Retrospective, cohort study evaluating empiric dose-reduced nab-paclitaxel with gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single institution experience.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 456-456
Author(s):  
Olugbenga Olanrele Olowokure ◽  
LeeAnn Geraghty ◽  
Lisa Grate ◽  
Alicia Gesenhues ◽  
Adam Lane ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cohort Study ◽  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Primary Outcome ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Single Institution ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

456 Background: The phase III MPACT trial was conducted to assess OS in patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (mPAC) receiving nab-paclitaxel (nab-P) 125 mg/m2 + gemcitabine (G) 1000 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Due to reported increased incidence of adverse events (AEs) at this dose, practice at UC Health outside the setting of a clinical trial is to empirically dose reduce (EDR) nab-P to 100 mg/m2. This study is a review of the efficacy of EDR nab-P + G in patients with mPAC compared to MPACT data. Methods: This retrospective, single-center, cohort study included patients ≥18 years of age with mPAC (by biopsy) receiving first line therapy with EDR nab-P + G from January 1, 2012 to March 31, 2017. Primary outcome is OS. Secondary outcomes include PFS, CA19-9 percent reduction, incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs. Results: See table. Conclusions: In patients with mPAC, EDR nab-P plus G demonstrated a median OS of 10 months and PFS of 5 months. 53% of patients had a 20% CA19-9 reduction from baseline with a 1 year OS rate of 45%. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs appeared to be acceptable. [Table: see text]

Doxorubicin and Paclitaxel Versus Fluorouracil, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide as First-Line Therapy for Women With Metastatic Breast Cancer: Final Results of a Randomized Phase III Multicenter Trial

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (6) ◽  
pp. 1707-1715 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacek Jassem ◽  
Tadeusz Pieńkowski ◽  
Anna Płuzańska ◽  
Svetislav Jelic ◽  
Vera Gorbunova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: This phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of doxorubicin and paclitaxel (AT) to 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) as first-line therapy for women with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 267 women with metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive either AT (doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 followed 24 hours later by paclitaxel 220 mg/m2) or FAC (5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2), each administered every 3 weeks for up to eight cycles. Patients had to have measurable disease and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2. Only one prior non–anthracycline, nontaxane-containing adjuvant chemotherapy regimen was allowed. RESULTS: Overall response rates for patients randomized to AT and FAC were 68% and 55%, respectively (P = .032). Median time to progression and overall survival were significantly longer for AT compared with FAC (time to progression 8.3 months v 6.2 months [P = .034]; overall survival 23.3 months v 18.3 months [P = .013]). Therapy was generally well-tolerated (median of eight cycles delivered in each arm). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia was more common with AT than with FAC (89% v 65%; P < .001); however, the incidence of fever and infection was low. Grade 3 or 4 arthralgia and myalgia, peripheral neuropathy, and diarrhea were more common with AT, whereas nausea and vomiting were more common with FAC. The incidence of cardiotoxicity was low in both arms. CONCLUSION: AT conferred a significant advantage in response rate, time to progression, and overall survival compared with FAC. Treatment was well-tolerated with no unexpected toxicities.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Toxicity of Fludarabine (F) in First Line Therapy of Younger Versus Elderly Patients (Pts) with Advanced Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL): Results of a Meta-Analysis of Two Phase III Trials of the German CLL Study Group (GCLLSG).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 717-717 ◽  
Author(s):  
Barbara F. Eichhorst ◽  
Raymonde Busch ◽  
Clemens M. Wendtner ◽  
Michael Hallek ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Age Groups ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Two Phase ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Phase Iii Trials ◽  
Binet Stage ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Introduction: F based regimen have become the standard treatment in CLL at least in younger pts. However, in elderly pts chlorambucil is still frequently used since it is easy to administer and has less side effects. Here we compare the efficacy and toxicity of F administered to younger pts and elderly pts treated between 1999 and 2004 within two phase III trials of GCLLSG. Patients: 362 pts (median age 59 [range 37–65] years) were randomized to F (n=182) or F plus cyclophosphamide (n=180) within the CLL4 trial. 191 elderly pts (median age 71 [range 65–79] years) were treated with F (92 pts) or chlorambucil (99 pts) within the CLL5 protocol. Inclusion criteria were identical in both trials except for age limits. All pts were previously untreated and in advanced stage Binet C or Binet B with symptoms which require therapy or Binet A with severe B-symptoms. In both studies the F regimen consisted of 30 mg/m2/day (d) IV for 5 consecutive days, every 28 d for up to 6 cycles. Anti-infective prophylaxis and growth factors were not given routinely in both trials. Results: Most of patients in both age groups were in Binet stage B (54% of the younger pts and 52% of the elderly), 35% in each age group were in Binet stage C, 11% and 13% respectively in Binet stage A. No significant difference in the main clinical features was observed except for a higher incidence of concomitant disease in the elderly (61% versus 36%, p=0.001). A mean number of 5.2 F courses was administered in the CLL4 trial and 4.9 courses in the CLL5 trial. The mean administered cumulative dose of F per pt was lower in the elderly pts (1076 mg vs. 1194 mg, p= 0.05). Overall response rates were similar in both arms, with 82.9% in the younger group and 85.7% in the elderly. The complete remission rate was 6.7% in the younger patients and 10.4% in the elderly (p= 0.3). After a follow up time of 24 months (mo) the progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in the elderly group with 18.7 mo compared to 19.8 mo in the younger group after 22 mo observation time (p=0.03). The overall survival (OS) was significantly impaired in elderly pts as well (29 mo versus median not reached, p&lt;0.001). Progressive disease was the main cause of death in both age groups. In each group 3 treatment related deaths occurred due to infection or hemolysis. The incidence of side effects was similar in both age groups. Severe, CTC grade 3 and 4, myelosuppression occurred in 39% of the younger and 41% of the elderly pts. No difference in the rate of leukocytopenia, thrombocytopenia or anemia was oberved as well. The incidence rate and severity of infections was similar in both groups (24% vs. 32% all and 8.7% vs. 6.9% CTC grade 3 and 4). The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts (2.2% vs. 12.2%, p=0.001). In comparison the prevalence rate of neoplasia in the U.S. population peaks at 11% in the age group of 70–79 (SEER cancer statistic review: 1972–2002). Conclusion: F is a well tolerated treatment regimen in first line therapy of elderly pts with CLL. Response rates were similar in both age groups. PFS and OS were significantly shorter in the elderly population. The incidence of second neoplasia was significantly higher in the elderly pts, but is only slightly increased in comparison to the normal population.

