Frontline hyper-CVAD plus ponatinib for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Updated results of a phase II study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7013-7013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicholas James Short ◽  
Hagop M. Kantarjian ◽  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Naval Guastad Daver ◽  
Naveen Pemmaraju ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Vascular Events ◽  
Term Survival ◽  
Protocol Amendment ◽  
Highly Effective ◽  
Grade 3

7013 Background: The combination of chemotherapy plus a TKI is highly effective in Ph+ ALL. In this phase II study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of HCVAD in combination with the third-generation pan- BCR-ABL inhibitor, ponatinib. Methods: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL received 8 cycles of HCVAD alternating with high dose MTX/Ara-C every 21 days. Ponatinib was given at 45 mg daily for the first 14 days of cycle 1. Initially ponatinib 45 mg daily was given indefinitely beginning at cycle 2. Due to concern for vascular events, a protocol amendment was made in which, beginning in cycle 2, pts in CR received 30mg daily and pts in CMR received 15mg daily. Rituximab and IT chemotherapy were given with the first 4 courses. After 8 cycles of HCVAD, pts in CR received maintenance with ponatinib, vincristine and prednisone for 2 years followed by indefinite ponatinib. Results: 64 pts have been treated, 10 of whom had received prior treatment with another regimen (8 in CR, 2 not in CR). Median age was 48 years (range, 21-80) and median follow-up was 33 months (range, 2-62). Median cycles received was 6 (range, 2-8). 63 pts (98%) achieved CR after 1 cycle; 1 pt achieved CRp. CCyR was achieved in 98%, MMR in 97% and CMR in 77%. Median time to CMR was 10 weeks (range, 2-96). Median times to platelet and ANC recovery in cycle 1 were 22 and 18 days, respectively, and for subsequent cycles were 22 and 16 days, respectively. Grade ≥3 pancreatitis was observed in 12 pts (19%), thrombotic events in 4 (6%) and MI in 3 (5%). 8 pts have died, with 2 deaths attributed to ponatinib (both from MI). No grade ≥3 vascular events occurred after the protocol amendment. 38 pts continue to receive treatment (7 in consolidation, 14 in maintenance and 17 post-maintenance). 10 pts (16%) underwent allogeneic SCT in CR1. 7 pts have relapsed, 3 of whom were still receiving ponatinib. The 3-year continued remission and OS rates were 79% and 76%, respectively. In a landmark analysis at 4 months, CR duration and OS did not differ significantly in pts with or without allogeneic SCT. Conclusions: HCVAD plus ponatinib is highly effective in pts with newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL, resulting in high rates of CMR and promising long-term survival. Clinical trial information: NCT01424982.

A phase II study of high dose ARA-C and mitoxantrone for treatment of relapsed or refractory adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia

2000 ◽  
Vol 24 (3) ◽  
pp. 183-187 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Rosen ◽  
Cathryn Rankin ◽  
David R. Head ◽  
David H. Boldt ◽  
Frederick W. Luthardt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Phase II Study of Combination of the HyperCVAD Regimen with Dasatinib in Patients with Philadelphia Chromosome (Ph) or BCR-ABL Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) and Lymphoid Blast Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML-LB).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2814-2814 ◽  
Author(s):  
Farhad Ravandi ◽  
Deborah Thomas ◽  
Hagop Kantarjian ◽  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Charles Koller ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Philadelphia Chromosome ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Blast Phase ◽  
Platelet Recovery

