Treatment outcomes of patients (pts) with primary mediastinal germ cell tumors (PMGCT): The M. D. Anderson Cancer Center (MDACC) experience

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14538-14538
Author(s):  
A. J. Rodney ◽  
A. Siefker-Radtke ◽  
N. M. Tannir ◽  
S. Swisher ◽  
G. Walsh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Excellent Outcome ◽  
Undifferentiated Histology ◽  
Disease Free

14538 Background: PMGCT are uncommon germ cell malignancies. Mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) have a poor prognosis, whereas pure seminoma (Sem) has a good or intermediate prognosis irrespective of mediastinal presentation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 19 male pts with PMGCT seen at MDACC between October 1998 and September 2004 from a clinical database. Pts with resectable NSGCT were offered surgery upon plateau of their chemotherapy response. Prior to referral, 1 pt had primary surgical resection without preoperative (preop) chemotherapy. Results: There were 14 pts with NSGCT and 5 with good prognosis Sem. The median age was 29.5 (20–60). Seven pts with NSGCT had mixed or undifferentiated histology, and the remainder had pure yolk sac (5 pts) or choriocarcinoma (2 pts). The estimated median survival (Kaplan-Meier) for all patients (Sem + NSGCT) was 21 months. All pts with Sem were alive and disease-free at last follow-up (median 12 months, range 7–34). All pts with Sem received 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP); one also received bleomycin (BEP); one received radiotherapy consolidation; none received surgery. Of the pts with NSGCT, 9 (64%) have died, including 1 who refused surgery. Five pts with NSGCT were alive at last follow-up and 3 (21%) were disease-free (15+, 27+ and 35+ months). Four pts with NSGCT (29%) reached beyond 2 years survival (27+, 28, 35+, and 63+ months) including 3 with lung metastases and one with elevated preop alpha-fetoprotein (28,022 ng/ml). Each of these pts received 6–10 courses of multiple-regimen preop chemotherapy, and 2 received initially 4 courses of BEP without marker normalization. Conclusions: Mediastinal Sem treated with 4 courses EP had an excellent outcome without surgery. Pts with mediastinal NSGCT had a 64% mortality rate despite aggressive treatment. Several pts with mediastinal NSGCT did achieve long-term survival following aggressive chemotherapy and surgery, even with lung metastases and failure to normalize markers. A phase III trial of BEP versus dose-dense chemotherapy for poor-prognosis NSGCT is now in progress at MDACC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Intensive Induction Chemotherapy With CBOP/BEP in Patients With Poor Prognosis Germ Cell Tumors

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (5) ◽  
pp. 871-877 ◽  
Author(s):  
J.A. Christian ◽  
R.A. Huddart ◽  
A. Norman ◽  
M. Mason ◽  
S. Fossa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Induction Chemotherapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Royal Marsden Hospital ◽  
Prognosis Group ◽  
Male Patients ◽  
Patients With Poor Prognosis

Purpose: Despite a high cure rate in patients with testicular cancer, there remain patients in the poor prognosis group who have a less favorable outcome. Intensive induction chemotherapy using a regimen consisting of carboplatin, bleomycin, vincristine, and cisplatin, followed by bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (CBOP/BEP), developed at the Royal Marsden Hospital, is designed to overcome the rapid proliferation seen in germ cell tumors. This study assesses the outcome of patients with poor-prognosis nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) treated with CBOP/BEP. Patients and Methods: Patients with NSGCT from three centers, classified as poor prognosis according to International Germ Cell Classification Consensus Group criteria, were treated with CBOP/BEP regimen during the period from 1989 to 2000. Data on treatment toxicity, relapse-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) were collected prospectively on a hospital database. Results: Fifty-four male patients with poor prognosis NSGCT were treated with CBOP/BEP. The RFS at 3 and 5 years for all patients was 83.2% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.8% to 91.3%). After a median follow-up of 4 years, the OS of the 54 patients was 91.5% (95% CI, 78.6% to 96.8%) at 3 years and 87.6% (95% CI, 71.3% to 94.9%) at 5 years. Three-year OS in patients with a primary mediastinal germ cell tumor was 77.1% (95% CI, 34.5% to 93.9%) compared with 95.4% (95% CI, 82.8% to 98.8%) in patients with a testicular primary tumor (P = .24). Conclusion: The results reported here compare favorably with the historical results of alternative regimens used in the management of poor-prognosis NSGCT. We suggest a phase III trial to confirm our findings.

