Neurotoxicity associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15096-e15096
Author(s):  
Muhammad Zain Farooq ◽  
Sheeba Habeeb Ba Aqeel ◽  
Prasanth Lingamaneni ◽  
Shristi Upadhyay Banskota ◽  
Rayli Pichardo ◽  
...  

e15096 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are associated with multiple immune related adverse events (irAE). Moderate to severe neurotoxicity is reported in less than 1% of all patients treated with ICI. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess neurotoxicity associated with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and anti-CTLA4 therapy. Methods: The Embase, Ovid, Pubmed and Scopus database were comprehensively searched by two independent reviewers, from inception to 2019, to include Phase II and III clinical trials reporting neurotoxicity with the combination of, or monotherapy with anti-PD-1/PD-L1 and/or anti-CTLA4 therapies. Our primary outcome was assessment of neurologic irAE of all grades. We divided neurotoxicity into two groups: peripheral nervous system (PNS) including peripheral neuropathy (PeN), fatigue, Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS), myelitis; and central nervous system (CNS) including stroke, myasthenia gravis (MG), encephalopathy/encephalitis, altered mental status (AMS), decreased appetite and headache. Statistical heterogeneity was quantified using I2 statistics and publication bias was assessed with Eggers regression test. The estimates were reported as odds Ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) using random effect model. Results: A total of 2,876 full text articles retrieved in the initial database search were analyzed according to PRISMA guidelines. The final analysis included 39 trials, evaluating 10,595 patients in the control arm and 13,110 patients in the immunotherapy arm. All-grade neurotoxicity events with ICI were significantly lower compared to placebo or standard of care (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.38-0.81, I2 96.82%, P < 0.001). Only significant CNS irAE observed was fatigue (OR 0.82, CI 0.71-0.96, I2 81.75%, P < 0.001). Other CNS irAE including AMS (OR 1.318, 95% CI 0.86-2.0, I2 0%, P = 0.442), encephalopathy/encephalitis (OR 1.36, 95% CI 0.38-4.96, I2 0%, P = 0.82) and seizures (OR 1.96, 95% CI 0.64-6.02, I2 0%, P = 0.56) had statistically non-significant increased risk in ICI group. Only one case of myelitis was reported in placebo group. The ICI arm had statistically significant lower rates of PeN (OR 0.28, CI 0.16-0.49, I2 87.31, P < 0.001). One trial reported 1 patient with MG and 5 trials reported 1 patient each of GBS in the ICI arm. Conclusions: Our meta-analysis concludes that use of ICI is associated with lower rate of neurotoxicity overall. Fatigue and PeN are lower with ICI compared to standard of care or placebo. Although, CNS irAE are increased with ICI, they do not reach statistical significance.

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (3) ◽  
pp. 546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fausto Petrelli ◽  
Diego Signorelli ◽  
Michele Ghidini ◽  
Antonio Ghidini ◽  
Elio Gregory Pizzutilo ◽  
...  

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can elicit toxicities by inhibiting negative regulators of adaptive immunity. Sometimes, management of toxicities may require systemic glucocorticoids. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies to evaluate the correlation between steroids use, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) in cancer patients treated with ICIs. Publications that compared steroids with non-steroid users in cancer patients treated with ICIs from inception to June 2019 were identified by searching the EMBASE, PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. The pooled hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Patients (studies, n = 16; patients, n = 4045) taking steroids were at increased risk of death and progression compared to those not taking steroids (HR = 1.54, 95% CI: 1.24–1.91; p = 0.01 and HR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.02–1.76; p = 0.03, respectively). The main negative effect on OS was associated with patients taking steroids for supportive care (HR = 2.5, 95% CI 1.41–4.43; p < 0.01) or brain metastases (HR = 1.51, 95% CI 1.22–1.87; p < 0.01). In contrast, steroids used to mitigate adverse events did not negatively affect OS. In conclusion, caution is needed when steroids are used for symptom control. In these patients, a negative impact of steroid use was observed for both OS and PFS.


2021 ◽  
Vol 148 ◽  
pp. 76-91
Author(s):  
Elisa Agostinetto ◽  
Daniel Eiger ◽  
Matteo Lambertini ◽  
Marcello Ceppi ◽  
Marco Bruzzone ◽  
...  

PLoS ONE ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. e0255716
Author(s):  
Náthali Felícia Mineiro dos Santos Garrett ◽  
Ana Cristina Carvalho da Costa ◽  
Elaine Barros Ferreira ◽  
Giovanni Damiani ◽  
Paula Elaine Diniz dos Reis ◽  
...  

Background Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized advanced melanoma care; however, their cutaneous side effects have not been definitively elucidated. Objective To identify the prevalence of cutaneous toxicity in patients with melanoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors as monotherapy and/or in combination with chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Materials and methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis, which encompassed both clinical trials and observational studies describing the dermatological toxicities in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review under the number CRD42018091915. The searches were performed using the CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, LILACS, LIVIVO, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated with the JBI Critical Appraisal Checklist for Studies Reporting Prevalence Data Results A total of 9,802 articles were identified in the databases. The final sample comprised 39 studies. The evaluated drugs were ipilimumab, tremelimumab, pembrolizumab, and nivolumab. The results suggest that the most prevalent side effect was grade 1 and 2 pruritus (24%), followed by grade 1 and 2 rash (21%) and grade 1 and 2 vitiligo (10%). Conclusion The most prevalent side effects in patients treated with checkpoint inhibitors are pruritus, rash, and vitiligo, and they are rated mostly as grades 1 and 2 adverse events. Remarkably, vitiligo is most commonly found in patients treated with PD-1 inhibitors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document