3-weekly daratumumab-IMiD-dexamethasone is highly efficacious and cost-effective in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19521-e19521
Author(s):  
James Chim ◽  
Vincent Wong ◽  
Elaine AU ◽  
Yok-Lam Kwong
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Cost Effective ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Infusion Reaction ◽  
Immunomodulatory Agents ◽  
Asian Patients ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Rapid Responses ◽  
Grade 3

e19521 Background: Daratumumab (dara) with immunomodulatory agents (IMiD) and dexamethasone (dex) is highly effective in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM). The recommended schedule of dara is weekly for 8 doses, followed by 2-weekly for 8 doses, and then every 4-weekly thereafter. Given the high cost and the long half-life as an antibody, a 3-weekly dosing of dara was used together with IMiD/dexamethasone. Methods: Dara at 16mg/kg was used every 3-weekly with lenalidomide or pomalidomide. Patient achieving best response received single agent IMiD maintenance until disease progression. Results: Fourteen relapsed MM patients were enrolled. One had received weekly dara from a private oncologist, hence was excluded from analysis. Thirteen patients at a median age of 63 years (range: 50-84 years) were studied. The median number of previous therapies was 2 (range: 1-5), with nine patients (69.2%) having undergone autologous stem cell transplantation. Three patients (23.1%) were refractory to bortezomib, seven patients (53.8%) to lenalidomide, and eight patients (61.5%) to last treatment. At relapse, two (15.4%) had high LDH, eight (61.5%) impaired renal function, and three (23.1%) extramedullary disease. Treatment was dara-lenalidomide-dex in six (46.2%), and dara-pomalidomide-dex in seven (53.8%). Responses after four cycles included CR in 5 patients (38.5%), VGPR in five patients (38.5%), and PR in three patients (23.1%). After a median of four dara infusions (range: 3-10), the best responses included CR in seven patients (53.8%), nCR in two patients (15.4%), VGPR in two patients (15.4%), and PR in two patients (15.4%). Median time to VGPR was one month. At 10 months, the OS was 90%, and PFS 54.7%. Three patients progressed, one of whom died of ruptured hepatic plasmacytoma. The most frequent toxicity was haematological especially neutropenia (all grades: 92.3%, Grade ¾: 76.9%), infusion reaction (38.5%, all grade ½), neuropathy (38.5%, all grade ½), gastrointestinal (all grades: 38.5%, grade ¾: 7.7%), and sepsis (all grades: 30.8%; grade ¾: 23.1%). Neutropenia was effectively prevented with prophylactic G-CSF. Conclusions: In conclusion , a 3-weekly dara-IMiD-dex regimen is highly efficacious, inducing deep and rapid responses, hence cost-effective for less affluent countries. In view of prevalent grade 3/4 neutropenia despite less frequent dara, 3-weekly dara might be more suitable for Asian patients.

