Adjuvant chemotherapy with uracil-tegafur (UFT) for stage III colorectal cancer: Final results of randomized trials by the National Surgical Adjuvant Study of Colorectal Cancer (NSAS-CC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4049-4049 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Hamaguchi ◽  
K. Shirao ◽  
Y. Moriya ◽  
S. Yoshida ◽  
S. Kodaira ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

4049 Background: In the latter 1990s, no consensus was reached as to whether adjuvant chemotherapy was standard treatment for completely resected stage III colorectal cancer in Japan. At that time, we started two randomized controlled trials to clarify the role of adjuvant chemotherapy of stage III colon and rectal cancer in the same time. Methods: Patients with completely resected stage III cancer of the colon or rectum (PS, 0 to 2; age, 20 to 75 years; no other adjuvant therapy) were eligible for these trials. Patients were registered within 6 weeks after surgery and were randomly assigned to receive surgery alone (control group) or surgery followed by treatment with UFT (400 mg/m2/day), given for 5 consecutive days per week for 1 year (UFT group). The target number of patients was 500 for colon cancer and 400 for rectal cancer (hazard ratio = 0.67, one-sided a= 0.05, β= 0.2). The primary endpoint was relapse-free survival (RFS), and the secondary end point was overall survival (OS). Results: Between October 1996 and April 2001, a total of 334 patients with colon cancer and 276 with rectal cancer were enrolled. Four ineligible patients were excluded; data from the remaining 332 patients with colon cancer and 274 with rectal cancer were analyzed. The patients’ characteristics were similar in the groups. Analysis of the results of follow-up until March 2006, at least 5 years after surgery in all patients (median follow-up period, 6.2 years), showed no significant difference in RFS or OS in colon cancer. In rectal cancer, however, RFS and OS were significantly better in the UFT group than in the control group. The only grade 4 toxicity was diarrhea, occurring in 1 patient with colon cancer and 1 patient with rectal cancer. Conclusions: Postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with UFT is well tolerated and improved RFS and OS in patients with stage III rectal cancer. In colon cancer, the expected benefits were not obtained (hazard ratio = 0.67). [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Duration of Oxaliplatin-Containing Adjuvant Therapy for Stage III Colon Cancer: ASCO Clinical Practice Guideline

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (16) ◽  
pp. 1436-1447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christopher Lieu ◽  
Erin B. Kennedy ◽  
Emily Bergsland ◽  
Jordan Berlin ◽  
Thomas J. George ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Expert Panel ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Evidence Base ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Risk Of Recurrence ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Resected Stage

PURPOSE To develop recommendations for duration of adjuvant chemotherapy with a fluoropyrimidine and oxaliplatin for patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer based on the results of trials of 3 months compared with 6 months of treatment. METHODS ASCO convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of relevant studies. The guideline recommendations were based on the review of evidence by the Expert Panel. RESULTS Pooled data from the six International Duration Evaluation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy (IDEA) Collaboration randomized controlled trials comprise the evidence base for these guideline recommendations. RECOMMENDATIONS The recommendations for therapy duration apply to patients with completely resected stage III colon cancer who are being offered adjuvant chemotherapy with oxaliplatin and a fluoropyrimidine. Recommendations are informed by the findings of a recent pooled analysis of clinical trials that compared 6 months versus 3 months of oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. For patients at a high risk of recurrence (T4 and/or N2), adjuvant chemotherapy should be offered for a duration of 6 months. For patients at a low risk of recurrence (T1, T2, or T3 and N1), either 6 months of adjuvant chemotherapy or a shorter duration of 3 months may be offered on the basis of a potential reduction in adverse events and no significant difference in disease-free survival with the 3-month regimen. In determining duration of therapy, the Expert Panel recommends a shared decision-making approach, taking into account patient characteristics, values and preferences, and other factors and including a discussion of the potential for benefit and risks of harm associated with treatment duration. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines .

scholarly journals Severe rhabdomyolysis related to oxaliplatin adjuvant therapy for colorectal cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. e228673 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ana Pissarra ◽  
Mariana Malheiro ◽  
Leonor Vasconcelos Matos ◽  
Ana Neto Plácido
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Standard Chemotherapy ◽  
Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Distal Muscle ◽  
Common Cancer ◽  
Resected Stage

Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in men and the second in women. The standard chemotherapy regiment in stage III colon cancer is based in oxaliplatin. The most common side effects include neutropenia, peripheral neuropathy, vomiting and diarrhoea. Rhabdomyolysis due to oxaliplatin is rare, and there are no established guidelines for managing this adverse event. This report describes a case of a 52-year-old man, with a resected stage III colon cancer that started postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with capecitabine plus oxaliplatin. After the second cycle, the patient developed distal muscle pain and weakness, with a total inability to walk. Blood tests showed an elevated creatine kinase and renal injury. Severe drug-related rhabdomyolysis was diagnosed. The goal of this case report is to discuss the side effect of adjuvant chemotherapy, given its rarity and severity.

scholarly journals Physicians' Beliefs About the Benefits and Risks of Adjuvant Therapies for Stage II and Stage III Colorectal Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (5) ◽  
pp. e360-e367 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony C. Wong ◽  
Shannon Stock ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
Katherine L. Kahn ◽  
Talya Salz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Net Benefit ◽  
Stage Iii Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies ◽  
Stage Ii Colorectal Cancer

Physicians agreed that the benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage III colon cancer and chemotherapy, and radiation for stage III rectal cancer, outweigh the risks, but were divided over the net benefit of adjuvant therapies for stage II colorectal cancer.

scholarly journals Patterns of colorectal cancer care in the United States: 1990-2010.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 684-684
Author(s):  
Caitlin C. Murphy ◽  
Linda C Harlan ◽  
Jennifer Leigh Lund ◽  
Charles Lynch ◽  
Ann M. Geiger
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
The United States ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Adjuvant Therapies

684 Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence and mortality have declined in the U.S. over the past two decades. Much of the decline can be attributed to screening and advances in treatment. Few studies have evaluated the extent to which recommended therapies have been adopted in community settings and temporal changes in patterns of care. Methods: Patients diagnosed with stages II and III CRC were randomly sampled from the population-based Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program in 1990-91, 1995, 2000, 2005, and 2010 (n=7,056). Treatment data were obtained through medical record review and physician verification. We described the receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy among colon cancer patients and preoperative or postoperative radiation therapy among rectal cancer patients. Log-binomial regression was used to examine factors associated with receipt of therapy. Results: Receipt of adjuvant chemotherapy increased among stages II and III colon cancer patients from 1990 (stage II: 22%, stage III: 55%) to 2005 (stage II: 32%, stage III: 72%) and decreased in 2010 (stage II: 29%, stage III: 65%). Chemotherapy regimens changed over time; there was an increase in the use of capecitabine (3% in 2000 to 24% in 2010) and oxaliplatin (6% in 2000 to 79% in 2010). Stage III colon cancer patients who were older (75-79 years: RR 0.82, 95% CI 0.72, 0.94; ≥80 years: RR 0.36, 95% CI 0.27, 0.49) or had a comorbidity score ≥ 2 (RR 0.54, 95% CI 0.34, 0.86) were less likely to receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Receipt of radiation therapy among stages II and III rectal cancer patients increased across all study years from 46% to 66%, with a shift toward preoperative therapy in 2005. From 2005 to 2010, receipt of neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by surgery and postoperative chemotherapy nearly doubled (11% in 2005 to 21% in 2010). Increasing age (75-79 years: RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.48, 0.75; ≥80 years: RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.25, 0.45) was associated with lower chemoradiation use in rectal cancer. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate increased adoption of adjuvant therapies for both colon and rectal cancer patients and differences in therapy receipt by age, comorbidity, and diagnosis year. Improved receipt of adjuvant therapies in the community may further reduce CRC mortality.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Aidi Injection and Brucea javanica Oil Emulsion Injection in Rectal Cancer during CapeOX Adjuvant Chemotherapy

2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Wenjun Meng ◽  
Xiaoge Zeng ◽  
Yuchen Gao ◽  
Qi Chen ◽  
Lian Bai
Keyword(s):  
Rectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Oil Emulsion ◽  
Brucea Javanica ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Aidi Injection ◽  
One Year ◽  
Brucea Javanica Oil