Long-term follow-up of a phase III study of three versus four cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin in favorable-prognosis germ-cell tumors: the Indian University experience.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 702-706 ◽  
Author(s):  
S B Saxman ◽  
D Finch ◽  
R Gonin ◽  
L H Einhorn
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Favorable Prognosis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Long Term Follow Up

PURPOSE In a previously reported randomized Southeastern Cancer Study Group (SECSG) trial, three cycles of chemotherapy were found to be equivalent to four cycles in patients with favorable-prognosis germ-cell cancer. We have conducted a follow-up analysis of patients treated at Indiana University (Indianapolis, IN) to compare long-term survival between the two groups and to examine factors associated with survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty-nine patients with minimal-stage and 49 patients with moderate-stage disseminated germ-cell tumors were randomized to either three or four courses of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP) administered every 3 weeks. Median follow-up time is 10.1 years (range, 7 months to 12.6 years). Ninety-two percent of patients have an actual follow-up time of > 5 years, and 97.5% of patients have an actual follow-up time of > 3 years. RESULTS Survival analysis shows no significant difference between the two treatment groups in terms of overall (P = .80) or disease-free (P = .93) survival. Several clinical variables were examined by univariate analysis; only serum human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) had an impact on survival. There were two disease-related deaths in 104 patients with HCG < or = 1,000 mIU/mL and five disease-related deaths in 14 patients with HCG greater than 1,000 mIU/mL (P < .001). Ninety-eight percent (95% CI, 95.2 to 100) of patients with favorable prognosis germ-cell tumor with an initial HCG of < or = 1,000 mIU/mL are alive without evidence of disease at 5+ years. CONCLUSION With long-term follow-up, there is no statistically significant difference in survival between three or four cycles of BEP chemotherapy in patients with favorable prognosis germ-cell carcinoma. Serum HCG elevation of greater than 1,000 mIU/mL is a significant predictor of poor outcome in patients with otherwise good-risk disease.

A randomized trial of standard chemotherapy v a high-dose chemotherapy regimen in the treatment of poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell tumors.

1988 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 1031-1040 ◽  
Author(s):  
R F Ozols ◽  
D C Ihde ◽  
W M Linehan ◽  
J Jacob ◽  
Y Ostchega ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Dose Regimen ◽  
Standard Therapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
High Dose Regimen ◽  
Disease Free

We performed a prospective randomized trial of a high-dose chemotherapy regimen v standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy in poor prognosis nonseminomatous germ-cell cancer patients. The high-dose regimen consisting of twice the standard dose of cisplatin (P), along with vinblastine (Ve), bleomycin (B), and the epipodophylotoxin etoposide (VP-16) (V) (PVeBV) was compared to the classic regimen with normal dose cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin (PVeB). Eligibility criteria included large abdominal masses, liver metastases, multiple pulmonary metastases, brain metastases, marked elevations in serum tumor markers (alpha-fetoprotein greater than 1,000 ng/mL or the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin greater than 10,000 mIU), unfavorable histology (pure choriocarcinoma), or extragonadal germ-cell tumors. Fifty-two consecutive patients with poor prognostic features were randomized to receive either PVeBV or PVeB. The median follow-up is 4 years. Treatment with the high-dose regimen increased the complete remission rate (88% v 67%, P = .14) and was associated with a lower relapse rate (17% v 41%, P = .2). The median survival of patients receiving standard therapy was 30 months, while the median survival for patients receiving the high-dose regimen has not been reached. Actuarial 5-year survival for patients treated with the high-dose regimen is 78%, compared with 48% for patients receiving standard therapy (two-sided Mantel-Cox test = .06). Disease-free survival was also superior for patients randomized to PVeBV (P = .03). Sixty-eight percent of patients (23 of 34) randomized to PVeBV are alive and continuously disease-free, compared with 33% (six of 18) for PVeB (P = .02). The major difference in toxicity between the high-dose regimen and standard therapy was the severity of myelosuppression and the incidence of severe hearing loss. Ninety-one percent of patients treated with PVeBV had a WBC count less than 1,000/microL, compared with 50% of patients receiving PVeB (P less than .05). Hearing aids were recommended for 12 patients who received PVeBV and two who received PVeB. The increased effectiveness of the PVeBV regimen in poor prognosis germ-cell cancer patients may relate to the double-dose cisplatin, the addition of VP-16, or to a synergistic effect of these two drugs.

