A multicenter, phase Ib/2 study of varlitinib plus gemcitabine and cisplatin (gem/cis) for treatment of naïve, advanced, or metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 319-319
Author(s):  
Do-Youn Oh ◽  
Wei-Peng Yong ◽  
Li-Tzong Chen ◽  
Ji-Won Kim ◽  
Alex Yuang-Chi Chang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Her Family ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Response To Chemotherapy ◽  
Grade 3

319 Background: BTC is a rapidly progressing cancer with limited response to chemotherapy. First line therapy (gem/cis) was defined in the ABC-02 study (Valle et al), where a 26% response was seen. HER family receptors are overexpressed and may be involved in tumour proliferation and survival in BTC. Varlitinib, a reversible tyrosine kinase inhibitor of EGFR, HER2, and HER4, shows potent activity as monotherapy in preclinical BTC models and clinical activity in BTC patients (pts) in phase (ph) 1 trials. We conducted a ph Ib/2 study of varlitinib plus gem/cis in BTC to understand the safety profile and determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination. Methods: A modified 3+3+3 escalation design was used in Ph1b, with 2 varlitinib dose levels (200 and 300 mg BID) plus gem/cis on Day 1 and 8 in a 3 week cycle. The primary objectives are to determine the MTD and to characterize the safety profile. Secondary objectives are to assess the preliminary efficacy and to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of varlitinib and any circulating metabolites. Results: As of 10 Sep 2018, 21 pts were enrolled (11 in 200 mg cohort and 10 in 300 mg cohort, with 9 and 4 evaluable for MTD, respectively). Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) were observed in 3 pts (1 G3 unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia and 1 G3 ALT transaminitis/G4 AST transaminitis in 200 mg cohort; 1 G4 thrombocytopenia/G3 febrile neutropenia/G3 AST elevation in 300 mg cohort). In 19 pts who were on varlitinib ≥ 1 month, 7 had partial response and 10 achieved stable disease (all > 12 weeks), giving the overall response rate of 37% and the disease control rate of 89%. The median PFS for the 200 mg cohort was 248 days and was not reached for the 300 mg cohort. The most common (≥ 30%) all-grade adverse events (AEs) regardless of causality were thrombocytopenia (62%), neutropenia (52%), anorexia (38%), nausea (38%), diarrhoea (38%), and anaemia (33%); the most common (≥ 15%) grade ≥ 3 AEs were neutropenia (48%), thrombocytopenia (33%), and anaemia (19%). Conclusions: Varlitinib plus gem/cis was well tolerated in the 200 mg cohort; the 300 mg cohort is ongoing. Preliminary anti-tumour activity was observed. Data will be updated at the time of presentation. Clinical trial information: NCT02992340.

Safety and tolerability of lapatinib in combination with taxanes (T) in patients with breast cancer (BC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1027-1027 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. P. Crown ◽  
H. A. Burris ◽  
S. Jones ◽  
K. M. Koch ◽  
A. Fittipaldo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Side Effects ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Clinical Studies ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Safety Data ◽  
Systemic Exposure ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Grade 3

