Descriptive evaluation of frequent patient referrals to our cardio-oncology clinic: The Mayo experience.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14018-e14018
Author(s):  
Anza Zahid ◽  
Prema P. Peethambaram ◽  
Carrie A. Thompson ◽  
Minetta C. Liu ◽  
Kathryn Jean Ruddy ◽  
...  

e14018 Background: Cancer survival rates are improving. Therefore, management of cardiovascular complications has now become a crucial clinical concern. Cardio-oncology is the sub-specialty that assists in the overall management of cancer patients in a multi-disciplinary manner. Mayo Clinic cardio-oncology practice was initiated to work closely with our oncology colleagues for early detection of cardiovascular complications in response to cancer-therapy. Majority of the patients visit our cardio-oncology clinic once, we thought it is important to study the group of patients that visited frequently due to cardiovascular complications. Aim: To evaluate the most common cardiovascular complication in patients with 2 or more visits to our cardio-oncology clinic. Methods: From 2012-2017, there were > 2500 patients visits to our clinic, with 24 patients having 2 or more visits. Data including patients’ demographics, ethnicity, chemotherapeutic medications, primary cancer type, cardiovascular risk factors, echocardiography and clinical outcomes were collected. Cardiotoxicity was defined as the decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of > 10% to a value of < 53%. Heart failure was diagnosed based on Framingham’s criteria or by a cardiologist. Results: There were 19 women (80%) and 5 men (20%). Median age at the time of diagnosis was 56 years [19-76]. The most common malignancy was breast cancer (70%), followed by B-cell lymphoma (12%) and acute myeloid leukemia (8%). Thirty percent had > 2 risk factors for cardiovascular disease. 75% of the patients had an LVEF of < 53, of these 67% developed heart failure with 58% preserved and 42% reduced ejection fraction. Those with heart failure had received a mean anthracycline dose of 305 ± 91.8mg/m2. With initiation of ACEI, B-Blockers, and diuretics (GDMT) 79% showed recovery of LVEF to ≥53 during the follow up. Conclusions: In our experience, most patients who were seen at least twice in the cardio-oncology clinic for heart failure had received a dose of > 300mg/m2 anthracycline. With GDMT over 75% of the patients recovered. Care in the cardio-oncology clinic plays a key role in optimizing these clinical outcomes.

Author(s):  
Naila Niaz ◽  
Syed Muhammad Faraz Ali ◽  
Attaullah Younas ◽  
Tallat Anwar Faridi ◽  
Asif Hanif

Despite advancing medical technology, Heart Failure (HF) is still a prevalent disease with high mortality and high health expenditure. To improve patient outcome and prognosis, it is important to identify the association of risk factors which leads to the co-morbid depression and anxiety in heart failure patients. Objectives: To determine the association of depression and/or anxiety with age, gender and ejection fraction in heart failure patients. Methods: It is an analytical cross sectional study including 323 CHF patients who visited the to the Faisalabad Institute of Cardiology hospital Out-Patient Department, 250 were males and 73 were females, mean age was 54.1 ± 9.2 years having 70 years as maximum and 25 years as minimum.  Data collection was done using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) questionnaire to assess depression and anxiety. Data was analyzed using SPSS version 24. For quantitative data, mean and standard deviation was calculated and for qualitative data frequency and percentages was calculated. To measure the association of anxiety and depression with age categories, ejection fraction and gender, chi square test was used. P values less than and equal to 0.05 were taken as significant. Results: No association of depression and anxiety with gender and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) was observed. However, depression and anxiety were found to be significantly associated with age Conclusions: The study concluded that age is a strong risk factor of depression and anxiety in congestive heart failure patients. Multidisciplinary health care team approach and interventions are required to cater chronic heart failure (CHF) patients to address the psychological burden.


2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 58-61
Author(s):  
Swapan Sarkar ◽  
Joydeep Biswas ◽  
Suprotim Ghosh

Background: Heart failure is a common clinical entity which we come across in our daily practice and accounts for significant mortality and morbidity. The basic pathophysiology lies in the inability of the heart to pump adequate blood (output) to meet the demands of circulation/tissue or can do so only at the expense of elevated left ventricular filling pressure. Among various types of heart failure, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is still a poorly understood entity and several comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, obesity, and CKD are common association of HFpEF. Diabetes causes heart failure by increasing the risk of CAD and by direct injury to myocardium (cardiomyopathy). Hence, in this cross-sectional observational study, we assess the cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes mellitus in association with HFpEF. Aims and Objectives: This study aims to establish the hypothesis that hypertension and diabetes mellitus are associated with a predictor of HFpEF. Materials and Methods: Ninety patients were selected. NTproBNP, HbA1C, FBS, PPBS level, and blood pressure was measured and echocardiogram was performed to assess ratio of transmitral flow velocity and annular velocity (E/E’); left ventricular end-diastolic pressure; and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Results: The mean age was 64±7. Forty-two (46.67%) were men and 48 (53.33%) were female. Hypertension was present in 73 (81.11%) and diabetes in 44 (48.89%). E/E´, a parameter of LV diastolic function, showed positive correlation to both risk factors in study (r=0.653, p<0.001). Linear regression indicated that E/E’ (β-coefficient=0.845, p<0.001) was significantly associated with the presence of risk factors. Conclusion: The data show that the prevalence of HTN and DM is significantly higher in patients with HFpEF and establishes a strong association between duration of HTN and DM with symptomatic HFpEF.


