Treatment outcome of patients with intermediate- and poor-prognosis metastatic testicular cancer in the 2000s: A multicenter experience in Japan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 397-397
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kojima ◽  
Koji Kawai ◽  
Kunihiko Tsuchiya ◽  
Takashige Abe ◽  
Nobuo Shinohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

397 Background: As a risk classification system of metastatic germ cell tumors, the International Germ Cell Consensus (IGCC) classification was proposed in 1997 and has received broad approval. We aimed to clarify the significance of the IGCC classification in the 2000s especially in intermediate and poor-prognosis patients in Japan. Methods: We analyzed 118 patients with intermediate- and poor-prognosis metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer treated at five university hospitals in Japan between 2000 and 2010. Data were collected on age, levels of serum AFP, HCG and LDH, lung metastases, spread to non-pulmonary visceral metastases (NPVM) and on treatment details (first, second and third-line chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy surgery) and survival data. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 2-54 years). The median follow-up period of all patients was 57 months. Sixty-eight patients were classified as poor prognosis, having LDH elevation in 14 (21%), AFP in 13 (19%), HCG in 27 (40%), presence of NPVM in 44 (65%). As first line chemotherapy, 93 (79%) were treated by BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin)-containing regimen. Of 118 patients, 75 (64%) received second-line chemotherapy, in which the most frequently used regimen was taxane-containing regimen, including TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin), TIN (paxlitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin) and DIN (docetaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin). Third-line chemotherapy was carried out in 33 patients (28%). Eighty-nine patients (75%) underwent post-chemotherapy surgery. The 5-year overall survivals for intermediate (n=50) and poor (n=68) prognosis was 89% and 83% (P=0.23), respectively. In poor prognosis patients, patients with more than 2 poor-prognostic factors had significantly worse survival than those with only one prognostic factor (72% vs 91%, P=0.01). Conclusions: There was a trend of increase in survival for any risk groups and, in particular, large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis. Further classification of poor-prognosis patients into two subgroups has a potential to identify a patient group with very poor-prognosis.

Second-Line Chemotherapy in Patients With Relapsed Extragonadal Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors: Results of an International Multicenter Analysis

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1641-1648 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jörg T. Hartmann ◽  
Lawrence Einhorn ◽  
Craig R. Nichols ◽  
Jean-P. Droz ◽  
Alan Horwich ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Testicular Cancer

PURPOSE: Relapsed extragonadal germ cell tumors patients (EGGCT) are treated with identical salvage chemotherapy regimens, as are patients with metastatic testicular cancer. This investigation evaluates the results of second-line chemotherapy in nonseminomatous EGGCT and tries to identify prognostic factors for survival.PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 142 patients treated at eleven European and American centers between 1975 and 1996. All had received cisplatin-containing regimens as induction treatment.RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 142 patients (19%) were long-term disease-free, 11% with primary mediastinal and 30% of patients with primary retroperitoneal disease. Median follow-up since start of salvage treatment was 11 months (range, 1 to 157) for all patients and 45 months (range, 6 to 157) for surviving patients. Forty-eight patients (34%) received high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow transplant at relapse, and 10 of these patients (21%) are continuously disease-free. Primary mediastinal location (P = .003), sensitivity to cisplatin (P = .003), elevated β-HCG at relapse (P = .04), and normal LDH at diagnosis (P = .01) were shown to be significant negative prognostic factors for overall survival in univariate; mediastinal location [relative risk ratios (HR) = 1.9; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 1.2 to 3.0] and sensitivity to cisplatin [HR = 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2] were significant negative prognostic factors in multivariate analysis.CONCLUSION: Although current salvage strategies will cure between 20% and 50% of recurrent metastatic testicular cancer, relapsed nonseminomatous EGGCT patients appear to have an inferior survival rate, in particular in case of primary mediastinal location. Mediastinal primary tumor and inadequate response to cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy have been identified as independent negative prognostic factors, both associated with an approximately two-fold higher risk for failure of salvage treatment.