1027 Background: Lapatinib (L) is an oral, dual ErbB1/B2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor. T are mainstay of BC treatment. The side-effects seen with T in combination with gefitinib and erlotinib include neutropenia, diarrhea and rash. Based on preclinical synergy, early clinical studies with L and paclitaxel (P) or docetaxel (D) were studied. Methods: We summarize pharmacokinetics (PK) and preliminary safety data from 192 patients. Results: PK analysis for EGF10009 (q3w), show systemic exposure was increased for both L (21%) and P (23%) at doses of 1500mg daily and 175mg/m2/q3w, respectively. PK analysis in EGF10021 , (L 1250 mg & D 75 mg/m2 with prophylactic pegfilgrastim) indicated no significant effect on systemic exposure of either agent. Toxicities across all studies include i.e., for all patients = grade 3, neutropenia (7.3%), diarrhea (18.2%), rash (3.6%). The rate of adverse events for neutropenia and rash were similar to each agent alone, however diarrhea was more common. The frequency and severity of diarrhea was increased in studies EGF10009 and EGF102580 where no proactive treatment of diarrhea was introduced, whereas in EGF105764, with proactive treatment, currently no =grade 3 diarrhea has been reported. The data show that the combination of L and P has clinical activity (>70% RR reported in EGF102580). Conclusions: T plus L combinations have a predictable and manageable safety profile and clinical activity of P plus L combination was observed. Proactive diarrhea management is essential for these combinations. Based on the PK data, no dose adjustments are required, and any dose adjustments should be toxicity-based. Ongoing clinical studies investigating the combinations of L with T, and combinations of L with T plus trastuzumab will be reported in the future. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A dose finding study with erlotinib in combination to irinotecan and capecitabine in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13075-13075 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Di Bartolomeo ◽  
E. Bajetta ◽  
R. Buzzoni ◽  
E. Ferrario ◽  
L. Mariani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Safety Profile ◽  
Dose Group ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Neutropenic Fever ◽  
Dose Finding ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Cutaneous Rash ◽  
Group 2

13075 Background: Erlotinib is an oral selective and reversible small molecule inhibitor with specificy for the EGFR/HER1. This study evaluated the maximum tolerated dose and the dose limiting toxicity (DLT) of erlotinib when combined to irinotecan and capecitabine. Secondary objectives included the safety profile and the response rate of the combination. Methods: Twenty-two pts (median age 57 yrs, range: 39–69; M/F:12/10) with mCRC refractory to first-line therapy (oxaliplatin-combinations) were accrued. Five dose level combinations with irinotecan (from 180 to 240 mg/m2, day 1, q21), capecitabine (1500 to 2400 mg/m2/d, days 2–15 q21) and erlotinib (50 to 150 mg/d., continuously until progression) were planned. Cycles were repeated every 3 weeks, maximum of 6–8 cycles. Tumor assessments (RECIST criteria) performed every 3 cycles. Maximum tolerated dose was defined as the highest dose where the toxicity rate does not exceed the 30% target level. Patients were enrolled in cohorts of three, and evaluated for first cycle acute toxicity. Results: Three pts entered the first dose group (no DLT), six the second (1 DLT; G4 neutropenic fever), six the third dose group (2 DLT; G3 diarrhea, G4 neutropenic fever), and one (protocol deviation in the dose escalation scheme) the fourth dose group (1 DLT; G3 diarrhea and vomiting). Cutaneous rash and mucositis G3 (no DLT), were documented in one pt (dose group 2). To confirm these results, six pts were additionally accrued in dose groups 2 and 3 showing no DLT. Among twenty evaluable pts, two had an objective response, 15 showed disease stabilization and completed the 6-cycle treatment, 3 had disease progression. Conclusions: Erlotinib at a dose of 100 mg/d, combined with irinotecan 240 mg/m2 and capecitabine 1500 mg/m2/d, (as correspond to dose group 3) has an acceptable safety profile and appears suitable for further investigation. Editorial Assistance by the Scientific Service of the I.T.M.O. group. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase Ib, open-label, dose-escalation study of tivozanib and FOLFOX6 in patients (pts) with advanced gastrointestinal (GI) tumors.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 549-549 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Eskens ◽  
C. N. Oldenhuis ◽  
P. Bhargava ◽  
W. Loos ◽  
B. Esteves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Embolism And Thrombosis ◽  
Grade 3

