Towards cancer mega-cohorts: A novel homogenization algorithm applied to diverse breast cancer RNA-Seq datasets.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13507-e13507
Author(s):  
Talal Ahmed ◽  
Mark Carty ◽  
Stephane Wenric ◽  
Raphael Pelossof

e13507 Background: Recent advances in transcriptomics have resulted in the emergence of several publicly available breast cancer RNA-Seq datasets, such as TCGA, SCAN-B, and METABRIC. However, molecular predictors cannot be applied across datasets without the correction of batch differences. In this study, we demonstrate a homogenization algorithm that allows the transfer of molecular subtype predictors from one RNA-Seq cohort to another. The algorithm only uses cohort-level RNA-Seq summary statistics, and therefore, does not require joint normalization of both datasets nor the transfer of patient information. Using this approach, we transferred a breast cancer subtype (Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2+, Basal) predictor trained on SCAN-B data to accurately predict subtypes from TCGA. Methods: First, we randomly split the TCGA cohort (n = 481 Luminal A, n = 189 Luminal B, n = 73 Her2+, n = 168 Basal) into two sets: TCGA-train and held-out TCGA-test (n = 455 and n = 456, respectively). Second, the SCAN-B cohort (n = 837) was homogenized with the TCGA-train set. Third, a molecular subtype predictor, based on a logistic regression model, was trained on homogenized SCAN-B RNA-Seq samples and used to predict the subtypes of TCGA-test RNA-Seq samples. For baseline comparison, a similar predictor trained on the non-homogenized SCAN-B cohort was tested on the TCGA-test set. The experimental framework was iterated 250 times. Reported P-values reflect a paired one-sided t-test. Results: To quantify model performance, we measured the average F1 score for each tumor subtype prediction from the held-out TCGA test set with and without cohort homogenization. The average F1 scores with vs. without homogenization were: Luminal A, 0.88 vs. 0.85 ( P< 1e-69); Luminal B, 0.74 vs. 0.51 ( P< 1e-183); Her2+, 0.73 vs. 0.53 ( P< 1e-99); Basal, 0.98 vs. 0.97 ( P< 1e-53). Overall, homogenization significantly outperformed no homogenization. Conclusions: We developed a novel homogenization algorithm that accurately transfers subtype predictors across diverse, independent breast cancer cohorts.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22119-e22119
Author(s):  
Maria Gonzalez Cao ◽  
Carlota Costa ◽  
Miguel Angel Molina-Vila ◽  
Maria Teresa Cusido ◽  
Santiago Viteri Ramirez ◽  
...  

e22119 Background: Although it is know that pCR following neoadjuvant chemotherapy is more frequent in some subtypes of breast cancer such as Triple Negative (TN) or erb2 tumors, the predictive role of gene expression and mutation status is not well defined in this setting. Methods: We analyzed samples from 41 patients (p) prospectively treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (sequential AC followed by weekly TXL, or inverse sequence, plus trastuzumab for erb2 positive p). Pathologic response (PR) was classified according to Miller-Payne and RCB criteria. Radiologic evaluation was performed by ultrasonography, dynamic MR and PET-TAC after each chemotherapy sequence. We performed expression analysis of AXL, BRCA1, RAP80, BIM, EZH2, ROR1, FGFR1, PTPN12, YAP, GAS6, beta-TRCP, HIF1 alpha and ZNF217 by RT-PCR, and mutational status of p53 and PI3K genes in pretreatment biopsies. Statistical analysis was performed using Mann-Whitney U and Pearson’s chi-squared tests. Results: pCR was detected in 5 p (3TN, 2 erb2) of 25 p (9 luminal A, 5 luminal B, 6 erb2 and 5 TN) evaluated for PR at time of submitting this abstract. TN tumors had lower levels of RAP80 (p=.0013), PTPN12 (p=.003), beta TRCP (p=.001), ZNF217 (p=.014) and YAP (p=.097). Luminal B tumors had low levels of YAP and the highest levels of FGFR1 (p=.09) and ZNF217 (p=.014). Luminal A tumors had high levels of beta-TRCP (p=.003). We found no differences in BRCA1, AXL, BIM, EZH2, ROR1, GAS6 and HIF1 levels by breast cancer subtype. P with low levels of FGFR1 (p=.087), HIF1alpha (p=.07) or EZH2 (p=.005) had higher probability of pCR. No pCR was observed in p with higher levels of AXL, EZH2, RAP80, GAS6, beta TRCP, HIF alpha. Four p had p53 mutations (1 luminal B, 1 erb2 and 2 TN) and 4 p had PI3K mutations (2 luminal A, 1 erb2, 1 luminal B). There was no correlation between p53 status and PR. P with PI3K mutations did not achieve pCR vs 46% of p with wild type PI3K (p=.23). Conclusions: Gene expression profile varies by breast cancer subtype. Chemosensitivity could be higher in tumors with lower levels of FGFR1, HIF1alpha or EZH2. Further results will be presented.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 20-20
Author(s):  
Sandeep K. Reddy ◽  
Tara Elisabeth Seery ◽  
Christopher Szeto