Randomized Phase III Study of Capecitabine Plus Oxaliplatin Compared With Fluorouracil/Folinic Acid Plus Oxaliplatin As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (12) ◽  
pp. 2006-2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jim Cassidy ◽  
Stephen Clarke ◽  
Eduardo Díaz-Rubio ◽  
Werner Scheithauer ◽  
Arie Figer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate whether capecitabine plus oxaliplatin (XELOX) is noninferior to fluorouracil. folinic acid, and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX-4) as first-line therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (MCRC).Patients and MethodsThe initial design of this trial was a randomized, two-arm, noninferiority, phase III comparison of XELOX versus FOLFOX-4. After patient accrual had begun, the trial design was amended in 2003 after bevacizumab phase III data became available. The resulting 2 × 2 factorial design randomly assigned patients to XELOX versus FOLFOX-4, and then to also receive either bevacizumab or placebo. We report here the results of the analysis of the XELOX versus FOLFOX-4 arms. The analysis of bevacizumab versus placebo with oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy is reported separately. The prespecified primary end point for the noninferiority analysis was progression-free survival.ResultsThe intent-to-treat population comprised 634 patients from the original two-arm portion of the study, plus an additional 1,400 patients after the start of the amended 2 × 2 design, for a total of 2,034 patients. The median PFS was 8.0 months in the pooled XELOX-containing arms versus 8.5 months in the FOLFOX-4–containing arms (hazard ratio [HR], 1.04; 97.5% CI, 0.93 to 1.16). The median overall survival was 19.8 months with XELOX versus 19.6 months with FOLFOX-4 (HR, 0.99; 97.5% CI, 0.88 to 1.12). FOLFOX-4 was associated with more grade 3/4 neutropenia/granulocytopenia and febrile neutropenia than XELOX, and XELOX with more grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 hand-foot syndrome than FOLFOX-4.ConclusionXELOX is noninferior to FOLFOX-4 as a first-line treatment for MCRC, and may be considered as a routine treatment option for appropriate patients.

Modified FOLFIRINOX for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma after failure of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 467-467
Author(s):  
Masato Ozaka ◽  
Takashi Sasaki ◽  
Seita Kataoka ◽  
Ryo Kanata ◽  
Kazunaga Ishigaki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Start Date ◽  
Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma ◽  
Head Of The Pancreas ◽  
Grade 3

467 Background: Both FOLFIRINOX and Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine standard treatment in first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma (MPA). It could be of interest to use them consecutively, knowing that there is currently no standard for 2nd line treatments for MPA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of modified FOLFIRINOX after gemcitabine plus Nab-paclitaxel failure in MPA. Methods: From January 2015 to March 2016, medical records were retrospectively reviewed for consecutive patients receiving modified FOLFIRINOX for a histologically proven MPA after failure of Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine. Patients were treated with modified FOLFIRINOX every 2 weeks as follows: intravenous oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, 5-FU infusion 2,400 mg/m2 over 46 h, no bolus 5-FU, until disease progression, patient refusal or unacceptable toxicity. Results: Modified FOLFIRINOX was administered to 23 pts. Among these patients, median age was 64 years (range 42.4 - 74.2). 83% of the patients had a PS 0, the primary site of the tumor was the head of the pancreas in 39% of patients, and 26% of patients experienced recurrence after resection. Disease control rate was 66.7% (n = 17) with a 23.8 % (n = 17) objective response rate (RECIST). Within the whole cohort, median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI: 3.1-5.3) and median overall survival (OS) was 9.3 months (95% CI: 3.8-14.8). Since the start date of first line chemotherapy with Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine, median OS was 18.8 months (95% CI: 9.6-27.9). No toxic death occured. Grade 3-4 toxicities were reported in 30% of patients and were neutropenia (17%), anemia (8%), cholangitis (8%) and acute kidney injury (4%). Conclusions: Modified FOLFIRINOX seems promising with a manageable toxicity profile after Nab-paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine failure, in selected patients able to receive second line treatment for a MPA. These promising results have now to be confirmed in a phase III randomized trial.

