AGO-OVAR 2.29 (ENGOT-ov34): Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5601-TPS5601 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik Marme ◽  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Els Van Nieuwenhuysen ◽  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andres Redondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Tumor Biopsy ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

TPS5601 Background: A standard non-platinum based treatment option in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer is bevacizumab in combination with paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, but responses are still short-lived. Checkpoint-inhibitors as single agent have limited activity in ovarian cancer. However, the role of the checkpoint-inhibitor like atezolizumab, in addition to chemotherapy and bevacizumab in ovarian cancer is so far undefined. Methods: AGO-OVAR 2.29 is a randomized (1:1), double blinded, phase III trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy (weekly paclitaxel or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) compared with placebo plus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in patients with recurrent ovarian-, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with 1st or 2nd relapse within 6 months after platinum-based chemotherapy or 3rd relapse. A tumor biopsy available at study entry for PD-L1 testing is mandatory. Patients are treated with chemotherapy plus bevacizumab +/- atezolizumab/placebo until progression or prohibitive toxicity. Co-primary endpoints are overall survival and progression-free survival. It is planned to randomize 664 patients. A safety interim analysis will be done when 24 patients have been randomized and completed at least cycle 1. As of 1st February 2019, 24 patients have been randomized. Clinical trial information: NCT03353831.

Randomized Phase III Trial of Gemcitabine Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Patients With Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (19) ◽  
pp. 2811-2818 ◽  
Author(s):  
David G. Mutch ◽  
Mauro Orlando ◽  
Tiana Goss ◽  
Michael G. Teneriello ◽  
Alan N. Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Therapeutic Index ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
End Points ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Significant Difference

Purpose Ovarian cancer (OC) patients experiencing progressive disease (PD) within 6 months of platinum-based therapy in the primary setting are considered platinum resistant (Pt-R). Currently, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) is a standard of care for treatment of recurrent Pt-R disease. On the basis of promising phase II results, gemcitabine was compared with PLD for efficacy and safety in taxane-pretreated Pt-R OC patients. Patients and Methods Patients (n = 195) with Pt-R OC were randomly assigned to either gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m2 (days 1 and 8; every 21 days) or PLD 50 mg/m2 (day 1; every 28 days) until PD or undue toxicity. Optional cross-over therapy was allowed at PD or at withdrawal because of toxicity. Primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Additional end points included tumor response, time to treatment failure, survival, and quality of life. Results In the gemcitabine and PLD groups, median PFS was 3.6 v 3.1 months; median overall survival was 12.7 v 13.5 months; overall response rate (ORR) was 6.1% v 8.3%; and in the subset of patients with measurable disease, ORR was 9.2% v 11.7%, respectively. None of the efficacy end points showed a statistically significant difference between treatment groups. The PLD group experienced significantly more hand-foot syndrome and mucositis; the gemcitabine group experienced significantly more constipation, nausea/vomiting, fatigue, and neutropenia but not febrile neutropenia. Conclusion Although this was not designed as an equivalency study, gemcitabine and PLD seem to have a comparable therapeutic index in this population of Pt-R taxane-pretreated OC patients. Single-agent gemcitabine may be an acceptable alternative to PLD for patients with Pt-R OC.

scholarly journals Olaparib Versus Nonplatinum Chemotherapy in Patients With Platinum-Sensitive Relapsed Ovarian Cancer and a Germline BRCA1/2 Mutation (SOLO3): A Randomized Phase III Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1164-1174 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard T. Penson ◽  
Ricardo Villalobos Valencia ◽  
David Cibula ◽  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Charles A. Leath ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
End Point ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Measurable Disease

