Assessment of compliance with USPSTF lung cancer screening guidelines among resident primary care physicians in a university residency program.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (27_suppl) ◽  
pp. 43-43
Author(s):  
Nerea Lopetegui-Lia ◽  
Syed Imran Jafri ◽  
Manish Kumar ◽  
Shashank Sama ◽  
James J. Vredenburgh
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Primary Care Physicians ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
The Us

43 Background: Lung cancer remains the leading cause of morbidity and mortality, with a predicted 1.8 million deaths worldwide yearly. The United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommends screening for lung cancer with Low Dose Computed Tomography (LDCT) for all genres of age 55 to 80 with a 30 pack-year smoking history, current smokers or have quit within the past 15 years. Early detection has shown to reduce mortality. Only 4% of eligible patients in the US actually undergo lung cancer screening. Methods: A retrospective review of data was performed amongst the University of Connecticut Internal Medicine Residents acting as PCPs at a Clinic in Hartford, CT, USA. Results: 369 medical charts were reviewed. 115 patients (31.1%) met the USPSTF criteria for screening. 5.7% had an appropriately ordered LDCT scan. 2.71% had a LDCT completed and 2.98% had LDCT scheduled but pending or cancelled. 4 patients with smoking history who did not meet USPSTF criteria but had a LDCT due to clinical suspicion for lung cancer. Approximately 11% of patients had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or emphysema and asthma. 5 patients had a first degree relative with history of lung cancer. 6 patients had lung cancer, 3 of which had metastatic lung cancer at the time of diagnosis and are deceased. Conclusions: Lung cancer screening amongst resident PCP is insufficient. The results obtained were lower than the national average. This is likely due to newer trainees focusing less in prevention/screening and more on managing chronic medical conditions. Patients that attend resident PCP clinics in the US are typically of lower socio-economic status, less insurance coverage or uninsured and with a lower level of education. LDCT orders that were cancelled were likely because insurers declined it. Patients not realizing the importance of screening could also be contributing. It is unclear if lung disease or family history attributes a higher risk of developing lung cancer. In conclusion, educating resident PCPs and patients on lung cancer screening, as well as evaluating the reasons for cancelling LDCT could help ensure high quality care.

scholarly journals CO-DESIGNING CANCER SCREENING INTERVENTIONS WITH PEOPLE OVER 55 YEARS OLD AT RISK FOR LUNG CANCER

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. S917-S918
Author(s):  
Leah Tuzzio ◽  
Lorella Palazzo ◽  
Sarah Brush ◽  
Kelly Ehrlich ◽  
Melissa Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Cancer Mortality ◽  
Financial Incentives ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
The Us ◽  
Multilevel Interventions

Abstract In 2014, the US Preventive Task Force recommended annual lung cancer screening with low dose CT (LDCT) for adults aged 55 to 80 years old with significant smoking history. Although screening reduces lung cancer mortality, the leading cause of cancer mortality in the US, adherence to screening follow-up remains low. In a human-centered design qualitative study, health services researchers and eight adults over 55 years old from Kaiser Permanente Washington who had recently had an LDCT participated in two co-design sessions. We elicited barriers, facilitators and design principles to develop multilevel interventions that aim to improve adherence to ongoing LDCT. In the initial discussion, participants identified four key areas for improvements to adherence: a) reminders for scheduling and appointments, b) knowledge about tests and follow-up, c) convenience in location and scheduling, and d) financial and non-financial incentives. In a second session, participants referenced patient personas and sketched storyboards, a comic strip-like format showing steps in a journey, to describe different ways to help patients return for LDCTs. Through qualitative analysis, we identified ten elements to consider incorporating in multilevel interventions: versatility (e.g., multiple reminder options), social support (e.g., families, peers), individualization (e.g., tailoring to patient needs), feelings (e.g., fear, relief), knowledge (e.g., harms/benefits, expectations), responsibility (e.g., who is accountable for reminders), continuity (e.g., clear pathway to adherence), consistency (e.g., same messages), cadence (e.g., rhythm of messages), and acknowledgment (e.g., recognition of screening completion). Next steps are to incorporate feedback from clinical stakeholders and develop multilevel interventions for further testing.

