A phase II study of lenvatinib in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer refractory to standard chemotherapy: LEMON study (NCCH1503).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3538-3538
Author(s):  
Hirokazu Shoji ◽  
Satoru Iwasa ◽  
Aya Kuchiba ◽  
Gakuto Ogawa ◽  
Mamiko Kawasaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Elevated Serum ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Correct Trial

3538 Background: Although regorafenib significantly improved overall survival compared with placebo for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) refractory to standard chemotherapies in the global phase III CORRECT trial, regorafenib is often discontinued due to toxicity. Lenvatinib is an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1–3, FGF receptors 1–4, PDGF receptors α, RET, and KIT, showing receptor inhibition profile and kinetics different from regorafenib. This phase II study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lenvatinib in patients with mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapies. Methods: mCRC patients with measurable lesions, PS 0-1, and refractory to standard chemotherapies including fluoropyrimidine, oxaliplatin, irinotecan, bevacizumab, cetuximab or panitumumab (if RAS wild-type), and TAS-102 (trifluridine/tipiracil) were eligible. Prior treatment with regorafenib was not allowed. Patients received lenvatinib orally at a dose of 24 mg once daily in 28-day cycles until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) assessed by independent central review. Secondary endpoints included safety, response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival. The planned sample size was 30 patients to expect a DCR of 60% with a threshold DCR of 35%, one-sided alpha of 5% and power of 80%. Results: Between October 2016 to January 2018, 30 patients were enrolled. All had received prior chemotherapy; 14 (47%) and 16 (53%) had received 3 or ≥ 4 prior lines for advanced disease, respectively. The median number of lenvatinib cycles was 4 (range 1-13). Two patients achieved partial response and 19 patients had stable disease, resulting in a response rate of 6.7% and DCR of 70.0% (95% CI: 50.6-85.3%). Median PFS was 3.6 months (95% CI: 2.6-3.7). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hypertension (53%), elevated serum aspartate aminotransferase (13%), thrombocytopenia (10%), and anorexia (7%) without unexpected safety signals. Conclusions: Lenvatinib showed promising antitumor activity with acceptable toxicity for patients with mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapies. Clinical trial information: UMIN000023446.

Multicenter Phase II Study of Bimonthly High-Dose Leucovorin, Fluorouracil Infusion, and Oxaliplatin for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Resistant to the Same Leucovorin and Fluorouracil Regimen

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (11) ◽  
pp. 3560-3568 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thierry André ◽  
Mohamed A. Bensmaine ◽  
Christophe Louvet ◽  
Eric François ◽  
Virginie Lucas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Median Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To evaluate the objective tumor response rates and toxicities of leucovorin (LV) plus fluorouracil (5-FU) cancer regimen combined with oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) every 2 weeks on metastatic colorectal cancer patients with documented proof of progression while on bimonthly LV and 5-FU alone. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients were enrolled onto this study and 97 received the study drugs between October 1995 and December 1996. Eighty-nine patients were eligible for per-protocol efficacy analysis with documented proof of progression on one of the following two treatments: LV 500 mg/m2 and continuous 5-FU infusion 1.5 to 2 g/m2/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (FOLFUHD); or LV 200 mg/m2, bolus 5-FU 400 mg/m2, and continuous 5-FU infusion 600 mg/m2/22 hours, days 1 through 2 every 2 weeks (LV5FU2). In our study, 40 patients received FOLFUHD + 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX3) and 57 patients received LV5FU2 + 85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin day 1 (FOLFOX4). RESULTS: Of the 97 patients treated, 20 partial responses were observed (FOLFOX3/4: response rate, 20.6%; 95% confidence interval, 13% to 31.1%; FOLFOX3: response rate,18.4%; FOLFOX4: response rate, 23.5%). For patients treated with FOLFOX3/4, the median response duration for was 7.5 months, and the major toxicities were peripheral neuropathy and neutropenia. The incidence of grade 3 (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria) peripheral neuropathy was 20.6%; whereas the overall incidence of grade 3 to 4 neutropenia was 27.8%, 15%, and 36.9% for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, and FOLFOX4, respectively (P = .02). From the start of treatment, median progression-free survival was 4.7, 4.6, and 5.1 months for FOLFOX3/4, FOLFOX3, FOLFOX4, respectively, and median overall survival was 10.8, 10.6, and 11.1 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: This phase II study of oxaliplatin at 85 mg/m2 in combination with bimonthly LV plus 5-FU in patients with colorectal cancer resistant to LV plus 5-FU alone confirms the enhanced antitumor activity of oxaliplatin in combination with 5-FU.