549 Background: Tivozanib (AV-951), a highly potent and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3, has shown additive antitumor activity with fluorouracil (5-FU) in preclinical studies. An open-label phase Ib study was conducted to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetics (PK), and antitumor activity of escalating doses of tivozanib combined with standard-dose FOLFOX6 (i.e., oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-FU) in pts with advanced GI tumors. Methods: Tivozanib was administered orally once daily in 4-week cycles (3 weeks on, 1 week off), with FOLFOX6 administered on days 1 and 15 of each cycle. Pts were allowed to continue tivozanib following discontinuation of FOLFOX6. Results: 22 pts (14 male/8 female; median age of 58 years [range, 40-75]) received 0.5 mg (n = 9), 1.0 mg (n = 3), or 1.5 mg (n = 10) tivozanib plus FOLFOX6. Pts received a median of 8.1 weeks (range, 0.1 - 43.1) of treatment. DLTs were observed in 2 pts receiving 0.5 mg tivozanib (reversible grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 and 4 transaminase elevations, respectively) and in 2 pts receiving 1.5 mg tivozanib (reversible grade 3 seizures and grade 3 vertigo, respectively). Other grade 3/4 drug-related adverse events (AEs) included neutropenia, fatigue, and hypertension (n = 2 each); and pyrexia, pulmonary embolism, and thrombosis (n = 1 each). There was no indication that drug-related AEs in this study were more frequent or severe than those observed with tivozanib or FOLFOX6 alone. The MTD was 1.5 mg tivozanib with full dose FOLFOX6. The PK profiles of tivozanib, oxaliplatin, and 5-FU will be presented. Several durable partial responses were observed. Additional safety and efficacy data are being obtained in 8 pts currently being treated at the 1.5-mg dose level. Conclusions: The combination of tivozanib and FOLFOX6 is tolerable and safe, with tivozanib given at its recommended dose of 1.5 mg. Observed clinical activity merits further exploration in several GI tumors, and these studies are being planned. [Table: see text]

Phase Ib study of gemcitabine and oxaliplatin with erlotinib in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14503-e14503 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen Keon Ciombor ◽  
Dana Backlund Cardin ◽  
Emily Chan ◽  
Pamela McClanahan ◽  
Kang-Hsien Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Biliary Tract ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Tract Cancer ◽  
Disease Stabilization

e14503 Background: Gemcitabine (GEM) with a platinum agent such as oxaliplatin (OX) is standard therapy for advanced biliary tract cancers (ABTC). The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) erlotinib has also shown modest benefit in ABTC. Erlotinib (E) induces G1/S cell cycle arrest and may exhibit sequence-specific synergy with GEM. Given continuously, it may antagonize the action of chemotherapy against cycling tumor cells but intermittent pulsatile dosing of EGFR TKIs in combination with chemotherapy may lead to maximum efficacy. The purpose of this study is to assess the tolerability of E when pulsed with GEM and OX (GEMOX). Methods: This investigator initiated, single institution phase Ib study (NCT00987766) used a standard 3+3 dose-escalation model in patients with ABTC, pancreas cancer or duodenal cancer. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of pulsatile E in combination with GEMOX. Patients received escalating doses of E starting at 50 mg daily (given on D3-8) with GEM on D1 (dose rate 10 mg/m2/min) and OX on D2 every two weeks. Dose-limiting toxicity was defined as any treatment-related, first course (28 days) non-hematologic ≥Gr3 toxicity, except nausea/vomiting or Gr4 hematologic toxicity. Results: Nineteen patients have been enrolled and 4 dose levels have been explored. Two of two patients experienced DLT [Gr3 diarrhea (n=1), Gr4 anemia (n=1)] at a dose of 150 mg E + 1000 mg/m2 GEM + 85 mg/m2 OX, exceeding the MTD. Most frequent toxicities were nausea (68%), neuropathy (68%), fatigue (63%) diarrhea (52%) and rash (52%), most Gr1 or 2. Disease stabilization occurred in 12/17 (71%) evaluable patients (5/9 ABTC, 7/8 pancreas), and partial responses were seen in 4/17 evaluable patients (24%), all with ABTC (4/9). The rate of progression-free survival at 6 months was 75% in ABTC. Conclusions: The MTD and recommended phase 2 dose of E in combination with GEMOX was E 150 mg given on days 3-8 with GEM 800 mg/m2 and OX 85 mg/m2 in this population. Clinical activity of this combination was seen in the majority of patients. An expansion cohort of an additional ten patients with ABTC at the MTD is ongoing, and correlative studies on available tissue will be performed.

