Efficacy and safety of regorafenib compared to TAS-102 for metastatic colorectal cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 735-735
Author(s):  
Ana Beatriz Kinupe Abrahao ◽  
Yoo-Joung Ko ◽  
Kelvin K. Chan ◽  
Scott R. Berry
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Indirect Comparison ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Meta Analyses

735 Background: Recent studies have shown regorafenib and TAS-102 (TAS) to be superior to placebo (P) in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, no studies have directly compared both drugs. Giving the lack of therapeutic options for these patients,, a systematic review to compare the efficacy and safety of regorafenib compared with TAS was performed, using indirect comparison methods. Methods: A systematic review using PubMed, Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane database to identify published and unpublished studies up to November 2015 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, involving regorafenib or TAS was performed. Data including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were extracted. Pairwise direct meta-analyses (regorafenib versus placebo and TAS versus placebo) and indirect comparison (regorafenib versus TAS) using network meta-analyses methods (R package “netmeta”) to preserve randomization were performed using random effects. Results: 914 citations were initially identified among which 3 RCTs fulfilled eligibility criteria (CORRECT, CONCUR and RECOURSE trials) involving 1.764 patients (regorafenib: 641, TAS: 534, Placebo: 589). Subgroups of patients (1.659) who had not received prior regorafenib or TAS-102 were used to performed meta-analyses for efficacy. In indirect comparison, there were no statically differences observed between regorafenib and TAS-102 in overall survival (HR 0.96 95% CI 0.56-1.55 p = 0.082) and progression-free survival (HR HR 0.85 95% CI 0.40-1.80 p = 0.0182). In addition, there were no differences in objective response rate and disease control between both drugs. However, regorafenib has statistically more all grade toxicity (risk difference (RD) 0.31 CI 0.25-0.38 p = 0.001) and toxicity grade 3-5 (RD 0.22 CI 0.13-0.31 p < 0.001) compared to TAS. Conclusions: In this indirect comparison, regorafenib and TAS appeared to have similar efficacy. However, regorafenib has more toxicity compared to TAS. Post-approval real world data focusing on the comparative toxicity of regorafenib and TAS is warranted.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Regorafenib in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Multi-institutional Retrospective Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 13 ◽  
pp. 117955491882544 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ali Aljubran ◽  
Mahmoud A Elshenawy ◽  
Magdy Kandil ◽  
Muhammed N Zahir ◽  
Ahmed Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Background: Regorafenib is a multi-kinase inhibitor approved for treatment of refractory advanced colorectal cancer. It was found in the clinical trials to have a modest benefit and significant toxicity. Our aim was to assess the outcome in our local clinic practice. Patients and methods: Records of patients with confirmed colorectal cancer treated with regorafenib were reviewed. Clinical, pathological, and molecular data were collected. Efficacy and factors of possible prognostic significance were analyzed. Results: A total of 78 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were treated with regorafenib from February 2014 to February 2016 in 4 different institutions (median age: 50.5 years; male: 40 [51.3%]; KRAS mutant: 41 [52%]; right colonic primary: 18 [23%]). A total of 52 patients (66.7%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 to 1, whereas in 25 patients (32.1%) it was >1. In total, 58 patients (74%) had dose reduction. No patient achieved objective response, 15 patients (19%) achieved stable disease, and 56 patients (72%) had progressive disease. With a median follow-up of 6.5 months, the median progression-free survival was 2.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.5-3.3) and overall survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 6.2-9.7). Only performance status of ⩽1 had a statistically significant impact on progression-free survival and overall survival in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Conclusions: Regorafenib in our clinical practice has equal efficacy to reported data from pivotal registration trials. Our data suggest that performance status is the most important prognostic factor in patients treated with regorafenib, suggesting a careful selection of patients.

Apatinib monotherapy for chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: A multicenter, single-arm, prospective study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3527-3527 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fen Wang ◽  
Shubin Wang ◽  
Xia Yuan ◽  
Jun Jia ◽  
Xiaoxia Bi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Disease Control Rate ◽  
Free Survival

3527 Background: Apatinib is an oral highly-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that blocks vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 (VEGFR-2). This exploratory study evaluated the efficacy and safety of apatinib monotherapy in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: In this multicenter, single-arm, prospective study, 48 patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who had failed at least two lines standard chemotherapies including fluorouracil, oxaliplatin and irinotecan were recruited from 14 centers in Guangdong, China. Apatinib at a 500mg dose was administered daily continuously. Each cycle was 4 weeks (28 days). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), quality of life (QoL) and toxicity. Results: A total of 48 patients was enrolled in the study from September 3, 2015 to June9, 2017. Four patients achieved a partial response, and 22 achieved stable disease, representing a response rate of 8.3% and a disease control rate of 60.4%. Median follow-up time was 10.3 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of evaluable patients (n=41) were 4.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.7-5.9) and 9.7 months (95% CI 5.9-13.6). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) were hypertension (12.5%), hand-foot syndrome (10.4%), thrombocytopenia (10.4%), proteinuria (8.3%) and mucositis oral (6.3%). Conclusions: Apatinib monotherapy shows promising efficacy and manageable toxicities in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Further phase 3 trial is warranted. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR1900020503.