scholarly journals Binimetinib, Encorafenib, and Cetuximab Triplet Therapy for Patients With BRAF V600E–Mutant Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Safety Lead-In Results From the Phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer Study

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (17) ◽  
pp. 1460-1469 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Sanne Huijberts ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Pieter-Jan Cuyle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Cancer Trial ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE To determine the safety and preliminary efficacy of selective combination targeted therapy for BRAF V600E–mutant metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) in the safety lead-in phase of the open-label, randomized, three-arm, phase III BEACON Colorectal Cancer trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02928224; European Union Clinical Trials Register identifier: EudraCT2015-005805-35). PATIENTS AND METHODS Before initiation of the randomized portion of the BEACON Colorectal Cancer trial, 30 patients with BRAF V600E–mutant mCRC who had experienced treatment failure with one or two prior regimens were to be recruited to a safety lead-in of encorafenib 300 mg daily, binimetinib 45 mg twice daily, plus standard weekly cetuximab. The primary end point was safety, including the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities. Efficacy end points included overall response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival. RESULTS Among the 30 treated patients, dose-limiting toxicities occurred in five patients and included serous retinopathy (n = 2), reversible decreased left ventricular ejection fraction (n = 1), and cetuximab-related infusion reactions (n = 2). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were fatigue (13%), anemia (10%), increased creatine phosphokinase (10%), increased AST (10%), and urinary tract infections (10%). In 29 patients with BRAF V600E–mutant tumors (one patient had a non– BRAF V600E–mutant tumor and was not included in the efficacy analysis), the confirmed overall response rate was 48% (95% CI, 29.4% to 67.5%), median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% CI, 5.6 to 9.3 months), and median overall survival was 15.3 months (95% CI, 9.6 months to not reached), with median duration of follow-up of 18.2 months (range, 16.6 to 19.8 months). CONCLUSION In the safety lead-in, the safety and tolerability of the encorafenib, binimetinib, and cetuximab regimen is manageable and acceptable for initiation of the randomized portion of the study. The observed efficacy is promising compared with available therapies and, if confirmed in the randomized portion of the trial, could establish this regimen as a new standard of care for previously treated BRAF V600E–mutant mCRC.

Addition of Aflibercept to Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan Improves Survival in a Phase III Randomized Trial in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Previously Treated With an Oxaliplatin-Based Regimen

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (28) ◽  
pp. 3499-3506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Josep Tabernero ◽  
Radek Lakomy ◽  
Hans Prenen ◽  
Jana Prausová ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Survival Times ◽  
Previously Treated

Purpose Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) commonly involves a fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimen such as infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) or fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin, often combined with bevacizumab or an epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody. We studied the effect of adding the novel antiangiogenic agent aflibercept (also known as ziv-aflibercept in the United States) to FOLFIRI in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin, including patients who received prior bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to receive aflibercept (4 mg/kg intravenously; 612 patients) or placebo (614 patients) every 2 weeks in combination with FOLFIRI. Treatment was administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was overall survival. Results Adding aflibercept to FOLFIRI significantly improved overall survival relative to placebo plus FOLFIRI (hazard ratio [HR], 0.817; 95.34% CI, 0.713 to 0.937; P = .0032) with median survival times of 13.50 versus 12.06 months, respectively. Aflibercept also significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS; HR, 0.758; 95% CI, 0.661 to 0.869; P < .0001), with median PFS times of 6.90 versus 4.67 months, respectively. The effects on overall survival and PFS exhibited a consistent trend across prespecified subgroup analyses, including bevacizumab pretreated patients. Response rate was 19.8% (95% CI, 16.4% to 23.2%) with aflibercept plus FOLFIRI compared with 11.1% (95% CI, 8.5% to 13.8%) with placebo plus FOLFIRI (P = .0001). Adverse effects reported with aflibercept combined with FOLFIRI included the characteristic anti–vascular endothelial growth factor effects and also reflected an increased incidence of some chemotherapy-related toxicities. Conclusion Aflibercept in combination with FOLFIRI conferred a statistically significant survival benefit over FOLFIRI combined with placebo in patients with mCRC previously treated with oxaliplatin.