Treatment outcomes of patients (pts) with primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCT): The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14538-14538
Author(s):  
A. J. Rodney ◽  
A. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
N. M. Tannir ◽  
S. Swisher ◽  
G. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Undifferentiated Histology ◽  
Disease Free

14538 Background: PMGCT are uncommon germ cell malignancies. Mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have a poor prognosis, whereas pure seminoma (Sem) has a good or intermediate prognosis irrespective of mediastinal presentation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 male pts with PMGCT seen at MDACC between October 1998 and September 2004 from a clinical database. Pts with resectable NSGCT were offered surgery upon plateau of their chemotherapy response. Prior to referral, 1 pt had primary surgical resection without preoperative (preop) chemotherapy. Results: There were 14 pts with NSGCT and 5 with good prognosis Sem. The median age was 29.5 (20–60). Seven pts with NSGCT had mixed or undifferentiated histology, and the remainder had pure yolk sac (5 pts) or choriocarcinoma (2 pts). The estimated median survival (Kaplan-Meier) for all patients (Sem + NSGCT) was 21 months. All pts with Sem were alive and disease-free at last follow-up (median 12 months, range 7–34). All pts with Sem received 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP); one also received bleomycin (BEP); one received radiotherapy consolidation; none received surgery. Of the pts with NSGCT, 9 (64%) have died, including 1 who refused surgery. Five pts with NSGCT were alive at last follow-up and 3 (21%) were disease-free (15+, 27+ and 35+ months). Four pts with NSGCT (29%) reached beyond 2 years survival (27+, 28, 35+, and 63+ months) including 3 with lung metastases and one with elevated preop alpha-fetoprotein (28,022 ng/ml). Each of these pts received 6–10 courses of multiple-regimen preop chemotherapy, and 2 received initially 4 courses of BEP without marker normalization. Conclusions: Mediastinal Sem treated with 4 courses EP had an excellent outcome without surgery. Pts with mediastinal NSGCT had a 64% mortality rate despite aggressive treatment. Several pts with mediastinal NSGCT did achieve long-term survival following aggressive chemotherapy and surgery, even with lung metastases and failure to normalize markers. A phase III trial of BEP versus dose-dense chemotherapy for poor-prognosis NSGCT is now in progress at MDACC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Intensive induction-sequential chemotherapy with BOP/VIP-B compared with treatment with BEP/EP for poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumor: a Randomized Medical Research Council/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer study.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 692-701 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Kaye ◽  
G M Mead ◽  
S Fossa ◽  
M Cullen ◽  
R deWit ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Medical Research ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Medical Research Council ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Sequential Chemotherapy ◽  
European Organization ◽  
Significant Difference

PURPOSE The aim of this randomized trial was to assess the potential therapeutic advantage of an intensive induction-sequential chemotherapy schedule (bleomycin, vincristine, cisplatin [BOP])/etoposide, ifosfamide, cisplatin, and bleomycin [VIP-B]), compared with a regimen based on bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) (BEP/etoposide and cisplatin [EP]) for the treatment of patients with poor-prognosis metastatic nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCTs). PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients had one or more of the following: a retroperitoneal mass > or = 10 cm in diameter; mediastinal or supraclavicular mass > or = 5 cm in diameter; at least 20 lung metastases (any size); liver, bone, or brain metastases; and serum beta human chorionic gonadotropin (betaHCG) > or = 10,000 IU/L or alfa fetoprotein (AFP) > or = 1,000 IU/L. A total of 380 patients were accrued between May 1990 and June 1994 into this joint Medical Research Council (MRC)/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) trial; of these, nine patients were deemed ineligible. RESULTS There was no significant difference between the two arms in the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR) with chemotherapy alone, ie, 79 of 185 assessable patients (57%) with BEP/EP and 72 of 186 (54%) with BOP/VIP-B (P = 0.687). With a median follow-up of 3.1 years (maximum, 5.8), a total of 107 patients (28%) had progressive disease. There was no significant difference in time to first disease progression, or failure-free or overall survival between the two arms (P = 0.21, 0.101, and 0.190, respectively). The 1-year failure-free survival rates for BEP/EP and BOP/VIP-B were 60% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 67%) and 53% (95% CI, 47% to 61%). Grade 3 or 4 myelosuppression, febrile neutropenia, and weight loss were more pronounced with BOP/VIP-B than with BEP/EP, and there were more toxic deaths with BOP/VIP-B than BEP/EP (18 [9%] v nine [5%]). CONCLUSION The intensive BOP/VIP-B therapy was associated with more toxicity, but there was no evidence of an improvement in response rate or survival compared with treatment with BEP/EP.

