A phase II trial of bevacizumab in patients with recurrent solid tumor brain metastases who have failed whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2070-2070
Author(s):  
Priya Kumthekar ◽  
Karan Dixit ◽  
Sean Aaron Grimm ◽  
Rimas Vincas Lukas ◽  
Margaret A. Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Open Label

2070 Background: Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial malignancy with overall a poor prognosis estimated at approximately 4 months from time of initial diagnosis for treated patients, and even lower after failing WBRT after which treatment options have been limited and outcomes poor. Methods: This is an open label phase 2 study where patients who have previously failed WBRT received bevacizumab at a dose of 10 mg/kg intravenously every two weeks until CNS disease progression with one cycle being defined as 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective radiographic tumor response as defined by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Secondary endpoints included progression free survival (PFS) at 6 months, time to progression, time to response, duration of response, overall survival (OS), quality of life (QOL) as measured by the FACT-G and FACT-Br and safety. Results: A total of 27 patients were consented and registered to study of which 24 were evaluable for ORR (3 came off study prior to first follow up MRI brain). Medianage was 53 (range 27-73), median number of cycles was 5.5 (range 1-20) with a median follow up of 8.7 months (range 2.4-47.9mo). Of the 24evaluable patients, there were 6 Partial response, 16 stable disease and 2progressive disease. The 6 month PFS: 46% (95% CI: 25% - 67%) and median PFS was 5.3 months. Median OS was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval 6.3m – 15.0m). For the patients who completed sequential QOL assessments, there was no significant decline in QOL but there was a nonsignificant improvement in the FACT-Br scores. Overall, treatment was well tolerated with 3grade 3 adverse events seen: hypertension (n = 3), headache (n = 1) and thrombotic event (n = 1). Conclusions: For this WBRT failure BM population, we were able to show a 25% disease response to bevacizumab therapy along with good drug tolerability and no noted central nervous system bleeding. Improved survival as compared to historical controls was seen 9.5 m. Of the 24 evaluable patients, 81% (22/24) experienced clinical benefit defined as stable disease or better. Bevacizumab therapy could be a viable option for solid tumor BM patients who experience progression following WBRT, however a larger trial is required to confirm this data. Clinical trial information: NCT01898130.

scholarly journals CMET-16. A PHASE II TRIAL OF BEVACIZUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RECURRENT SOLID TUMOR BRAIN METASTASES WHO HAVE PROGRESSED FOLLOWING WHOLE BRAIN RADIATION THERAPY (WBRT): FINAL RESULTS

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (Supplement_6) ◽  
pp. vi54-vi54
Author(s):  
Priya Kumthekar ◽  
Karan Dixit ◽  
Sean Grimm ◽  
Rimas Lukas ◽  
Margaret Schwartz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Solid Tumor ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Thrombotic Event ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Open Label

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases (BM) are the most common intracranial tumor with limited treatment options following the progression after WBRT. METHODS This open label phase 2 study for patients have progressed following WBRT enrolled participants who received bevacizumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every two weeks until CNS disease progression (one cycle=4 weeks). The primary endpoint was objective radiographic tumor response as defined by modified Response Assessment in Neuro-oncology (RANO) criteria. Secondary endpoints included safety, progression free survival (PFS), time to response, duration of response, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QOL) as measured by FACT-G and FACT-Br. RESULTS A total of 27 patients were registered of which 24 were evaluable for ORR (3 came off study prior to first follow up MRI brain). Median age was 53 (range 27–73), median number of cycles was 5.5 (range 1–20) with a median follow up of 8.7 months (range 2.4–47.9mo). Of the 24 evaluable patients, 6 showed radiographic response (Partial response=6, stable disease=16, progressive disease=2, 81% (22/24) experienced clinical benefit). The 6 month PFS: 46% (95% CI: 25% - 67%) and median PFS was 5.3 months. Median OS was 9.5 months (95% confidence interval 6.3m – 15.0m). For the patients who completed sequential QOL assessments, there no decline in QOL seen secondary to treatment and there was a non statistically significant improvement seen in the FACT-Br questionnaire. Overall, treatment was well tolerated with 3 grade 3 adverse events seen: hypertension (n=3), headache (n=1) and thrombotic event (n=1). CONCLUSION For this pretreated BM population with historically poor clinical outcome and survival, we showed disease response with bevacizumab therapy, drug tolerability and improved survival as compared to historical controls. While larger studies are needed to confirm, bevacizumab therapy could be a viable option for solid tumor BM patients who experience progression following WBRT.