Effect of the addition of bevacizumab to first-line FOLFOX on efficacy, including response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival, in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 588-588
Author(s):  
M. Suenaga ◽  
N. Mizunuma ◽  
S. Matsusaka ◽  
E. Shinozaki ◽  
M. Ogura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Benefit ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
First Line Treatment

588 Background: Bevacizumab (BV) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. Used in combination with chemotherapy, BV has been shown to improve survival in both first- and second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However, it was reported that addition of BV to FOLFOX conferred only little survival benefit (Saltz et al. JCO2008). The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment for patients with mCRC. Methods: Bevacizumab was approved for mCRC in July 2007 in Japan. This study was conducted at a single institution and comprised 217 consecutive patients receiving first-line treatment for mCRC between 2005 and 2009. The primary objective was to compare survival benefit in patients treated with FOLFOX4 (FF) between 2005 and 2007 with that in patients receiving FOLFOX4+BV 5 mg/kg (FF+BV) between 2007 and 2009. Results: Total number of patients in the FF and FF+BV groups was 132 and 85, respectively. Characteristics of patients were as follows (FF vs. FF+B): median age, 62 yrs (range 28-76 yrs) vs. 60 yrs (range16-74 yrs); ECOG PS0, 98.8% vs. 81.8%; and median follow-up time, 20.8 months vs. 24.4 months. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in the FF and FF+BV groups was 10 months (95% CI, 8.7-11.3) and 17 months (95% CI, 10.2-14.1), while median overall survival (OS) was 21 months (95% CI, 17.9-24.1) and not reached, respectively. Response rate was 46% (95% CI, 37- 54) in FF, and 62% (95% CI, 51-73) in FF+BV. Addition of BV to FOLFOX4 significantly improved PFS (p=0.002) and OS (p<0.001). Conclusions: The additive effect of BV for first-line FOLFOX was reconfirmed. These data indicate potential survival benefits from the addition of BV to FOLFOX in first-line treatment of mCRC. In addition, PFS may be a sensitive indicator of outcome prior to post-treatment. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of apatinib combined with S-1 in previously treated refractory metastatic colorectal cancer.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15016-e15016
Author(s):  
Ning Li ◽  
Wenying Deng ◽  
Guifang Zhang ◽  
Yanwei Guo ◽  
Yijie Ma ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Third Line Treatment

e15016 Background: Although regorafenib and fruquintinib have been recommended as the third-line treatment for patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the median survival time of mCRC is still only for 4-8 months and the low response rate and unpleasant side effects limit their use in Chinese patients. Apatinib, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, has been approved as a third line treatment in metastatic gastric cancer. In addition, apatinib has demonstrated good safety, tolerability, and efficacy in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of apatinib combined with S-1 in the treatment of refractory mCRC. Methods: In this prospective, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase II study, patients after failure of second-line chemotherapy were enrolled and took apatinib (250mg, daily) combined with S-1 (standard dose). The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) and the second endpoint was response rate and overall survival time. Results: From December 2017, 22 patients (14 male) with a median age of 56y (range: 34-71 y) were enrolled and eligible for evaluation of the PFS, response rate and safety. The median PFS was 105d (95% CI: 79.01-130.98). two patients (9%) achieved partial response, 15 (68.18%) achieved stable disease, and 5 (22.72%) were progressive disease. The objective response rate and the disease control rate were 9% and 77.27%, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached. The common adverse effects were abnormal liver function (7/22; 31.81%), leukopenia (5/22; 22.72%) and thrombocytopenia (4/22; 18.18%). The incidence for grade 3-4 side effect was very low. One patient experienced grade 3 proteinuria and there were no toxic deaths. Conclusions: This preliminary result indicated that apatinib combined with S-1 may extend the PFS in mCRC, with well-tolerated toxicities, making it a promising therapeutic target for mCRC treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT03397199 .