Abstract Combination of cytotoxic chemotherapy with imatinib has improved the outcome for patients with Ph+ ALL and resulted in eradication of minimal residual disease and durable remissions without allogeneic stem cell transplant in some patients (Thomas D, Blood, 2004; Yanada M, JCO, 2006; Wassmann B, Blood, 2006; de Labarthe A, Blood, 2007). The dual Src and Abl inhibitor dasatinib has a significantly higher in vitro kinase inhibition against BCR-ABL and has demonstrated potent clinical activity in patients with imatinib-resistant lymphoid blast phase CML (CML-LB) and Ph+ ALL with over 50% complete cytogenetic responses (CG CR) in phase I and II trials but with median progression free survival of only 3 to 4 months. We are conducting a phase II trial in which patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB receive dasatinib 50 mg po bid for the first 14 days of each of 8 cycles of alternating hyperCVAD and high dose cytarabine and methotrexate. Patients in complete remission (CR) continue to receive maintenance dasatinib 50 mg po bid daily and vincristine and prednisone monthly for 2 years followed by dasatinib indefinitely. To date 15 newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL (cohort I) and 4 patients with relapsed Ph+ ALL or CML-LB (cohort II) have received a median of 4 cycles (range 1 – 8); 4 patients are receiving maintenance in CR. Median age for cohort I is 55 years (range 23 – 79) and for cohort II, 43 years (range 26 – 69); 13 and 3 patients were older than 50 years, respectively. Median WBC at diagnosis for cohort I was 4.3 × 109/L (range, 0.8 – 203.4 x 109/L). Three patients had CNS involvement. Fourteen and 3 patients in the 2 cohorts are evaluable for response to induction; 2 are too early. Thirteen patients (93%) in cohort I and all evaluable patients in cohort II have achieved CR after the first cycle; 1 patient in cohort I died on day 20 from infections before response assessment; her bone marrow exam on day 14 showed no detectable disease. Ten of 11 (91%) patients in cohort I have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 3 are too early. Three of 4 patients in cohort II have achieved CG CR after 1 cycle; 1 had a new CG abnormality and 1 is too early. Six patients have achieved complete molecular remission after the first cycle with the lowest BCR-ABL/ABL in the other patients ranging from 0.01 to 1.91. Median time to neutrophil and platelet recovery for cohort I is 18 and 25 days and for cohort II 18.5 and 30.5 days. Grade 3 and 4 toxicity has included 7 episodes of GI bleeding as well as infections, diarrhea, hypophosphatemia, hypocalcemia, elevated transaminases, and acute renal failure unrelated to treatment. With a median follow up of 4 months (range, 0 – 10), 15 patients are alive and in CR; 1 died at induction, 1 died in CR from an unrelated cardiac event, and 2 are too early. No patient has relapsed and no patient has received an allogeneic transplant. We conclude that the combination of the hyperCVAD regimen with dasatinib is feasible and can achieve early molecular remissions in patients with Ph+ ALL and CML-LB.

Results of a Feasibility and Phase II Study on Bortezomib (BTZ) in Pediatric Multiply Relapsed or Refractory Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Complete Hematological Responses with a Modestly Intensive Regimen Including BTZ

Blood ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 124 (21) ◽  
pp. 2290-2290
Author(s):  
Gertjan Kaspers ◽  
Denise Niewerth ◽  
Satianand Ramnarain ◽  
Andishe Attarbaschi ◽  
André Baruchel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Research ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Research Support ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intensive Regimen