20 Background: ERBB2 (HER2) is thought to be a target in <10% of CRC patients versus 20% of breast cancers, 15% of gastroesophageal cancers, and 10% of biliary cancers, based on FISH or IHC. Intrinsic molecular subtype is used to classify cancers into distinct biologic subtypes (eg. CMS 1-4 in CRC). A 50-gene qPCR assay (PAM50) identifies 5 intrinsic biological subtypes: luminal A, luminal B, HER2-enriched, basal-like, and normal-like in breast cancer. The HERACLES trial (trastuzumab plus lapatinib) resulted a 32% ORR and median TTP of 5.5 months in heavily pre-pretreated HER2+ CRC patients. We determined molecular subtypes using the 50-gene breast cancer classifier to identify an expanded CRC patient population eligible for HER2 therapy. Methods: Retrospective analysis on Whole exome (WES) DNA tumor and paired germline and matched deep whole transcriptomic sequencing (RNA-Seq) (∼200x106 reads per tumor) data from NantHealth was performed. Breast Cancer Intrinsic Subtypes based on RNAseq was used to classify CRC into 5 BC subtypes. Results: 167 CRC patients were classified using the Nant50 Breast Cancer classifier: 15.0% as Luminal B, 13.1% as Luminal A, and 1.8% as Basal-like. Surprisingly, 117/167 (70%) classified as HER2-enriched (HER-E). 15/167 (9.0%) had over-expression of ERBB2 by RNAseq or CN gain, which is consistent with published data of HER2+ CRC. ERBB2 is very significantly differentially expressed in HER2-E subtyped CRC (p=<0.001), more than ERBB2 CN gain, suggesting that HER2-E may be more HER2 driven. Across subtypes APC and TP53 were the most commonly mutated genes at 65.3% and 52.6% respectively, however both were more enriched in HER2-E CRC (APC OR=3.3, p=0.001, TP53 OR=2.6, p=0.007). Other known drivers of CRC such as PIK3CA, KRAS, and BRAF, were not differentially mutated in HER2-E CRC, however NRAS mutants were significantly more enriched in non-HER2-E CRC (OR=4.6, p=0.02). Conclusions: Even after excluding known HER2 over-expression and CN gain, PAM50-like gene classifier identifies a far higher than expected percentage of HER-E subtype CRC (99/167 = 59%) which may represent an under appreciated population for HER2 directed therapy and clinical trials.