A phase II study investigating cabozantinib in patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (AGICC 17CRC01).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 103-103
Author(s):  
Aaron James Scott ◽  
Steven J. Cohen ◽  
Atrayee Basu Mallick ◽  
Efrat Dotan ◽  
Philip Jordan Gold ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Progression ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Alternative Hypothesis ◽  
Pik3ca Mutation ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Primary Tumors

103 Background: Therapeutic resistance to antiangiogenics in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) inevitably develops via multiple mechanisms including upregulation of the MET kinase pathway. Cabozantinib, an oral multityrosine kinase inhibitor targeting MET, AXL, and VEGFR, demonstrated significant anti-tumor activity in CRC xenograft and cell line models. Methods: A single-arm, two-stage phase II study was conducted at 7 AGICC centers nationwide. 44 patients (pts) with mCRC who had progressed on or were intolerant of standard of care agents were treated with cabozantinib 60 mg daily in q3 wk cycles. The primary endpoint was 12-wk PFS rate. Based on the control arm of phase III CORRECT study, the Kaplan-Meier 12-wk PFS rate estimate was 13% and served as the null hypothesis. This study was powered at 0.906 to detect the alternative hypothesis of 12-wk PFS rate of 33% with a type I error rate of 0.044. Secondary endpoints were safety, RR, OS, and retrospective analysis of PFS and RR based on RAS, BRAF, and PIK3CA mutation status. Results: 44 pts were enrolled and 34 pts were response-evaluable as having undergone at least the first 6-wk restaging scan. 10 pts discontinued treatment prior to the first 6-wk scan due to clinical disease progression. Median number of cycles was 4 and median follow-up was 2.5 months. As of data-cutoff 8/23/2019, 55 Grade 3/4 AEs were reported with the most common being hypertension, fatigue, diarrhea, pain, HFS, nausea, vomiting, and proteinuria. 32 SAEs occurred in 18 pts. 5 Grade 5 AEs were reported: disease progression (3), disseminated intravascular coagulopathy, and bowel perforation. 15 pts (34%) achieved ≥ 12-wk PFS and 8 patients remain on treatment. Best response was 1 PR and 31 SD with a DCR at 6 wks of 72.7%. Of the pts who achieved ≥ 12-wk PFS, 12 had left-sided primary tumors, 5 had a RAS mutation, 1 had a PIK3CA mutation, and all pts were BRAF WT and MSI stable. Conclusions: Cabozantinib was deemed safe and demonstrates encouraging efficacy in a heavily pretreated mCRC pt population. These results support further investigation of cabozantinib in mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03542877.

scholarly journals Bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 14 (Suppl 2) ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
S Whyte ◽  
A Pandor ◽  
M Stevenson ◽  
A Rees
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Absolute Difference ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Free Survival

This paper presents a summary of the evidence review group (ERG) report into the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab in combination with fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy for the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer based on the manufacturer’s submission to the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) as part of the single technology appraisal (STA) process. Evidence was available in the form of one phase III, multicentre, multinational, randomised, open-label study (NO16966 trial). This two-arm study was originally designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority of oral capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) compared with 5-fluorouracil plus folinic acid plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX)-4 in adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer who had not previously been treated. Following randomisation of 634 patients, the open-label study was amended to include a 2 × 2 factorial randomised (partially blinded for bevacizumab) phase III trial with the coprimary objective of demonstrating superiority of bevacizumab in combination with chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone. Measured outcomes included overall survival, progression-free survival, response rate, adverse effects of treatment and health-related quality of life. The manufacturer’s primary pooled analysis of superiority (using the intention-to-treat population) showed that after a median follow-up of 28 months, the addition of bevacizumab to chemotherapy significantly improved progression-free survival and overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in adult patients with histologically confirmed metastatic colorectal cancer who were not previously treated [median progression-free survival 9.4 vs 7.7 months (absolute difference 1.7 months); hazard ratio (HR) 0.79, 97.5% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 0.87; p = 0.0001; median overall survival 21.2 vs 18.9 months (absolute difference 2.3 months); HR 0.83, 97.5% CI 0.74 to 0.93; p = 0.0019]. The NO16966 trial was of reasonable methodological quality and demonstrated a significant improvement in both progression-free survival and overall survival when bevacizumab was added to XELOX or FOLFOX. However, the size of the actual treatment effect of bevacizumab is uncertain. The ERG believed that the modelling structure employed was appropriate, but highlighted several key issues and areas of uncertainty. At the time of writing, NICE was yet to issue the guidance for this appraisal.