Treatment outcome of patients with intermediate- and poor-prognosis metastatic testicular cancer in the 2000s: A multicenter experience in Japan.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 397-397
Author(s):  
Takahiro Kojima ◽  
Koji Kawai ◽  
Kunihiko Tsuchiya ◽  
Takashige Abe ◽  
Nobuo Shinohara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Testicular Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Survival Data ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Lung Metastases ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
University Hospitals ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

397 Background: As a risk classification system of metastatic germ cell tumors, the International Germ Cell Consensus (IGCC) classification was proposed in 1997 and has received broad approval. We aimed to clarify the significance of the IGCC classification in the 2000s especially in intermediate and poor-prognosis patients in Japan. Methods: We analyzed 118 patients with intermediate- and poor-prognosis metastatic non-seminomatous germ cell testicular cancer treated at five university hospitals in Japan between 2000 and 2010. Data were collected on age, levels of serum AFP, HCG and LDH, lung metastases, spread to non-pulmonary visceral metastases (NPVM) and on treatment details (first, second and third-line chemotherapy and post-chemotherapy surgery) and survival data. Results: The median age at diagnosis was 31 years (range, 2-54 years). The median follow-up period of all patients was 57 months. Sixty-eight patients were classified as poor prognosis, having LDH elevation in 14 (21%), AFP in 13 (19%), HCG in 27 (40%), presence of NPVM in 44 (65%). As first line chemotherapy, 93 (79%) were treated by BEP (bleomycin, etoposide and cisplatin)-containing regimen. Of 118 patients, 75 (64%) received second-line chemotherapy, in which the most frequently used regimen was taxane-containing regimen, including TIP (paclitaxel, ifosfamide and cisplatin), TIN (paxlitaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin) and DIN (docetaxel, ifosfamide and nedaplatin). Third-line chemotherapy was carried out in 33 patients (28%). Eighty-nine patients (75%) underwent post-chemotherapy surgery. The 5-year overall survivals for intermediate (n=50) and poor (n=68) prognosis was 89% and 83% (P=0.23), respectively. In poor prognosis patients, patients with more than 2 poor-prognostic factors had significantly worse survival than those with only one prognostic factor (72% vs 91%, P=0.01). Conclusions: There was a trend of increase in survival for any risk groups and, in particular, large increase in survival for patients with a poor prognosis. Further classification of poor-prognosis patients into two subgroups has a potential to identify a patient group with very poor-prognosis.

Spermatocytic Tumor With Sarcoma: A Rare Testicular Neoplasm

2017 ◽  
Vol 25 (6) ◽  
pp. 559-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ashley E. Stueck ◽  
John E. Grantmyre ◽  
Lori A. Wood ◽  
Cheng Wang ◽  
Jennifer Merrimen
Keyword(s):  
Differential Diagnosis ◽  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Testicular Neoplasm ◽  
Spermatocytic Seminoma ◽  
Isochromosome 12P ◽  
Pathologic Findings

Spermatocytic tumor, formerly known as spermatocytic seminoma, is an uncommon testicular neoplasm which is a distinct clinicopathologic entity from classic seminoma. These tumors are not associated with germ cell neoplasia in situ, other germ cell tumors, or isochromosome 12p. Although typically, these tumors have an excellent prognosis occasional cases are associated with sarcoma and have a very poor prognosis. We present a case of spermatocytic tumor with sarcoma showing a chondrosarcomatous component, discuss the pathologic findings and differential diagnosis and provide follow-up information.

