Performance of a 31-gene expression profile (GEP) test for metastatic risk prediction in cutaneous melanomas (CM) of the head and neck.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9576-9576
Author(s):  
John T. Vetto ◽  
Sancy Ann Leachman ◽  
Brooke Middlebrook ◽  
Kyle R. Covington ◽  
Jeffrey D. Wayne ◽  
...  

9576 Background: Accurate prognostication of distant metastatic risk using sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for CM can be challenging in melanomas of the head and neck due to a higher false negative rate compared to other anatomical areas. A GEP signature that predicts metastatic risk based on primary tumor biology, providing a binary outcome of Class 1 (low risk of metastasis) or Class 2 (high risk), was previously described. The prognostic capabilities of the GEP independently and in combination with SLN status in a cohort of patients with primary head and neck CM are assessed here. Methods: All samples and clinical data were collected under an IRB-approved multicenter protocol. qPCR analysis was used to assess expression of the gene signature (Class 1 vs. Class 2). Distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) were assessed. Results: 157 subjects with primary CMs in the head and neck region were identified. 110 of 157 subjects had a SLN biopsy performed. Median age was 65 years (range 25-89) and median Breslow depth was 1.6 mm (range 0.2-15.0 mm). In 71 SLN-negative patients, 18 of 27 (67%) distant metastatic events were GEP Class 2. Overall, 73% (47 of 64) distant metastases, and 88% (22 of 25) deaths due to CM were called Class 2. By comparison, sensitivities for DMFS and MSS were 41% (26 of 64) and 52% (13 of 25), respectively, using SLN biopsy alone, and increased to 80% (51 of 64) and 88% (22 of 25), respectively, when combining the SLN status and GEP class. Kaplan-Meier 5-year DMFS and MSS rates based on SLN status alone or in combination with GEP are shown in the table. Conclusions: These data support the ability of the GEP test to accurately identify low- and high-risk cases of head and neck melanoma. The results strongly support the role of GEP testing to enhance current staging by better predicting the risk of distant metastasis and death for patients with melanoma in an anatomic region that is associated with a higher SLN biopsy false negative rate. [Table: see text]

2021 ◽  
Vol 108 (Supplement_2) ◽  
Author(s):  
E Johnston ◽  
S Taylor ◽  
F Bannon ◽  
S McAllister

Abstract Introduction and Aims The aim of this systematic review is to provide an up-to-date evaluation of the role and test performance of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) in the head and neck. Method This review follows the PRISMA guidelines. Database searches for MEDLINE and EMBASE were constructed to retrieve human studies published between 1st January 2010 and 1st July 2020 assessing the role and accuracy of sentinel lymph node biopsy in cutaneous malignant melanoma of the head and neck. Articles were independently screened by two reviewers and critically appraised using the MINORS criteria. The primary outcomes consisted of the sentinel node identification rate and test-performance measures, including the false-negative rate and the posttest probability negative. Results A total of 27 studies, including 4688 patients, met the eligibility criteria. Statistical analysis produced weighted summary estimates for the sentinel node identification rate of 97.3% (95% CI, 95.9% to 98.6%), the false-negative rate of 21.3% (95% CI, 17.0% to 25.4%) and the posttest probability negative of 4.8% (95% CI, 3.9% to 5.8%). Discussion Sentinel lymph node biopsy is accurate and feasible in the head and neck. Despite technical improvements in localisation techniques, the false negative rate remains disproportionately higher than for melanoma in other anatomical sites.