Evaluating efficacy of current lung cancer screening guidelines

2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 208-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara Nemesure ◽  
April Plank ◽  
Lisa Reagan ◽  
Denise Albano ◽  
Michael Reiter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Preventive Services ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Cancer Network

Objective Current lung cancer screening criteria based primarily on outcomes from the National Lung Screening Trial may not adequately capture all subgroups of the population at risk. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of lung cancer screening criteria recommended by the United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and the National Comprehensive Cancer Network in identifying known cases of lung cancer. Methods An investigation of the Stony Brook Cancer Center Lung Cancer Evaluation Center's database identified 1207 eligible, biopsy-proven lung cancer cases diagnosed between January 1996 and March 2016. Age at diagnosis, smoking history, and other known risk factors for lung cancer were used to determine the proportion of cases that would have met current United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network eligibility requirements for lung cancer screening. Results Of the 1046 ever smokers in the study, 40% did not meet the National Lung Screening Trial age requirements, 20% did not have a ≥30 pack year smoking history, and approximately one-third quit smoking >15 years before diagnosis, thus deeming them ineligible for screening. Applying the United States Preventive Services Task Force, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network eligibility criteria to the Stony Brook Cancer Center's Lung Cancer Evaluation Center cases, 49.2, 46.3, and 69.8%, respectively, would have met the current lung cancer screening guidelines. Conclusions The United States Preventive Services Task Force and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services eligibility criteria for lung cancer screening captured less than 50% of lung cancer cases in this investigation. These findings highlight the need to reevaluate the efficacy of current guidelines and may have major public health implications.

Lung cancer: Improving screening in rural clinic.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13060-e13060
Author(s):  
Thuy Thanh Thi Le ◽  
Helen Johnson-wall ◽  
Katherine Hu
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
North Carolina ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Chart Review ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Study Patient ◽  
Rural Clinic ◽  
Bronchus Cancer

e13060 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of overall cancer-related deaths in both men and women in the United States. In 2009, cancer surpassed cardiovascular disease as the leading cause of death in North Carolina. Between 2010-2014, the age-adjusted incidence rate for lung and bronchus cancers in North Carolina was 70 per 100000 persons per year. Between 2010-2014, the age-adjusted mortality rate for lung and bronchus cancers in North Carolina was 50.6 per 100000 persons per year. It is documented that about half of lung and bronchus cancer cases were diagnosed at the distant stage and about 60 percent of deaths occurred in adults ages 65-84. In 2011, 32 percent of cancer death was from lung/bronchus cancer in Robeson County. A chart review in a rural primary care clinic identified patients not being appropriately screened for targeted intervention. Methods: Our retrospective chart review at Lumberton Medical Clinic, a rural outpatient Internal Medicine Clinic, reviewed 91 records from adults aged 55 to 80 years old during the timeframe of September 2017 through August 2018. Patients with a known history of lung cancer were excluded from this study. Patient records were assessed for compliance with USPTF lung cancer screening guidelines. USPTF recommends adults aged 55 to 80 who have a 30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years to have an annual low-dose computed tomography of the chest to screen for lung cancer. Results: The review showed that during the timeframe studied, 42% of patients who qualified received appropriate screening, while 58% of those qualified were found to have no documentation of screening. Following data analysis, intervention to increase screening rates has been initiated. This involves provider education, posters, and individualized letters mailed to patients found deficient during the study. The success of this direct patient outreach effort will be measured over six months. Conclusions: It is the responsibility of providers to emphasize the importance of proper lung cancer screening. This retrospective review found that a large percentage (58%) of adults were not being adequately screened in our rural clinic. Direct outreach is underway to increase compliance rates in this high-risk population served by our rural clinic.

The US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation on Lung Cancer Screening

JAMA ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 326 (5) ◽  
pp. 440
Author(s):  
Bryan S. Squires ◽  
Ronald Levitin ◽  
Inga S. Grills
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Preventive Services ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The Us

Computed Tomographic Screening for Lung Cancer

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Doraid Jarrar ◽  
Grace Y. Song ◽  
Scott Swanson
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Diagnostic Tools ◽  
Computer Tomographic ◽  
Computed Tomographic ◽  
Screening Cost

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Although lung cancer screening has been advocated, for a long time level 1 evidence has been absent, leaving physicians with the challenge of treating patients with mostly incurable disease. Even in 2014, the 5-year survival for lung cancer will only be around 16% despite sophisticated imaging and diagnostic tools. Physicians are thus taking a more proactive route, including early screening for lung cancer and efforts to curb tobacco use. This review discusses lung cancer screening in the context of the National Lung Screening Trial, risk of overdiagnosis, cost-effectiveness, U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations, lung cancer screening in the community, improving the specificity of lung cancer screening, and treatment options for early-stage lung cancer. Tables review key principles of computed tomographic screening, cost-effectiveness of computer tomographic screening, predictors of malignancy in the Pan-Canadian screening study model, and follow-up and management of newly detected indeterminate nodules. Figures show common causes of cancer death in the United States, estimated new cancer cases and cancer deaths in men and women, a four-stage system used in clinical and surgical evaluation of lung cancer, secondary prevention lung cancer screening goals, and a low-dose computer tomographic scan. This review contains 5 figures, 4 tables, and 31 references.