Background. Adjuvant chemotherapy with CapeOX regimen is widely used in resected rectal cancer, which brings benefits to patients. But drug-related toxicities are severe during this process; thus, survival outcomes may potentially be affected. This study explored the efficacy of two Chinese herbal injections, Aidi injection (ADI) and Brucea javanica oil emulsion injection (BJOEI), as adjuvant drugs in CapeOX adjuvant chemotherapy on rectal cancer patients. Methods. A total of 240 cases were enrolled in this retrospective study. 80 cases received CapeOX with ADI (the ADI group), 80 cases received CapeOX with BJOEI (the BJOEI group), and the rest 80 cases received CapeOX alone (the control group). After four cycles’ chemotherapy, adverse reactions (ADRs) and quality of life (QOL) were analyzed. Then, patients received follow-up for at least one year, and the endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Results. All patients completed at least four cycles’ adjuvant chemotherapy. The incidence of leukopenia and thrombocytopenia was significantly lower in the ADI group; the incidence of nausea was significantly lower in the BJOEI group; the incidence of hand-foot syndrome was significantly lower in both the ADI group and BJOEI group. Significant difference was found in the control group regarding the Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) scores prior and posttreatment. No difference was found among three groups regarding one-year DFS. Conclusion. As adjuvant drugs for rectal cancer during CapeOX chemotherapy, ADI shows advantages in decreasing leukopenia and thrombocytopenia, while BJOEI results better in remitting nausea. Both two CHIs had positive impacts on decreasing hand-foot syndrome and the maintenance of patients’ QOL. It is worthy of further study and promotion for CHIs.

scholarly journals Systemic therapy for colorectal cancer

2003 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-263 ◽  
Author(s):  
Borut Stabuc
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Randomized Clinical Trials ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Oral Fluoropyrimidines ◽  
Significant Difference

Colorectal cancer alone accounts for around 200,000 deaths in Europe and represents a significant health problem. Although about fifty percent of patients are cured by surgery alone, the other half will eventually die due to metastatic disease, which includes approximately 25% of patients who have evidence of metastases at the time of diagnosis. Surgical resection of the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes is the only curative therapy for colorectal cancer. However, adjuvant chemotherapy in stage III for colon cancer following curative resection has been shown to reduce the risk of recurrence by 19-40% and of death by 16-33%. Today, 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin given for six months may represent the best adjuvant treatment available The contribution of levamisole to adjuvant treatment seems to be marginal, if any. The benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for the patients with Dukes B colon cancer is less clear. A meta-analysis of 1,381 patients with advanced colorectal cancer showed a significant increase in response rate with the bolus 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin versus 5-fluoroUracil alone but no significant difference in median survival. Continuous infusion allows higher doses of 5-FU than rapid bolus infusion and improves response rate survival and time to progression. Oral fluoropyrimidines (capecitabine and Uracil/Tegafur [UFT]) are as active as intravenous fluoropyrimidines. Compared to intravenous 5FU, oral fluoropyrimidines have safety advantages clinical benefits, and are more convenient for patients. Phase III randomized clinical trials in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer demonstrate the significant superiority of combining irinotecan with 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin or oxaliplatin with 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin over the same 5-fluoroUracil and Leucovorin alone. Several phase II studies have shown that the combination of the oral fluoropyrimidines plus irinotecan or oxaliplatin is very active in metastatic colorectal cancer. Trials with agents acting on novel targets in colorectal cancer are progressing rapidly, including doxifluridine, new inhibitors of thymidylate synthase (ZD9331), oral camptothecins (Rubitecan), multitarget antifolate antimetabolite (Premetrexet), inhibitors of epidermal growth factor receptor (Cetuximab), COX-2 inhibitors (celecoxib) and farnesyltransferaze inhibitors (Zarnestra). However, a few randomized trials failed to show a survival advantage compared with placebo in patients with advanced refractory colorectal cancer.