Long-Term Survival After High-Dose Salvage Chemotherapy for Germ Cell Malignancies With Adverse Prognostic Variables

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (22) ◽  
pp. 4100-4104 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel A. Vaena ◽  
Rafat Abonour ◽  
Lawrence H. Einhorn
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Salvage Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Prognostic Variables ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Risk Patients ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Purpose: Independent prognostic variables for patients undergoing high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) as salvage modality for germ cell tumors (GCT) were previously described, and a score was created. Patients with more than 2 points had a poor prognosis. However, these data were from patients treated from 1984 to 1993, and most received a single HDCT course. In this study, we evaluated outcomes at Indiana University and determined the applicability of the Beyer score to contemporary poor-risk patients. Patients and Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of patients who received salvage HDCT between 1988 and 2001 and had at least one of the following characteristics: platinum-refractory or absolutely platinum-refractory GCT, primary mediastinal nonseminomatous GCT (PMNSGCT), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) ≥ 1,000 mU/mL or alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) ≥ 1,000 ng/mL before HDCT. Primary end points were overall and 2-year failure-free survival (FFS). Results: Eighty patients were identified. Fifty-six were platinum refractory, 23 had a Beyer score greater than 2, and 13 had PMNSGCT. Fifty-six patients received two HDCT courses. HDCT included carboplatin and etoposide. Forty-three patients received HDCT as first salvage modality. Median overall survival was 14.7 months. The 2-year FFS was 32%. No relapses have occurred after 2 years from HDCT. Patients with greater than 2 points in the Beyer score, platinum-refractory patients, and patients with HCG ≥ 1,000 mU/mL, AFP ≥ 1,000 ng/mL, and PMNSGCT had 2-year FFS of 30%, 37%, 26%, 18%, and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: Results with PMNSGCT remained poor. However, other patients with poor prognosis should not be denied an attempt at curative salvage HDCT.

Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors: results of modern therapy including cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 725-732 ◽  
Author(s):  
K Fizazi ◽  
S Culine ◽  
J P Droz ◽  
A Kramar ◽  
C Théodore ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Hematologic Malignancy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Disease Free ◽  
Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors

PURPOSE Primary mediastinal nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) are uncommon neoplasms and clinically and biologically distinct from other germ cell tumors (GCT). We describe the clinical and biologic features of these patients and evaluate the results of treatment during the cisplatin era. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between 1976 and 1993, 38 patients with mediastinal NSGCT received cisplatin-based chemotherapy as part of their primary treatment. Twenty-nine of them were initially treated at the Institut Gustave-Roussy (IGR), VillejuiF, France, and nine were referred for salvage treatment. RESULTS Of the 29 patients initially treated at IGR, 11 (39%) had metastasis. A complete response (CR) to therapy was obtained in 19 of 29 patients (66%) after chemotherapy and surgery. Ten patients (34.5%) have remained free of disease with a median follow-up of 89 months. All patients who did not achieve a CR died of disease. The 2-year overall survival rate for the IGR patients is 45% and the 2-year disease-free survival is 37%. Only the presence of extrapulmonary metastasis was of prognostic significance in the univariate analysis (P = .0095). None of the 20 patients who required salvage therapy is currently disease-free. Five patients developed and subsequently died of a hematologic malignancy at an interval range of 1 to 47 months from treatment of mediastinal NSGCT. Cytogenetic analysis of leukemic cells found an isochromosome of the short arm of chromosome 12 (12p) in two cases. The incidence of leukemia was 21% in patients who attained a CR. CONCLUSION Primary mediastinal NSGCT is a clinical and biologic entity that should be distinguished from other GCT. About 40% of these patients can envisage long-term survival with modern therapy that includes cisplatin-based chemotherapy followed by surgical resection of residual masses. New strategies are required for patients who do not attain a CR. Predictive factors and improvement in therapy are required for mediastinal NSGCT-associated leukemia.

Randomized trial of etoposide and cisplatin versus etoposide and carboplatin in patients with good-risk germ cell tumors: a multiinstitutional study.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 598-606 ◽  
Author(s):  
D F Bajorin ◽  
M F Sarosdy ◽  
D G Pfister ◽  
M Mazumdar ◽  
R J Motzer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Relapse Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Carboplatin Dose ◽  
Good Risk