A phase I study of MK-2206 in combination with lapatinib in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2607-2607
Author(s):  
Kari Braun Wisinski ◽  
Amye Tevaarwerk ◽  
Maria Bell ◽  
Mark E. Burkard ◽  
Jens C. Eickhoff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Biologically Active ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Combination Methods

2607 Background: The AKT protein kinase is a key mediator of signaling in the human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2) pathway. HER2 inhibition can result in feedback regulation of signaling, leading to high AKT activity. Preclinical studies demonstrate activity of combined HER2 and AKT inhibition. Lapatinib is an oral tyrosine kinase inhibitor of HER2. MK-2206 is an oral selective inhibitor of AKT with a maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 60mg qod. Both agents cause rash and diarrhea. This study was designed to determine the MTD, dose limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), clinical activity and pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters of the combination. Methods: This phase I study evaluated the safety of MK-2206 (30-60 mg qod) and lapatinib (1000-1500 mg qd) continuously. Cycles were 28 days, except cycle 1 (35 days), due to a 1 week MK-2206 lead-in to evaluate for PK interactions. Because of the continuous nature of therapy, protocol-specified intolerable grade 2 AEs were considered DLTs during cycle 1. Results: 23 pts (median age 59 [range 22-72];15 female:8 male) were enrolled. The most common malignancies were colorectal (8 pts), lung (4 pts), and breast (3 pts). 4 pts were unevaluable per protocol; 19 evaluable pts were on study a median of 8 weeks (range 3-35). 3 pts experienced DLTs. At dose level one, 1 pt had grade (gr) 3 hyponatremia and fatigue. At dose level four, 1 pt had gr 4 hyponatremia, gr 3 rash and hypocalcemia and 1 pt had intolerable gr 2 mucositis with delivery of <75% of drug. The most common AEs at least possibly related to therapy included diarrhea (gr 3-4 in 3 pts; gr 1-2 in 16 pts), nausea (gr 3 in 2 pts; gr 1-2 in 14 pts) and rash (gr 3 in 2 pts; gr 1-2 in 12 pts). The MTD was 45mg po qod of MK-2206 with 1500 mg po qd of lapatinib, exceeding biologically active doses for each agent. One pt with adrenal cortical carcinoma was on study for 6 months with stable disease (SD) and 1 pt with colorectal cancer was on study for 5 months with significant tumor marker decline and SD. PK analyses are ongoing. Conclusions: MK-2206 in combination with lapatinib is well-tolerated at biologically active single agent doses. Anti-tumor activity will be evaluated further in a dose expansion cohort in pts with advanced HER2-positive breast cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT01245205.

scholarly journals Avelumab in Combination with Axitinib as First-Line Treatment in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Results from the Phase 1b VEGF Liver 100 Trial