A phase 1b multicenter study of trifluridine/tipiracil (FTD/TPI) in combination with irinotecan (IRI) in patients (pts) with metastatic or unresectable gastric and gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (mGEC) after at least one line of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum (FP) containing regimen.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16006-e16006
Author(s):  
Farshid Dayyani ◽  
Kit Wah Tam ◽  
Edward Jae-Hoon Kim ◽  
Samuel Ejadi ◽  
Fa Chyi Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Meaningful Improvement ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B

e16006 Background: FTD/TPI, an antimetabolite, is approved for treatment of refractory mGEC. This study sought to determine whether the combination of FTD/TPI with IRI (“TASIRI”) was safe and effective in mGEC previously treated with FP. Methods: This investigator‐initiated, multicenter, open‐label, single-dose level, single‐arm phase 1b study enrolled pts with mGEC previously treated with at least one line of FP containing regimen. FTD/TPI was given at 25 mg/m2 twice daily on days 1 to 5 with 180 mg/m2 IRI on day 1 of a 14‐day cycle. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival at six months (mo) (PFS-6). The aim was to show an improvement of PFS-6 from 15% to at least 30% based on historical controls. Results: At the time of data-cutoff (03Feb2021), 23 pts were screened and ultimately 20 pts were treated. The study met its primary endpoint. With a median follow-up of 9.8 mo (range 0.7 – 17), 8 pts are still on treatment and 4 pts have died. PFS-6 is 53.9% (lower limit of 95% CI: 28%). Median PFS and overall survival are 6.9 mo and not reached, respectively. At the time of data-cutoff, data were available for 13 pts with measurable disease by RECIST criteria and at least 1 on-treatment scan. Of those, 11 had stable disease and 2 had progressive disease as best response (5 pts had tumor shrinkage < 30%), therefore the disease control rate was 84.6%. The most common any grade (G) treatment related adverse events (TRAE) were nausea (n = 14, 70%), diarrhea (n = 9, 45%), and fatigue (n = 8, 40%). G3-4 TRAE in > 5% of pts were anemia (17%) and neutropenia (9%). 2 serious TRAE were reported: G4 febrile neutropenia (n = 1) and G3 hypotension (n = 1). There was no G5 TRAE. Conclusions: The combination of TASIRI showed encouraging clinical activity with a meaningful improvement in PFS-6 compared to historic controls. TASIRI was well tolerated and no new safety signals were seen. TASIRI warrants further investigation for patients with refractory mGEC and limited treatment options. Updated results with longer follow-up will be presented at the meeting. Clinical trial information: NCT04074343.

A trial of gemcitabine (gems) in combination with cisplatin for treatment of recurrent/metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15505-15505
Author(s):  
M. Yang ◽  
H. Wang ◽  
W. Wang ◽  
T. Chiou ◽  
P. Chen
Keyword(s):  
Stable Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Patient Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3

