Integrated Risk Stratification Using Minimal Residual Disease and Sentinel Genetic Alterations in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (1) ◽  
pp. 4-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen P. Hunger
Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 272-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Esmé Waanders ◽  
Vincent H.J. van der elden ◽  
Ellen van der Schoot ◽  
Frank N. van Leeuwen ◽  
Simon V. van Reijmersdal ◽  
...  

Abstract Abstract 272 The response to therapy as determined by minimal residual disease (MRD) is currently used for stratification in treatment protocols for pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Even though MRD classification clearly identifies patients at low or at high risk for relapse, it also results in a large intermediate group (50 to 60% of patients), which still contains approximately half of all relapse cases. To improve risk stratification, we evaluated the added value of the IKZF1 alteration status, recently identified as a prognostic factor, in precursor-B-ALL patients. In an unbiased cohort of 131 uniformly treated precursor-B-ALL patients, we determined MRD levels at 42 and 84 days after treatment initiation using RQ-PCR analysis of Ig/TCR rearrangements. Based on these levels, patients were divided into three groups: MRD-Low (MRD-L), MRD-Medium (MRD-M) and MRD-High (MRD-H). IKZF1 alterations at diagnosis were determined using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification and genomic sequencing. We confirmed the strong prognostic significance of MRD classification, which was independent of IKZF1 status. Importantly, in the large MRD-M group (n=81; 62% of patients) containing 46% of the relapsed patients, IKZF1 alteration status identified 8 out of 11 relapsed patients (72%). The 9 year relapse-free survival (RFS) for IKZF1 mutated patients in this MRD-M group was 27% compared to 96% for patients wild-type for IKZF1 (P<0.001). Based on these results, we defined a new parameter integrating both MRD and IKZF1 status. The favorable risk group included patients classified as MRD-L or MRD-M with IKZF1 wild-type (n=104; 5 relapses), whereas the high risk group consisted of MRD-H patients or MRD-M patients with IKZF1 alterations (n=27; 19 relapses). This parameter showed stronger prognostic value than each of the established risk factors alone (Hazard Ratio[95%CI]: 24.98[8.29-75.31]). Importantly, whereas MRD and IKZF1 status alone identified only 46% and 54% of relapses, respectively, their integrated use allowed prediction of 79% of all relapses with 93% specificity. In conclusion: The use of a new parameter integrating MRD and IKZF1 status results in an unprecedented sensitivity in upfront relapse prediction and has a high potential for future risk stratification, particularly for patients originally classified as non-high-risk, such as the large group of MRD-M patients. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (6) ◽  
pp. 660-667 ◽  
Author(s):  
David O’Connor ◽  
Anthony V. Moorman ◽  
Rachel Wade ◽  
Jeremy Hancock ◽  
Ronald M.R. Tan ◽  
...  

Purpose Our aim was to determine the role of end-of-induction (EOI) minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment in the identification and stratification of induction failure in patients with pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and to identify genetic abnormalities that drive disease in these patients. Patients and Methods Analysis included 3,113 patients who were treated in the Medical Research Council UKALL2003 multicenter randomized trial (NCT00222612) between 2003 and 2011. MRD was measured by using standardized real-time quantitative PCR. Median follow-up was 5 years 9 months. Results Fifty-nine patients (1.9%) had morphologic induction failure with 5-year event-free survival (EFS) of 50.7% (95% CI, 37.4 to 64.0) and 5-year overall survival of 57.7% (95% CI, 44.2 to 71.2). Of these, a small proportion of patients with M2 marrow (6 of 44) and a low EOI MRD level (< 0.01%) had 5-year EFS of 100%. Conversely, among patients with morphologic remission 2.3% (61 of 2,633) had high MRD (≥ 5%) and 5-year EFS of 47.0% (95% CI, 32.9 to 61.1), which was similar to those with morphologic induction failure. Redefining induction failure to include morphologic induction failure and/or MRD ≥ 5% identified 3.9% (120 of 3,133 patients) of the trial cohort with 5-year EFS of 48.0% (95% CI, 39.3 to 58.6). Induction failure (morphologic or MRD ≥ 5%) occurred most frequently in T-ALL (10.1%; 39 of 386 T-ALL cases) and B-other ALL, that is, lacking established chromosomal abnormalities (5.6%; 43 of 772 B-other cases). Genetic testing within the B-other group revealed the presence of PDGFRB gene fusions, particularly EBF1-PDGFRB, in almost one third of B-other ALL cases. Conclusion Integration of EOI MRD level with morphology identifies induction failure more precisely than morphology alone. Prevalence of EBF1-PDGFRB fusions in this group highlights the importance of genetic screening to identify abnormalities that may be targets for novel agents.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document