Liver Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Kudo ◽  
Kenta Motomura ◽  
Yoshiyuki Wada ◽  
Yoshitaka Inaba ◽  
Yasunari Sakamoto ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Recist 1.1 ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Introduction:</i></b> Combining an immune checkpoint inhibitor with a targeted antiangiogenic agent may leverage complementary mechanisms of action for the treatment of advanced/metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC). Avelumab is a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 antibody with clinical activity in various tumor types; axitinib is a selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptors 1, 2, and 3. We report the final analysis from VEGF Liver 100 (NCT03289533), a phase 1b study evaluating safety and efficacy of avelumab plus axitinib in treatment-naive patients with aHCC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Eligible patients had confirmed aHCC, no prior systemic therapy, ≥1 measurable lesion, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Patients received avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks plus axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included safety and investigator-assessed objective response per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 and modified RECIST (mRECIST) for HCC. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twenty-two Japanese patients were enrolled and treated with avelumab plus axitinib. The minimum follow-up was 18 months as of October 25, 2019 (data cutoff). Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 16 patients (72.7%); the most common (≥3 patients) were hypertension (<i>n</i> = 11 [50.0%]), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (<i>n</i> = 5 [22.7%]), and decreased appetite (<i>n</i> = 3 [13.6%]). No grade 4 TRAEs or treatment-related deaths occurred. Ten patients (45.5%) had an immune-related AE (irAE) of any grade; 3 patients (13.6%) had an infusion-related reaction (IRR) of any grade, and no grade ≥3 irAE and IRR were observed. The objective response rate was 13.6% (95% CI: 2.9–34.9%) per RECIST 1.1 and 31.8% (95% CI: 13.9–54.9%) per mRECIST for HCC. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Treatment with avelumab plus axitinib was associated with a manageable toxicity profile and showed antitumor activity in patients with aHCC.

Clinical activity of fianlimab (REGN3767), a human anti-LAG-3 monoclonal antibody, combined with cemiplimab (anti-PD-1) in patients (pts) with advanced melanoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9515-9515
Author(s):  
Omid Hamid ◽  
Ding Wang ◽  
Tae Min Kim ◽  
Sang-We Kim ◽  
Nehal J. Lakhani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Adrenal Insufficiency ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase 1 ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Grade 3

9515 Background: Fianlimab and cemiplimab are two high-affinity, fully human, hinge-stabilized IgG4 monoclonal antibodies. In a Phase 1 dose escalation study, fianlimab combined with cemiplimab showed an acceptable safety profile and some clinical activity in pts with advanced malignancies. Here, we present safety and clinical activity data from two expansion cohorts of pts with advanced melanoma (anti–programmed cell death/ligand-1 [anti–PD-(L)1] naïve or experienced) who were treated with fianlimab + cemiplimab and had an opportunity for first on-treatment tumor assessment (cut-off date: Jan 4, 2021). Methods: Pts with advanced melanoma who had no prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment (naïve) or prior anti–PD-(L)1 treatment within 3 months of screening (experienced) received fianlimab 1600 mg + cemiplimab 350 mg by IV infusion every 3 weeks. Tumor measurements were performed every 6 weeks for the first 24 weeks and subsequently every 9 weeks per RECIST v1.1. Results: 48 pts with advanced melanoma were treated with the combination therapy: 33 were anti–PD-(L)1 naïve and 15 were anti–PD-(L)1 experienced (median age: 69 years vs 59 years; male: 66.7% vs 46.7%; Caucasian: 87.9% vs 60%). The safety profile (including immune-related adverse events [AEs]) of fianlimab + cemiplimab combination therapy was similar to that of anti–PD-1 monotherapy with one exception. The rate of adrenal insufficiency, 8.3% (4/48) of pts, is similar to the rate previously observed with anti–PD-1 + anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA-4) combination therapy but higher than that observed with anti–PD-1 monotherapy. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent AEs (TEAEs) occurred in 35.4% (17/48) of patients; Grade ≥3 serious TEAEs occurred in 22.9% (11/48) of patients; 8.3% (4/48) of patients discontinued treatment due to a TEAE. The most common TEAEs were fatigue (n = 15, 31.3%) and rash (n = 11, 22.9%). By investigator assessment, objective response rate (includes unconfirmed complete [CR] and partial responses [PR]) was 63.6% (3 CRs and 18 PRs) for anti–PD-(L)1 naïve pts and 13.3% (1 CR and 1 PR) for anti–PD-(L)1 experienced pts. Median progression-free survival and median duration of response for the anti–PD-(L)1 treatment naïve cohort have not been reached. Prognostic clinical markers and tumor biomarkers such as expression of LAG-3, PD-L1, and major histocompatibility complex II are being evaluated. Recruitment is ongoing. Conclusions: The safety profile of fianlimab + cemiplimab is similar to that observed with cemiplimab monotherapy and other anti–PD-1s, with the exception of higher rate of adrenal insufficiency. Fianlimab + cemiplimab combination has shown clinical activity for pts with advanced melanoma that is similar to anti–PD-1 + CTLA-4 combination therapy, but with lower demonstrated rates of TEAEs. Clinical trial information: NCT03005782.