A Phase 1 Trial of Lenalidomide (REVLIMID®) with Bortezomib (VELCADE®) in Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 365-365 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
R. Schlossman ◽  
N. Munshi ◽  
D. Avigan ◽  
S. Jagannath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Significant Treatment ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib and lenalidomide are active agents in multiple myeloma (MM), and preclinical data showing additive activity in MM in vitro suggest that enhanced clinical benefit may be derived from combining the two drugs. Bortezomib is approved in MM patients (pts) who have received at least one prior therapy in both the US and EU. Lenalidomide has produced durable responses in the relapsed and refractory MM setting, including in those who received prior bortezomib. Toxicities of bortezomib and lenalidomide do not overlap unfavorably. These observations suggest that this regimen, compared with either agent alone, may provide better clinical anti-MM activity. In phase 1 trials, the maximum tolerated doses (MTD) of single-agent bortezomib and lenalidomide were 1.3 mg/m2 (IV bolus twice weekly) and 25 mg/d (PO days 1–21 of a 28–day cycle), respectively. The objective of this phase 1 dose-escalation trial was to determine the MTD and activity of this combination in pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: Eight 3-pt cohorts were planned with bortezomib 1.0 or 1.3 mg/m2 and lenalidomide 5, 10, 15, or 20 mg/day. Pts received bortezomib on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 and lenalidomide on days 1–14 of a 21-day cycle. Dexamethasone 20 mg orally could be added on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 11, 12 in the event of PD. Toxicity was assessed using NCI-CTC, version 3.0. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as grade ≥ 3 nonhematologic toxicity, grade 4 neutropenia lasting ≥ 5 days and/or neutropenic fever, or a platelet count ≤ 10,000 on > 1 occasion despite transfusion. Modified EBMT criteria were used to assess response. Results: Nineteen pts with MM have been enrolled to date to cohorts 1–5, including 8 with relapsed and 11 with relapsed and refractory disease. Median number of prior therapies was 4 (range, 1–9). Twelve pts had prior SCT; 17 had received thalidomide, 9 bortezomib, 2 lenalidomide. With a median of 7 cycles completed (range, 2–16), pts have received bortezomib 1.0–1.3 mg/m2 and lenalidomide 5–15 mg/d. Two pts with rapid disease progression were not evaluable and were removed from study within the first cycle. One DLT was observed (cohort 4, grade 3 hyponatremia). To date, doses of study drugs were reduced in 6 pts beyond cycle 3. Bortezomib was reduced for thrombocytopenia [n = 3] and hypotension [n = 1] and lenalidomide was reduced for neutropenia [n = 1] and fatigue [n = 1]. No significant treatment-emergent PN has been seen. Responses by cohort are shown in the table, and of 17 evaluable pts, 10 (59%) achieved CR + PR. Conclusions: In heavily treated pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM, the combination of bortezomib and lenalidomide has been well tolerated and has demonstrated very promising activity, even in pts who had previously received either agent alone. Dose escalation is continuing until MTD is reached. Phase II evaluation of this regimen is planned both in relapsed and/or refractory and in newly diagnosed MM. Cohort Bortezomib, mg/m2 Lenalidomide, mg Best Response NE = not evaluable. 1 1.0 5 2 PR, 1 MR 2 1.3 5 1 CR, 2 PR 3 1.0 10 1 nCR, 2 PR, 1 NE 4 1.3 10 2 PR, 2 MR, 1 SD, 1 PD 5 1.0 15 2 SD, 1 NE

Bortezomib in Combination with Bendamustine and Prednisone in the Treatment of Patients with Refractory/Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2723-2723
Author(s):  
Wolfram Poenisch ◽  
Malvina Bourgeois ◽  
Song-Yau Wang ◽  
Simone Heyn ◽  
Nadja Jaekel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Severe Thrombocytopenia ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Myeloma Protein ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Autologous Pbsct ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: Bortezomib is a novel proteasome inhibitor that has shown important clinical efficacy either as a single agent or in combination with other cytostatic agents in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The combinated treatment of bortezomib with bendamustine and prednisone (BPV) was assessed to determine the efficacy and toxicity of this regiment in patients with advanced MM. Methods: Between January 2005 and July 2007, 46 patients (median age 63; range 31–77 years) with relapsed or refractory MM (29 patients stage III a, 17 patients III b) were treated with bendamustine 60 (−80) mg/qm on day 1 and 2, bortezomib 1,3 mg/qm on day 1, 4, 8 and 11, and prednisone 100 mg on day 1, 2, 4, 8 and 11. Cycles were repeated every 21 days until maximum response or progressive disease. The time from first diagnosis ranged from 1 to 183 (median 36) months. The duration of the last remission before beginning the BPV-therapy was 6 (range 0–36) months. Previous therapy lines (median 2, range 1–6) included 18 × thalidomide, 10 × autologous PBSCT, and 9 × autologous/allogeneic PBSCT. 16 patients were refractory to the last treatment. 22 patients had preexistent severe thrombocytopenia, leukocytopenia or anemia (WHO grade 3 or 4). Response was assessed using EBMT criteria modified to include near complete remission (nCR) and very good partial remission (VGPR). Results: 36 patients (78%) responded after at least one cycle of chemotherapy with 2 CR, 5 nCR, 6 VGPR, 15 PR and 8 MR. 4 patients had stable disease and 6 patients had a progress. With a median follow up of 13 months, EFS, and OS at twelve months for patients without severe haematological toxicities due to previous treatments (n=24) were 46% and 79%, respectively. Outcome for these patients was significantly better compared to patients with severe haematological toxicities (grade 3 or 4, n=22) where EFS, and OS were 10% and 22%, respectively (p<0,01). The median number of the BPV-treatment was 2 (1–7) cycles. 20 of 36 responding patients showed a rapid decrease of the myeloma protein and reached the best response after the first cycle and 12 after the second cycle. The regimen was well-tolerated with few significant side effects reported. New cytopenias occured infrequently (four patients had a thrombocytopenia grade 3, and two patients had a grade 4 thrombocytopenia). 1 patient had a moderate new polyneuropathy (grade 2). Summary: These results indicate that the combination of bortezomib, bendamustine and prednisone is effective and well tolerated in a heavily pretreated population of patients with relapsed or refractory MM.

