Predictors of successful randomized phase III studies in the treatment metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A meta-analysis.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17105-e17105
Author(s):  
Justin Lin ◽  
Xiaobo Zhong ◽  
Matt D. Galsky ◽  
William K. Oh ◽  
Che-Kai Tsao

e17105 Background: The success of randomized phase III therapeutic trials (RP3TT) to reach their primary endpoint is critical given the enormous resources required to conduct such studies. In an era of accelerated therapeutic development in advanced kidney cancer, we aim to identify factors in such studies associated with a positive endpoint (PE) to better understand how to optimize trial design. Methods: Using PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov, we identified all published RP3TT in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma between 1/2007-9/2019. Studies were considered PE if the primary endpoint was reached, and negative endpoint (NE) if otherwise. Studies were categorized as either first line only (FLO) or second line and beyond (SLB), with adjuvant and consolidation therapy studies excluded. We collected components of study design and baseline patient characteristics and analyzed with multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the associations between each factor and PE RP3TT. Results: Of the 65 studies evaluated, only 22 RP3TT (14 FLO, 8 SLB) were found to have published data and were included, with 14 PE and 8 NE. For all studies, those with larger enrollment size (OR = 1.008, 95% CI [1.001-1.015], p = 0.021) and clear cell requirements (OR = 0.077, 95% CI [0.007-0.901], p = 0.041) were associated with PE. After adjusting for sample size, only larger enrollment size remained significant (OR = 1.007, 95% CI [1.001-1.014], p = 0.032). Other baseline patient demographic and clinical characteristic variables were not associated with PE RP3TT. Subgroup analysis of only FLO or SLB studies also did not yield any significant associations with PE RP3TT. Conclusions: Higher enrollment size was identified as factor associated with PE in RP3TT. Incomplete trial data reporting was evident, particularly in earlier studies. Further efforts are needed to better characterize factors in order to optimize clinical trial design in this disease. [Table: see text]

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. LBA308-LBA308 ◽  
Author(s):  
R. J. Motzer ◽  
T. E. Hutson ◽  
M. R. Olsen ◽  
G. R. Hudes ◽  
J. M. Burke ◽  
...  

LBA308 Background: In a randomized phase III trial, sunitinib 50 mg/d on Schedule 4/2 (4 wk on treatment [Tx], 2 wk off) showed superior progression-free survival (primary endpoint) to IFN-α (11 vs. 5 mo; p<0.001) as first-line metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) therapy with a median overall survival (OS) of >2 yr (Motzer 2009). Continuous dosing of sunitinib 37.5 mg has demonstrated antitumor activity with a manageable safety profile in first- and second-line mRCC (Barrios; Escudier, 2009). Methods: This randomized phase II trial compared sunitinib 50 mg/d on Schedule 4/2 (Arm A) vs. 37.5 mg continuous once-daily dosing (Arm B) in first-line mRCC. Eligible patients (pts) had clear cell locally recurrent or mRCC; measurable disease; and Karnofsky performance status ≥70%. Randomization (1:1) was stratified by MSKCC risk groups. Sunitinib was continued until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or up to 2 yr. The primary endpoint was time to tumor progression (TTP) by Kaplan-Meier estimate. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), OS, and adverse events (AEs). Results: Between January 2007 and June 2008, 292 pts were randomized. As of October 2010, 289 pts had received sunitinib, and all pts were off therapy. Median age was 62 yr. 65% were male. By MSKCC criteria, 28%, 61%, and 11% were favorable, intermediate, and poor risk, respectively. Pts received a median 4 and 5 Tx cycles in Arms A and B, respectively; median relative dose intensity was 90.8% and 77.5%. Dose delays, reductions, and interruptions occurred in 30% vs. 13%, 36% vs. 43%, and 65% vs. 62%, respectively; 11% and 15% discontinued due to Tx-related AEs. Median TTP was 9.9 vs. 7.1 mo in Arms A and B, respectively (HR=0.773, 95.1% CI, 0.572, 1.044; p=0.090). ORR was 32.2% vs. 28.1% (p=0.444). Median OS was 23.1 vs. 23.5 mo (p=0.615). The most common Tx-related AEs were fatigue (both 62%), nausea (56% vs. 49%), and diarrhea (56% vs. 64%). Conclusions: In this randomized phase II mRCC trial, there was a trend toward inferior TTP with continuous dosing. ORR, OS, and AE profiles were similar for the approved sunitinib 50 mg/d dose on Schedule 4/2 vs. 37.5 mg continuous dosing. [Table: see text]


2021 ◽  
Vol 154 ◽  
pp. 120-127
Author(s):  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandro Rizzo ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Matteo Santoni ◽  
Matteo Rosellini ◽  
Andrea Marchetti ◽  
...  

Aim: Few data are available regarding the safety profile of immunotherapy–tyrosine kinase inhibitor (IO-TKI) combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. The authors investigated all-grade and grade 3–4 (G3–4) adverse events in trials comparing IO-TKI combinations with sunitinib monotherapy. Methods: The relative risks of several all-grade and G3–4 adverse events were analyzed. Results: Relative risks were similar between patients receiving IO-TKI combinations versus sunitinib monotherapy. However, the use of IO-TKI combinations was associated with a higher risk of all-grade and G3–4 diarrhea, all-grade hypothyroidism, G3–4 decreased appetite, all-grade and G3–4 aspartate transaminase increase and all-grade and G3–4 alanine transaminase increase. Conclusion: The results of the authors' meta-analysis suggest that risks of treatment-related adverse events should be carefully considered when choosing IO-TKI combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document