Abstract Prognosis of refractory and relapsed ALL is poor and its improvement requires the introduction of novel agents with a new mechanism of action. Bortezomib (BTZ) as proteasome inhibitor is such an agent, and has been shown to be safe as single agent in phase I studies in children with either solid tumors (Blaney 2004) or leukemias (Horton 2007). Recently, Messinger (2012) reported in a single-arm study that BTZ can be combined safely with vincristine (VCR), dexamethasone (DXM), pegylated asparaginase (PEG-ASP) and doxorubicin and that the combination was remarkably effective in B-cell precursor ALL. BTZ has been reported to sensitise malignant cells to other agents, both in vitro for leukemias as well as for multiple myeloma patients in vivo. In patients with ALL, the sensitizing effect of BTZ regarding the efficacy of glucocorticoids (GC) has not been addressed yet. Considering the lack of any clinical experience with BTZ in children, we developed a European multicenter feasibility and phase II study in refractory or relapsed ALL, in which all patients receive BTZ, with day 8 peripheral blast count as primary endpoint. The study is performed in compliance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Patients are randomised for BTZ to be administered “early”, or “late”. Bortezomib is then given as iv push for 4 doses at 1.3 mg/m2/dose, thus in group “early” on days 1, 4, 8 and 11 and in group “late” on days 8, 11, 15 and 18. In addition, all patients receive DXM (10 mg/m2/day in 3 doses for 2 weeks, orally or iv) and VCR (1.5 mg/m2/dose with a maximum of 2 mg as 1-hour infusion on days 8 and 15), as well as one intrathecal administration of methotrexate (MTX, dose age-adjusted) on day 1. No ASP and no anthracycline is given. Cycles can be repeated in case of a good response. Eligible patients have 2nd or greater relapsed ALL, 1strelapsed ALL after allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) in CR1, or refractory first relapsed ALL, and bone marrow (BM) involvement and at least 100 leukemic cells per µl blood. Exclusion criteria include symptomatic CNS leukemia. It is planned to evaluate 24 fully evaluable randomised patients. This analysis, not being an official interim-analysis and not evaluating the primary endpoint of the study, focusses on haematological responses with this modestly intensive regimen. BM M1 indicates <5% blasts, M2 5-15% and M3>15% blasts. Between October 2010 and March 2014, a total of 21 eligible patients with information on response and/or toxicity after cycle 1 has been enrolled, 11 boys and 10 girls, median 9.8 years of age (range, 1.2 – 17.5). Most had second relapsed ALL (n=11), others first relapsed ALL following allo-SCT in CR1 (n=8) or refractory first relapsed ALL (n=2). Regarding efficacy, 17 patients were evaluable (1 patient no material received, 2 patients discontinued treatment due to toxicity, and 1 patient had early progression which led to treatment discontinuation). Day 22 BM showed M1 in 5, M2 in 6, and M3 in 6 patients. There was no relation between day 22 BM status and the administration of BTZ being early or late. There was no association between response and disease status, being either refractory or relapsed, although numbers are small. Two patients with a relapse after allo-SCT achieved BM M1, as well as 3 patients with a second or subsequent relapse. Four patients (23.5%) achieved hematological remission after cycle 1, while 11 out of 17 patients (65%) had a good initial response (day 22 BM M1 or M2). A total of 10 patients received a 2ndcycle and 5 out of them achieved a complete remission, 4 of whom already had a day 22 BM M1. Eight out of 21 (38%) patients suffered from grade 3 and/or 4 toxicity during cycle 1, and most frequently reported were pain (n=4), peripheral neuropathy and fatigue (n=2 each). After 2 cycles, grade 3/4 toxicity was reported in 3 out of 10 patients: one with peripheral neuropathy, one with peripheral neuropathy, haemorrhage and hematuria, and one with raised ALAT. Future analyses will focus on sensitisation to GC by BTZ and on the efficacy of BTZ in relation to PK and PD. Meanwhile, BTZ in combination with VCR, DXM and intrathecal MTX is effective in a significant subset of pediatric relapsed and refractory ALL, and repetitive cycles could be given in several children without undue toxicity. This research is financially supported by the Dutch Foundation Children Cancer-free (clinical research support) and by Janssen Pharmaceuticals (clinical research support and free drug). Disclosures Baruchel: Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy.