A Phase I/II Study of Bortezomib and Low Dose Intravenous Melphalan (BM) for Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2555-2555 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rakesh Popat ◽  
Heather E. Oakervee ◽  
Nicola Foot ◽  
Samir Agrawal ◽  
Patricia Smith ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Overall Response Rate ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Overall Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

Abstract Background: Bortezomib as a single agent has known efficacy in the treatment of relapsed multiple myeloma. The overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) was 35% in the SUMMIT study and 46% in the APEX study. In-vitro studies including our own have demonstrated potent synergy with other chemotherapeutic agents such as melphalan. It therefore follows that responses to bortezomib may be further improved by the combination of such drugs. Aims: The primary objectives of this Phase I/II study was to assess the safety, tolerability and response rates in patients with relapsed multiple myeloma; secondary objectives being time to progression (TTP) and overall surival (OS). Methods: This was a multi-centre, non-randomised trial for patients with relapsed myeloma. Patients received bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 on days 1,4,8 and 11 of each 28 day cycle with melphalan on day 2 at increasing dose levels. This was initially at 10mg/m2, but due to cytopenias subsequently at 2.5 and 5mg/m2 (levels 1a, 1 and 2) and we plan to escalate to 7.5mg/m2. Up to 8 cycles were given with dexamethasone added for stable or progressive disease after 4 or 2 cycles respectively. Responses were determined by EBMT criteria. Results: To date, 18 patients have been enrolled (12 male 6 female; median age 60 [range 44–73]; median number of prior therapies 3 [range 1–5] of which 17 have had at least one autologous stem cell procedure with high dose melphalan; 10 prior thalidomide and 2 prior bortezomib). 12 patients received melphalan at 10mg/m2 but due to unacceptable delays predominantly due to thrombocytopaenia, subsequent treatment levels commenced at 2.5mg/m2. The median number of cycles completed thus far is 4 (range 0–8) and of the 16 evaluable, the overall response rate (CR+PR+MR) across all treatment levels was 50% rising to 75% following the addition of dexamethasone as per protocol. At level 1a (melphalan 10mg/m2 ,N=12, median number of cycles completed =5) the best responses (with dexamethasone as indicated) were: 1CR, 1 VGPR, 5 PR, 2 MR; at level 1 (melphalan 2.5mg/m2, N=4) 1 PR, 2 MR (after 2 cycles only). The median time to any response was 1 cycle (range 1–3 ). Three patients have progressive disease, but the median TTP and OS have not yet been reached (median follow-up 3 months). Non-haematological toxicities have been modest with 7 SAEs reported of which only 1 was possibly drug related (myocardial infarction), and 4 episodes of Grade 3 neuropathy (2 resulting in study withdrawal). The commonest grade 3–4 haematological toxicity was thrombocytopaenia (N=10) complicated by bleeding in one patient, followed by neutropenia (N=6). Summary: The combination of bortezomib and intravenous melphalan can be given safely to patients with relapsed multiple myeloma and dose escalation is ongoing. Myelosupression was the commonest grade 3–4 adverse event. A response rate of 50% was seen, which was further improved to 75% with the addition of dexamethasone. This combination may therefore result in higher responses than single agent bortezomib in heavily pretreated patients.

