Treatment decision making in metastatic prostate cancer (mPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17552-e17552
Author(s):  
Frank Schumacher ◽  
Jiahui Xu ◽  
Laura Oswald ◽  
Benjamin Lee ◽  
Brian Gonzalez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Similar Efficacy ◽  
Clinic Visit ◽  
Specific Pattern ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Physician Perceptions ◽  
Significant Difference

e17552 Background: Multiple treatments with similar efficacy exist for mPC, leaving patients (pts) with complicated treatment choices. Shared decision-making (SDM) can facilitate treatment decisions. The extent to which SDM is used in mPC is unknown. We assessed mPC pt, caregiver, and physician perceptions of decision locus of control (DLOC) (SDM vs. physician- or pt-directed decisions), and the degree of agreement between groups. Methods: Pt/caregiver/physician triads completed surveys of decision-making practices between 12/2016 and 11/2017 after a clinic visit in which a decision occurred. Pts were included only if they had a caregiver present. To evaluate the degree of agreement between pt, caregiver, and physician perceptions of DLOC, we used the quadratic-weighted kappa coefficient (κ). Agreement was evaluated on an overall basis and by pt age group (5-year increments). Results: 50 pt/caregiver/physician triads participated, with median pt age of 72 yo. Most pts were white (96%) and married (90%). A majority of pts, caregivers, and physicians reported SDM (66%, 56%, and 52%, respectively). No group reported completely pt-directed decisions. Pts and physicians demonstrated agreement about DLOC for most encounters (weighted κ = 0.35; P = 0.01). Overall, pts and physicians agreed on the DLOC in 44% of cases, and SDM was the most common agreed-upon DLOC (36%). Relative to physicians, 34% of pts reported more pt influence on DLOC, and 22% of pts reported less pt influence on DLOC. In contrast, caregiver reports of DLOC were independent of physician reports (weighted κ = 0.23; P = 0.55). Overall, caregivers and physicians agreed on DLOC in 38% of cases, and SDM was the most common agreed-upon DLOC (32%). Relative to physicians, 46% of caregivers reported more pt influence on DLOC and 16% of caregivers reported less pt influence on DLOC. There was a statistically significant difference in the degree of agreement by pt age group between pts and physicians (P = 0.045) and caregivers and physicians (P = 0.002), although no specific pattern according to pt age was noted. Conclusions: A majority of pts, caregivers, and physicians reported SDM occurring in routine clinical visits for mPC. Pts reported a higher degree of agreement with their physicians in DLOC than caregivers. Both pts and caregivers perceived greater pt influence on treatment choice than physicians. Efforts to explore the association between SDM, pt satisfaction, and quality of life are ongoing.

Physicians' views on the influence of patient participation on treatment decisions - an explorative study

2007 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 174-182 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elina Jaakkola
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Patient Participation ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Role Expectations ◽  
Customer Participation ◽  
Health Care Managers ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Explorative Study ◽  
Significant Difference

While patient participation in treatment decisions is increasingly advocated in medical literature, patient demand has been considered to cause unnecessary prescribing. Using the concept of customer participation as discussed in services marketing and management literature as a theoretical base, the paper analyses the influence of patient participation on the medical service process and treatment decision-making. A qualitative, explorative study was conducted to investigate American and British physicians' views on patient participation in the treatment of osteoporosis and schizophrenia. It became evident that in the cases of both osteoporosis and schizophrenia, patients influence prescribing decisions despite the significant difference in their willingness and ability to participate. The manifestations of patient participation were divided into three groups: (1) resources, such as the patient's condition and information about it, and his/her preconceived notions and preferences, (2) actions, such as preparing for the service, negotiating decisions and implementing the treatment, and (3) the patient's role expectations and inclination to participate. The influence of such manifestations on prescribing decision-making is discussed in detail, and differences between the studied illnesses are explained. Implications to health-care managers and practitioners are discussed.

Patient satisfaction with oncology clinical decision support in South Korea.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18329-e18329
Author(s):  
Kyounga Lee ◽  
Seon Heui Lee ◽  
Anita Preininger ◽  
JungHo Shim ◽  
Gretchen Jackson
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Medical Center ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Clinical Decision ◽  
Treatment Decisions ◽  
Tumor Board ◽  
Fully Integrated ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Level Of Satisfaction ◽  
Significant Difference

e18329 Background: Watson For Oncology (WFO) is an artificial intelligence (AI) tool that presents therapeutic options to oncologists and patients at 9 hospitals in Korea. The earliest user is Gachon University Gil Medical Center (GMC), where the tumor board (MDT) is fully integrated with WfO (MDT-WfO). GMC patients and oncologists may select one of the treatment choices presented by MDT-WfO or choose to follow recommendations of one or more oncologists at GMC augmented by WfO (non-MDT-WfO). This study is aimed at determining the satisfaction of patients who pursue shared decision-making through the MDT-WfO approach. Methods: Cancer patients enrolled in this IRB-approved study and treated at GMC between March and September of 2018 were surveyed. All patients rated satisfaction levels from 1-10 after treatment decision-making was completed, with 1 indicating the lowest level of satisfaction and 10 the highest. For each question, the average satisfaction score for patients in the MDT-WfO group was compared to the mean for patients in the non-MDT-WfO group, with a t-test for significance. Results: There were 9 cancer types treated at GMC from March through September of 2018. Of the of 290 patients enrolled in this study, 130 (44.8%) selected MDT-WfO and 160 (55.2%) did not. Overall, patients that interacted with MDT-WfO viewed GMT more positively (86.9%) after treatment decisions had been made than patients in the non-MDT-WfO group (71.3%).Although patients did not report significantly differing levels of satisfaction for most survey questions, there was a significant difference in terms of satisfaction with the explanation they received from the medical staff. Satisfaction level for this item was 9.52 with MDT-WfO and 9.22 points without ( p = 0.029). Conclusions: Patients reported greater satisfaction in the explanations they received in the MDT-WfO group, consistent with their more positive impression of GMT after treatment decisions were made. More studies are needed to determine if the increase in the level of satisfaction for this item is due to explanations from MDT unrelated or related to WfO. More studies on how WfO is used differently by the tumor board and individual oncologists may provide a unique perspective on how WfO is integrated into the MDT.