15505 Aims: To determine the efficacy of gemcitabine in combination with cisplatin, and to assess the safety profile of the regimen as the first-line treatment in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Methods: An open-label, non-comparative, multi-center phase II study for patients with histologically proven recurrent/metastatic HNSCC without prior treatment for their recurrent/metastatic disease. In this trial, 1250 mg/m2 gemcitabine was administered alone on day 1 and day 8 and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin would follow gemcitabine on day 8, to be repeated in cycles of 21 days until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. Results: Between 04/2004 and 09/2005, 34 patients were enrolled in this study. 33 patients have completed the study treatment. Characteristics of the 33 patients: male- 33; median age- 51 years (range 38–65); 30 pts had a performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 and 3 had a PS of 2 (ECOG scale); histology: recurrent/metastatic HNSCC in all cases. Of the 33 patients, 25 were evaluable for response assessment. Partial response was observed in 8, stable disease in 10, and progressive disease in 7 patients. Overall response rate was 32% (95% Confidence interval 12%–52%). Grade 3/4 hematological toxicities included neutropenia in 12 pts, leukopenia in 11 pts, thrombocytopenia in 2 pts and anemia in 8 pts. Grade 3/4 nausea or vomiting was observed in 2 pts. Other toxicity was mild in the treatment. Patient treatment and follow-up are still ongoing. Conclusion: This study, with an overall response rate of 32% and a rate of stable disease of 40%, has shown a good activity with mild and acceptable toxicities of gemcitabine/cisplatin regimen in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC. Survival and response analyses will be presented at the meeting. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

An open label, nonrandomized, multi-arm, phase II trial evaluating pembrolizumab combined with cetuximab in patients with recurrent/metastatic (R/M) head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC): Results of cohort 1 interim analysis.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6033-6033 ◽  
Author(s):  
Assuntina Gesualda Sacco ◽  
Ruifeng Chen ◽  
Debanjali Ghosh ◽  
Deborah J.L. Wong ◽  
Francis P. Worden ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Monoclonal Antibody ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Dual Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Refractory

6033 Background: Pembrolizumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody blocking programmed death receptor-1[PD-1]), and cetuximab (a chimeric monoclonal antibody inhibiting epidermal growth factor receptor) are both FDA-approved, second-line monotherapies for R/M HNSCC. This is the first trial to evaluate anti-tumor efficacy of dual therapy with pembrolizumab and cetuximab. Previously reported safety data demonstrated favorable toxicity. An interim futility analysis of cohort 1 (anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and cetuximab naïve) was completed per protocol. Methods: Patients (pts) with platinum-refractory/ineligible, R/M HNSCC were treated with pembrolizumab 200mg IV on day 1 and cetuximab 400mg/m2 loading dose followed by 250mg/m2 weekly (21-day cycle). Primary endpoint: overall response rate (complete and partial responses) by 6 months (mo). Secondary endpoints: 12-mo progression-free survival (PFS) probability, overall survival, response duration, safety, correlative analyses. Results: 14 evaluable pts were enrolled March 2017-October 2018. Median age 60y (range 47-86y), M:F 6:8, ECOG (0:1) 2:12, 14 mucosal primaries (9 oral cavity, 2 HPV-mediated oropharynx, 2 non-EBV-associated nasopharynx, 1 larynx). 11 pts (79%) had no prior lines of systemic therapy for R/M HNSCC (range 0-1). 6 pts (42.8%) had a partial response by 6 months, meeting pre-planned criteria for trial continuation. 4 pts (28.6%) had stable disease and 4 (28.6%) had progressive disease. Median PFS was 128 days (4.3 mo). Median duration of response was 160.5 days (5.4 mo) for partial responders and 133 days (4.4 mo) for pts with stable disease. Disease control rate (partial + stable) was 71.4%. There were 7 grade 3 treatment-related toxicities. 2 pts discontinued cetuximab due to toxicity, however, both continued pembrolizumab. Conclusions: Interim analysis indicates that pembrolizumab plus cetuximab is potentially active for platinum-refractory/ineligible pts with R/M HNSCC. These results meet protocol specifications for trial continuation. Final results will include PD-L1 expression data. Clinical trial information: NCT03082534.

