Discrepancy of pathologic complete response and outcome between breast tumor and axillary node in HER2 positive breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12503-e12503
Author(s):  
Shin-Cheh Chen ◽  
Hsien-Kun Chang ◽  
Yung-Chang Lin ◽  
Shih Che Shen ◽  
Wen-Lin Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

e12503 Background: The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in primary tumor and axillary node after different chemotherapy regimens of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in HER2 positive breast cancer (BC) is unknown, the impact of pCR on disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) is still controversial. Methods: A cohort of 350 HER2 positive BC (296 cytologically proved axillary node metastasis) received NAC with different regimens, antracyclin with taxotere (AT), docetaxel with transtuzumab (DT) and docetaxel with transtuzumab and pertuzumab( DTP) between 2005 and 2016 in a large medical center were analyzed retrospectively. The impact of pCR rates of breast and axillary node on DFS and OS were analyzed. Results: Of 350 women with HER2 positive BC received NAC, median age was 50 years(18~93), median tumor size was 4.3 cm, the pCR rates of breast and axillary node were 16.2% and 28.7% ( P= 0.018) in patients received AT( n= 130) , 47.6% and 66.9% ( P= 0.00028 ) in patients received DT( n= 191) ,65.5% and 77.8% ( P= 0.372 ) in patients received DTP( n= 29), respectively. The 5-year DFS were 79.3% and 66.0% ( p= 0.0023), 5-year OS were 89.5% and 76.6% ( P= 0.0201) in patients with breast pCR and non-pCR, respectively. The 5-year DFS were 75.7% and 58.4% ( P= 0.00037), 5-year OS were 85.7% and 72.6% ( P= 0.0024) in axillary pCR and non-pCR patients, respectively. The 5-year DFS were 79.3% and 75.7% ( P= 0.430), and 5-year OS were 89.5% and 85.7% ( P= 0.695) in breast and axillary pCR, respectively . The 5-year DFS in breast pCR whom received targeted therapy (DT and DTP groups) was significantly better than whom not received targeted therapy (AT groups), 85.3% and 65.0% ( P= 0.039), respectively Conclusions: Higher pCR rate in axillary node than breast was found in this cohort. Either pCR in axillary node or breast was associated with improved DFS and OS, but no difference of DFS and OS between breast and axillary pCR . The 5-year DFS in breast pCR received targeted therapy were significantly better than breast pCR patients received chemotherapy alone.

scholarly journals Pathologic and molecular responses to neoadjuvant trastuzumab and/or lapatinib from a phase II randomized trial in HER2-positive breast cancer (TRIO-US B07)

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara A Hurvitz ◽  
Jennifer L Caswell-Jin ◽  
Katherine L McNamara ◽  
Jason Zoeller ◽  
Gregory R Bean ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Early Assessment ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Immune Infiltrate ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

In this neoadjuvant trial (TRIO-US B07), participants with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer (N=128) were randomized to receive trastuzumab (T), lapatinib (L), or both (TL) as HER2-targeted therapy, with each participant given one cycle of this designated anti-HER2 therapy alone followed by six cycles of standard combination chemotherapy with the same anti-HER2 therapy. We observed similar pathologic complete response (pCR) rates between T and TL, and a lower pCR rate with L. Higher-level amplification of HER2 and hormone receptor-negative status were associated with a higher pCR rate. Higher pre-treatment immune infiltrate trended toward higher pCR rate in T-treated groups, and greater HR expression correlated with lower immune infiltrate. Large shifts in tumor, immune, and stromal gene expression occurred after one cycle of HER2-targeted therapy. In contrast to pCR rates, the L-containing arms exhibited greater proliferation reduction than T at this timepoint. Immune expression signatures increased in all arms after one cycle of HER2-targeted therapy, decreasing again by the time of surgery. Our results inform approaches to early assessment of sensitivity to anti-HER2 therapy and shed light on the role of the immune microenvironment in response to HER2-targeted agents.

scholarly journals Lapatinib, trastuzumab or the combination added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 863
Author(s):  
Quan Liang ◽  
Qiang Fu ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Jiacong You ◽  
Zhanchao Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