PURPOSE A phase II study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00628251 ) showed activity of olaparib capsules versus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-resistant or partially platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer. We conducted a phase III trial (SOLO3) of olaparib tablets versus nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS In this randomized, open-label trial, patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice a day or physician’s choice single-agent nonplatinum chemotherapy (pegylated liposomal doxorubicin, paclitaxel, gemcitabine, or topotecan). The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) in the measurable disease analysis set assessed by blinded independent central review (BICR). The key secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by BICR in the intent-to-treat population. RESULTS Of 266 randomly assigned patients, 178 were assigned to olaparib and 88 to chemotherapy. In patients with measurable disease (olaparib, n = 151; chemotherapy, n = 72), the BICR-assessed ORR was significantly higher with olaparib than with chemotherapy (72.2% v 51.4%; odds ratio [OR], 2.53 [95% CI, 1.40 to 4.58]; P = .002). In the subgroup who had received 2 prior lines of treatment, the ORR was 84.6% with olaparib and 61.5% with chemotherapy (OR, 3.44 [95% CI, 1.42 to 8.54]). BICR-assessed PFS also significantly favored olaparib versus chemotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.91]; P = .013; median, 13.4 v 9.2 months). Adverse events were consistent with the established safety profiles of olaparib and chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Olaparib resulted in statistically significant and clinically relevant improvements in ORR and PFS compared with nonplatinum chemotherapy in patients with germline BRCA-mutated platinum-sensitive relapsed ovarian cancer who had received at least 2 prior lines of platinum-based chemotherapy.

Trabectedin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (19) ◽  
pp. 3107-3114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bradley J. Monk ◽  
Thomas J. Herzog ◽  
Stanley B. Kaye ◽  
Carolyn N. Krasner ◽  
Jan B. Vermorken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Recurrent Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Platinum Sensitive ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

PurposeThe objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of trabectedin plus pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) with that of PLD alone in women with recurrent ovarian cancer after failure of first-line, platinum-based chemotherapy.Patients and MethodsWomen ≥ 18 years, stratified by performance status (0 to 1 v 2) and platinum sensitivity, were randomly assigned to receive an intravenous infusion of PLD 30 mg/m2followed by a 3-hour infusion of trabectedin 1.1 mg/m2every 3 weeks or PLD 50 mg/m2every 4 weeks. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiology assessment.ResultsPatients (N = 672) were randomly assigned to trabectedin/PLD (n = 337) or PLD (n = 335). Median PFS was 7.3 months with trabectedin/PLD v 5.8 months with PLD (hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.96; P = .0190). For platinum-sensitive patients, median PFS was 9.2 months v 7.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.56 to 0.95; P = .0170). Overall response rate (ORR) was 27.6% for trabectedin/PLD v 18.8% for PLD (P = .0080); for platinum-sensitive patients, it was 35.3% v 22.6% (P = .0042), respectively. ORR, PFS, and overall survival among platinum-resistant patients were not statistically different. Neutropenia was more common with trabectedin/PLD. Grade 3 to 4 transaminase elevations were also more common with the combination but were transient and noncumulative. Hand-foot syndrome and mucositis were less frequent with trabectedin/PLD than with PLD alone.ConclusionWhen combined with PLD, trabectedin improves PFS and ORR over PLD alone with acceptable tolerance in the second-line treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study Comparing Patupilone (EPO906) With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin in Platinum-Refractory or -Resistant Patients With Recurrent Epithelial Ovarian, Primary Fallopian Tube, or Primary Peritoneal Cancer

