Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel retreatment as a third-line therapy following second-line FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15794-e15794
Author(s):  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Adarsh Das ◽  
Meabh McNulty ◽  
Domenic Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Third Line Treatment

e15794 Background: First-line and second line treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma typically involves therapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, FOLFIRINOX or as per the recent phase III trial (NAPOLI-1), the combination of nal-irinotecan with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin. Despite these advances, there remains minimal amount of data regarding the options for, or efficacy of, third-line treatment in these patients. We have previously reported our experience of twenty patients who received effective third-line therapy with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel retreatment after receiving FOLFIRINOX as second-line treatment. This retrospective analysis assessed the updated data of the use of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as a third-line treatment option in a single hospital setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using an electronic database of patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received first-line gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel, second line FOLFIRINOX and third-line retreatment with gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel between January 2013 and December 2018. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Twenty-six patients were reviewed. Median age of 73 (range, 45 – 81). 73% of the studied patients had locally advanced cancer at diagnosis. The median OS from diagnosis was 39.0 months (95% CI, 34.0 – 66.0). The median OS from third-line re-initiation of gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel was 18.0 months (95% CI, 9.0 – 32.0). Conclusions: This is one of the first retrospective studies to show the efficacy of third-line treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic cancer. It demonstrated that retreatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel is feasible, tolerable and effective in patients with a good performance status. We suggest a formal phase 3 study to confirm our data and potentially establish a formal new standard of care for third line chemotherapy in this previously disadvantaged group.

scholarly journals Efficacy of Docetaxel Plus Ramucirumab as Palliative Third-Line Therapy Following Second-Line Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitor Treatment in Patients With Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Stage IV

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117955492095135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wolfgang M Brueckl ◽  
Martin Reck ◽  
Achim Rittmeyer ◽  
Jens Kollmeier ◽  
Claas Wesseler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor ◽  
Synergistic Effects ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Third Line Treatment

Background: Antiangiogenic agents have been shown to stimulate the immune system and cause synergistic effects with chemotherapy. Effects might be even stronger after immune-checkpoint-inhibitor (ICI) therapy. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate the efficacy of ramucirumab plus docetaxel (R + D) as third-line treatment after failure of a first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and a second-line ICI treatment in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage IV. Methods: Retrospective data were collected from 9 German thoracic oncology centers. Only patients who had received at least 1 cycle of third-line R + D were included. The numbers of cycles, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were investigated. Results: Sixty-seven patients met the criteria for inclusion. Third-line treatment with R + D achieved an ORR of 36% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 69%. Median PFS for third-line therapy was 6.8 months with a duration of response (DOR) of 10.2 months. A median OS of 29 months was observed from the start of first-line therapy with a median OS of 11.0 months from the start of third-line treatment. No unexpected toxicities occurred. Conclusion: R + D is a highly effective and safe third-line treatment after failure of second-line programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD1/PD-L1)-derived ICI therapy irrespective of NSCLC histology. As there may be synergistic effects of second- and third-line treatments, this sequence is a very suitable option for patients not treated with first-line ICI. In addition, R + D should continue to be investigated as a second-line treatment option after failure of chemotherapy plus ICI in the palliative first–line treatment.

Role of second-line gemcitabine after FOLFIRINOX failure in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A retrospective analysis.

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (3_suppl) ◽  
pp. 473-473
Author(s):  
Aline Da Rocha Lino ◽  
Rodnei Merlrina Martins Junior ◽  
Carina Mina Abrahao ◽  
Raphael Brandao Moreira ◽  
Tarcia Tarciane Soares de Sousa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

473 Background: Cancer of the exocrine pancreas is a highly lethal malignancy. Based on a phase III study, FOLFIRINOX regimen became the standard first-line treatment for patients with good performance status. However, the optimal management strategy for patients who fail initial FOLFIRINOX remains undefined. We aim at reporting our experience with single-agent gemcitabine as a second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer patients who progressed on FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Patients with advanced exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received gemcitabine (1.000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) until disease progression, as second-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX failure at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 20 patients were reviewed. Most of them (60%) had metastatic disease while 40% had locally advanced tumors. Median age was 60 years (range 43–74) and 80% were male. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 or 1 in 65% and 2 or 3 in 35% of the patients. Median time on prior FOLFIRINOX therapy was 5 months. Median PFS and OS with gemcitabine were 2,0 (95% CI 1,2-2,8) and 5,7 months (95% CI 3,9-7,4), respectively. There were no deaths due to the treatment. Conclusions: In this study, gemcitabine was a reasonable second-line treatment option for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Phase III trials are urgently needed exploring the role of gemcitabine in the second-line setting.