Nilotinib Combined with Multi-Agents Chemotherapy for Adult Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia: Results of a Prospective Study from a Single Center

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1301-1301
Author(s):  
Bingcheng Liu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
Chunlin Zhou ◽  
Hui Wei ◽  
Dong Lin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
Complete Remission ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Lymphoblastic Leukemia ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Molecular Response ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Induction Cycle

Abstract Background: Imatinib combined with conventional chemotherapy has significantly improved the prognosis of adults with Philadelphia-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia ( Ph+ ALL ). Nilotinib, the second generation TKIs is approximately 30 fold more potent than imatinib and is active in vitro against multiple BCR/ABL mutations. Here, we report the efficacy and safety of nilotinib combined with multiple reagents chemotherapy in newly diagnosed patients with Ph+ ALL. Methods: Newly diagnosed Ph+ ALL patients aged 15 to 59 and with adequate organ function were recruited. The 4weeks induction cycle consist of vincristine, daunorubicin, cyclophosphamide and prednisone. After achieving hematological complete remission (HCR), patients received 2 years of consolidation and maintenance therapy. Consolidation therapy was including 7 courses of multiple drug chemotherapy or allogeneic/autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo/auto HCT). Nilotinib was the only drug for maintenance therapy. Nilotinib 400mg was given orally twice daily along with combination chemotherapy starting from day 15 of induction until the initiation of conditioning for transplantation, hematological relapse or continuing for 2 years since achievement of hematological complete remission (HCR).Central nervous system (CNS) prophylaxis was performed by intrathecally administering triple agents. The data cut-off day was June 1st 2015. HCR and molecular complete remission (MCR), overall survival(OS), hematologic relapse free survival (HRFS), toxicity, nilotinib concentration in serum and cerebrospinal fluid(CSF) were evaluated. MCR was defined as Bcr-Abl fusion gene becomes negative in bone marrow using quantitative RT-PCR. Results: A total of 30 patients (19 males and 11 females) were enrolled from September 2011 to November 2013. The median age was 40 (range 21-57) years old. The type of BCR breakpoint was minor in 24 patients, major in 2 patients and both in 4 patients. All the 30 patients (100%) and 8 patients (26.7%) achieved HCR and MCR respectively after the induction cycle. Cumulative MCR rate was 80%. 17 patients underwent HCT, 14 patients with alloHCT and 2 patients with autoHCT in first HCR, 1 patient received alloHCT after relapse. 9 patients died from leukemia relapse and 4 patients died post-alloHCT without relapse. The median HRFS and OS were 20.7 and 34 months respectively. The 4 year HRFS rate was 41% and the 4 year OS rate was 48%. The molecular response after induction has no impact on HRFS and OS. Patients achieving MCR had better HRFS (32 vs 8.9 months, p=0.006) but not OS(33.3vs 17.2months, p=0.068) than those patient without MCR. During induction, 23 patients experienced infectious fever including 2 patients with septicemia and 6 patients with pneumonia needing antifungal therapy. Intestinal obstruction occurred in 7 patients during induction and relived by interrupting nilotinib treatment. The incidence of non-hematologic adverse events (AE) over grade 3 during the study was 23% jaundice, 10% rash, 6.7% arthralgia and bone pain, 6.7%headache, 3.3% ALT elevation. No QTc prolongation over 500ms happened. Grade 2 tachycardia and premature ventricular contraction occurred in 2 patients and 1 patient respectively. During the high-dose methotrexate treatment cycle, delaying of methotrexate metabolism happened in 20 patients (66.7%), increasing creatine occurred in 8 patients (26.7%, grade 3 in 3 patients), 1 patient received haemodialysis. Nilotinib serum level reached to stable concentration after 15 days of administration. Only traces of nilotinib was detected in CSF. Conclusion: In this prospective study, combination of nilotinib and cytotoxic drug was shown to be effective and tolerable for adult Ph+ALL. Nilotinib could not penetrate the blood brain barrier. (ChiCTR-ONC-12002469) Disclosures Off Label Use: nilotinib,the 2nd generation TKI, was approved for CML. Wang:Novarits and Bristol-Mayers squibb. G.S.: Consultancy.