Safety and efficacy analysis by histology of weekly nab-paclitaxel in combination with carboplatin as first-line therapy in patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7592-7592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus Frederic Renschler ◽  
Isamu Okamoto ◽  
Jeremy K. Hon ◽  
Vera Hirsh ◽  
Shaker R. Dakhil ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Positive Trend ◽  
First Line ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Efficacy Analysis ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Gender

7592 Background: Treatment of advanced NSCLC differs by histology, with fewer options and poorer outcomes in pts with squamous histology. In a phase III trial of nab-paclitaxel (nab-P, 130 nm albumin-bound paclitaxel particles) + carboplatin (C) vs solvent-based paclitaxel (sb-P) + C, the primary endpoint of ORR was significantly improved from 25% to 33%, p = 0.005, with a 1-month improvement in OS (p = NS) and improved safety. This analysis evaluated efficacy and safety by histology. Methods: Pts with untreated stage IIIB/IV NSCLC were randomized 1:1 (stratified by age, histology, region, stage, and gender) to C AUC 6 day 1 and either nab-P 100 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, 15 or sb-P 200 mg/m2 day 1 q 21 days. ORR and PFS were determined by blinded centralized review. Results: In squamous pts, nab-P/C produced a significantly higher ORR (41% vs 24%, p < 0.001), similar PFS (5.6 vs 5.7 mo, HR: 0.865) and >1-month improvement in OS (10.7 vs 9.5 mo, HR: 0.890) vs sb-P/C (Table). nab-P/C was as effective as sb-P/C in nonsquamous pts for ORR (26% vs 25%, p = 0.808), PFS (6.9 vs 6.5 mo, HR: 0.933), and OS (13.1 vs 13.0 mo, HR: 0.950). In both squamous and nonsquamous pts, nab-P/C vs sb-P/C produced lower rates of grade 3/4 neuropathy (3% vs 11% and 3% vs 12%, respectively, p < 0.001 both), neutropenia (43% vs 51%, p = NS, and 50% vs 63%, p = 0.008), and higher but manageable rates of anemia (27% vs 4% and 28% vs 9%, p < 0.001 both) and thrombocytopenia (21% vs 7% and 16% vs 11%, p < 0.001 both). Conclusions: In pts with advanced NSCLC, nab-P/C demonstrated a favorable risk-benefit profile as a first-line therapy regardless of histology. Significantly improved ORR and a positive trend in OS were observed in pts with squamous histology. [Table: see text]

Randomized, Open-Label, Phase III Study of a 28-Day Oral Regimen of Eniluracil Plus Fluorouracil Versus Intravenous Fluorouracil Plus Leucovorin as First-Line Therapy in Patients With Metastatic/Advanced Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 1519-1526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard L. Schilsky ◽  
Jeremey Levin ◽  
William H. West ◽  
Alfred Wong ◽  
Bruce Colwell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
First Line Therapy ◽  
Line Therapy ◽  
Open Label Phase ◽  
Phase Iii Study ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and tolerability of eniluracil (EU)/fluorouracil (5-FU) with that of 5-FU/leucovorin (LV) as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic/advanced colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III study (FUMA3008) conducted in the United States and Canada compared the safety and efficacy of EU/5-FU (11.5 mg/m2/1.15 mg/m2 twice daily for 28 days every 35 days) with that of intravenous 5-FU/LV (425 mg/m2/20 mg/m2 once daily for 5 days every 28 days) in patients with previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. Overall survival (OS) was the primary end point. RESULTS: A total of 981 patients were randomized and 964 patients received treatment (485 EU/5FU, 479 5FU/LV). Survival for EU/5-FU was not statistically equivalent (but not statistically inferior) to that for 5-FU/LV (hazard ratio, 0.880; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75 to 1.03). Median duration of survival was 13.3 months in the EU/5-FU group and 14.5 months in the 5-FU/LV group. Median duration of progression-free survival for EU/5-FU was statistically inferior to that of the control group (20.0 weeks [95% CI, 19.1 to 20.9 weeks] v 22.7 weeks [95% CI, 18.3 to 24.6 weeks]; P = .01). Both treatments were well tolerated. Diarrhea was the most common nonhematologic toxicity in both groups; treatment-related grade 3 or 4 diarrhea occurred in 19% of patients treated with EU/5-FU and 16% of patients receiving 5-FU/LV (P = .354). Grade 3 or 4 granulocytopenia occurred in 5% of EU/5-FU patients and 47% of 5-FU/LV patients. CONCLUSION: Safety profiles of both treatments were acceptable. Although antitumor activity was observed, EU/5-FU did not meet the protocol-specified statistical criteria for equivalence to 5-FU/LV in terms of OS.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document