<p>The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of trastuzumab versus the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for HER2 positive breast cancer. PubMed, MEDLINE, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science and nearly 5 years of the important international conference on oncology records were searched for randomized clinical trials that compared lapatinib plus trastuzumab and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) with trastuzumab in combination with NAC and that included pathologic complete response rate as the primary outcome. Finally, 6 clinical randomized controlled trials were included. Meta-analysis shows that pathological complete response rate was significantly increased in trastu-zumab plus lapatinib group than single use trastuzumab group (53.4%, 40.4%, RR = 1.75, 95% CI 1.38 ~ 2.23, p&lt;0.001). In conclusion, the combination of trastuzumab and lapatinib added to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 positive breast cancer is more effective.</p><p> </p>

The impact of hormone receptor status on pathologic response of HER2-positive breast cancer treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 533-533
Author(s):  
F. Peintinger ◽  
A. Buzdar ◽  
H. Kuerer ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
C. Hatzis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Hormone Receptor ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Pathologic Response ◽  
Weekly Paclitaxel ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Positive Breast Cancer ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

533 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the extent of pathologic response in HER2-positive patients treated with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without trastuzumab according to hormone receptor (HR) status. Methods: The study included 199 patients with HER2-positive disease treated in clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Eighty-nine patients treated with 3- weekly paclitaxel and concurrent trastuzumab followed by 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC) were compared with 110 patients treated with weekly or 3-weekly paclitaxel followed by FEC or FAC. Residual cancer burden (RCB), a measurement of residual disease (RD) from pathologic review of the primary tumor and lymph nodes, was classified as pathologic complete response (pCR), RCB-I (near-pCR, minimal RD), RCB-II (moderate RD), or RCB-III (extensive RD). RCB was compared between treatment groups according to HR status. Results: In HR-negative patients, similar pCR rates were achieved with weekly T/FAC as with 3-weekly T/FEC and trastuzumab (61% and 65%, respectively). However, in HR-positive patients, higher pCR rates were achieved with 3-weekly T/FEC and trastuzumab (47%) than with the weekly T/FAC (25%; p=0.04) or 3-weekly T/FAC (19%; p=0.01) ( Table 1 ). Near pCR (RCB-I) was slightly higher in HR-positive (26%) than in HR-negative patients treated with 3-weekly T/FEC and trastuzumab (11%; p=0.07). Conclusions: Patients with HR- negative/HER2-positive breast cancer had similar pathologic response rates from addition of trastuzumab to 3-weekly T/FEC or from weekly T/FAC chemotherapy. Patients with HR-positive/HER2-positive breast cancer obtained significant benefit from addition of trastuzumab to 3- weekly T/FEC, compared to 3-weekly T/FAC or weekly T/FAC. The combination of weekly T/FEC with trastuzumab as neoadjuvant chemotherapy should be evaluated. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Effect of neoadjuvant pertuzumab-containing regimens on pathologic complete response rates in stage II-III HER2-neu positive breast cancer: A retrospective, single institutional experience.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 580-580
Author(s):  
Rashmi Krishna Murthy ◽  
Takeo Fujii ◽  
Kenneth R. Hess ◽  
Akshara Singareeka Raghavendra ◽  
Bora Lim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Neoadjuvant Treatment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Positive Breast Cancer