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Irinotecan and Docetaxel in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors: Preliminary Evidence of Clinical Activity

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (5) ◽  
pp. 1116-1116 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Cheri E. Klein ◽  
Helen Kastrissios ◽  
Richard M. Goldberg ◽  
Steven R. Alberts ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Intravenous Infusion ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Clinically Significant ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Recommended Phase Ii Dose ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

PURPOSE: The goals of this study were to determine the maximum-tolerated dose and describe the toxicities of the combination of irinotecan and docetaxel administered every 3 weeks to patients with advanced malignancies and, also, to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel and describe preliminary evidence of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighteen patients received 85 courses (median, two courses; range, one to 15 courses) of treatment with irinotecan, administered over 90 minutes by intravenous infusion, followed by docetaxel, administered over 60 minutes by intravenous infusion. Four escalating dose levels of irinotecan/docetaxel (160/50 mg/m2, 160/65 mg/m2, 200/65 mg/m2, and 200/75 mg/m2) were studied. Pharmacokinetic analyses were performed to evaluate the effect of irinotecan on the disposition of docetaxel. RESULTS: The most common and dose-limiting toxicity was myelosuppression, which consisted of neutropenia that was severe (National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria [NCI CTC] grade 4) but brief (< 5 days) in 11 patients, with three episodes of febrile neutropenia. Nonhematologic toxicities of anorexia, nausea, and stomatitis were mild to moderate (NCI CTC grades 1 and 2), but there was one incidence each of both CTC grade 3 anorexia and nausea. All patients had total alopecia. Diarrhea was dose-dependent and severe in four patients who failed to take adequate antidiarrhea therapy. Five out of 16 assessable patients, one with cholangiocarcinoma, one with leiomyosarcoma, and three with non–small-cell lung cancer, achieved partial remissions. CONCLUSION: The combination of irinotecan and docetaxel causes significant reversible myelosuppression, which was dose limiting but led to no serious sequelae. There was no evidence of a clinically significant interaction using these two agents in this sequence. The combination showed antitumor activity at all the dose levels tested and should be further studied in a number of tumor types. The recommended phase II dose on this schedule is irinotecan 160 mg/m2 and docetaxel 65 mg/m2.

Phase I Study of Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin and Clofarabine Plus Idarubicin Plus Cytarabine (ARA-C) in Patients (PTS) with Relapsed and Primary Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML), Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS), and Myeloid Blast Phase of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CML).