A phase II study of two induction schedules of high dose carboplatin (HDC) vs weekly paclitaxel/gemcitabine (WPG) followed by paclitaxel/carboplatin/gemcitabine (PCG) in advanced ovarian cancer (AOC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15062-15062
Author(s):  
G. Bolis ◽  
G. Polverino ◽  
C. Sciatta ◽  
G. Scarfone ◽  
G. Scambia
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Active Agent ◽  
Advanced Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Stage Iiic ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Grade 3

15062 Background: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed AOC generally receive platinum plus taxane therapy. G represents a new active agent to improve the standard regimen. To investigate the safety of two schedules of induction treatments both followed by triplet PCG we have drafted a phase II study. Methods: 14 pts, suboptimally debulked (FIGO stage IIIc) entered the study. HDC ( AUC 7,5) was administered for 2 courses every 21 days ( arm A) and P ( 80 mg/sqm, d 1,8,15,22) + G ( 2500 mg/sqm, d 1,15) (arm B). Both regimens have been followed by standard triplet P ( 175 mg/sqm, d1) + C ( AUC 5, d1) + G ( 800 mg/sqm, d1,8) every 21 days for a total of 6 courses. Antiemetics, corticoids, antihistaminics and ranitidine have been added. Results: The median age was 57 y (39–68). Histology was serous in 64.3%, mixed 14.3% and other 21.4%. All pts had Grade 3 tumor but one. Seven pts received arm A schedule and 7 arm B both followed by PCG regimen. Worst haematological toxicities ( in term of nadir) observed in all courses for all pts were neutropenia G4 ( 42.8% arm A vs 71.4% arm B), anemia G2 (71.4% arm A vs 57.1% arm B), thrombocytopenia G2 ( 57.1% arm A vs 42.8% arm B). Most common non haematological toxicities were alopecia and mild nausea/vomiting. Mild paresthesias in both regimens were observed. No sepsis or neutropenic fever nor unespected toxicity or treatment-related deaths were observed. 71.4% of pts completed foreseen schedules of treatments. 78.5% of pts received erytropoietin and 28.5% G-CSF support. Conclusions: HDC and weekly PG followed by triplet PCG are feasible and safety regimens in AOC pts ( residual disease > 1 cm). Further phase II-III setting study using these schedules will be conducted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Bortezomib Maintenance Therapy after Induction with R-CHOP, ARA-C and Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Newly Diagnosed MCL Patients, Results of a Multicenter Phase II HOVON Study