Treatment Decision-making in Chinese Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Li Yang ◽  
Xiaomei Song ◽  
Yan Chen ◽  
Yue Li ◽  
Yubei Gu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel Disease ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Illness Severity ◽  
Factors Affecting ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Employment Situation ◽  
Inflammatory Bowel ◽  
Actual Decision

Abstract BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is rising in China, and the tendency for lifelong recurrence decreases patients’ quality of life. However, no studies on treatment decision-making in Chinese patients with IBD exist. Thus, this study aimed to determine the actual and ideal decision-making as well as factors affecting decision-making in Chinese IBD patients. METHODS A multi-center online questionnaire was distributed among patients diagnosed with IBD. To assess factors that influence treatment decision-making, univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed. RESULTS From March 20, 2018, to May 20, 2018, 866 patients completed the questionnaires, including 222 patients with ulcerative colitis, 588 patients with Crohn’s disease and 56 patients with unclassified IBD. There was a significant difference between ideal and actual decision-making in Chinese IBD patients (P ˂ .005). The factors affecting ideal decision-making included income, education, illness severity, religiosity, the importance of the treatment decision, the employment situation, and occupation area. The factors affecting actual decision-making included age, illness severity, religiosity, the employment situation, economic anxiety, concern about the side effects, and the importance of the treatment decision. CONCLUSION There is a significant difference between ideal and actual decision-making in IBD patients in China. That is, the economy, religiosity, illness severity, and concern about the side effects of treatment are the most important factors affecting treatment decisions in Chinese IBD patients.

Patient Preferences Versus Physician Perceptions of Treatment Decisions in Cancer Care

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (11) ◽  
pp. 2883-2885 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Bruera ◽  
Catherine Sweeney ◽  
Kathryn Calder ◽  
Lynn Palmer ◽  
Suzanne Benisch-Tolley
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Palliative Care ◽  
Patient Preferences ◽  
Medical Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Weighted Kappa ◽  
Kappa Coefficient ◽  
Medical Decision ◽  
Initial Assessment ◽  
Physician Perceptions

PURPOSE: To examine patient preferences as well as physician perceptions of these preferences for decision making and communication in palliative care. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Medical decision-making preferences (DMPs) were prospectively studied in 78 assessable cancer patients after initial assessment at a palliative care outpatient clinic. DMPs were assessed with a questionnaire using five possible choices ranging from 1 (patient prefers to make the treatment decision) to 5 (patient prefers the physician to make the decision). In addition, the physician’s perception of this preference was assessed. RESULTS: Full concordance between the physician and the patient was seen in 30 (38%) of 78 cases; when the five original categories were recombined to cover active, shared, and passive decision making, there was concordance in 35 (45%) of 78 cases. The kappa coefficient for agreement between physician and patient was poor at 0.14 (95% confidence limit, −0.01 to 0.30) for simple kappa and 0.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.00 to 0.34) for weighted kappa (calculated on the three regrouped categories). Active, shared, and passive DMPs were chosen by 16 (20%) of 78, 49 (63%) of 78, and 13 (17%) of 78 patients, and by 23 (29%) of 78, 30 (39%) of 78, and 25 (32%) of 78 physicians, respectively. The majority of patients (49 [63%] of 78; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.74) preferred a shared approach with physicians. Physicians predicted that patients preferred a less shared approach than they in fact did. Patient age or sex did not significantly alter DMP. CONCLUSION: An individual approach is needed and each patient should be assessed prospectively for DMP.

Patients’ practices for taking the initiative in decision-making in outpatient psychiatric consultations

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-184 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuya Kushida ◽  
Takeshi Hiramoto ◽  
Yuriko Yamakawa
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Conversation Analysis ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Close Inspection ◽  
Important Resource ◽  
Treatment Decision Making ◽  
The Way

In spite of increasing advocacy for patients’ participation in psychiatric decision-making, there has been little research on how patients actually participate in decision-making in psychiatric consultations. This study explores how patients take the initiative in decision-making over treatment in outpatient psychiatric consultations in Japan. Using the methodology of conversation analysis, we analyze 85 video-recorded ongoing consultations and find that patients select between two practices for taking the initiative in decision-making: making explicit requests for a treatment and displaying interest in a treatment without explicitly requesting it. A close inspection of transcribed interaction reveals that patients make explicit requests under the circumstances where they believe the candidate treatment is appropriate for their condition, whereas they merely display interest in a treatment when they are not certain about its appropriateness. By fitting practices to take the initiative in decision-making with the way they describe their current condition, patients are optimally managing their desire for particular treatments and the validity of their initiative actions. In conclusion, we argue that the orderly use of the two practices is one important resource for patients’ participation in treatment decision-making.

Enhancing Involvement in Treatment Decision Making by Women with Breast Cancer

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary A. O'Brien ◽  
Timothy Whelan ◽  
Amiram Gafni ◽  
Cathy Charles ◽  
Peter Ellis
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Decision Making ◽  
Treatment Decision ◽  
Treatment Decision Making
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document