Phase I-II Trial of Oral Cyclophosphamide, Prednisone and Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) (CPR) for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed and Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 116 (21) ◽  
pp. 3055-3055
Author(s):  
Donna E. Reece ◽  
Esther Masih-Khan ◽  
Arooj Khan ◽  
Saima Dean ◽  
Sharon Fung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Research Funding ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Abstract 3055 Lenalidomide (Revlimid®) and dexamethasone is an effective regimen for relapsed/refractory (rel/ref) multiple myeloma (MM) patients (pts) with an overall response rate of 60% and median time to progression of 13.4 months (Dimopoulos ME, et al. Leukemia 2009; 23: 2147-52). We combined lenalidomide with the alkylating agent combination of cyclophosphamide and prednisone—an older regimen with minimal cumulative myelosuppression and good activity as second or third line therapy (Trieu Y, et al, Mayo Clin Proc 2005; 80: 1582). The CPR regimen consisted of cyclophosphamide (CY) on days 1, 8, and 15, lenalidomide on days 1–21 and prednisone 100 mg q 2 days in a 28-day cycle. ASA 81 mg/day was given as DVT prophylaxis. Three dose levels were evaluated using a 3 × 3 dose escalation design. Thirty-two pts were entered between 11/2007-06/2009; median age was 64 (42-80) yrs, 60% were male, and immunoglobulin isotype was IgG in 19 (62%), IgA in 8 (25%) and light chain in 4 (13%) pts. Median β2-microglobulin level was 257 (92-767) nm/L, albumin 39 (34-48) g/L, creatinine 83 (50-126) μmol/L, platelet count 355 (75-479) × 109/L and ANC 2.5 (1.1-6.1) × 109/L. The median number of prior regimens was 2 (1-5). Prior therapy included: ASCT (single in 91%; double in 19%), thalidomide (28%) and bortezomib (50%). FISH cytogenetics were available in 13 pts; 1 had del 13q but none had t(4;14) or del p53. Table 1 summarizes protocol treatment delivered. Table 1. Dose level N Cyclophosphamide dose (mg/m2) Lenalidomide dose (mg) Prednisone dose (mg) Median # cycles given 1 3 150 15 100 12 (12–34+) 2 3 150 25 100 10 (9–23) 3 26 300 25 100 17 (5–28+) 1–3 (All) 32 150–300 15–25 100 19 (5–34+) Dose limiting toxicity was not observed during cycle 1 at any dose level. Grade 3–4 toxicities during the trial included: thrombocytopenia in 7 (22%) and neutropenia in 9 (29%), managed with dose reduction and/or growth factors; five episodes of febrile neutropenia occurred, all at dose level 3. In cohort 3, other grade 3–4 non-hematologic toxicities included 1 episode each of abdominal pain/bacteremia, hypokalemia, fatigue, sick sinus syndrome, cardiac amyloidosis, perforated diverticulum and 2 episodes of DVT. Two heavily pretreated pts developed 2° MDS, including 1 previously treated for lymphoma, 43 and 190 mos after the diagnosis of MM. The best response using modified EBMT criteria was documented at a median of 7 (1-26) cycles and included the following: dose level 1 (1 CR, 2 PR); dose level 2 (1 VGPR, 2 PR); dose level 3 (4 CR, 14 VGPR, 11 PR, 1 MR and 1 stable disease). At a median F/U of 16 (5-34) months, 13 pts remain on study and 18 have progressed at a median of 10 (2-23) mos; 1 was lost to F/U and 9 have died of progressive MM. The 1-year actuarial OS and PFS rates are 93% (95% CI 76–98%) and 78% (95% CI 60–89%), respectively. We conclude: 1) the combination of full doses of the agents in CPR can be given in a 28 day cycle with an acceptable safety profile; 2) the objective response rate (CR + PR + MR) in all 32 pts to date is 94%; 3) the 1-year OS of 93% and PFS of 78% compare favorably with other 3-drug combinations in rel/ref MM pts; 4) further evaluation of this regimen in newly diagnosed pts would be of interest. Disclosures: Reece: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Off Label Use: Combination of lenalidomide and cyclophosphamide and prednisone in relapsed and refractory myeloma patients. Chen:Celgene Corporation: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Kukreti:Celgene: Honoraria.

Irinotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in advanced pancreatic cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15111-15111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y. Park ◽  
S. Yi ◽  
H. Kim ◽  
S. Lee ◽  
I. Hwang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles

15111 Background: The aim of this phase II study was to determine whether second line therapy with single agent irinotecan could provide any clinical benefit in patients with gemcitabine- pretreated advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods: From January 2004 to October 2006, patients with advanced pancreatic cancer previously treated with gemcitabine alone or combination were treated with single agent irinotecan(150 mg/m2, biweekly), until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoint was response rate with single stage design. Results: Twenty-eight patients were enrolled(22 male, 6 female, median age : 54.5 years (39–76)). Nine patients are still alive and 3 remain on therapy with stable disease. The median number of cycles was 3.5(1–12). Twenty-four patients were assessable for toxicity and 21 for response. The most common toxicities was diarrhea (grade 3, 12.5%). Grade 3 neutropenia in 1 patient was observed. Other hematological and non-hematological toxicities were mild and manageable. Partial responses were observed in 3 patients (3/21, 14%). An additional 9 patients (9/21, 43%) had stable disease as their best response. 12 patients have progressed with a median time-to-progression of 4.0 months. Conclusions: Single-agent irinotecan was tolerated with manageable toxicity, offering encouraging activity as second-line treatment of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, refractory to gemcitabine. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Safety and efficacy of retreatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC) who have previously received an ICI.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 698-698
Author(s):  
Praful Ravi ◽  
Ziad Bakouny ◽  
Ronan Flippot ◽  
David A. Braun ◽  
Sarah Abou Alaiwi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Investigational Agent ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

698 Background: Several ICIs are approved for use in first and subsequent lines of therapy in mRCC, either alone or in combination with another ICI or targeted therapy. There is limited data on whether patients who receive an ICI derive benefit from a subsequent line of ICI-based therapy. Methods: We reviewed mRCC patients at our institution who were treated with an ICI between 2009 and 2018 having previously received ICI-based therapy. The primary outcomes of interest were radiologic response and time to treatment failure (TTF) on ICI retreatment. Immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were graded using CTCAE v5.0. Results: A total of 31 patients were retreated with an ICI, either alone (n=15) or in combination with another ICI (n=8), tyrosine kinase inhibitor (n=2) or investigational agent (n=6); reasons for discontinuation of prior ICI were disease progression (n=23), toxicity (n=7) and study completion (n=1). Median age at the start of first-line therapy was 62 years and the majority of patients (n=30, 90%) had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium intermediate- or poor-risk disease; median follow-up was 3.4 years (95% CI 2.5-4.6). The median number of lines of therapy received prior to ICI retreatment was 3 (range 1-7). Of 27 evaluable patients, 3 (11%) had a partial response (PR) to ICI retreatment (2 with ICI-ICI combination therapy and 1 with single-agent ICI), 13 (48%) had stable disease, and 11 (41%) had progressive disease (PD) as their best response; of the 3 with a PR, 2 had a PR and 1 had SD to prior ICI therapy. In comparison, 13 of 31 patients (42%) had a PR or better to first ICI-based therapy, with 4 (13%) having PD. Median TTF on ICI retreatment was 3.2 months (95% CI 1.8-5.2), compared to 8.2 months (3.3-10.0) on prior ICI. 19 patients experienced an irAE with ICI retreatment, with 8 (26%) suffering a grade 3 or higher irAE. Conclusions: Retreatment with ICIs after prior therapy with an ICI was relatively safe but demonstrated limited efficacy. Additional data, ideally from prospective studies, assessing outcomes of retreating patients with ICIs are needed to determine whether using different ICIs in sequence has a role in treatment of mRCC.