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 339-339 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeanette K Doorduijn ◽  
Monique C. Minnema ◽  
Marie Jose Kersten ◽  
Pieternella J Lugtenburg ◽  
Martin R. Schipperus ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cell ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Induction Treatment ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction. The standard first-line treatment of young and fit mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients consists of a rituximab containing induction of CHOP and high dose ARA-C, followed by high dose consolidation and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Thus far, almost all patients relapse after ASCT. Bortezomib is a proteasome inhibitor with activity in MCL. We investigated in a randomized phase II study whether there was any indication that maintenance therapy with bortezomib after ASCT could improve the outcome of treatment, measured as event free survival (EFS). Methods. Patients 18-65 years with newly diagnosed MCL were treated with 3 cycles of R-CHOP and 2 cycles of ARA-C (2 x 2 g/m2 iv d1-4) and rituximab (375 mg/m2, iv d11). Patients in PR or CR continued with ASCT after BEAM conditioning. Patients with a PR or CR after ASCT, with a neutrophil count > 0.5 x 109/l and platelets > 80 x 109/l were randomized between bortezomib and no further treatment. Bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 iv was given once every two weeks, for 2 years, starting between 6 - 12 weeks after transplantation. Results . Between October 2007 and February 2012, 140 patients aged 34-66 years (median 57) were registered. Five patients were not eligible. The MIPI score was low, intermediate, high or unknown in 57%, 32%, 10% and 1% respectively. All eligible patients started induction treatment with R-CHOP. Two patients did not receive the first ARA-C cycle, because of progressive disease and physician decision. Hundred-fifteen patients (85%) received the BEAM and ASCT. Reasons to stop protocol treatment before ASCT were: progressive disease (PD) (n=6), inadequate stem cell harvest (n=3), excessive toxicity (n=3), other reasons (n=8). The response after ASCT was CR/CRu in 99 patients (86%), PR in 15 (13%), unknown in 1 (1%). Only 62 patients (45%), aged 34-65 years (median 56) were randomized between bortezomib maintenance and no further treatment. Two patients were randomized, but not eligible. Reasons for no randomization were: not eligible (n=30), patient refusal (n=14), excessive toxicity (n=2, and other reasons (n=7). In each treatment arm 30 patients were included. The patient characteristics were well balanced, except the MIPI score. In the no maintenance arm 21 patients (70%) had a low MIPI, compared to 15 patients (50%) in the bortezomib arm, and 6 (20%) versus 11 (37%) patients had an intermediate MIPI score. In both arms 3 patients (10%) had a high MIPI. Fifteen patients (50%) in the maintenance group continued bortezomib for 2 years. Reasons to stop earlier were excessive toxicity (n=6), PD/relapse (n=4), patients refusal (n=3) and other (n=2). The main adverse events during maintenance therapy were neurologic (CTC grade 2: 14%, grade 3: 4%), and infectious (grade 2: 11%, grade 3: 7%). Three patients developed a secondary malignancy: a basal cell carcinoma in the no maintenance group, a melanoma and a prostate carcinoma in the bortezomib group. With a median follow-up of the patients still alive of 50.9 months EFS at 4 years for all patients is 61%, and the overall survival (OS) 78%. The median follow-up of the randomized patients still alive is 42.9 months. The EFS at 4 years is 72% without maintenance versus 71% in the patients randomized for bortezomib maintenance. The OS at 4 years also shows no significant difference between the groups, 90% versus 93% respectively. Conclusion. There is no indication that bortezomib iv maintenance in a frequency of once every 2 weeks does improve the EFS of newly diagnosed MCL patients after intensive induction treatment with R-CHOP, double ARA-C and BEAM followed by ASCT. Figure 1. Figure 1. Figure 2. Figure 2. Disclosures Doorduijn: Celgene: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Off Label Use: bortezomib maintenance in MCL. Minnema:Celgene: Consultancy; Jansen Cilag: Consultancy; Amgen: Consultancy. Kersten:janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; takeda millennium: Research Funding; roche: Honoraria, Research Funding. Lugtenburg:Mundipharma: Consultancy; Servier: Consultancy; Janssen-Cilag: Consultancy; Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy. Schipperus:Novartis: Consultancy. Zijlstra:Celgene: Consultancy; Roche: Consultancy.

Phase II study of irinotecan, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin combination chemotherapy in taxane and cisplatin-based chemotherapy-refractory metastatic gastric cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15599-e15599
Author(s):  
J. Yoon ◽  
S. Cho ◽  
W. Bae ◽  
J. Hwang ◽  
H. Shim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gastric Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Haematological Toxicity ◽  
Metastatic Gastric Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Grade 3

e15599 Background: The role of the second line chemotherapy in advanced gastric cancer was not clear, but possibility of prolongation of survival is open question. Irinotecan is promising agents in gastric cancer and this phase II study evaluated the efficacy and safety of combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, high dose of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and leucovorin in taxane and cisplatin based chemotherapy refractory metastatic gastric cancer. Methods: Eligible criteria were as followed; histologic confirmed adenocarcinoma of stomach, previously treated with taxane and cisplatin, age≥18, Eastern Clinical Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 1 or less, adequate organ function. Irinotecan (150 mg/m2) as a 30-min infusion and leucovorin (200 mg/m2) as a 15-min infusion were given on day 1, followed by 5-FU 400 mg/m2bolus infusion then 5-FU 2,400 mg/m2 as a 48-hour continuous infusion. This cycle was repeated every 2 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Results: Thirty-four patients were enrolled. The median age was 57 years (range 27–73 years), and the ECOG performance status of all patients was 1. All patients were evaluable for safety and survival and twenty seven patients (79.4%) were evaluable for tumor response. The overall response rate was 18.5% (95% CI: 3.9–33.1). The median progression free survival and overall survival were 4.6 (95% CI: 2.4–6.9) and 9.3 months (95% CI: 5.2–13.4), respectively. Greater than grade 3 haematological toxicities were neutropenia in nine (26.5%), febrile neutropenia in one (2.9%) and thrombocytopenia in one patient (2.9%). The major non-haematological toxicity was asthenia, but most of patients showed grade 1 or 2. Greater than grade 3 non- haematological toxicities were elevated AST/ALT in four (11.8%), hyperbilirubinemia in two (5.9%), nausea in two patients (5.9%). Conclusions: This results showed that the combination chemotherapy with irinotecan, 5-FU and leucovorin was well tolerated and active in taxane and cisplatin refractory patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A Phase II Study of Ofatumumab-High Dose Methylprednisolone Followed By Ofatumumab-Alemtuzumab in 17p Deleted or TP53 Mutated CLL