PURPOSE This multicenter, randomized phase III clinical trial evaluated the efficacy of etoposide plus carboplatin (EC) versus etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) in good-risk germ cell tumor (GCT) patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between October 1986 and December 1990, 270 patients with good-risk GCTs were randomized to receive four cycles of either EP or EC. The etoposide dose in all patients was 100 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5. EP patients received cisplatin at 20 mg/m2 on days 1 through 5 and therapy was recycled at 21-day intervals. For EC patients, the carboplatin dose was 500 mg/m2 on day 1 of each cycle and the EC recycling interval was 28 days. RESULTS Two hundred sixty-five patients were assessable: 131 patients treated with EC and 134 treated with EP. One hundred fifteen of 131 assessable patients (88%) treated with EC achieved a complete response (CR) versus 121 of 134 patients (90%) treated with EP (P = .32). Sixteen patients (12%) treated with EC relapsed from CR versus four patients (3%) treated with EP. Therefore, 32 patients (24%) who received carboplatin experienced an event (incomplete response [IR] or relapse) compared with 17 of 134 patients (13%) who received cisplatin (P = .02). At a median follow-up of 22.4 months, event-free and relapse-free survival were inferior for patients treated with EC (P = .02 and P = .005, respectively). No difference in overall survival was evident (P = .52). CONCLUSION Two-drug therapy with EC using this dose and schedule was inferior to therapy with EP. Cisplatin remains as the standard platinum analog in the treatment of patients with good-risk GCTs. Carboplatin should be restricted to investigational trials in GCT.

Determination of efficacy of TIP combination (paclitaxel, ifosfamide, cisplatin) as first salvage therapy for patients with relapsed germ cell tumors in a poor prognosis group

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16049-e16049
Author(s):  
J. Mardiak ◽  
K. Rejlekova ◽  
M. Mego ◽  
J. Rajec ◽  
Z. Sycova-Mila ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Salvage Therapy ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Good Prognosis ◽  
Prognostic Features ◽  
Patients With Poor Prognosis

e16049 Background: The efficacy of TIP appears to be suitable salvage therapy for patients with relapsed germ cell tumors (GCTs) with good prognostic features.The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy of TIP as first salvage therapy for patients with relapsed GCTs with poor prognostic features. Methods: Thirty seven patients with relapsed GCTs were treated with TIP as first salvage therapy. Sixteen (43%) patients had favorable prognostic features for response (testis primary tumor site and prior complete response to induction chemotherapy regimen) and 21 (57%) patients had poor prognostic features (either extragonadal site or incomplete response to induction chemotherapy regimen). Four cycles of paclitaxel (175 to 250 mg/m2), ifosfamide 6 g/m2, and cisplatin 100 mg/m2 were given 21 days apart with GC-SF support, followed by resection of resectable radiographic residua. Results: Ten (69%) out of 16 patients with good prognostic features achieved a favorable response to TIP, and all 10 (100%) patients achieved complete response (CR). Six (60%) of the favorable responses remain durable at a median follow-up of 50,6 months. 9 (43%) of 21 patients with poor prognosis achieved a favorable response to chemotherapy, from whom only 1 (10%) patient achieved CR, but 5 patients achieved durable response at a median follow-up duration of 60,6 months. Estimated 2-year overall survival rate (OS) for patients with good prognosis was 56% (95 % CI 54–100%) and 33% (95% CI 21–68%) for patients with poor prognosis. Despite this results, estimated 5-year OS was even more positive for patients with poor prognosis 19% (95% CI 15–61%) comparing to 13% (95% CI 23–80%) for patients with good prognosis. Conclusions: Demonstrated long-term survival of patients with poor prognosis in our nonrandomised study with limited number of patients refers to the TIP being suitable therapy also for patients with relapsed GCTs with poor prognosis. These results warrant the need to continue investigation of real effectiveness of TIP as a first salvage therapy even for patients with poor prognostic features. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase III trial of personalized chemotherapy based on serum tumor marker decline in poor-prognosis germ-cell tumors: Results of GETUG 13.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA4500-LBA4500
Author(s):  
Karim Fizazi ◽  
Lance C. Pagliaro ◽  
Aude Flechon ◽  
Jozef Mardiak ◽  
Lionnel Geoffrois ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Serum Tumor Marker ◽  
Daily News ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Online Supplement ◽  
Personalized Chemotherapy ◽  
Final Text

LBA4500 The full, final text of this abstract will be available at abstract.asco.org at 7:30 AM (EDT) on Saturday, June 1, 2013, and in the Annual Meeting Proceedings online supplement to the June 20, 2013, issue of Journal of Clinical Oncology. Onsite at the Meeting, this abstract will be printed in the Saturday edition of ASCO Daily News.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document