Development and validation of a robust prognostic and predictive signature for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4036-4036
Author(s):  
A. M. Glas ◽  
P. Roepman ◽  
R. Salazar ◽  
G. Capella ◽  
V. Moreno ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Gene Signature ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Independent Cohort

4036 Background: Between 25 and 35% of stage II CRC patients will experience a recurrence of their disease and may benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Official guidelines give suggestions but no clear recommendation for best risk stratification. Here we describe the development a robust signature that predicts disease relapse and can assist in treatment decisions. Methods: Fresh frozen tumor tissues from 180 patients with stage I, II and III colorectal cancer undergoing surgery were analyzed using high density Agilent 44K oligonucleotide arrays. Median FU was 70.2 months; 85% of patients did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on full-genome gene expression measurement indicated the existence of 3 main colon molecular subclasses. Survival analysis of the 3 classes showed that subtype C (n= 27) had a poor outcome and subtype A (n= 48) good outcome. Only the intermediate group B (n=104) was used to develop a signature by using a cross validation procedure to score all genes for their association with 5-yr distant metastasis free survival (DMFS) and subsequently applied to all samples (n=180). The obtained gene signature was further validated on an independent cohort of 178 stage II + III colon samples. Results: A set of 38 prognosis related gene probes showed robust DMFS association in over 50% of all iterations in the Training Set of 180 samples. The gene signature was validated on an independent cohort of 178 samples from stage II + III colon cancer patients. The profile classified 61% of the validation samples as low-risk and 39% as high-risk. The low- and high-risk samples showed a significant difference in DMFS with a HR of 3.19 (P= 8.5e-4). Five-year DMFS rates were 89% (95%CI 83–95) for low-risk and 62% (95%CI 50–77) for high-risk samples. Moreover, the profile showed a significant performance within stage II (P=0.0058) and III (P=0.036) only samples. The performance of the profile was significant for both untreated (P=0.0082) and treated patients (P=0.016) suggesting that its power is independent of treatment benefits. Conclusions: ColoPrint is able to predict the prognosis of stage II and III colon cancer patients and facilitates the identification of patients who would benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. [Table: see text]

Comparative clinical efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of early-stage colon cancer: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 498-498
Author(s):  
J. Cassidy ◽  
H. Schmoll ◽  
E. Chu ◽  
N. Hawkins ◽  
I. Tatt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Group Analysis ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Early Stage Colon Cancer

498 Background: A systematic review was conducted to identify RCTs of adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early-stage colon cancer and a network meta-analysis performed to compare efficacy of oxaliplatin/fluoropyrimidine regimens. Methods: A systematic review identified RCTs recruiting adult patients with early-stage (adjuvant) stage II/III colon cancer. Outcome measures included hazard ratios for DFS and OS. Only publications in English were considered. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration “risk of bias” assessment tool. A single reviewer screened abstracts/titles using predefined selection criteria, with critical appraisal and data extraction conducted independently by two reviewers. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to estimate comparative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy across RCTs. Results: 56 articles describing 40 trials were selected, of which six reported data on regimens accepted as current standard of care (capecitabine/X-ACT, XELOX/NO16968, FOLFOX/MOSAIC, FLOX/C-07) or common comparators: bolus 5FU/LV and LV5FU2 (C-96-1, PETACC-2). Statistical assessment of heterogeneity was not possible due to the limited study network. Baseline characteristics were similar across trials with the exception of three trials recruiting only stage III patients; sub-group analysis on these trials was not possible due to lack of common comparators. There was no significant difference in DFS at a median follow-up of 3-years (or closest reported analysis) for XELOX vs. FLOX (HR=0.99, 95% CI 0.80–1.22) or FOLFOX (HR=1.00, 95% CI 0.72–1.41). There was also no significant difference in OS at a median follow-up of at least 5 years. Taken as a class, oxaliplatin-containing regimens (XELOX, FOLFOX, FLOX) improved DFS vs. non-oxaliplatin-containing regimens (HR=0.80, 95% CI 0.73–0.87). This result was confirmed for OS. Conclusions: Despite the limited number of available trials, the results of these analyses demonstrate a clear benefit of incorporating oxaliplatin into combination regimens for early-stage colon cancer. XELOX, FOLFOX and FLOX appear to be equivalent in terms of efficacy in this setting. [Table: see text]