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 4159-4159 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew S. Davids ◽  
Haesook T. Kim ◽  
Stacey M. Fernandes ◽  
Jeffrey Hellman ◽  
Karen Francoeur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Tp53 Mutation ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Infectious Complications ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Color Flow ◽  
Part C ◽  
High Dose Methylprednisolone ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract BACKGROUND: Even in the age of kinase inhibitors, the prognosis for patients (pts) with CLL with del(17p) or TP53 mutations remains poor, with the median PFS only 28 mo. for pts with relapsed/refractory del(17p) CLL treated with ibrutinib. High dose methylprednisolone (HDMP) and alemtuzumab (alem) both have activity in 17p disease and work independently of TP53. Prior work has demonstrated that giving HDMP/alem simultaneously is efficacious, but toxic. We hypothesized that giving these agents sequentially with ofatumumab (ofa) would maintain efficacy while decreasing toxicity. METHODS: This phase II study of ofa/HDMP followed by ofa/alem in CLL pts with 17p deletion or TP53 mutation employed a parallel 2-arm design (treatment-naive (TN) and relapsed/refractory (R/R)). Therapy was the same in both arms and included ofa/HDMP for 2-4 cycles (part A) followed by ofa/alem for 4-24 weeks, up to maximum response (part B). Responders could proceed to alloHSCT or a maintenance phase with ofa given q2 mo and alem given q2 wks (part C). Antimicrobial prophylaxis for PCP, HSV/VZV, and fungal infections was mandatory, as was G-CSF support. The primary objective was to estimate the ORR at the conclusion of the two-part induction therapy in both cohorts. Secondary objectives were to estimate the rate of CR, objective response by compartment, rate of MRD negativity by 4 color flow cytometry, PFS, and OS, rate at which transplant-eligible pts were able to proceed to alloHSCT, and to assess safety. Toxicity was assessed by IW-CLL and CTCAE v4.0. Response assessments by IW-CLL criteria were performed mid-way and at the end of parts A and B, and q6 mo. on part C. RESULTS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled. Baseline pt characteristics were as follows: TN (n=15): median age 64 (range 45-86), median WBC 58K, Hct 31, Plts 134, B2M 4.3, IGHV unmutated 79%, median %bone marrow (BM) involvement 80%. R/R (n=15): median age 65 (range 58-80), median WBC 31, Hct 33, Plts 114, B2M 4.5, IGHV unmutated 73%, median %BM involvement 60%, median # prior therapies 2 (range 1-4) including 9 pts with prior FCR or FR and 7 pts with prior BR. One patient in each arm had TP53 mutation without 17p deletion, and 4 pts had mut NOTCH1. The median number of copy number changes by SNP array was high, at 12.4 in the TN and 14 in the R/R cohorts. In the TN arm, 14/15 pts moved from part A->B, 5 moved from part B->C, and 5 moved on to alloHSCT in remission. The best ORR for the TN arm was 80% (67% PR, 13% CR), with 12/15 (80%) pts achieving BM MRD negativity. The TN 2-yr PFS and OS are 70% and 85%, respectively. In the R/R arm, 8/15 pts moved from part A->B, 4 moved from part B->C, and 5 moved on to alloHSCT in remission. The best ORR for the R/R arm was 68% (all PRs), with 8/15 (54%) pts achieving BM MRD negativity. The R/R 2-yr PFS and OS are 53% and 67%, respectively. Responses in both arms were independent of TP53 and NOTCH1 mutation status. Studywide, a greater number of somatic mutations was associated with shorter PFS and OS (HR 1.13 per mutation, 95% CI 1.02-1.25, p=0.015 and HR 1.185, 95% CI 1.047-1.341, p=0.0073, respectively). The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia (33%), thrombocytopenia (20%), anemia (10%). Infectious complications included pneumonia (5 cases, 1 Gr2, 3 Gr3, 1 Gr4), febrile neutropenia (2 cases, both Gr3), and cellulitis (1 case, grade 3). Four pts had low-level CMV reactivation, but no CMV infections occurred. Venous thromboembolism occurred in 3 pts. With a median follow-up time among survivors of 25 mo., 21 of the total 30 pts are still alive, and causes of death included: progressive disease n=6, infection n=3. 12/18 (67%) pts who were transplant eligible were able to proceed to HSCT. Discontinuations were due to: progressive/refractory disease (n=10, including 3 Richter's transformations (R/R n=2, TN n=1)), physician decision (n=2), and unacceptable toxicity (n=1). CONCLUSION: Ofa/HDMP followed by Ofa/alem is highly active for both TN and R/R CLL pts with del(17p) and/or TP53 mutation. In addition to a robust ORR, we observed a high rate of MRD-negativity in the bone marrow, which allowed most of the transplant-eligible pts to proceed to alloHSCT. Sequential dosing appears to reduce infectious complications compared to concurrent dosing. This regimen is a feasible option for pts with ultra-high risk CLL to facilitate maximal cytoreduction prior to alloHSCT. <> Disclosures Davids: Genentech: Other: ad board; Pharmacyclics: Consultancy; Janssen: Consultancy.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Bimonthly High-Dose Leucovorin, Fluorouracil Infusion, and Oxaliplatin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resistant to the Same Leucovorin and Fluorouracil Regimen