Sonographic Diagnosis of Unilateral Synchronous Testicular Tumors

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 2
Author(s):  
Allison Forrest ◽  
Numbereye Numbere ◽  
Jerome Jean-Gilles ◽  
Thomas Frye ◽  
Vikram Dogra
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Histological Type ◽  
Synchronous Tumors ◽  
Testicular Tumors ◽  
Sonographic Diagnosis ◽  
Histological Types ◽  
Common Cancer

Testicular cancer accounts for 1% of all male cancers yet is the most common cancer affecting men aged 15–44 years. Most testicular cancers are seminomas or non-seminomatous germ cell tumors. Rarely, multiple testicular cancers may occur simultaneously, most often of the same histological type. However, synchronous tumors of different histological types may occur, although rarely. In this case study, we present the sonographic features with histopathologic correlation in a case of unilateral synchronous testicular tumors of discordant histology.

A randomized trial of standard chemotherapy v a high-dose chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
R F Ozols ◽  
D C Ihde ◽  
W M Linehan ◽  
J Jacob ◽  
Y Ostchega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Regimen ◽  
Disease Free

We performed a prospective randomized trial of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen v standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell cancer patients. The high-dose regimen consisting of twice the standard dose of cisplatin (P), along with vinblastine (Ve), bleomycin (B), and the epipodophylotoxin etoposide (VP-16) (V) (PVeBV) was compared to the classic regimen with normal dose cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (PVeB). Eligibility criteria included large abdominal masses, liver metastases, multiple pulmonary metastases, brain metastases, marked elevations in serum tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein greater than 1,000 ng/mL or the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin greater than 10,000 mIU), unfavorable histology (pure choriocarcinoma), or extragonadal germ-cell tumors. Fifty-two consecutive patients with poor prognostic features were randomized to receive either PVeBV or PVeB. The median follow-up is 4 years. Treatment with the high-dose regimen increased the complete remission rate (88% v 67%, P = .14) and was associated with a lower relapse rate (17% v 41%, P = .2). The median survival of patients receiving standard therapy was 30 months, while the median survival for patients receiving the high-dose regimen has not been reached. Actuarial 5-year survival for patients treated with the high-dose regimen is 78%, compared with 48% for patients receiving standard therapy (two-sided Mantel-Cox test = .06). Disease-free survival was also superior for patients randomized to PVeBV (P = .03). Sixty-eight percent of patients (23 of 34) randomized to PVeBV are alive and continuously disease-free, compared with 33% (six of 18) for PVeB (P = .02). The major difference in toxicity between the high-dose regimen and standard therapy was the severity of myelosuppression and the incidence of severe hearing loss. Ninety-one percent of patients treated with PVeBV had a WBC count less than 1,000/microL, compared with 50% of patients receiving PVeB (P less than .05). Hearing aids were recommended for 12 patients who received PVeBV and two who received PVeB. The increased effectiveness of the PVeBV regimen in poor prognosis germ-cell cancer patients may relate to the double-dose cisplatin, the addition of VP-16, or to a synergistic effect of these two drugs.

