Targeting checkpoint kinases in prostate cancer cells resistant to poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16543-e16543
Author(s):  
Mohammad Omar Atiq ◽  
Goutam Chakraborty ◽  
Subhiksha Nandakumar ◽  
Ying Zhang Mazzu ◽  
Konrad Hermann Stopsack ◽  
...  

e16543 Background: The identification of DNA damage response (DDR) gene abnormalities in various cancers has provided potential therapeutic targets including the poly ADP-ribose polymerase enzyme (PARP). PARP inhibitors are now approved for use in ovarian, breast, and prostate cancer (PC). Olaparib and rucaparib have been given Breakthrough Therapy designation by the FDA for use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and germline BRCA1/2 or ATM mutations. However, drug resistance limits the efficacy of PARPi. Somatic reversion mutations of BRCA1/2 have been described as one potential mechanism of resistance to PARPi in patients with germline BRCA1/2 mutations. However, in PC, the BRCA2 gene is frequently deleted, in contrast to other cancers, where it is mutated. Thus, we hypothesize that resistance to PARPi in PC may involve alternative molecular mechanisms. Methods: We performed cell viability assays to determine the inhibitory growth (IG) concentrations of olaparib and talazoparib on human castration-resistant PC cell lines (PC-3 and LNCaP-Abl) that have heterozygous genomic deletions of BRCA2. Parental PC-3 cells were cultured in sublethal concentrations (IG 50% and IG 90%) of talazoparib-supplemented media for approximately 2 months to develop talazoparib-resistant cells. We then performed an analysis of phosphorylation status in untreated and treated parental PC-3 and talazoparib-resistant clones with a phosphokinase array. We confirmed this with Western blot. Results: Talazoparib-resistant PC-3 clones showed significantly enhanced cell growth compared to parental cells when cultured in media supplemented with the IG 90% concentration of talazoparib or olaparib. The phosphokinase array revealed a significant increase in the phosphorylation of CHEK2 in talazoparib-resistant clones compared to parental PC-3 cells. Interestingly, a similar increase was seen after 72 hours of treatment with talazoparib, indicating an early connection between PARP inhibition and CHEK2 phosphorylation in PC cells. Moreover, a pan-CHEK inhibitor, prexasertib, led to significant cell growth inhibition in talazoparib-resistant PC-3 clones and a significantly lower IG 50% concentration compared to parental PC-3 cells. Conclusions: We speculate that early activation of CHEK2 may be a primary mechanism of resistance to PARPi in PC cells with deletion of BRCA2. Furthermore, our preliminary data showed that CHEK inhibition can overcome PARPi resistance, indicating a potential for CHEK inhibitor-based therapy for PC patients.

2021 ◽  
pp. 1200-1220
Author(s):  
Fadi Taza ◽  
Albert E. Holler ◽  
Wei Fu ◽  
Hao Wang ◽  
Nabil Adra ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Two poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (olaparib and rucaparib) are US Food and Drug Administration–approved for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) harboring BRCA1/ 2 mutations, but the relative efficacy of PARP inhibition in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC is understudied. METHODS We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis involving 12 sites. We collected genomic and clinical data from 123 patients with BRCA1/ 2-altered mCRPC who were treated with PARP inhibitors. The primary efficacy end point was the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% PSA decline) rate. Secondary end points were PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS), clinical or radiographic PFS, and overall survival. We compared clinical outcomes, and other genomic characteristics, among BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. RESULTS A total of 123 patients (13 BRCA1 and 110 BRCA2) were included. PARP inhibitors used were olaparib (n = 116), rucaparib (n = 3), talazoparib (n = 2), and veliparib (n = 2). At diagnosis, 72% of patients had Gleason 8-10 disease. BRCA1 patients were more likely to have metastatic disease at presentation (69% v 37%; P = .04). Age, baseline PSA, metastatic distribution, and types of previous systemic therapies were similar between groups. There were equal proportions of germline mutations (51% v 46%; P = .78) in both groups. BRCA1 patients had more monoallelic (56% v 41%; P = .49) and concurrent TP53 (55% v 36%; P = .32) mutations. PSA50 responses in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered patients were 23% versus 63%, respectively ( P = .01). BRCA2 patients achieved longer PSA-PFS (HR, 1.94; 95% CI, 0.92 to 4.09; P = .08), PFS (HR, 2.08; 95% CI, 0.99 to 4.40; P = .05), and overall survival (HR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.32 to 6.83; P = .008). Biallelic (compared with monoallelic) mutations, truncating (compared with missense) mutations, and absence of a concurrent TP53 mutation were associated with PARP inhibitor sensitivity. CONCLUSION PARP inhibitor efficacy is diminished in BRCA1- versus BRCA2-altered mCRPC. This is not due to an imbalance in germline mutations but might be related to more monoallelic mutations and/or concurrent TP53 alterations in the BRCA1 group.


2020 ◽  
Vol 2020 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carlo Messina ◽  
Carlo Cattrini ◽  
Davide Soldato ◽  
Giacomo Vallome ◽  
Orazio Caffo ◽  
...  

Despite chemotherapy and novel androgen-receptor signalling inhibitors (ARSi) have been approved during the last decades, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a lethal disease with poor clinical outcomes. Several studies found that germline or acquired DNA damage repair (DDR) defects affect a high percentage of mCRPC patients. Among DDR defects, BRCA mutations show relevant clinical implications. BRCA mutations are associated with adverse clinical features in primary tumors and with poor outcomes in patients with mCRPC. In addition, BRCA mutations predict good response to poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors, such as olaparib, rucaparib, and niraparib. However, concerns still remain on the role of extensive mutational testing in prostate cancer patients, given the implications for patients and for their progeny. The present comprehensive review attempts to provide an overview of BRCA mutations in prostate cancer, focusing on their prognostic and predictive roles.


Cells ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (8) ◽  
pp. 860 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob J. Adashek ◽  
Rohit K. Jain ◽  
Jingsong Zhang

The approval of upfront abiraterone for castration-sensitive prostate cancer and the approval of enzalutamide and apalutamide for non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer have led to early utilization of potent androgen receptor (AR) signaling inhibitors in treating advanced prostate cancer. There is an unmet need to develop novel therapies beyond targeting AR signaling for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) belong to a class of targeted agents being developed for the treatment of homologous recombination repair (HRR) deficient tumors. Olaparib, rucaparib, niraparib, veliparib, and talazoparib were evaluated in early phase trials as a monotherapy for HRR-deficient mCRPC. Among them, olaparib and rucaparib have breakthrough designations for BRCA1/2-mutated mCRPC. Phase II studies also reported clinical activity of the PARPi and abiraterone combination and the PARPi checkpoint inhibitor combination in HRR-intact mCRPC. Ongoing phase III trials are testing these combinations as frontline or later line treatments for mCRPC. This review summarizes the critical clinical data as well as ongoing clinical trials for developing PARPi in treating mCRPC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document