Does chemotherapy, radiotherapy, or hormonal therapy increase the risk of multiple cancers? A pilot study at University of Florida, Jacksonville—2011-2016.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13559-e13559
Author(s):  
Karan Seegobin ◽  
Estela G. Staggs ◽  
Robina Khawaja ◽  
Satish Maharaj ◽  
Shiva Gautam ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 66 (7) ◽  
pp. 1050-1054
Author(s):  
Karan Seegobin ◽  
Estela Staggs ◽  
Robina Khawaja ◽  
Satish Maharaj ◽  
Shiva Gautam ◽  
...  

New primary cancers can occur in patients with a previous cancer. Among the risk factors, therapies such as chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and hormonal therapy have been associated with the development of neoplasms. Second cancers most commonly develop 5–10 years after the initial tumor. We observe the implications of cancer-related therapy in the development of a new tumor. We looked at 602 patients who had their first cancer diagnosed in 2011 and calculated the number of different primary cancers between 2011 and 2016 for each patient. Twenty-four patients had a second cancer within 5 years from the first diagnosis and there were no patients with a third cancer. There was no statically significant difference in the rates of second cancers after exposure to chemotherapy, radiotherapy, hormonal therapy, or any combination of these (p=0.738). Of the second cancers reported after 2011, renal, uterine, cervical, and lung cancers were the most frequently reported. Additionally, there was no statically significant difference among the rates of second cancers in men versus women (p=0.467), as well as among whites versus blacks (p=0.318). We conclude that while new primaries can occur after one cancer, there was no increased risk after exposure to different cancer-related therapies. With increased focus on the primary disease, there is a higher likelihood of missing another primary lesion. This is important as the practical implications of managing multiple primaries are rarely discussed.


2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4646-4646
Author(s):  
D. J. Bloomfield ◽  
V. Shilling ◽  
T. Edginton ◽  
V. Jenkins

F&S Reports ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amy D. DiVasta ◽  
Catherine Stamoulis ◽  
Jenny Sadler Gallagher ◽  
Marc R. Laufer ◽  
Raymond Anchan ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 153430
Author(s):  
Nataša Todorović-Raković ◽  
Jelena Milovanović ◽  
Samuel Olutunde Durosaro ◽  
Marko Radulovic

Neoplasia ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 10 (9) ◽  
pp. 949-953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Soha Salama El Sheikh ◽  
Hanna M. Romanska ◽  
Paul Abel ◽  
Jan Domin ◽  
El-Nasir Lalani

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (14_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4646-4646 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. J. Bloomfield ◽  
V. Shilling ◽  
T. Edginton ◽  
V. Jenkins

Cephalalgia ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. 305-310 ◽  
Author(s):  
EA MacGregor ◽  
H Chia ◽  
RC Vohrah ◽  
M Wilkinson

Objective: To define the term “menstrual” migraine and to determine the prevalence of “menstrual” migraine in women attending the City of London Migraine Clinic. Design: Women attending the clinic were asked to keep a record of their migraine attacks and menstrual periods for at least 3 complete menstrual cycles. Results: Fifty-five women completed the study. “Menstrual” migraine was defined as “migraine attacks which occur regularly on or between days -2 to +3 of the menstrual cycle and at no other time”. Using this criterion, 4 (7.2%) of the women in our population had “menstrual” migraine. All 4 women had migraine without aura. A further 19 (34.5%) had an increased number of attacks at the time of menstruation in addition to attacks at other times of the cycle. Eighteen (32.7%) had attacks occurring throughout the cycle but with no increase in number at the time of menstruation. Fourteen (25.5%) had no attacks within the defined period during the 3 cycles studied. Discussion: A small percentage of women have attacks only occurring at the time of menstruation, which can he defined as true “menstrual” migraine. This group is most likely to respond to hormonal treatment. The group of 34.5% who have an increased number of attacks at the time of menstruation in addition to attacks at other times of the month could be defined as having “menstrually related” migraine and might well respond to hormonal therapy. The 32.7% who have attacks throughout the menstrual cycle without an increase at menstruation are unlikely to respond to hormonal therapy. The 25.5% who do not have attacks related to menstruation almost certainly will not respond to hormonal therapy.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document