580 Background: Pertuzumab (P) in combination with trastuzumab (H) based chemotherapy is currently FDA- approved as a standard neoadjuvant treatment for patients with clinical stage II-III HER2-positive (HER2+) breast cancer (BC). The chemotherapy backbone of HER2-targeted therapy varies and may include taxane (T) and/or anthracycline (A), or carboplatin (C). The goal of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate for HP-containing regimens compared to H containing regimens for stage II-III HER2+ BC. Methods: We identified all patients (n = 1150) with stage II-III HER2+ BC who received neoadjuvant HER2-targeted therapy from 2005 to 2016 through an institutional database. All patients underwent primary breast and lymph node surgery. pCR was defined as ypT0/is, ypN0. Univariate/multivariate logistic regression and chi-squared test for comparing proportions was used for the statistical analysis. Results: pCR was significantly higher for the HP group (n = 200) compared to the H group (n = 950): 44% vs. 41%, odds ratio = 1.8 (95% CI = 1.3, 2.5; P = 0.0002). Even with adjustment for all clinically significant factors (age, stage, tumor grade, hormone receptor (HR) status, A or C exposure), the improvement was statistically significant (adjusted OR = 2.1 (95% CI = 1.5, 2.9; P < 0.0001). The pCR rate by stage and HR status for the HP group is 62% vs. 55% (stage II vs. III) and 71% vs. 51% (HR- vs. HR+). The effect of P was not modified by HR status (HR-, OR = 2.3; HR+, OR = 1.7, P = 0.39) or by A (A-yes, OR = 1.8; A-no, OR = 2.6) (P = 0.28 for interaction) or C (C-yes, OR 2.6; C-no, OR = 1.8) (P = 0.30 for interaction). P was significantly more likely to be given to patients without A (36% vs. 10%, P < 0.0001) and more likely to be given to patients with C (30% vs. 14%, P < 0.001). In both groups, significant predictors of pCR were found to be stage, HR status, and C exposure. Conclusions: Pertuzumab containing regimens yield higher pCR rates compared to non-Pertuzumab containing regimens in stage II- III HER-2 positive breast cancer. The effect of Pertuzumab is not modified by anthracycline or carboplatin use.

Association of pathologic non-complete response of axillary node with outcome after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in node positive breast cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12101-e12101
Author(s):  
Shin-Cheh Chen ◽  
Hsien-Kun Chang ◽  
Yung-Chang Lin ◽  
Yung-Chang Lin ◽  
Shih-Che Shen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Axillary Node ◽  
Predicting Factors ◽  
The Impact

e12101 Background: The pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) correlates with better outcome in specific subtype of breast cancer and the axillary nodal pCR (N-pCR) rate are more common than breast pCR (B-pCR). While only a few studies to compare the survival in terms of B-pCR and N-pCR, and no study compare between the outcome for those non pCR either in breast or axillary node. Methods: A cohort of 968 cytologically proved nodal metastatic breast cancer (cT1~4N1~2) received NAC in a single medical center between 2005~2017 were analyzed retrospectively. NAC regimen included anthracycline and taxanes in all patients, Trastuzumab was used in 308(70.3%) HER2(+) patients. The percentage of both breast and axillary pCR (T-pCR) 、B-pCR and N-pCR were compared in different subtypes. The impact of T-pCR、B-pCR and N-pCR to DFS and OS were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model. Results: The median follow-up time was 45 months. The median age was 49 years old, average tumor size was 4.2cm, and 543 (56.1%) patients were N1 disease. 382(39.5%) patients were HR(+) HER2(-), 222(22.9%)were HR(+)HER2(+),216(22.3%) were HR(-)HER2(+) and 148(15.3%) were HR(-)HER2(-). After NAC, T-pCR was found in 213 (22.0%) patients, B-pCR and N non-pCR in 31 patients, N-pCR and B non-pCR in 245 patients and T non-pCR in 479 patients. N-pCR rate(47.3%) were significantly higher than B-pCR(25.2%) and this trend found in all subtypes ( P<0.0001).The predicting factors of N-pCR were N1,HER2(+) and HR(-). In survival analysis the pCR (either T,B or N) patients had significantly better 5-year DFS and OS than non- pCR(T-pCR v.s T non-pCR, DFS,85.1% v.s 58.4%;OS,91.2% v.s 73.6%,p<0.0001). B-non pCR had a significant better DFS than T non Pcr(65.1% v.s 58.4%,p=0.041) and non- significant. Cox better 5-year OS(78.9% v.s73.6%,p=0.059). Cox regression model demonstrated that T4,N2,grade 3, HR(-) and T non-pCR were poor prognostic factors in DFS and OS. Conclusions: The study demonstrated higher N-pCR rates than B-pCR in all subtypes after NAC, either T-pCR;B-pCR or N-pCR were associated with better outcome than non pCR. The worst outcome found in those T non-pCR or N non-pCR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document