Trends and disparities in place of death for cancer patients in the United States, 1999-2015.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6522-6522 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fumiko Ladd Chino ◽  
Arif Kamal ◽  
Thomas William LeBlanc ◽  
Yousuf Zafar ◽  
Gita Suneja ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 149 ◽  
pp. 14-15
Author(s):  
K. Hicks-Courant ◽  
A. Melamed ◽  
J.A.A. Rauh-Hain

Oral Oncology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 104555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah J. Stephens ◽  
Fumiko Chino ◽  
Hannah Williamson ◽  
Donna Niedzwiecki ◽  
Junzo Chino ◽  
...  

1966 ◽  
Vol 05 (02) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. I. Lourie ◽  
W. Haenszeland

Quality control of data collected in the United States by the Cancer End Results Program utilizing punchcards prepared by participating registries in accordance with a Uniform Punchcard Code is discussed. Existing arrangements decentralize responsibility for editing and related data processing to the local registries with centralization of tabulating and statistical services in the End Results Section, National Cancer Institute. The most recent deck of punchcards represented over 600,000 cancer patients; approximately 50,000 newly diagnosed cases are added annually.Mechanical editing and inspection of punchcards and field audits are the principal tools for quality control. Mechanical editing of the punchcards includes testing for blank entries and detection of in-admissable or inconsistent codes. Highly improbable codes are subjected to special scrutiny. Field audits include the drawing of a 1-10 percent random sample of punchcards submitted by a registry; the charts are .then reabstracted and recoded by a NCI staff member and differences between the punchcard and the results of independent review are noted.


2021 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1591-1593
Author(s):  
Luca Valerio ◽  
Giacomo Turatti ◽  
Frederikus A. Klok ◽  
Stavros V. Konstantinides ◽  
Nils Kucher ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Jennifer Ailshire ◽  
Margarita Osuna ◽  
Jenny Wilkens ◽  
Jinkook Lee

Abstract Objectives Family is largely overlooked in research on factors associated with place of death among older adults. We determine if family caregiving at the end of life is associated with place of death in the United States and Europe. Methods We use the Harmonized End of Life data sets developed by the Gateway to Global Aging Data for the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) and the Health and Retirement Study (HRS). We conducted multinomial logistic regression on 7,113 decedents from 18 European countries and 3,031 decedents from the United States to determine if family caregiving, defined based on assistance with activities of daily living, was associated with death at home versus at a hospital or nursing home. Results Family caregiving was associated with reduced odds of dying in a hospital and nursing home, relative to dying at home in both the United States and Europe. Care from a spouse/partner or child/grandchild was both more common and more strongly associated with place of death than care from other relatives. Associations between family caregiving and place of death were generally consistent across European welfare regimes. Discussion This cross-national examination of family caregiving indicates that family-based support is universally important in determining where older adults die. In both the United States and in Europe, most care provided during a long-term illness or disability is provided by family caregivers, and it is clear families exert tremendous influence on place of death.


2021 ◽  
pp. 106913
Author(s):  
Elena O. Dewar ◽  
Edward Christopher Dee ◽  
Melaku A. Arega ◽  
Chul Ahn ◽  
Nina N. Sanford

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document