Doxil (D), Vincristine (V), Reduced Frequency Dexamethasone (d) and Revlimid(R) (DVd-R) Results in a High Response Rate in Patients with Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RMM).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 2559-2559 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachid Baz ◽  
Toni K. Choueiri ◽  
Rony Abou Jawde ◽  
Bridget McGowan ◽  
Yvette Ellis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Median Time ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Median Number ◽  
High Response Rate ◽  
High Response ◽  
Chemotherapeutic Regimen ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: The combination of DVd with Thalidomide (T) results in a high response rate (greater than 80% with about 50% of patients achieving a CR or NCR) in multiple myeloma. Revlimid, an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) is active in patients with MM. We previously reported on a phase I trial of DVd-R in patients with MM, in which the maximum tolerated dose of R was 10mg daily. Methods: The DVd-R regimen was given as follows: on day 1 D was given at 40 mg/m2 IVPB; V at 2 mg IVP; d at 40 mg PO daily for 4 days, R was started at 10mg daily. R was given for 21 days consecutively. For the first cycle R was started 7 days prior to chemotherapy, while it was started on day 1 on subsequent cycles (cycle 1 was 35 days). DVd was planned every 28 days for 2 cycles after best response or a minimum of 4 cycles. Maintenance therapy consisted of R +/− Prednisone 50 mg Qod. All patients received amoxicillin, acyclovir and aspirin 81mg prophylactically. Responses were assessed based on the criteria set forth by SWOG. Patients: The study accrued 58 patients to date (36 refractory and 22 relapsed patients), 45 are evaluable for response. The median patient age at the start of the study is 62 years and 74% are males. The median number of prior chemotherapeutic regimen is 3 (range 1–7), 67% of patients had progressed after a Thalidomide containing regimen, 70% had received a VAD like regimen and 17% had received a prior autologous stem cell transplant. The median time from diagnosis to study entry is 39 month (range 5–182). Eighty six percent had Durie Salomon stage III. The mean serum B2microglobin was 6.6mg/dL (s.d.4.2). Results: The median number of cycles of DVd-R delivered was 4. Of evaluable patients, 6 patients had a CR (13%), 5 had a NCR (11%), 16 had a PR (35%), 11 had stable disease (24%), and 7 had progressive disease (15%) as their best response. The median time to best response was 38 days. After a median follow up of 7.3 month (range 0–24 months), 23 patients had progressive disease and 16 patients had died. Fifty two percent of refractory patients (19/36) had a response on DVd-R. Grade 3 and 4 leukopenia occurred in 24% and 15% respectively, however febrile neutropenia occurred in only 1 patient. Grade 3 and 4 infections occurred in 26% and 3% respectively (all but one were pneumonia). Grade 3 thrombocytopenia occurred in 20%. Venous thromboembolic events occurred in 5 patients (9%) (2 patients with pulmonary embolus and 4 with deep venous thrombosis). Grade 3 neuropathy occurred in 3 patients (no patients had grade 4 neuropathy). Two patients developed grade 3 tumor lysis syndrome. Conclusion: DVd-R is an effective chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with RMM who progressed or did not respond to VAD like regimens or to Thalidomide containing regimens, produces a high response rate among chemotherapy resistant patients, and has a manageable toxicity profile. The results will be updated at the time of the meeting.

A Clinical Study of Bortezomib in Combination with Dexamethasone and/or Doxorubibcin for the Treatment of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 5216-5216
Author(s):  
Jie Jin ◽  
Jiejing Qian ◽  
Haitao Meng ◽  
Wenbin Qian ◽  
Hongyan Tong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Mean Response Time ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Lost To Follow Up

Abstract Purpose: This study assessed the safety, tolerability, and response rate of bortezomib in combination with dexamethasone and/or doxorubibcin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma. Methods: Botezomib was administered 1.3mg/m2 on days 1, 4, 8, 11 of a 28-day cycle. Intravenous dexamethasone was administered 20–40mg/d on day 1–2, 4–5, 8–9,11–12, and 5 patients were also given 20mg/d doxorubibcin on day 1–4. Results: Thirty relapsed or refractory myeloma patients (table 1) were enrolled; two patients could not be evaluated because they were lost to follow-up. Of the remaining patients 19 are male, 9 are female. Median age of the patients were 61(49–78). Median number of prior therapies was 4 (1–11). 22 of 28 patients who had been evaluated were assessable for response according to the EBMT criteria (European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation criteria). One CR(3.6%), twelve immunofixation-positive CRs[nCR] (42.9%), six PRs(21.4%), and three MR (10.7%) were observed. All patients who had an objective response were alive as of this analysis. Nine patients died during follow-up. Mean response time (time to best response)for the 28 patients was 25 days. Most common Grade ≥3 toxicities (table 2) were peripheral neuropathy(3/28), thrombocytopenia (3/28), rash(one in 28 patients). Six patients(21.4%) suffered herpes after one or two cycles. Table 1. Patents and Disease Characteristics (N=28) No. % Abbreviations: Ig, immunoglobulin; Parameter 61 49–78 Age, years Median Range 19 Sex Male Female 9 Paraprotein type IgG IgA Light-chain only 18 β2..Cmicroglubulin, 3 64.3 10.7 Range 7 25.0 Prior treatments 1262–8691 Median 4 Range 1–11 Table 2. Treatment-emergent adverse events Total No. of patients with event(%) Adverse event 0 Hematologic Neutropenia No. with 3(10.7) grade ≥3 event Thrombocytopenia No. 0 with grade ≥3 event Anemia No. with 6(21.4) grade ≥3 event 5(17.8) Nonhematologic herpes Diarrhea 10(35.7) Fatigue Rash No. with 1(3.6) grade ≥3 event Tachycardia Peripheral 1(3.6) neuropathy Total No. No. 16(57.1) with grade ≥ 3 event 3(10.7) Conclusion: Bortezomib plus dexamethasone given on a 28-day schedule showed encouraging activity with manageable toxicity and represents a promising treatment for multiple myeloma patients.