Medicinus ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Primariadewi Rustamadji ◽  
Stephanie Marisca

<p>Introduction: Breast cancer can be classified into luminal A, luminal B, Her2+, dan basal-like molecular subtype according to genetic profile and immunophenotype. The aim of this study is to assess histopathologic and immunophenotype characteristics of breast cancer in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital Jakarta, Indonesia.<br />Material and methods: This study is a cross-sectional retrospective study. The sample was 2632 breast cancer case in Department of Anatomical Pathology Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital from the year 2011 until 2015. ER, PR, Her2, Top2 α, and Ki67 immunohistochemical stain was then grouped into luminal A (ER+/PR+/Her2-/Ki67&lt;20%) subtype, luminal B (ER+/PR+/Her2-/Ki67≥20%) subtype, Her2+ (ER-/PR-/Her2+) subtype, and basal-like (ER-/PR-/Her2-) subtype. Kendall’s Tau analysis was done to assess association between sample characteristics and molecular subtype, association between top2α positive and molecular subtype.<br />Result: The most prevalent to the less prevalent breast cancer molecular subtype was luminal B (43,9%), Her2+ (14,6%), luminal A (14,0%), and basal-like (11,3%). There was a significant association between the tumor stage and breast cancer subtype (p=0,0001). There is also a significant association between Top2α expression and molecular subtype (p=0,0001).<br />Conclusion: The most prevalent breast cancer molecular subtype was luminal B. There was an association between breast cancer molecular subtype and a higher degree and Top2α expression.</p>


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (14) ◽  
pp. 2373-2378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul L. Nguyen ◽  
Alphonse G. Taghian ◽  
Matthew S. Katz ◽  
Andrzej Niemierko ◽  
Rita F. Abi Raad ◽  
...  

Purpose To determine whether breast cancer subtype is associated with outcome after breast-conserving therapy (BCT) consisting of lumpectomy and radiation therapy. Patients and Methods We studied 793 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who received BCT from July 1998 to December 2001. Among them, 97% had pathologically negative margins of resection, and 90% received adjuvant systemic therapy. No patient received adjuvant trastuzumab. Receptor status was used to approximate subtype: estrogen receptor (ER) or progesterone receptor (PR) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 negative = luminal A; ER+ or PR+ and HER-2+ = luminal B; ER–and PR –and HER-2+ = HER-2; and ER–and PR –and HER-2–= basal. Competing risks methodology was used to analyze time to local recurrence and distant metastases. Results Median follow-up was 70 months. The overall 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence was 1.8% (95% CI, 1.0 to 3.1); 0.8% (0.3, 2.2) for luminal A, 1.5% (0.2, 10) for luminal B, 8.4% (2.2, 30) for HER-2, and 7.1% (3.0, 16) for basal. On multivariable analysis (MVA) with luminal A as baseline, HER-2 (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR] = 9.2; 95% CI, 1.6 to 51; P = .012) and basal (AHR = 7.1; 95% CI, 1.6 to 31; P = .009) subtypes were associated with increased local recurrence. On MVA, luminal B (AHR = 2.9; 95% CI, 1.3 to 6.5; P = .007) and basal (AHR = 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 5.2; P = .035) were associated with increased distant metastases. Conclusion Overall, the 5-year local recurrence rate after BCT was low, but varied by subtype as approximated using ER, PR, and HER-2 status. Local recurrence was particularly low for the luminal A subtype, but was less than 10% at 5 years for all subtypes. Although further follow-up is needed, these results may be useful in counseling patients about their anticipated outcome after BCT.


2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (11) ◽  
pp. 191-197
Author(s):  
Jefri Adi Kam Sitepu ◽  
Marjono Dwi Wibowo ◽  
Iskandar Ali