Sacituzumab govitecan (IMMU-132) in patients with previously treated metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC): Results from a phase I/II study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 354-354 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott T. Tagawa ◽  
Bishoy Morris Faltas ◽  
Elaine Tat Lam ◽  
Philip James Saylor ◽  
Aditya Bardia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Antibody Drug Conjugate ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer

354 Background: Patients (pts) with mUC who progress after platinum (PLT)-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapy have poor outcomes and limited treatment options. Sacituzumab govitecan (SG) is a novel antibody-drug conjugate. It consists of a monoclonal antibody targeting Trop-2, an epithelial cell surface antigen overexpressed in UC, conjugated to the active metabolite of irinotecan (SN38). Methods: We performed a phase I/II basket study in pts with advanced solid tumors receiving intravenous SG administered on day 1 and 8 of 21-day cycles, until progression or unacceptable toxicity. CT/MRI scans were obtained at 8-week intervals for response assessment. We evaluated pts with mUC who progressed after ≥1 prior systemic therapy and were treated with SG at the 10 mg/kg dose level. Endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR) by RECIST 1.1, clinical benefit rate (CBR; complete response [CR], partial response [PR], or else SD ≥6-mo), and Kaplan-Meier estimated duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Results: 45 pts (41M/4F; median age 67, range 49-90; ECOG 0/1: 31%/69%) received a median of 2 (range: 1-6) prior treatment lines, including PLT-based chemotherapy (95%) and CPI (38%). 33 had visceral metastases involving liver (n=15), lung (n=27), and other organs (n=5). The ORR was 31% (14/45), with 2 CR and 12 PR. In pts with visceral involvement, the ORR was 27% (9/33). The ORR in CPI-treated pts was 23% (4/17). The median DOR was 12.6 mo (2 pts continuing >2 y), and the CBR was 47% (21/45). Median PFS and OS were 7.3 mo and 18.9 mo, respectively. The AE profile was consistent with prior reports. Grade ≥3 AEs in ≥5% of pts were neutropenia/neutrophil count decreased (38%), anemia (11%), hypophosphatemia (11%), diarrhea (9%), fatigue (9%), and febrile neutropenia (7%). Conclusions: SG demonstrated clinical activity in pts with relapsed/refractory mUC, including CPI-treated pts and pts with visceral disease. A single-arm, open-label, global phase 2 trial is underway to evaluate antitumor activity and safety of SG in advanced UC.(TROPHY-U-01; NCT03547973). Clinical trial information: NCT03547973.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab-based treatment as salvage therapy in patients with recurrent symptomatic brain metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Sophie Berghoff ◽  
Michael Oliver Breckwoldt ◽  
Lars Riedemann ◽  
Kianush Karimian-Jazi ◽  
Sarah Loew ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Local Treatment ◽  
Whole Brain Radiotherapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Salvage Treatment ◽  
Symptom Improvement ◽  
Median Reduction ◽  
Bevacizumab Treatment

Abstract Background Salvage treatment for recurrent brain metastases (BM) of solid cancers is challenging due to the high symptomatic burden and the limited local treatment options. Methods Patients with recurrent BM with no option for further local therapies were retrospectively identified from BM databases. Bevacizumab-based treatment was initiated as a salvage treatment. Radiological imaging before and after bevacizumab-based treatment was reevaluated for treatment response using the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) BM criteria. Results Twenty-two patients (36.4% male) with recurrent BM from breast cancer (40.9%), colorectal cancer (31.8%), or lung cancer (27.3%) were identified. Previous BM-directed therapies were radiosurgery in 16/22 (72.7%) patients, whole-brain radiotherapy in 8/22 (36.4%), and neurosurgical resection in 11/22 (50.0%). Time since BM diagnosis to initiation of bevacizumab treatment was 16.5 months. Of 22 patients 14 (63.6%) received concurrent systemic therapies. Neurological symptom improvement could be achieved in 14/22 (63.6%) and stabilization in 6/22 (27.3%) patients, resulting in a clinical benefit in 20/22 (90.9%) patients. Steroids could be reduced or stopped in 15/22 (68.2%) patients. Rate of improvement on T1-weighted imaging was 15/19 (78.9%; median reduction: −26.0% ± 32.9) and 19/20 (95%; median reduction: −36.2% ± 22.2) on T2-weighted FLAIR imaging. According to RANO-BM best response was partial response in 7/19 (36.8%), stable disease in 9/19 (47.3%), and progressive disease in 3/19 (15.7%) patients. Median CNS-specific progression-free survival was 8 months and median overall survival after initiation of bevacizumab treatment was 17 months. Conclusions Bevacizumab-based treatment had clinically relevant intracranial activity in the vast majority of patients suffering from recurrent, symptomatic BM. The data supports a prospective clinical trial of bevacizumab as a salvage treatment in BM.