Author(s):  
Erin McGuinn ◽  
Theodore Warsavage ◽  
Mary E. Plomondon ◽  
Javier A. Valle ◽  
P. Michael Ho ◽  
...  

Background The significant morbidity associated with systolic heart failure makes it imperative to identify patients with a reversible cause. We thus sought to evaluate the proportion of patients who received an ischemic evaluation after a hospitalization for new‐onset systolic heart failure. Methods and Results Patients admitted with a new diagnosis of heart failure and a reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction (≤40%) were identified in the VA Healthcare System from January 2006 to August 2017. Among those who survived 90 days without a readmission, we evaluated the proportion of patients who underwent an ischemic evaluation. We identified 9625 patients who were admitted with a new diagnosis of systolic heart failure with a concomitant reduction in ejection fraction. A minority of patients (3859, 40%) underwent an ischemic evaluation, with significant variation across high‐performing (90th percentile) and low‐performing (10th percentile) sites (odds ratio, 3.79; 95% CI, 2.90–4.31). Patients who underwent an evaluation were more likely to be treated with angiotensin‐converting enzyme inhibitors (75% versus 64%, P <0.001) or beta blockers (92% versus 82%, P <0.001) and subsequently undergo percutaneous (8% versus 0%, P <0.001) or surgical (2% versus 0%, P <0.001) revascularization. Patients with an ischemic evaluation also had a significantly lower adjusted hazard of all‐cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.47–0.61) compared with those without an evaluation. Conclusions Ischemic evaluations are underutilized in patients admitted with heart failure and a new reduction in left ventricular systolic function. A focused intervention to increase guideline‐concordant care could lead to an improvement in clinical outcomes.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (11) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yook Chin Chia ◽  
Lyanne M. Kieneker ◽  
Gaston van Hassel ◽  
S. Heleen Binnenmars ◽  
Ilja M. Nolte ◽  
...  

Background The cause of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is poorly understood, and specific therapies are lacking. Previous studies suggested that inflammation plays a role in the development of HFpEF. Herein, we aimed to investigate in community‐dwelling individuals whether a higher plasma interleukin 6 (IL‐6) level is associated with an increased risk of developing new‐onset heart failure (HF) over time, and specifically HFpEF. Methods and Results We performed a case‐cohort study based on the PREVEND (Prevention of Renal and Vascular End‐Stage Disease) study, a prospective general population‐based cohort study. We included 961 participants, comprising 200 participants who developed HF and a random group of 761 controls. HF with reduced ejection fraction or HFpEF was defined on the basis of the left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40% or >40%, respectively. In Cox proportional hazard regression analyses, IL‐6 levels were statistically significantly associated with the development of HF (hazard ratio [HR], 1.28; 95% CI, 1.02–1.61; P =0.03) after adjustment for key risk factors. Specifically, IL‐6 levels were significantly associated with the development of HFpEF (HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.16–2.19; P =0.004), whereas the association with HF with reduced ejection fraction was nonsignificant (HR, 1.05; 95% CI, 0.75–1.47; P =0.77). In sensitivity analyses, defining HFpEF as left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%, IL‐6 levels were also significantly associated with the development of HFpEF (HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04–2.06; P =0.03) after adjustment for key risk factors. Conclusions IL‐6 is associated with new‐onset HFpEF in community‐dwelling individuals, independent of potential confounders. Our findings warrant further research to investigate whether IL‐6 might be a novel treatment target to prevent HFpEF.


2017 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 264-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Puey Ling Chia ◽  
K Chiang ◽  
R Snyder ◽  
A Dowling

Background Anthracycline-based chemotherapy is used in many malignancies. Current recommendations by several groups suggest cardiac monitoring prior to and during anthracycline therapy. We aim to review the usefulness of baseline cardiac screening for left ventricular ejection fraction to assess if it had any impact on chemotherapy decisions in patients to be treated with anthracycline-based regimens or any beneficial effect upon outcomes. Methods We conducted a retrospective three-year audit of cancer patients who underwent GBPS prior to anthracycline (doxorubicin) chemotherapy. Subjects were identified via records from the Department of Nuclear Medicine. Pharmacy dispensing records identified those who received doxorubicin. Patient demographics, cancer type, cardiac risk factors, GBPS ejection fraction (EF), and cumulative anthracycline dose were collected. Results From 1 August 2009 to 31 July 2012, 179 patients underwent GBPS pre-doxorubicin chemotherapy. The mean age was 59 years (range 21–89 years), with 51% being males. Only two patients (1.1%) had an abnormal EF < 50%, while 33 patients (18%) had an EF 51–59% and 144 patients (80%) had EF ≥ 60%. The two patients with reduced baseline EF still received anthracycline-based chemotherapy. All 135 patients without any known cardiovascular risk factors had normal EFs. The total number of patients who received anthracycline chemotherapy during the same period was 207. Thus 28 patients (13%) commenced anthracycline without a prior GBPS. Conclusion Only 1.1% of the screened patients had EF < 50%. These two patients still received doxorubicin chemotherapy despite a compromised EF, as their treating clinicians believed that the benefits of chemotherapy outweighed the risk of potential cardiac toxicity. Our audit questions the practice of routine cardiac evaluation pre-anthracycline screening with GBPS. We propose that routine screening only be requested if cardiac risk factors are present.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document