pancreatic cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16268-e16268
Author(s):  
Andrew Stewart Poklepovic ◽  
Emma Charlotte Fields ◽  
Dipankar Bandyopadhyay ◽  
Mary Beth Tombes ◽  
Maciej Kmieciak ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Drug Exposure ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Correlative Studies ◽  
Dose Levels

e16268 Background: The multi-kinase inhibitor sorafenib (S) and HDAC inhibitor vorinostat (V) demonstrated synergism against preclinincal pancreatic cancer (PaCa) models. The combination of S & V also potently radiosensitized pancreatic cancer cells and enhanced the activity of gemcitabine (G). This led to a phase 1 trial to determine the doses and schedule appropriate for phase 2 study of S & V with weekly G and intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) as neoadjuvant treatment of PaCa following chemotherapy. Methods: Using a 3+3 dose-escalation design, adult patients with resectable, borderline resectable, unresectable, and lymph node positive PaCa were enrolled to 6 dose levels. Enrolled patients had completed at least 8w of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to IMRT. The schedule of administration was weekly 200mg/m2 G weekly during IMRT, S & V were dosed either 3x or 5x weekly during IMRT. Primary endpoint was to identify the dose and schedule for S & V with G based chemoradiation. Key secondary endpoints included antitumor activity, R0 resection rate, OS. Correlative studies to evaluate a variety of biomarkers and Nanostring expression analysis on pre- and post-therapy tumor specimens were also performed. Results: 22 patients were enrolled and 21 treated at 6 dose levels. Due to thrombocytopenia limiting drug exposure, the trial was modified to reduce G to 200mg/m2/wk and S & V to 3 d/wk instead of 5 d/wk. 13 patients were eligible for surgery, and 9 had R0 resections. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that the study regimen was well tolerated, typical toxicities of S (hand foot syndrome) were not observed with intermittent dosing. Uncomplicated cytopenias limited drug exposure, which was improved with intermittent S&V dosing. The RP2D of the combination is S (400mg po BID 3d/wk), V (200mg po qd 3d/wk), G 200mg/m2 IV weekly, with IMRT (50.4 Gy over 28 fractions, 5d/wk). Antitumor activity was observed across dose levels, with an encouraging R0 resection rate. These results warrant further investigation of combining S and V with G and IMRT as neoadjuvant treatment of PaCa following chemotherapy. Analyses of correlative studies and OS are underway. Clinical trial information: NCT02349867. [Table: see text]

Multimodality therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: A single-institution experience.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 280-280
Author(s):  
Jose Mario Pimiento ◽  
Tai Hutchinson ◽  
Jill M. Weber ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Pamela Joy Hodul ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Multimodality Therapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Resection Rate ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Borderline Resectable ◽  
Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer

280 Background: Multimodality therapy has been advocated for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRCP); however, specific regimens vary widely by institution. Outcomes of these interventions need to be examined to inform future investigation of the optimal therapy for these patients. This study represents the experience of multimodality therapy for BRPC at an NCI designated cancer center. Methods: We identified all patients (pts) with operable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) from 2006 to 2011. Patients were divided into two groups: resectable group and BRPC group as per the NCCN and AHPBA consensus guidelines. Primary outcomes were resection rate, microscopic negative margin (R0) resection rate, overall survival (OS), and disease free survival (DFS). Fisher's exact and chi-square were used for group comparison while Kaplan-Meier estimates was used for survival analysis. Results: 160pts were identified with operable PDA. 100 (63%) pts had resectable tumors, and 60 (37%) pts had borderline resectable tumors. Neoadjuvant therapy (NT) was administered to 0% in the group with resectable tumors, and 100% in the group with borderline resectable tumors. The resection rate was 100% in pts with resectable tumors and 58% in pts with borderline resectable tumors. R0 resection rates were 80% in the resectable tumors and 97% in the borderline resectable tumors following NT. Perioperative mortality was <1% (1/125) for resectable tumors and 0% in borderline resectable tumors. Median OS was 22.6 months (m) for pts that had resectable tumors and 13.9m for all pts with borderline resectable tumors (p=0.017); however, the median OS for resected pts with borderline resectable tumors was 21.5m (p=0.6). Improved DFS was seen in patients with resectable tumors when compared with resected borderline resectable tumors (15 vs. 9.5m; p=0.04). Conclusions: Multimodality therapy leads to high rates of R0 resections in borderline resectable pancreatic cancer; however 42% of patients progressed during NT. The overall survival for patients with resected borderline resectable pancreatic cancer following NT is similar to patients who undergo resection for resectable pancreatic cancer.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document