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (31) ◽  
pp. 3841-3847 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicoletta Colombo ◽  
Elzbieta Kutarska ◽  
Meletios Dimopoulos ◽  
Duk-Soo Bae ◽  
Izabella Rzepka-Gorska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Fallopian Tube ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Primary Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Peritoneal Cancer ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Purpose This study compared the efficacy and safety of patupilone with those of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant epithelial ovarian, primary fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer. Patients and Methods Patients with three or fewer prior regimens were eligible if they had received first-line taxane/platinum-based combination chemotherapy and were platinum refractory or resistant. Patients were randomly assigned to receive patupilone (10 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks) or PLD (50 mg/m2 intravenously every 4 weeks). Results A total of 829 patients were randomly assigned (patupilone, n = 412; PLD, n = 417). There was no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS), the primary end point, between the patupilone and PLD arms (P = .195; hazard ratio, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.09), with median OS rates of 13.2 and 12.7 months, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 3.7 months for both arms. The overall response rate (all partial responses) was higher in the patupilone arm than in the PLD arm (15.5% v 7.9%; odds ratio, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.36 to 3.29), although disease control rates were similar (59.5% v 56.3%, respectively). Frequently observed adverse events (AEs) of any grade included diarrhea (85.3%) and peripheral neuropathy (39.3%) in the patupilone arm and mucositis/stomatitis (43%) and hand-foot syndrome (41.8%) in the PLD arm. Conclusion Patupilone did not demonstrate significant improvement in OS compared with the active control, PLD. No new or unexpected serious AEs were identified.

A phase III study comparing single-agent olaparib or the combination of cediranib and olaparib to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in recurrent platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 6003-6003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joyce F. Liu ◽  
Mark F. Brady ◽  
Ursula A. Matulonis ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Elise C. Kohn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Primary Endpoint ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
High Grade ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

6003 Background: Combination cediranib (C) and olaparib (O) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients (pts) with relapsed platinum (plat)-sensitive high-grade ovarian cancer (ovca) compared to O alone in a Phase 2 trial (NCT01116648). We conducted this randomized, open-label Phase 3 trial (NCT02446600) to assess whether combination C+O, or O alone, was superior to standard of care (SOC) plat-based therapy in relapsed plat-sensitive ovca. Methods: Eligible pts had recurrent plat-sensitive [ > 6-month plat-free interval (PFI)] high-grade serous or endometrioid, or BRCA-related, ovca. One prior non-plat therapy and unlimited prior plat-therapies were allowed; prior anti-angiogenics in the recurrent setting or prior PARP inhibitor were exclusions. Pts were randomized 1:1:1 to SOC (carboplatin/paclitaxel; carboplatin/gemcitabine; or carboplatin/liposomal doxorubicin), O (300mg twice daily), or C+O (C 30mg daily + O 200mg twice daily). Randomization was stratified by g BRCA status, PFI (6-12 vs > 12 months), and prior anti-angiogenic therapy. Target sample size was 549 pts; primary analysis occurred 2 years after the last pt enrolled. The primary endpoint was PFS. Type 1 error = 0.025 was controlled by a gatekeeping hierarchy that assessed C+O vs SOC, then O alone vs SOC, and finally C+O vs O. All maintenance therapy was prohibited. Results: Between 4FEB2016 and 13NOV2017, 565 pts enrolled (187 SOC, 189 O, 189 C+O), and 528 pts initiated treatment (166 SOC, 183 O, 179 C+O). 23.7% of patients had g BRCAmut. Median follow-up was 29.1 months. 53 pts on SOC initiated non-protocol therapy (predominantly PARP inhibitor maintenance) before disease progression. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS was 0.856 (95% CI 0.66-1.11, p = 0.08, 1-tail) between C+O and SOC and 1.20 (95% CI 0.93-1.54) between O and SOC, with median PFS of 10.3, 8.2, and 10.4 months for SOC, O, and C+O, respectively. Response rates were 71.3% (SOC), 52.4% (O), and 69.4% (C+O). In gBRCA pts, HR for PFS was 0.55 (95% CI 0.73-1.30) for C+O vs SOC, and 0.63 (95% CI 0.37-1.07) for O vs SOC. In non-g BRCA pts, HR for these comparisons was 0.97 (95% CI 0.73-1.30) and 1.41 (1.07-1.86). No OS differences between arms were observed at 44% events. Pts receiving C+O (vs SOC) had more frequent Grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal (30.1% vs 8.4%), hypertension (31.7% vs 1.8%), and fatigue events (17.5% vs 1.8%). Conclusion: C+O demonstrated similar activity to SOC in relapsed plat-sensitive ovca but did not meet the primary endpoint of improved PFS. Clinical trial information: NCT02446600.