Background: Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer death in women worldwide. Breast cancer has been classified into several molecular subgroups with different prognostic consequences based on immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology. The prognosis that commonly used is 5-years survival. In this study we aimed to examine the relationship between luminal subtype and 5-year survival rate in patients with early post-mastectomy breast cancer. Methods: We recruited early breast cancer patient who underwent modified radical mastectomy (MRM) in Dr. Soetomo General Hospital (Surabaya, Indonesia) between 2010 – 2014. Breast cancer tissues were collected during surgery for immunohistochemistry. The patients’ 5-years survival data was obtained from medical records and by phone call to the patients or to the close relatives of the patients. Breast cancer subtype was determined based on the result of immunohistochemistry Results: A total of 84 patients was included in this study. The majority of patients were aged >40 years (72/84; 85.7%). There were 39 patients (39/84; 46.4%) with luminal A subtype and 45 patients (45/84; 53.6%) with luminal B subtype. Seventy-four patients were diagnosed as invasive ductal carcinoma histologically. Almost all of the patients were able to survive within 5 years (81/84; 96.4%). We found that luminal B had a 1.071 times higher risk of dying within 5 years after therapy than luminal type A, although the analysis did not show significant results (P = 0.101). Conclusion: Luminal B was the most prevalent breast cancer subtype in Surabaya, Indonesia. The prevalence of breast cancer was higher in patients aged >40 years. There was no significant difference between the 5-years survival of luminal A and luminal B subtypes. Keywords: survival, locally advanced breast cancer, luminal subtype, mastectomy.


2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 392-400
Author(s):  
Fajar Lamhot Gultom ◽  
Marliana Nurprilinda ◽  
Ryani Nur Cahyaning Hutami

Immunohistochemistry examination (IHC) is one of the additional tests to diagnose and determine breast cancer subtype. IHC examination is a method to check intracellular protein using a monoclonal and polyclonal antibody to detect the antigen in tissue. IHC examination determined by hormone receptor markers (ER and PR), HER-2/Neu expression, and apoptotic and proliferation markers (Ki-67 and p53) can be used to determine therapy and prognosis. This study aims to determine the hormonal status of breast cancer patient at Siloam Semanggi Hospital in 2018, in the form of age, gender, pathology diagnose, and the result of IHC (ER, PR, HER2, and Ki-67). This study is a retrospective descriptive study using pathological anatomy laboratory results of breast cancer in MRCCC Siloam Semanggi Hospital and 208 patients following inclusion and exclusion criteria. The result obtained is that the age group with the highest frequency is 50-59 years, with 34.1%. The highest frequency by gender is a woman with 99.5%. Carcinoma mammae NST with grade II and III was found in 38.0% of patients. The hormonal receptor with ER and PR positive was found in 51.0% of patients. HER2 expression negative was found in 56.7% of patients. High proliferation Ki-67 was found in 82.7% of patients. Luminal B with HER2 negative subtype was found in 32.2% of patients. Patients in 50-59 years with Luminal B with HER2 negative subtype was found in 26 patients. Patients in carcinoma mammae NST with grade II with Luminal B with HER2 negative subtype was found in 27 patients. Keywords: Breast cancer, pathologic anatomy, immunohistochemistry, breast cancer subtype


BMC Cancer ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexey Surov ◽  
Yun-Woo Chang ◽  
Lihua Li ◽  
Laura Martincich ◽  
Savannah C. Partridge ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Radiological imaging plays a central role in the diagnosis of breast cancer (BC). Some studies suggest MRI techniques like diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) may provide further prognostic value by discriminating between tumors with different biologic characteristics including receptor status and molecular subtype. However, there is much contradictory reported data regarding such associations in the literature. The purpose of the present study was to provide evident data regarding relationships between quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values on DWI and pathologic prognostic factors in BC. Methods Data from 5 centers (661 female patients, mean age, 51.4 ± 10.5 years) were acquired. Invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) was diagnosed in 625 patients (94.6%) and invasive lobular carcinoma in 36 cases (5.4%). Luminal A carcinomas were diagnosed in 177 patients (28.0%), luminal B carcinomas in 279 patients (44.1%), HER 2+ carcinomas in 66 cases (10.4%), and triple negative carcinomas in 111 patients (17.5%). The identified lesions were staged as T1 in 51.3%, T2 in 43.0%, T3 in 4.2%, and as T4 in 1.5% of the cases. N0 was found in 61.3%, N1 in 33.1%, N2 in 2.9%, and N3 in 2.7%. ADC values between different groups were compared using the Mann–Whitney U test and by the Kruskal-Wallis H test. The association between ADC and Ki 67 values was calculated by Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. Results ADC values of different tumor subtypes overlapped significantly. Luminal B carcinomas had statistically significant lower ADC values compared with luminal A (p = 0.003) and HER 2+ (p = 0.007) lesions. No significant differences of ADC values were observed between luminal A, HER 2+ and triple negative tumors. There were no statistically significant differences of ADC values between different T or N stages of the tumors. Weak statistically significant correlation between ADC and Ki 67 was observed in luminal B carcinoma (r = − 0.130, p = 0.03). In luminal A, HER 2+ and triple negative tumors there were no significant correlations between ADC and Ki 67. Conclusion ADC was not able to discriminate molecular subtypes of BC, and cannot be used as a surrogate marker for disease stage or proliferation activity.