Effectiveness of low-dose CT scan for lung cancer screening in the community setting.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1543-1543
Author(s):  
Jason Aboudi Mouabbi ◽  
Tarik H. Hadid ◽  
Eugene Uh
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Task Force ◽  
Demographic Data ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
Lung Cancer Mortality ◽  
The United States

1543 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in the United States (US) and worldwide. Chest X-ray (CXR) is ineffective in reducing lung cancer mortality. National Lung Cancer Screening Trail (NLST) reported 20% reduction in mortality with the use of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scan to screen high risk individuals. Therefore, major organizations including US Preventive Services Task Force has adopted LDCT for lung cancer screening in high risk populations. However, The generalizability of this approach in community setting is yet to be confirmed. Our objective is to assess the ability of LDCT in detection of lung nodules and lung cancer in the community setting and compare the results to those reported in the NLST. Methods: Charts of subjects who underwent LDCT screening between 2013 and 2016 at SJHMC were retrospectively reviewed. Demographic data, the results of the LDCT scans, interventions performed, complications of procedures and pathology findings were collected. All cancer cases found by LDCT and the stage of cancers were documented. The results of our study were statistically compared to the results of both arms of the NLST (CT and CXR arms). Since CXR is ineffective for lung cancer screening, CXR arm serves equivalently to no screening. Results: The baseline characteristics of the subjects are significantly different between this study and NLST. LDCT in our study detected significantly higher positive findings. There are more cancers detected in this study compared to NLST CT and CXR arms, which could reflect higher incidence of cancer in this community or higher proportion of current smokers in our study. In this study, LDCT detected cancers at higher stages compared to that of the NLST CT arm but similar stages to NLST CXR arm. This may indicate that LDCT when performed in the community is less effective in detecting cancer at early stages. Conclusions: The community population have different characteristics compared those enrolled in clinical trials. This may limit the generalizability of the results. Population-based studies are needed to confirm the results of the NLST. [Table: see text]

Extent of implementation of low-dose CT in lung cancer screening.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e19177-e19177
Author(s):  
Merin Jose ◽  
Rajesh Desai
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Lung Cancer Screening ◽  
The United States ◽  
Smoking History ◽  
Community Clinic ◽  
Low Dose Ct ◽  
The Impact

e19177 Background: Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths in the United States with only 15% alive 5 years after diagnosis. In 2013, USPSTF recommended annual screening for LDCT in high risk individuals. Studies had shown a 20% lower mortality (NELSON trial showed significantly lower lung cancer mortality) with LDCT screening. We aimed to assess the extent to which the guideline for lung cancer screening is being adopted in a community clinic. Methods: A retrospective review of electronic medical record of patients aged 55-80 years with no history of lung cancer who visited a primary care provider in a community clinic in New Jersey from October 2014- December 2019 was done. All records with any form of documentation of smoking were identified electronically. The records of those meeting the criteria (30 pack-year smoking history and currently smoking or have quit within the past 15 years) were reviewed manually to check 1) whether they are eligible for screening, 2) if eligible whether low dose CT has been recommended by the provider and 3) once recommended has it been done and followed by the patients. Results: 359 individuals with documented smoking history were identified. Of those 38.8 % (139/359) had a proper documentation (includes both PPD and number of years of smoking) of smoking history based on which high risk individuals could be identified. Of those 37 individuals met the criteria for lung cancer screening. 62% (23/37) had CT chest ordered at some point of time (16.2% for a different indication and the rest for lung cancer screening). Only 52.2% (12/23) of the patients followed the recommendations and got a LDCT done. Among those 50% (6/12) had follow up CT, 50 % (3/6) of those did it on a regular annual basis while the rest 50% (3/6) did it irregularly. 3 patients followed the annual CT screening for lung cancer. Conclusions: Based on these we note that almost half a decade since the recommendation has been established only a small proportion received the care and a still smaller minority followed it. It reflects the dearth of information regarding the guideline among providers and the lack of awareness of the need to follow among patients. This puts forward need for further interventions for implementation of the guidelines at all levels of care for lung cancer prevention. Measures include analyzing the areas of deficiency through questionnaires for patients and providers. Creating awareness on the need for accurate documentation of smoking history and the impact it can have on care delivered. Educating patients about the benefits in health outcome by following the recommendations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document