Obinutuzumab short-duration infusion (SDI) in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma: Results from the end of induction analysis of the phase IV GAZELLE study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7545-7545
Author(s):  
Miguel Angel A. Canales Albendea ◽  
Thomas A. Buchholz ◽  
Koji Izutsu ◽  
Takayuki Ishikawa ◽  
Laura Maria Fogliatto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Response Assessment ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
To Receive ◽  
Phase Iv

7545 Background: Obinutuzumab (G)-chemotherapy (chemo) has demonstrated improved progression-free survival compared with rituximab (R)-chemo in previously untreated advanced follicular lymphoma (FL). G is currently administered by IV infusion over ̃3–4 hours. A shorter duration of infusion in Cycle (C) 2 and subsequent cycles, as is standard practice with R, could improve convenience for patients (pts) and efficiency for infusion facilities. We report the primary analysis of the prospective, open-label, multicenter, single-arm, Phase IV, GAZELLE study (NCT03817853), which evaluated the safety of G administered as a 90-minute (min) SDI from C2 onwards in pts with FL. Methods: Pts with previously untreated FL received G (1000mg) intravenously on Day (D) 1, 8, and 15 of C1, and on D1 thereafter, plus chemo (bendamustine, CHOP, or CVP) for 6–8 cycles. In C1, pts received G at the standard infusion rate. Pts without a Grade (Gr) ≥3 infusion-related reaction (IRR) in C1 were eligible to receive G as a 90-min SDI from C2. Pts with a Gr 3 IRR in C1 received the standard G infusion in C2, and were eligible for G SDI in subsequent cycles if no Gr ≥3 IRRs occurred. Pts with a second Gr 3/4 IRR discontinued G. At the end of induction (EOI), responding pts received maintenance G (1000mg) as SDI for 2 years or until disease progression (PD). The primary endpoint was incidence of Gr ≥3 IRRs during C2. IRRs were defined as any event occurring ≤24 hours from infusion judged to be related to treatment. Secondary endpoints included adverse events (AEs) and investigator-assessed overall response rate at EOI. Results: As of December 3, 2020, 113 pts had received study treatment. Median age was 62.0 years, 50.4% were male, 61.9% had stage IV FL, and 45.1% were classified as high-risk FLIPI. Of the 110 pts who were eligible for G SDI from C2, no pt experienced a Gr ≥3 IRR with SDI in C2 (Table). One pt experienced a Gr 3 IRR with SDI in C5, presenting hypertension. All other IRRs with SDI were Gr 1/2. No Gr 4/5 IRRs were reported. Other AEs were similar to those observed in previous studies. At the clinical cut-off date, 104 pts had a CT imaging-based response assessment at EOI and 9 pts had no response assessment; 76/113 (67.3%) had a complete response, 22 (19.5%) had a partial response, and six (5.8%) had PD. Conclusions: In GAZELLE, G SDI in C2 and beyond appeared to be safe. No Gr 3 IRRs were observed in C2 and only one Gr 3 IRR was reported in subsequent cycles. The safety profile of G SDI was comparable with the established profile of G in advanced FL. Clinical trial information: NCT03817853. [Table: see text]

Daratumumab (DARA) maintenance or observation (OBS) after treatment with bortezomib, thalidomide and dexamethasone (VTd) with or without DARA and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): CASSIOPEIA Part 2.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8004-8004
Author(s):  
Philippe Moreau ◽  
Pieter Sonneveld ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Autologous Stem Cell Transplant ◽  
Second Primary ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Depth Of Response

