Efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients with stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer: Retrospective study.

2016 ◽  
Vol 34 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 135-135
Author(s):  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
Takayuki Kii ◽  
Masahiro Gotoh ◽  
Ken Asaishi ◽  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Stage Ib ◽  
Resectable Esophageal ◽  
Resectable Esophageal Cancer ◽  
T4 Esophageal Cancer

135 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin infusion (FP) is standard therapy for stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer from results of JCOG9907 and definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT) of FP is one of the curative options for resectable esophageal cancer with organ preservation results of JCOG9906 in Japan. However, the efficacy and feasibility of NAC FP and CRT for elderly patients (pts) are unclear. Methods: We examined stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer pts aged 70 or over, who received NAC FP or dCRT at our institution between April 2008 and August 2015, retrospectively. Results: 16 pts received NAC FP at least 1 course, while 5 pts received dCRT because of intolerability for surgery, reject of surgery, and patient's wish. Median age was 73/75 (NAC FP/dCRT) and pts in NAC FP had more advanced stage cancer compared with pts in dCRT (p = 0.02). With respect to the toxicity, bone marrow depression developed in dCRT with more high frequency compared with NAC FP, but no pts had febrile neutropenia. Adverse effects of fatigue, nausea and appetite loss developed in both group frequently. 3 pts were not performed surgery because of decreased respiratory function, decreased PS and progression disease and 4 pts did not achieved 4 cycle of FP infusion because of leukopenia, decreased renal function, and gastrointestinal toxicity. 12 pts in NAC FP undergone R0 resection surgery and 4 pts had a complete remission. The 5-year progression free survival rate was 50% (95% CI: 12-86%) in dCRT and 50% (95% CI: 20-80%) in NAC FP (p = 0.69). The 5-year overall survival rate was 50% (95% CI: 12-86%) in dCRT and 67% (95% CI: 36-88%) in NAC FP (p = 0.83). Conclusions: NAC FP and dCRT for stage IB/II/III (excluding T4) esophageal cancer might be effective even in pts ≥ 70 years of age. The therapy of dCRT might be one of options for elderly inoperative patients.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil for resectable esophageal cancer: A phaseIIstudy

2018 ◽  
Vol 109 (11) ◽  
pp. 3554-3563 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hiroyuki Ohnuma ◽  
Yasushi Sato ◽  
Naotaka Hayasaka ◽  
Teppei Matsuno ◽  
Chisa Fujita ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Resectable Esophageal ◽  
Resectable Esophageal Cancer

Practice patterns in the treatment of locally advanced resectable esophageal carcinoma: A national survey of Canadian thoracic surgeons.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14695-e14695
Author(s):  
Gordon Buduhan
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Practice Patterns ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation ◽  
The Other ◽  
Insufficient Evidence ◽  
Canadian Association ◽  
Resectable Esophageal ◽  
Resectable Esophageal Cancer

e14695 Background: Many institutions have adopted a multimodality strategy for treating locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer including surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. While many neoadjuvant protocols have been studied, there is no well defined standard treatment. In order to determine current practices and clinician opinions regarding treatment of esophageal cancer, a survey study of practicing Canadian thoracic surgeons was performed. Methods: Members of the Canadian Association of Thoracic Surgeons were contacted by email; those who currently treat esophageal cancer were asked to complete an online survey. Three separate emails were sent to maximize participation. Results: The response rate was 54% (56 /104). Of the respondents, 85% exclusively practiced general thoracic surgery, 87% worked at a University-affiliated hospital. We presented a hypothetical patient with bulky, resectable distal esophageal adenocarcinoma with enlarged paraesophageal lymph nodes (T3N1M0). 54% stated that neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery was their institution’s treatment of choice, while 33% used neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus surgery. When asked to choose the best treatment for this patient based on available evidence, 33% chose neoadjuvant chemoradiation, 33% favored neoadjuvant chemotherapy, 31% were undecided. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. chemoradiation, 63% strongly agreed or agreed there was insufficient evidence to decide whether or not one treatment was superior to the other. 73% strongly agreed or agreed to support a future randomized trial of preoperative chemotherapy vs. preoperative chemoradiation for esophageal cancer patients. Conclusions: Most Canadian thoracic surgeons use either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiation followed by surgery for locally advanced resectable esophageal cancer. There is wide variation in practice patterns with no clear standard approach. 63% feel there is insufficient evidence to decide whether or not one treatment is superior to the other, and the majority support a future trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. chemoradiation. A pilot study is being planned to determine feasibility.

Efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for elderly patients with stage II/III esophageal cancer: Retrospective study.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 220-220
Author(s):  
Takahiro Miyamoto ◽  
Tetsuji Terazawa ◽  
Masahiro Goto ◽  
Ken Asaishi ◽  
Fukutaro Shimamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Age Range

220 Background: From the result of JCOG 9907 study, which showed the supremacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) of 5-fluorouracil plus cisplatin infusion (FP) over adjuvant chemotherapy, NAC FP is standard therapy for stage II or III esophageal cancer in Japan. However, the efficacy and feasibility of NAC FP for elderly patients (pts) still remains unclear. Methods: We examined stage II or III esophageal cancer patients aged 70 or over, who received NAC FP at our institution between April 2008 and August 2014, retrospectively. Results: 12 pts received NAC FP at least 1 course. The pts characteristics were as follows: median age (range), 73 (70-78); male/ female, 11/1; PS 0/1, 3/9. Location of primary tumor and clinical stage based on UICC 2009 were as follows: upper/middle/lower, 3/6/3; stage IIA/IIB/IIIA/IIIB, 3/3/3/3. 2 pts (16.7%) occurred grade3/4 neutropenia (16.7%). grade3/4 non-hematotoxicities were nausea; 2 pts (16.7%), vomiting; 1 pt (8.3%), appetite loss; 4 pts (33.3%), stomatitis; 1 pt (8.3%) and acute kidney injury; 1 pt (8.3%). 3 pts were underwent surgery after 1 course of NAC FP due to renal dysfunction. 3 pts were not performed surgery because of decreased respiratory function, decreased PS and progression disease. 9 pts were performed surgery after NAC FP. The histological efficacy was 1a/1b/2/3; 4/3/1/1 and curativity was R0 (degree A)/R0 (degree B); 8/1. 4 pts (44%) had down staging. Median follow-up time was 16.5 months (range; 4-63), the 5-year relapse free survival rate was 19.0% (95% CI: 2.7-66.4%) and the 5-year overall survival rate was 67% (95% CI: 32-89%). Conclusions: NAC FP for stage II/III esophageal cancer might be effective even in pts ≥70 years of age. However, gastrointestinal toxicity and renal toxicity were developed frequently, therefore the indication of NAC FP for elderly pts must be decided carefully.

Intergroup phase III trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy, followed by chemoradiation and surgery with and without cetuximab in locally advanced esophageal carcinoma: First results from the SAKK 75/08 trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4019-4019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas Ruhstaller ◽  
Peter C. Thuss-Patience ◽  
Stefanie Hayoz ◽  
Sabina Schacher-Kaufmann ◽  
Jorge Riera-Knorrenschild ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Esophageal Carcinoma ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
First Results ◽  
Resectable Esophageal ◽  
Resectable Esophageal Cancer ◽  
Hospital Deaths ◽  
Neo Adjuvant Chemotherapy

4019 Background: We compared chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery with the addition of neoadjuvant and adjuvant cetuximab (cetux) in patients with esophageal carcinoma. Methods: Pts with resectable esophageal cancer (T2N1-3;T3-4aNx) received two cycles of induction chemotherapy (docetaxel 75mg/m2, cisplatin 75mg/m2) followed by chemoradiation (45 Gy, docetaxel 20mg/m2 and cisplatin 25mg/m2 weekly) and surgery or the same treatment with addition of neoadjuvant cetux 250mg/m2 weekly and adjuvant cetux 500mg/m2 bi-weekly for three months. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). After a median follow-up of 4y 166 of the planned 180 events occurred (plateau reached). Results: 300 pts were treated between 2010-13: 88% male, median age 61y, 63% adenocarcinoma, 85% cT3/4a, 90% cN+. 84% completed neoadjuvant therapy, 87% were operated (cetux: 89%, control: 86%), 67% started and 50% completed adjuvant cetux-therapy. The R0 resection rate was 95% in the cetux-arm and 97% in the control-arm, there were 10 and 14 treatment-related deaths and 9 and 4 postoperative in-hospital deaths, respectively. Major differences in adverse events (grade >2) with addition of cetux were higher rate of allergic reactions and hypomagnesemia, but lower rate of dysphagia (-15%) and esophagitis (-4%) during chemoradiation. Conclusions: The addition of cetuximab to a multimodal therapy showed a statistically significant reduction of loco-regional recurrences which led to a statistically non-significant, but clinically relevant improvement of PFS and OS. Clinical trial information: NCT01107639. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document