Safety and efficacy of single-agent lenalidomide in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma

Blood ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 114 (4) ◽  
pp. 772-778 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Mohamad Hussein ◽  
James Berenson ◽  
Seema Singhal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Prior Treatment ◽  
Once Daily ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Refractory Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Treatment Regimens ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Lenalidomide plus dexamethasone is effective for the treatment of relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (MM); however, toxicities from dexamethasone can be dose limiting. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of lenalidomide monotherapy in patients with relapsed and refractory MM. Patients (N = 222) received lenalidomide 30 mg/day once daily (days 1-21 every 28 days) until disease progression or intolerance. Response, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), time to progression (TTP), and safety were assessed. Overall, 67% of patients had received 3 or more prior treatment regimens. Partial response or better was reported in 26% of patients, with minimal response 18%. There was no difference between patients who had received 2 or fewer versus 3 or more prior treatment regimens (45% vs 44%, respectively). Median values for TTP, PFS, and OS were 5.2, 4.9, and 23.2 months, respectively. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (60%), thrombocytopenia (39%), and anemia (20%), which proved manageable with dose reduction. Grade 3 or 4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 4% of patients. Lenalidomide monotherapy is active in relapsed and refractory MM with acceptable toxicities. These data support treatment with single-agent lenalidomide, as well as its use in steroid-sparing combination approaches. The study is registered at http://www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00065351.

Nivolumab/pembrolizumab in Child-Pugh grade B/C patients with advanced HCC.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16184-e16184
Author(s):  
Jeffrey Sum Lung Wong ◽  
Gin Wai Kwok ◽  
Vikki Tang ◽  
Bryan Li ◽  
Roland Ching-Yu Leung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Refractory Ascites ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Advanced Hcc ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Experienced Grade ◽  
Systemic Therapies

e16184 Background: Hepatic derangement commonly accompanies advanced HCC (aHCC) and limits the use of systemic therapies. We aimed to evaluate the use of single agent anti-PD-1 nivolumab or pembrolizumab in Child-Pugh (CP) grade B or C patients with aHCC. Methods: Consecutive aHCC patients with CP grade B (CPB) or C (CPC) liver function who received single agent nivolumab or pembrolizumab were analysed. Objective response rate (ORR), time-to-progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed. Results: Between May 2015 and June 2020, 61 patients were included. The median age was 60 (range 28-82). 81% and 4.8% had hepatitis-B and hepatitis-C related HCCs respectively. 72.1% (n = 44) were of CPB and 27.9% (n = 17) were of CPC. Amongst CPB patients, 19 (31.1% of all patients) had CP score 7 (CP7) and 25 (41.0% of all patients) had CP score 8 or 9. The median follow-up was 2.3 months. The ORR of CPB and CPC patients were 6.8% and 0% respectively (p = 0.553). The TTP of CPB and CPC patients were 2.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-2.8) and 1.4 months (95% C.I. 0.6-2.1) respectively (p = 0.204). CPB patients had significantly better OS than CPC patients (3.1 months (95% C.I. 1.4-4.7), vs. 1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.4), p = 0.041). Compared to CP score ≥8 (CP≥8) patients, CP7 patients had significantly better OS (median OS CP7 6.7 months (95% C.I. 4.0-9.3), vs. CP≥8 1.8 months (1.2-2.4), p = 0.002). Patients with diuretic-refractory ascites had significantly worse OS compared to those without (1.7 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5) vs. 3.7 months (95% C.I. 0.1-7.3), p = 0.004). Portal vein (PV) thrombosis was also significantly associated with inferior survival, with median OS of patients with any PV thrombosis being 1.8 months (95% C.I. 1.0-2.5), compared to 5.3 months (95% C.I. 2.4-8.1) of those without (p = 0.004). The median number of doses given was 3 (range 1-34). Median treatment duration was 5.0 weeks (range 0-77). Overall, 25.4% of patients experienced TRAEs and 4.8% experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were skin-related (13.1%) and constitutional symptoms (6.6%). Conclusions: Nivolumab/pembrolizumab had acceptable safety in CPB/C patients with aHCC. CP7, absence of diuretic-refractory ascites and lack of PV thrombosis were associated with better survival.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document