Three fluoropyrimidine-based regimens in second-line therapy following nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic cancer: Efficacy and tolerance in clinical practice.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 370-370
Author(s):  
Anne Laure Pointet ◽  
David Tougeron ◽  
Simon Pernot ◽  
Astrid Pozet ◽  
Dominique Bechade ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Secondary Resection ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Metastatic Sites

370 Background: Combination of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (N+G) has recently become a valid first-line treatment (1L) in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA) in patients (pts) with performance status (PS) of 0,1 or 2, but there is currently no standard second-line treatment (2L) after this new 1L option. We evaluated survival outcomes and tolerability of three usual fluoropyrimidine-based regimens: FOLFOX, FOLFIRI or FOLFIRI.3 (FOLFIRI1/3), and FOLFIRINOX after N+G failure in MPA pts. Methods: We prospectively identified 138 pts from 11 French centers who received 1L N+G for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma. After disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, we excluded pts with locally advanced cancer, or who underwent secondary resection/chemoradiotherapy. Three subgroups of 2L chemotherapy were identified: FOLFOX, FOLFIRI1/3 and FOLFIRINOX regimens. Response was evaluated by RECIST criteria, progression-free survivals (PFS1, PFS2), and overall survival (OS1, OS2) were calculated using Kaplan-Meier method and compared with the Log-rank test. Results: 61 pts with MPA received a 2L. Persistent neuropathy was present in 27% of pts. Median age was 71.7 years [41-83]. PS was 0, 1 or 2. Median 1L duration, number of metastatic sites, PS, CA19.9, albumin, and bilirubin levels, and persistent neuropathy grade were statistically comparable between the 3 subgroups. Median OS for all 2L pts was 6.0 months [4-8]. Third line regimen was used in 32.8% of 2L pts without statistical significance between the subgroups. Main grade 3/4 adverse events reported were thrombocytopenia (18%), anemia (7.7%), neutropenia (21.4%) and nausea (5.4%). No toxic deaths occurred. Conclusions: This study suggests a clinical benefit and a manageable toxicity profile of 2L fluoropyrimidine-based regimens after N+G failure in patients with MPA, in particularly combined with irinotecan.[Table: see text]

Modified FOLFIRINOX as a second-line treatment in pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients with poor performance status.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15796-e15796
Author(s):  
Adarsh Das ◽  
Andrew Peter Dean ◽  
Domenic Higgs
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

e15796 Background: FOLFIRINOX is well known to be a highly effective treatment in pancreatic cancer for young patients with good performance status. As the original ACCORD study was carried out with patient’s performance status 0 or 1, many oncologists feel uncertain administering modified dose FOLFIRINOX (m-FOLFIRINOX) as a second-line therapy. We have previously reported our experience in 35 patients (aged 27 – 85) where we concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX can be administered safely with appropriate dose reductions. More recently, the systematic review and meta-analysis by Tong et al. concluded that m-FOLFIRINOX is a good choice of therapy even for those with poor performance status. This retrospective analysis assessed the efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX in second-line treatment of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Methods: Using an electronic database, patients with either locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified who had received first-line gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel, followed by second-line m-FOLFIRINOX between January 2013 and July 2018. All patients had an ECOG performance status of 2 or less. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fifty-two patients were identified, with 65% of the patients having metastatic pancreatic disease. Median age of patients was 75 (range, 27 – 86). Dose intensity of m-FOLFIRINOX was 65% for oxaliplatin, 68% for irinotecan, 18% for bolus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and 68% for infusional 5-FU. From diagnosis, the median OS of all patients was 45.0 months (95% CI, 25.0 – 63.0). The median OS of the locally advanced and metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma was 63.0 months (95% CI, 45.0 – 70.0) and 22.5 months (95% CI, 18.0, 38.0), respectively. Conclusions: Our study demonstrates the safety and efficacy of m-FOLFIRINOX as a second-line therapy after gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel failure. These findings correlate with the findings of Tong et al.’s findings of the benefits of m-FOLFIRINOX for advanced pancreatic cancer in patients with poor performance status.

scholarly journals Effects of removing reimbursement restrictions on targeted therapy accessibility for non-small cell lung cancer treatment in Taiwan: an interrupted time series study

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (3) ◽  
pp. e022293 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jason C Hsu ◽  
Chen-Fang Wei ◽  
Szu-Chun Yang
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapies ◽  
Interrupted Time Series ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Second Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line Therapy ◽  
Third Line

InterventionsTargeted therapies have been proven to provide clinical benefits to patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Gefitinib was initially approved and reimbursed as a third-line therapy for patients with advanced NSCLC by the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) in 2004; subsequently it became a second-line therapy (in 2007) and further a first-line therapy (in 2011) for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor mutation-positive advanced NSCLC. Another targeted therapy, erlotinib, was initially approved as a third-line therapy in 2007, and it became a second-line therapy in 2008.ObjectivesThis study is aimed towards an exploration of the impacts of the Taiwan NHI reimbursement policies (removing reimbursement restrictions) related to accessibility of targeted therapies.SettingWe retrieved 2004–2013 claims data for all patients with lung cancer diagnoses from the NHI Research Database.Design and outcome measuresUsing an interrupted time series design and segmented regression, we estimated changes in the monthly prescribing rate by patient number and market shares by cost following each modification of the reimbursement policy for gefitinib and erlotinib for NSCLC treatment.ResultsTotally 92 220 patients with NSCLC were identified. The prescribing rate of the targeted therapies increased by 15.58%, decreased by 10.98% and increased by 6.31% following the introduction of gefitinib as a second-line treatment in 2007, erlotinib as a second-line treatment in 2008 and gefitinib as as first line treatment in 2011, respectively. The average time to prescription reduced by 65.84% and 41.59% following coverage of erlotinib by insurance and gefitinib/erlotinib as second-line treatments in 2007–2008 and following gefitinib as the first-line treatment in 2011.ConclusionsThe changes in reimbursement policies had a significant impact on the accessibility of targeted therapies for NSCLC treatment. Removing reimbursement restrictions can significantly increase the level and the speed of drug accessibility.