2018 ◽  
Vol 117 (7) ◽  
pp. 1584-1588 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles J. Puza ◽  
Srirama Josyula ◽  
Alicia M. Terando ◽  
John H. Howard ◽  
Doreen M. Agnese ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Miller ◽  
Mahkam Tavallaee ◽  
Malte Renz ◽  
Ann Folkins ◽  
Amer Karam

While sentinel lymph node (SLN) sampling has been established for low-risk endometrial cancer, few data exists on high-risk histologies. This study aims to measure the accuracy of immediate intraoperative SLN biopsy with frozen section in high-risk endometrial cancer. Patients diagnosed with endometrial cancer of high-grade histology (grade 3 endometrioid, clear cell, serous, carcinosarcoma, de- or undifferentiated histology) between 2014 and 2019 at a single institution who underwent SLN mapping, followed by pelvic lymphadenectomy with or without para-aortic lymphadenectomy were included. SLNs were assessed intraoperatively using multiple frozen sections and H&E staining. Lymph node metastases detected by SLN biopsy were compared with complete lymphadenectomy specimens. 35 patients with high-grade endometrial cancer histology underwent SLN mapping followed by lymphadenectomy. In 34 of 35 (97%) of these patients mapping with at least one SLN was successful. Positive SLNs were identified in 7/34 patients (20.6%). There were no patients who had positive lymph nodes on complete lymphadenectomy without a positive SLN, resulting in 100% sensitivity, and 0% false-negative rate. SLN mapping using intraoperative frozen sections in high-risk endometrial cancer demonstrated 100% sensitivity and 0% false-negative rate, provides immediate feedback on successful SLN mapping and valuable intraoperative information on the disease status guiding the intraoperative decision for completion lymphadenectomy.


2011 ◽  
Vol 21 (9) ◽  
pp. 1679-1683 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa A. Ennik ◽  
David G. Allen ◽  
Ruud L.M. Bekkers ◽  
Simon E. Hyde ◽  
Peter T. Grant

BackgroundThere is a growing interest to apply the sentinel node (SN) procedure in the treatment of vulvar cancer. Previous vulvar surgery might disrupt lymphatic patterns and thereby decrease SN detection rates, lengthen scintigraphic appearance time (SAT), and increase SN false-negative rate. The aims of this study were to evaluate the SN detection rates at the Mercy Hospital for Women in Melbourne and to investigate whether previous vulvar surgery affects SN detection rates, SAT, and SN false-negative rate.MethodsData on all patients with vulvar cancer who underwent an SN procedure (blue dye, technetium, or combined technique) from November 2000 to July 2010 were retrospectively collected.ResultsSixty-five SN procedures were performed. Overall detection rate was 94% per person and 80% per groin. Detection rates in the group of patients who underwent previous excision of the primary tumor were not lower compared with the group without previous surgery or with just an incisional biopsy. There was no statistical significant difference in SAT between the previous excision group and the other patients. None of the patients with a false-negative SN had undergone previous excision.ConclusionsResults indicate that previous excision of a primary vulvar malignancy does not decrease SN detection rates or increase SN false-negative rate. Therefore, the SN procedure appears to be a reliable technique in patients who have previously undergone vulvar surgery. Previous excision did not significantly lengthen SAT, but the sample size in this subgroup analysis was small.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine F. Jarvis ◽  
Joshua B. Kelley

AbstractColleges and other organizations are considering testing plans to return to operation as the COVID-19 pandemic continues. Pre-symptomatic spread and high false negative rates for testing may make it difficult to stop viral spread. Here, we develop a stochastic agent-based model of COVID-19 in a university sized population, considering the dynamics of both viral load and false negative rate of tests on the ability of testing to combat viral spread. Reported dynamics of SARS-CoV-2 can lead to an apparent false negative rate from ~ 17 to ~ 48%. Nonuniform distributions of viral load and false negative rate lead to higher requirements for frequency and fraction of population tested in order to bring the apparent Reproduction number (Rt) below 1. Thus, it is important to consider non-uniform dynamics of viral spread and false negative rate in order to model effective testing plans.


2021 ◽  
Vol 106 ◽  
pp. 106582
Author(s):  
Alex Niu ◽  
Bo Ning ◽  
Francisco Socola ◽  
Hana Safah ◽  
Tim Reynolds ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document