8004 Background: D-VTd plus ASCT was approved for transplant-eligible (TE) NDMM based on part 1 of CASSIOPEIA. We report a prespecified interim analysis of CASSIOPEIA part 2: DARA maintenance vs OBS in pts with ≥partial response (PR) in part 1, regardless of induction/consolidation (ind/cons) treatment. Methods: CASSIOPEIA is a 2-part, randomized, open-label, phase 3 study in TE NDMM. Pts received 4 cycles ind and 2 cycles cons with D-VTd or VTd. 886 pts who achieved ≥PR were rerandomized to DARA 16 mg/kg IV Q8W for up to 2 yr (n = 442) or OBS (n = 444) until progressive disease per IMWG. Pts were stratified by ind (D-VTd vs VTd) and depth of response (minimum residual disease [MRD] status and post cons response ≥PR). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) after second randomization. This interim analysis assessed efficacy and safety after 281 PFS events. A preplanned hierarchical procedure tested key secondary endpoints: time to progression (TTP), ≥complete response (CR), MRD negativity rates by NGS and overall survival (OS). Results: At median follow-up of 35.4 mo, median PFS was not reached (NR) with DARA and 46.7 mo with OBS (HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.42–0.68; P <0.0001). PFS advantage for DARA was consistent across most subgroups. However, a prespecified analysis showed significant interaction with ind/cons treatment arm ( P< 0.0001). PFS HR for DARA vs OBS was 0.32 (95% CI 0.23–0.46) in the VTd arm and 1.02 (0.71–1.47) in the D-VTd arm. Median TTP was NR for DARA vs 46.7 mo for OBS (HR 0.49; 95% CI 0.38–0.62; P <0.0001). More pts in the DARA vs OBS arm achieved ≥CR (72.9% vs 60.8%; OR 2.17; 95% CI 1.54–3.07; P <0.0001). MRD negativity (in ≥CR pts at 10-5) was 58.6% with DARA vs 47.1% with OBS (OR 1.80; 95% CI 1.33–2.43; P= 0.0001). Median OS was NR in either arm. Most common (≥2.5%) grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) with DARA vs OBS were pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.4%), lymphopenia (3.6% vs 1.8%), and hypertension (3.0% vs 1.6%). Serious AEs occurred in 22.7% (DARA) vs 18.9% (OBS) of pts; the most common (≥2.5%) was pneumonia (2.5% vs 1.6%). 13 (3.0%) pts discontinued DARA due to an AE. The rate of infusion-related reactions was 54.5% (DARA-naïve pts) and 2.2% (prior DARA pts); 90% were grade 1/2.Second primary malignancies occurred in 5.5% (DARA) vs 2.7% (OBS) of pts. Conclusions: CASSIOPEIA part 2 demonstrated a clinical benefit of DARA maintenance in TE NDMM pts, with significantly longer PFS for DARA vs OBS. With current follow-up, maintenance PFS benefit appeared only in pts treated with VTd as ind/cons. Pts who received D-VTd ind/cons with or without DARA maintenance achieved similar PFS; longer follow-up is needed for PFS2 and OS. DARA significantly increased deeper response and MRD negativity rates vs OBS, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals. Clinical trial information: NCT02541383.

scholarly journals TRLS-02. Trial in Progress: A Multicenter Phase 3 Study to Establish the Diagnostic Performance of 18F-Fluciclovine PET in Detecting Recurrent Brain Metastases after Radiation Therapy (REVELATE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_3) ◽  
pp. iii5-iii5
Author(s):  
Eugene Teoh ◽  
Alain Chaglassian ◽  
Nancy Tainer
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Conventional Mri ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Neurosurgical Intervention