Author(s):  
Natalie Turner ◽  
Laura Biganzoli ◽  
Luca Malorni ◽  
Ilenia Migliaccio ◽  
Erica Moretti ◽  
...  

In the past, treatment decisions regarding adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer (EBC) were made solely based on clinicopathologic factors. However, with increased awareness of the importance of underlying tumor biology, we are now able to use genomic analyses to determine molecular breast cancer subtype and thus identify patients with tumors that are chemotherapy resistant and unlikely to benefit from the addition of chemotherapy. Although genomics has allowed some patients to avoid chemotherapy—specifically those with luminal A–like breast cancer—these assays do not indicate which regimen is most appropriate. For this, consideration must be given to the combination of underlying tumor biology, tumor stage, and patient characteristics, such as age and tolerability of side effects.


2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1041-1041
Author(s):  
Joaquina Martínez-Galan ◽  
Sandra Rios ◽  
Juan Ramon Delgado ◽  
Blanca Torres-Torres ◽  
Jesus Lopez-Peñalver ◽  
...  

1041 Background: Identification of gene expression-based breast cancer subtypes is considered a critical means of prognostication. Genetic mutations along with epigenetic alterations contribute to gene-expression changes occurring in breast cancer. However, the reproducibility of differential DNA methylation discoveries for cancer and the relationship between DNA methylation and aberrant gene expression have not been systematically analysed. The present study was undertaken to dissect the breast cancer methylome and to deliver specific epigenotypes associated with particular breast cancer subtypes. Methods: By using Real Time QMSPCR SYBR green we analyzed DNA methylation in regulatory regions of 107 pts with breast cancer and analyzed association with prognostics factor in triple negative breast cancer and methylation promoter ESR1, APC, E-Cadherin, Rar B and 14-3-3 sigma. Results: We identified novel subtype-specific epigenotypes that clearly demonstrate the differences in the methylation profiles of basal-like and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing tumors. Of the cases, 37pts (40%) were Luminal A (LA), 32pts (33%) Luminal B (LB), 14pts (15%) Triple-negative (TN), and 9pts (10%) HER2+. DNA hypermethylation was highly inversely correlated with the down-regulation of gene expression. Methylation of this panel of promoter was found more frequently in triple negative and HER2 phenotype. ESR1 was preferably associated with TN(80%) and HER2+(60%) subtype. With a median follow up of 6 years, we found worse overall survival (OS) with more frequent ESR1 methylation gene(p>0.05), Luminal A;ESR1 Methylation OS at 5 years 81% vs 93% when was ESR1 Unmethylation. Luminal B;ESR1 Methylation 86% SG at 5 years vs 92% in Unmethylation ESR1. Triple negative;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years 75% vs 80% in unmethylation ESR1. HER2;ESR1 Methylation SG at 5 years was 66.7% vs 75% in unmethylation ESR1. Conclusions: Our results provide evidence that well-defined DNA methylation profiles enable breast cancer subtype prediction and support the utilization of this biomarker for prognostication and therapeutic stratification of patients with breast cancer.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document