scholarly journals Disease Management and Resource Use for the Management of Melanoma stage IIIc or IV Positive for BRAF V600 Mutations in Greece

2021 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Carayanni V ◽  
Gogas H ◽  
Bafaloukos D ◽  
Boukovinas I ◽  
Latsou D ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Resource Use ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
First Line ◽  
Cost Of Treatment ◽  
Management Scenario ◽  
Third Line ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Third Line Treatment ◽  
First Line Treatment

Objective: Melanoma is one of the most aggressive cancers and is responsible for the majority of skin cancer deaths, with the presence of metastases prognostic for poor survival. At a time when most cancer incidences are falling, the annual incidence of melanoma has risen as rapidly as 4-6% in many European countries, with a substantial economic burden in advanced stages. The objective of this study is the investigation of treatment pathways and healthcare resource use related to advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma in Greece. Methods: This study is based on the information collected by an expert panel comprising of 3 oncologists of major public and private melanoma clinics around Greece. A 3-round survey was undertaken, according to a modified Delphi method. The treatment phases studied were: pre-progression; disease progression and terminal care. Oncology drug costs, medical visits, laboratory tests, imaging examinations, hospitalization and concomitant medications were the resources considered in the context of the Greek National Services Organization (EOPYY). Results: Τhe most common management scenario (80% of cases) in Greece for patients of stage IV BRAF V600 mutated melanoma was: targeted therapies as first line treatment at 95%, followed by immunotherapies at 100% as second line as well as third line treatment at 65% of cases. The weighted annual cost of treatment was 89.215,78 €, (90%CI:62,451.05; 115,980.51) for first line treatment at list price and around 41.584,50 (90%CI:29,109.15; 54,059.85) based on the negotiated price. At second line, the cost of treatment has been estimated between 15,704.272 (90%CI:10,992.990; 20,415.553) and 19,800.92€, (90%CI: 16,489; 30,622) for the two most common management scenarios for immunotherapies. For third line treatment the cost was 37,778.93 (90%CI 26,445.25; 49,112.61€) for the mostly used management scenario (50% ipilimumab). Conclusions: Μetastatic BRAF mutant melanoma requires prolonged and costly treatment with new therapies shown to substantially increase life expectancy. Identifying the appropriate treatment options in order to optimize health outcomes should be an important priority in healthcare system.

scholarly journals Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety of Lenvatinib for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma Beyond Progression with Sorafenib

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tetsu Tomonari ◽  
Yasushi Sato ◽  
Hironori Tanaka ◽  
Takahiro Tanaka ◽  
Yasuteru Fujino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Signal Transduction ◽  
Signal Transduction Pathways ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
First Line ◽  
Array Analysis ◽  
Third Line ◽  
Protein Array Analysis ◽  
Third Line Treatment

AbstractBackground & AimsThe efficacy and safety of lenvatinib (LEN) as a second/third-line treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after sorafenib (SOR) therapy remains unknown. We evaluated the outcomes of second/third-line treatment of LEN, investigated the sensitivity of SOR-resistant HCC cell line (PLC/PRF5-R2) to LEN, and their signal transduction pathway by protein array analysis.MethodsWe retrospectively enrolled 57 unresectable HCC patients. Radiologic responses in 53 patients were evaluated by modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Active signal transduction pathways in cells were identified by protein array analysis, including 1205 proteins.ResultsPatients comprised 34 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-naive (first-line), nine SOR-intolerant (second-line), and ten resistant to regorafenib (third-line). Objective response rates (ORRs) were 61.8% (21/34) in TKI-naive, 33.3% (3/9) in second-line, and 20.0% (2/10) in third-line groups. The overall survival (OS) and the progression free survival (PFS) in the first-line was significantly longer than those in third-line group (p<0.05). Patients with better liver functional reserve (Child score, ALBI grade) exhibited higher ORR and longer OS. LEN was well-tolerated as second/third-line treatment. The IC50 value of LEN against PLC/PRF5-R2 cells (30 μM) was significantly higher than that against PLC/PRF5 cells (6.4 μM). LEN inhibited significantly more signal transduction pathways related to FRS2, a crucial FGFR downstream molecule, in PLC/PRF5 than PLC/PRF5-R2 cells.ConclusionsLEN was active and safe as a second/third-line treatment for unresectable HCC. LEN seems to be more effective for HCC patients with better hepatic reserve function or before TKI-resistance is acquired because of partial cross-resistance to SOR.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document