Use of antiresorptive therapy (ART) and skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases of neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN).
4096 Background: Antiresorptive therapy (ART) with bisphosphonates or denosumab is effective in preventing skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with bone metastases (BM). In neuroendocrine neoplasms (NEN), BM are a negative prognostic factor, however tend to be asymptomatic and SREs are considered a rare event. The role of ART in preventing SREs in NEN has not been investigated so far. Methods: Retrospective analysis of all patients with bone metastases in the NEN database of the National Center for Tumor Diseases who presented at our center between 12/2012 and 01/2017. Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis of BM as well as time to SRE (TTSRE) were calculated. In patients experiencing an SRE within 1 month after diagnosis (i.e. before efficacy of ART could be assessed), TTSRE was defined as the time to a subsequent SRE. Results: In a total of 513 patients in the database, 108 patients with BM could be identified. Median OS was not reached in a median follow-up of 15.2 months. ART was applied to 42.6 % of patients. OS with or without ART did not differ significantly (p = 0.2538). 28.7 % of patients experienced at least 1 SRE, 20.4 % after more than 1 month. Median TTSRE was 63.8 months with ART and 127.0 months without ART (p = 0.1751). TTSRE was shortened in grade 3 vs. grade 1+2 NEN (172 months vs. not reached, HR 4.058, p = 0.0032), as well as in lytic vs. non-lytic metastases (24.5 vs. not reached, HR 7.319, p < 0.0001), however not significantly different in oligometastatic vs. disseminated bone disease (not reached vs. 63,8 months, HR 1.415, p = 0.4287). Application of ART did not significantly change TTSRE in either of these subgroups. Significant toxicity attributable to ART was observed in 15.2 % of ART patients. Conclusions: SREs in NEN patients with BM were not uncommon, especially in patients with grade 3 NEN and osteolytic metastases. Application of ART did not significantly alter median OS or TTSRE, no subgroup with a benefit of ART could be identified. The use of ART in NEN should be questioned and evaluated prospectively.