Abstract Background Brain metastases occur in up to 40% of patients with cancer and are associated with poor prognosis and considerable levels of recurrence. Consequently, close follow-up with serial brain MRI is performed post-treatment to monitor for recurrent disease. Although conventional MRI (CE-T1-weighted and FLAIR/T2-weighted) is the recommended follow-up modality, it has poor specificity with limited ability to differentiate between true disease recurrence and treatment-related changes such as radiation necrosis. Therefore, alternative imaging options are sought in order to help physicians confidently diagnose treatment-related changes and thus reliably stratify the risk of continuation of a therapeutic regimen, especially given the morbidity associated with current treatments. Amino acid PET imaging agent, 18F-fluciclovine, has increased uptake in brain tumors relative to normal tissue and may be useful for detecting recurrent brain metastases. Methods NCT04410133 is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-dose (185 MBq ±20%) study with a primary objective to confirm the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET (read with conventional MRI for anatomical reference) for detection of recurrent brain metastases where MRI is equivocal. Approximately 150 subjects with solid tumor brain metastases who have undergone radiation therapy will be enrolled in this multicenter trial (~18 US sites) if they have a lesion considered equivocal on MRI that requires further confirmatory diagnostic procedures such as biopsy/neurosurgical intervention or clinical follow-up. Subjects will undergo 18F-fluciclovine PET &lt;28 days after the equivocal MRI and 2–21 days pre-biopsy/neurosurgical intervention. Clinical follow-up will occur for 6m post-18F-fluciclovine PET. Secondary objectives include evaluation of subject- and lesion-level 18F-fluciclovine negative and positive percent agreement (equivalent to specificity and sensitivity respectively) for recurrent brain metastases, inter-reader and intra-reader agreement, and safety evaluations. Enrolment began in October 2020 and the trial is open at the time of submission.

scholarly journals NEIM-02. TRIAL IN PROGRESS: A MULTICENTER PHASE 3 STUDY TO ESTABLISH THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF 18F-FLUCICLOVINE PET IN DETECTING RECURRENT BRAIN METASTASES AFTER RADIATION THERAPY (REVELATE)

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_4) ◽  
pp. iv6-iv7
Author(s):  
Samuel T Chao ◽  
Alain Chaglassian ◽  
Nancy Tainer ◽  
Eugene J Teoh
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Diagnostic Performance ◽  
Brain Mri ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Conventional Mri ◽  
Specificity And Sensitivity ◽  
Neurosurgical Intervention

Abstract BACKGROUND Brain metastases occur in up to 40% of patients with cancer and are associated with poor prognosis and considerable levels of recurrence. Consequently, close follow-up with serial brain MRI is performed post-treatment to monitor for recurrent disease. Although conventional MRI (CE-T1-weighted and FLAIR/T2-weighted) is the recommended follow-up modality, it has poor specificity with limited ability to differentiate between true disease recurrence and treatment-related changes such as radiation necrosis. Therefore, alternative imaging options are sought in order to help physicians confidently diagnose treatment-related changes and thus reliably stratify the risk of continuation of a therapeutic regimen, especially given the morbidity associated with current treatments. Amino acid PET imaging agent, 18F-fluciclovine, has increased uptake in brain tumors relative to normal tissue and may be useful for detecting recurrent brain metastases. METHODS NCT04410133 is a prospective, open-label, single-arm, single-dose (185 MBq ±20%) study with a primary objective to confirm the diagnostic performance of 18F-fluciclovine PET (read with conventional MRI for anatomical reference) for detection of recurrent brain metastases where MRI is equivocal. Approximately 150 subjects with solid tumor brain metastases who have undergone radiation therapy will be enrolled in this multicenter trial (~18 US sites) if they have a lesion considered equivocal on MRI that requires further confirmatory diagnostic procedures such as biopsy/neurosurgical intervention or clinical follow-up. Subjects will undergo 18F-fluciclovine PET &lt;42 days after the equivocal MRI and 1–21 days pre-biopsy/neurosurgical intervention. Clinical follow-up will occur for 6m post-18F-fluciclovine PET. Secondary objectives include evaluation of subject- and lesion-level 18F-fluciclovine negative and positive percent agreement (equivalent to specificity and sensitivity, respectively) for recurrent brain metastases, inter-reader and intra-reader agreement, and safety evaluations. Enrolment began in October 2020 and the trial is open at the time of submission.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document