Secondary neoplasms following treatment of malignant germ cell tumors.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. 1703-1709 ◽  
Author(s):  
C Bokemeyer ◽  
H J Schmoll
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Cumulative Incidence ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
German Population ◽  
Secondary Neoplasms ◽  
Secondary Neoplasia ◽  
Malignant Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE The current study investigates the frequency and outcome of secondary malignancies in patients treated for testicular cancer at Hannover University Medical School between 1970 and 1990. PATIENTS AND METHODS One thousand twenty-five patients with a median follow-up duration of 61 months (range, 12 to 240) were included in the analysis. Follow-up was complete in 1,018 patients (99%). Histology was seminoma in 324 patients (38.7%) and nonseminomatous germ cell tumor in 624 patients (61.3%). At the time of median follow-up, 814 patients (79.9%) were alive. RESULTS Fourteen patients developed a secondary neoplasm (cumulative incidence, 1.38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 2.30); 13 patients had solid tumors and one had secondary lymphoblastic leukemia with a t(4; 11) translocation including band 11q23. None of 224 patients on surveillance strategy (with or without retroperitoneal lymph node dissection [RPLND]) developed a second neoplasm, compared with four of 413 patients (0.97%; 95% CI, 0 to 1.9) after cisplatin-based chemotherapy (not significant) and nine of 332 patients (2.7%; 95% CI, 0.9 to 4.5) after radiotherapy (P = .02). The cumulative incidence of a secondary neoplasia of 1.76% (95% CI, 0.97 to 2.94) in patients treated by radiotherapy and/or chemotherapy was significantly higher compared with patients on surveillance protocols (P = .03). Chemotherapy containing standard-dose etoposide did not increase the risk of occurrence of secondary neoplasms. A significantly elevated relative risk of 7.53 (range, 3.4 to 14.3) compared with the male German population was only found for patients treated by radiotherapy. CONCLUSION Compared with patients who have other curable malignant tumors, an incidence of 1.38 of secondary neoplasms after a median follow-up duration of 61 months is low. The highest risk for secondary neoplasia after treatment of testicular cancer is associated with the use of radiotherapy. Following chemotherapy, no significantly elevated risk was observed. In conclusion, the benefits of curative treatment far outweigh the risk of secondary cancer in patients with malignant germ cell tumors.

The Second Medical Research Council Study of Prognostic Factors in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors

1992 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. 867-867 ◽  
Author(s):  
G.M. Mead ◽  
S.P. Stenning ◽  
M.C. Parkinson ◽  
A. Horwich ◽  
S.D. Fossa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Medical Research ◽  
Research Council ◽  
Embryonal Carcinoma ◽  
Medical Research Council ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Fibrous Tissue ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors

In the report entitled, "The Second Medical Research Council Study of Prognostic Factors in Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors" by Mead et al (J Clin Oncol 10:85–94, 1992), the second sentence in the Results section of the abstract should have read: "The independently adverse features proved to be (1) the presence of liver, bone, or brain metastases; (2) raised marker levels (alpha-fetoprotein [AFP] level > 1,000 kU/L or beta subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin [HCG] > 10,000 IU/L); (3) the presence of a mediastinal mass greater than 5 cm in diameter; (4) the presence of 20 or more lung metastases; (5) increasing age; and (6) absence of undifferentiated teratoma (embryonal carcinoma) or fibrous tissue from the primary tumor."

Evidence for Altered Hypothalamic-Hypophyseal-Gonadal Axis in Untreated Patients with Testicular Germ-Cell Tumor

1989 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 505-509
Author(s):  
Sergio Crispino ◽  
Gabriele Tancini ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Paolo Lissoni
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumor ◽  
Venous Blood ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Testicular Germ Cell Tumor ◽  
Cell Tumor ◽  
Testicular Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Testicular Germ Cell ◽  
Significant Difference

To investigate the function of the hypothalamic-hypophyseal-gonadal axis in testicular germ cell tumors, we evaluated gonadotropin responses to gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) in 12 untreated patients with testicular cancer (5 seminomas and 7 non-seminomas). GnRH was given i.v. at a dose of 100 μg as a bolus, and venous blood samples were collected at 0, 20, 60, and 120 min. As controls, 14 healthy males were studied. Basal levels of testosterone, estradiol and prolactin were also detected in each patient. Hormonal serum concentrations were measured by the radioimmunoassay. Mean basal testosterone, estradiol and prolactin levels were not significantly different from those of controls. Patients had a lower FSH and LH peak after GnRH than controls, without, however, any significant difference. As regards histology, nonseminoma patients lacked an FSH response to GnRH and had statistically lower mean peak levels than controls. Moreover, non-seminoma patients had statistically lower mean peak values of LH after GnRH than controls. These data show that patients with testicular germ cell tumor, and more particularly those with non-seminomas, have an altered function of the hypothalamic-hypophyseal-gonadal axis, which is already present prior to therapy. Further studies, particularly in stage I patients treated only with orchiectomy, should be performed to confirm and better define the Physiopathologic significance of the altered hypothalamic-hypophyseal-gonadal axis in testicular cancer and to clarify the alteration of fertility, which is frequently present before treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document