scholarly journals EFFECTIVENESS OF MAINTENANCE THERAPY AFTER THE END OF THE FIRST LINE OF TREATMENT FOR PATIENTS WITH METASTATIC COLORECTAL CANCER – THE RESULTS OF A POPULATION-BASED STUDY

2018 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 57-67
Author(s):  
M. Yu. Fedyanin ◽  
Sh. A. Aliyeva ◽  
L. Y. Vladimirova ◽  
A. N. Ivanov ◽  
A. A. Katkov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Observation Group ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Maintenance Group

Aim.To evaluate the effectiveness of different regimens of maintenance chemotherapy after the first line of treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.Materials and methods.We performed retrospective analyses of the data from 432 patients from 17 clinics in 14 regions of the Russian Federation who started systemic therapy for metastatic cancer in 2013. The main inclusion criterion was objective response or stabilization after the first 16 weeks of first-line therapy. Four groups of patients were compared, depending on the nature of maintenance therapy: those receiving fluoropyrimidines, a combination of fluoropyrimidines with bevacizumab, monotherapy of bevacizumab and monotherapy of anti-EGFR antibodies. The main criteria for assesment of the effectiveness of treatment were progression-free survival and overall survival. The statistical analysis was performed with the SPSS 20.0 sof tware package.Results.Maintenance therapy after completion of the first 16 weeks of the 1st line of chemotherapy was administered in 126 patients, most of them were treated with fluoropyrimidines (53.1 %). The median overall survival in the maintenance group was 27 versus 21 months in the observation group, p=0.01, HR=0.78 (95 % CI 0.6–1.02) Median progression-free survival in the maintenance group was 11 vs 7 months in the observation group (p<0.001, HR=0.6, 95 % CI 0.5–0.8). The worst results of progression-free survival were observed in the group with monotherapy of bevacizumab – median was 10 months versus 12 months in the fluoropyrimidine monotherapy group, 10 months for the combination of fluoropyrimidine with bevacizumab and 14 months for monotherapy of the anti-EGFR (p=0,9, HR=1.0, 95 % CI 0.9–1.2).Conclusions.There were no statistical differences in survival with different regimens of maintenance therapy. Monotherapy of bevacizumab in maintenance treatment was associated with the worst sur vival rates.

Phase II study of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan for wild-type KRAS metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidines.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 561-561
Author(s):  
S. Yuki ◽  
K. Shitara ◽  
M. Yoshida ◽  
D. Takahari ◽  
S. Utsunomiya ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Wild Type ◽  
Standard Regimen ◽  
Free Survival

561 Background: Weekly cetuximab and irinotecan is a standard regimen in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC). The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate the efficacy of combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan in patients with pretreated MCRC harboring wild-type KRAS. Methods: Patients with wild- type KRAS MCRC that had progressed after chemotherapy with irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and fluoropyrimidine were included in this study. Cetuximab was administered at 500 mg/m2 biweekly with irinotecan. The primary endpoint was response rate. The secondary endpoints included adverse events, progression-free survival, and overall survival. The pharmacokinetics of cetuximab was also evaluated in five patients. Results: From May, 2009 to February, 2010, a total of 31 patients were enrolled from five institutions. One patient was not eligible. Among the 30 assessable patients, ECOG PS was 0 in 12, 1 in 16, and 2 in two patients. The objective response rate was 30.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.7-49.4), and the disease control rate (complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 76.7% (95%CI, 61.4-92.3). The median progression-free survival was 5.3 months (95%CI, 3.4-7.3). Grade 3 skin toxicity was observed in 3 patients (10%), and treatment related death due to pneumonia occurred in one patient. Conclusions: The efficacy data are similar to those of standard dose of cetuximab plus irinotecan. Combination chemotherapy with biweekly cetuximab and irinotecan is effective for pretreated metastatic wild-type KRAS MCRC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A network meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115
Author(s):  
Xiaoyu Xie ◽  
Jianwei Zhang ◽  
Huabin Hu ◽  
Yue Cai ◽  
Zehua Wu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Biological Agents ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
R Software

115 Background: Recent studies have shown efficacy of chemotherapy (CTX) in combination with different biological agents including regorafenib (REG) in second-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). As there is no evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of REG as compared to other biological agents in combination with CTX, we evaluated the same in this network meta-analysis (NMA). Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing efficacy and safety of biological agents + CTX against CTX alone as second-line treatment of mCRC were retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. Progression free survival (PFS) was the primary outcome, while objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety were secondary outcomes. Outcomes were compared by random/mixed-effects NMA using Bayesian (R software, Gemtc package) and frequentist (R software, netmeta package) approaches. Results: Twelve RCTs comparing 9 different treatment regimens with a total of 6805 patients were included for analysis. Hazard ratios (HR)/ odds ratio (OR)/ relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for PFS, ORR and grade> 3 adverse events (AE) of selected comparisons from the results of the NMA are shown in table. Conclusions: REG combined with CTX might be a potential alternative to conventional therapeutic options and could be considered as the best option for treating KRAS and BRAF mutated mCRC patients. Future RCTs are needed to confirm our results. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document