Multicenter Phase II Study to Evaluate a 28-Day Regimen of Oral Fluorouracil Plus Eniluracil in the Treatment of Patients With Previously Untreated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (15) ◽  
pp. 2894-2901 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sridhar Mani ◽  
Howard Hochster ◽  
Thomas Beck ◽  
Eric M. Chevlen ◽  
Mark A. O’Rourke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Dose Ratio ◽  
Home Based ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy of fluorouracil (5-FU) plus eniluracil when administered to patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase II study, patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer received oral eniluracil plus 5-FU (10:1 dose ratio), at 5-FU doses of 1.00 mg/m2 or 1.15 mg/m2 twice daily (every 12 hours) for 28 consecutive days repeated every 5 weeks (one cycle). Treatment continued until there was documented disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Thirty and 25 patients were enrolled at a starting dose of 1.00 mg/m2 and 1.15 mg/m2, respectively. Fourteen (25%) of 55 patients (95% confidence interval, 15% to 39%) had a partial response, and 20 patients (36%) had stable disease. The median durations of the partial responses and stable disease were 23.9 weeks (range, 12.3 to 52.1+ weeks) and 24.1 weeks (range, 17.1 to 55.6+ weeks), respectively. The median durations of progression-free and overall survival were 22.6 weeks (range, 21.0 to 29.0 weeks) and 59 weeks (range, 4 to 84+ weeks), respectively. The response rate in the 1.15 mg/m2–dose group was similar to the 1.00 mg/m2–dose group (28% v 23%, respectively). Severe (grade 3/4) nonhematologic treatment-related toxicity included diarrhea (nine patients), nausea/vomiting (one patient each), mucositis (two patients), and anorexia (one patient). Severe hematologic toxicities were rare. At the 1.15 mg/m2–dose level, two patients exhibited grade 3 granulocytopenia, and two patients had grade 3 anemia. CONCLUSION: The response rate with oral 5-FU plus eniluracil is comparable with that observed with infusional 5-FU or bolus 5-FU and leucovorin. The toxicity profile of this oral regimen is acceptable for use in an outpatient home-based setting.

Phase II study of S-1 plus leucovorin (a new 1-week treatment regimen followed by a 1-week rest period) in patients with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer in Japan and China.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 598-598 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tadamichi Denda ◽  
Jin Li ◽  
Ruihua Xu ◽  
Jianming Xu ◽  
Koji Ikejiri ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Treatment Regimen ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Rest Period ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Japan And China

598 Background: The previous phase II study of the oral S-1 plus oral Leucovorin (LV) (2 weeks’ treatment regimen followed by a 2 week rest period) for patients (pts) with untreated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) have shown to be effective, but the grade 3 toxicities (diarrhea, stomatitis, and anorexia) were observed with relatively high frequency. In this phase II study, we tried to improve the administration schedule of S-1 plus LV regimens for well-tolerated toxicities and evaluated the efficacy. Methods: Pts were eligible as follows: histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma, age≥20, ECOG PS 0-1, no prior chemotherapy, at least one measurable lesion by RECIST ver1.0 criteria, adequate organ function, and written informed consent. S-1 (40-60 mg bid) and LV (25 mg bid) were orally administered for 1 week, followed by an 1 week rest period. Treatment was repeated until the onset of disease progression or unacceptable adverse events occurred. The primary endpoint was the response rate (RR), and the secondary endpoints were efficacy and safety. Results: From October 2008 to June 2009, 73 pts were enrolled in Japan and China. Of the eligible 71 pts, median age was 60 (range 27-84), Male/Female was 38/33, PS:0/1 was 39/32, and Japan/China was 32/39. RR as primary endpoint was 53.5% (95% CI, 41.3-65.5), and Disease Control Rate was 83.1%. With a median follow-up period of 26.4 months, the median Progression Free Survival was 6.5 months. Median Overall Survival was 24.3 months with the survival rate of 77.5 % at 1 year and 53.2 % at 2 years. The incidences of grade 3 adverse drug reactions were diarrhea 8.3 %, stomatitis 8.3%, anorexia 2.8%, neutropenia 9.7%, and there was no treatment-related death. Conclusions: The newly improved 1 week S-1 plus LV treatment regimen showed good efficacy and better tolerability than the 2 weeks’ treatment regimen. This therapy showed promising activity in pts with untreated mCRC without the concurrent use of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, or molecular-targeted drugs. This trial was supported by Taiho Pharmaceutical CO., LTD. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00891332 .

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document