Randomized Phase III Study of Canfosfamide in Combination With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Compared With Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin Alone in Platinum-Resistant Ovarian Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 772-780 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ignace Vergote ◽  
Neil J. Finkler ◽  
James B. Hall ◽  
Ostap Melnyk ◽  
Robert P. Edwards ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
Platinum Resistant ◽  
Platinum Refractory

Objective:To evaluate the safety and efficacy of canfosfamide in combination with pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD) in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer (OC).Methods:Patients with platinum-refractory or -resistant (primary or secondary) OC were randomized to receive canfosfamide at 1000 mg/m2 and PLD at 50 mg/m2 intravenously or PLD alone at 50 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 every 28 days until tumor progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Other end points were objective response rate and safety. The study was originally planned for 244 patients. The trial was temporarily placed on hold after 125 patients were randomized while the results of another trial were being reviewed and the sponsor decided not to resume enrollment. The interim analysis became the final analysis.Results:The median PFS was 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD (n = 65) versus 3.7 months for PLD (n = 60) (hazards ratio, 0.92; P = 0.7243). A preplanned subgroup analysis showed that 75 patients with platinum-refractory or primary platinum-resistant OC had a median PFS of 5.6 months for canfosfamide + PLD versus 2.9 months for PLD (hazards ratio, 0.55; P = 0.0425). Hematologic adverse events were 66% on the canfosfamide + PLD arm versus 44% on the PLD arm, manageable with dose reductions. Nonhematologic adverse events were similar for both arms. The incidence of palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis was lower on canfosfamide + PLD (23%, 31%, respectively) versus (39%, 49%, respectively) on PLD.Conclusions:Overall median PFS showed a positive trend but was not statistically significant. The median PFS in the platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC patients was significantly longer for canfosfamide + PLD versus PLD. Canfosfamide may ameliorate the palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia and stomatitis known to be associated with PLD. Further study of this active well-tolerated regimen in platinum-refractory and primary platinum-resistant OC is planned.This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00350948.

scholarly journals Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab and chemotherapy versus bevacizumab and chemotherapy in recurrent ovarian cancer – a randomized phase III trial (AGO-OVAR 2.29/ENGOT-ov34)

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 1997-2001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philipp Harter ◽  
Patricia Pautier ◽  
Els Van Nieuwenhuysen ◽  
Alexander Reuss ◽  
Andres Redondo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
De Novo ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Tissue Sample ◽  
Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Exclusion Criteria ◽  
Free Interval ◽  
Platinum Based Chemotherapy

BackgroundImprovement in clinical outcomes of patients with platinum-resistant disease is an unmet medical need and trials in this population are urgently needed. Checkpoint-inhibitors have already shown activity in multiple other tumor entities and ovarian cancer, especially in the combination with anti-angiogenic treatment.Primary objectiveTo test if the activity of non-platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab could be improved by the addition of atezolizumab.Study hypothesisThe addition of atezolizumab to standard non-platinum combination of chemotherapy and bevacizumab improves median overall survival from 15 to 20 months.Trial designPatients are randomized to chemotherapy (paclitaxel weekly or pegylated liposomal doxorubicin) + bevacizumab + placebo vs chemotherapy + bevacizumab + atezolizumab. Stratification factors are: number of prior lines, planned type of chemotherapy, prior use of bevacizumab, and tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) status.Major inclusion/exclusion criteriaRecurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer with up to three prior therapies and a treatment-free interval after platinum of less than 6 months. Patients with three prior lines of chemotherapy are eligible irrespective of the platinum free-interval. A de novo tumor tissue sample biopsy for determination of PD-L1 status prior to randomization for stratification is mandatory. Major exclusion criteria consider bevacizumab-specific and immunotherapy-specific criteria.Primary endpointOverall survival and progression-free survival are co-primary endpoints.Sample sizeIt is planned to randomize 664 patients.Trial registrationNCT03353831.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document