The efficacy of oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IV colorectal cancer after R0 resection.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 638-638
Author(s):  
Izuma Nakayama ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Takeru Wakatsuki ◽  
Mariko Ogura ◽  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Lymph Node ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Completion Rate ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
R0 Resection ◽  
Significant Prognostic Factor ◽  
Resected Stage

638 Background: In previous phase III studies (MOSAIC and XELOXA trial), oxaliplatin based chemotherapy was shown to be a standard adjuvant treatment for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its efficacy for curatively resected stage IV CRC has not yet been clarified. In this retrospective study, we evaluate the efficacy of oxaliplatin based chemotherapy in adjuvant setting for curatively resected stage IV CRC. Methods: Eighty-three patients received adjuvant chemotherapy after R0 resection for Stage IV CRC in our institute between Mar 2007 and Feb 2013. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), completion rate of the treatment and safety were evaluated. Median follow-up time was 33.3 months. Results: Baseline characteristics were as follows (N=83): median age, 61; male/female, 46/37; ECOG PS0, all; colon/rectum, 54/29; synchronous/asynchronous, 41/42. Metastatic sites were liver in 46, lung in 11, peritoneum in 13, lymph node in 12 patients. Median PFS and OS were not reached. Three-year PFS and OS were 67.8% and 88.2%, respectively. Completion rate was 78.6% of the patients. In univariate analysis, completion of treatment, synchronous development and metastasis limited to lung were associated with better PFS, though not statistically significant. Confirmed regional lymph node metastasis of primary tumor showed a trend toward to concern with poor OS. Differences in metastatic site were not observed in both PFS and OS. Multivariate analysis revealed none as a significant prognostic factor. Conclusions: Compared the results to previous trial for stage III CRC, oxaliplatin based adjuvant chemotherapy for stage IV CRC after R0 resection was demonstrated to be consistent in tolerability and efficacy.

Clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 867-867
Author(s):  
Shusuke Yagi ◽  
Eiji Shinozaki ◽  
Keisho Chin ◽  
Mitsukuni Suenaga ◽  
Daisuke Takahari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Clinical Impact ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Diverting Ileostomy ◽  
Grade 3

867 Background: CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy is a standard care option for stage III and high risk stage II colorectal cancer(CRC). And then chemotherapy induced diarrhea (CID) is known as one of the dose-limiting toxicities for CAPOX. Although diverting ileostomy is useful for preventing serious complications of high risk anastomosis, it is well recognized that high ileostomy output is hard to manage. Furthermore, the effect of diverting ileostomy on CID of adjuvant chemotherapy is unclear. In this study, we addressed the clinical impact of diverting ileostomy on the dose intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Methods: Patients who diagnosed with stage III colon cancer and stage II or III rectal cancer after curative surgery and received CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy during 2011- 2014 were reviewed retrospectively. We investigated the relationship between diverting ileostomy and dose intensity, toxicities and disease-free survival (DFS). Results: 112 patients (median age 60 years, 52% male, 69% colon cancer, 63% stage III, median follow-up 47 months) were enrolled in this study. Of 112 patients, 100 patients were received chemotherapy without ileostomy (non-ileostomy group: NIG) and 12 patients were received chemotherapy with ileostomy (ileostomy group: IG). 112 Patients received 870 chemotherapy cycles. All treatment related grade 3/4 adverse events were documented in 39% of patients in NIG and 33% of patients in IG (P = 0.77). Grade 3/4 of CID occurred in 8% of patients in NIG and 8% of patients in IG (P = 1). Grade 3/4 of neutropenia were recognized in 21% of patients in NIG and 17% of patients in IG (P = 1). Average relative dose intensity (RDI) in NIG were 75.7% and 85.8% for capecitabine and oxaliplatin, respectively. Average RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin in IG were 76.1% and 82.7%, respectively. Significant difference of RDI of capecitabine and oxaliplatin were not shown in comparison between NIG and IG (P = 0.93, P = 0.63). The 3-year DFS rate was 85.0% in NIG and 75.0% in IG. The HR for DFS for NIG compared to IG was 1.709 (95% CI, 0.49 to 5.95; P = 0.40). Conclusions: The presence of diverting ileostomy does not affect RDI of CAPOX as adjuvant chemotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document