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 3560-3568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Mohamed A. Bensmaine ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Eric François ◽  
Virginie Lucas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective tumor response rates and toxicities of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) cancer regimen combined with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every 2 weeks on metastatic colorectal cancer patients with documented proof of progression while on bimonthly LV and 5-FU alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled onto this study and 97 received the study drugs between October 1995 and December 1996. Eighty-nine patients were eligible for per-protocol efficacy analysis with documented proof of progression on one of the following two treatments: LV 500 mg/m2 and continuous 5-FU infusion 1.5 to 2 g/m2/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (FOLFUHD); or LV 200 mg/m2, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2, and continuous 5-FU infusion 600 mg/m2/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (LV5FU2). In our study, 40 patients received FOLFUHD + 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX3) and 57 patients received LV5FU2 + 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX4). RESULTS: Of the 97 patients treated, 20 partial responses were observed (FOLFOX3/4: response rate, 20.6%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 31.1%; FOLFOX3: response rate,18.4%; FOLFOX4: response rate, 23.5%). For patients treated with FOLFOX3/4, the median response duration for was 7.5 months, and the major toxicities were peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) peripheral neuropathy was 20.6%; whereas the overall incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was 27.8%, 15%, and 36.9% for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, and FOLFOX4, respectively (P = .02). From the start of treatment, median progression-free survival was 4.7, 4.6, and 5.1 months for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, FOLFOX4, respectively, and median overall survival was 10.8, 10.6, and 11.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This phase II study of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 in combination with bimonthly LV plus 5-FU in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to LV plus 5-FU alone confirms the enhanced antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document