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 1809-1809 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefan Faderl ◽  
Alessandra Ferrajolil ◽  
William Wierda ◽  
Srdan Verstovsek ◽  
Farhad Ravandi-Kashani ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Acute Leukemias ◽  
First Remission ◽  
First Relapse ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Phase I and II clinical studies demonstrated activity of Clofarabine in acute leukemias. In previous studies we have investigated clofarabine, plus ara-C combinations and reported a CR rate of 24% in relapsed AML and 52% in previously untreated AML ≥ 50 years (yrs) with acceptable toxicity profile. Anthracyclines are active in AML. To explore clofarabine further in AML combinations we conducted a phase I study of clofarabine with idarubicin with or without ara-C in pts with relapsed AML, MDS, and CML. Considered as dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) are ≥ grade 3 drug-related toxicities. Maximum tolerated dose (MTD) will be determined by “3+3” dose escalation scheme. On the clofarabine (C)/idarubicin (I) combination (CI), 9 AML pts are enrolled (2 primary refractory, 7 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs (range 24–71). Median first remission duration (CRD1): 3.1 mos. (0–7.6). For the first dose level, C was given at 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d and I at 12mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d. Among the first 6 pts, 2 ≥ gr. 3 toxicities (diarrhea, rash, ↑ bili) occurred necessitating dose de-escalation of C to 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5 and I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3. Among 3 pts, 1 ≥ gr.3 toxicity (↑ bili) was observed. No responses occurred. On the CI + ara-C arm (CIA), 7 AML pts are enrolled (1 primary refractory, 6 first relapse). Median age: 58 yrs. (24–78). Median CRD1: 11.2 mos. (0–13.1). First dose level: C 22.5mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 8mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 1g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 3 pts, 2 developed ≥ gr.3 toxicities (↑ bili, diarrhea) leading to the following de-escalation: C 15mg/m2 i.v. daily x 5d, I 6mg/m2 i.v. daily x 3d, A 0.75g/m2 i.v. daily x 5d. Of 4 pts (1 ≥ gr. 3 rash, ↑ bili), 3 pts achieved CR. The phase I study is ongoing until determination of DLT and MTD for each arm. Our preliminary results indicate clinical activity of CIA even at the low dose level.

A Phase I Trial of Two Sequence-Specific Schedules of Decitabine and Vorinostat in Patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML).

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 908-908 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen W.L. Yee ◽  
Mark D. Minden ◽  
Joseph Brandwein ◽  
Aaron Schimmer ◽  
Andre Schuh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Concurrent Schedule ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Leukemic Cells ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Sequential Schedule ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Background: Epigenetic silencing of genes has been documented in AML. This phase I trial evaluates the safety, tolerability, and maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of two schedules of administration of the hypomethylating agent decitabine in combination with the pan-selective histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat. Methods: Patients receive escalating doses of oral vorinostat administered either sequentially [100 mg bid (n=4), 200 mg bid (n=4), or 200 mg tid (n=8) Days 6–21] or concurrently [100 mg (n=3) or 200 mg (n=6) bid Days 1–21 or 200 mg tid (n=2) Days 1–14] with decitabine (20 mg/m2/d IV Days 1–5) every 28 days. Results: Twenty-seven patients with AML have been treated. Median age was 67 years (range, 32–82 years). Median ECOG status 1 (range, 0 to 2). Eighteen patients (67%) had received prior therapy (median, 1 regimen; range, 0 to 4 regimens); 3 had received a prior allogeneic stem cell transplant. A total of 85 cycles have been administered, with a median of 2 cycles (range, 1 to 13 cycles); 10 patients (37%) have received 3 or more cycles of therapy. One of 7 patients treated at dose level 3 of the sequential schedule developed dose-limiting toxicities (DLT), consisting of grade 3 fatigue, weakness, and mucositis. Therefore, the MTD was not reached in the 3 planned dose levels of the sequential schedule. One DLT (grade 3 fatigue) occurred in 6 patients treated at dose level 2 of the concurrent schedule. Most common drug-related non-hematological toxicities of any grade (all CTCAE grades 1 or 2) were nausea (71%), fatigue (54%), diarrhea (54%), vomiting (42%), anorexia (25%), constipation (13%), abdominal pain (13%), dehydration (13%), and headache (13%). No other non-hematological grade 3 or 4 toxicities were observed. Of the 25 evaluable patients, one patient achieved an incomplete CR (without neutrophil recovery), one a morphologic leukemia-free state (without blood count recovery), and three partial remissions (1 achieved red cell transfusion independency and a second normalization of platelet counts). Seven of these patients remain on study for 2.7 to 13.5+ months. Correlative studies examining histone acetylation and gene promoter methylation in leukemic cells at baseline and after treatment, as well as plasma pharmacokinetic levels for both decitabine and vorinostat are being evaluated. Conclusions: The combination of decitabine and vorinostat is safe, well-tolerated, and has clinical activity in patients with AML. Enrollment is ongoing.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document