A single-center analysis of adjuvant sequential versus ‘sandwich’ chemoradiotherapy for patients with stage III endometrial cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e18101-e18101
Author(s):  
Janice Shen ◽  
James Newman ◽  
Jennifer Hernandez ◽  
Beatrice Bloom ◽  
Jean Kyung Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiotherapy ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Clinical Patient ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

e18101 Background: To determine if the sequencing of chemotherapy with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in the adjuvant setting for FIGO stage III endometrial cancer impacts 2-year progression free survival (PFS). Methods: As part of our Gynecologic Oncology Multidisciplinary Group's initiative to establish an institutional guideline for the adjuvant treatment of Stage III endometrial cancer, we reviewed 144 cases identified by our cancer registry and departmental database. Treatment regimens were divided into three categories: sequential therapy with six cycles of carboplatin/taxane followed by EBRT, concurrent cisplatin for two cycles with EBRT followed by four cycles of carboplatin/taxane, or ‘sandwich’ therapy with three cycles of carboplatin/taxane followed by EBRT followed by three cycles of carboplatin/taxane. The published results of the phase III GOG-258 study called into question the efficacy of concurrent chemoradiation. Therefore, we only compared sequential versus ‘sandwich’ therapy using a Chi-Square analysis. We conducted a retrospective chart review to assess if patients were able to complete the prescribed six cycles and EBRT, and then measured their PFS at two years. We hypothesized that there would be no difference in PFS between the two groups. Results: There were no significant differences in clinical or pathologic factors between patients treated with either regimen. Ninety-four patients (65%) had stage IIIC disease. The majority of patients received six cycles of paclitaxel with carboplatin. Median EBRT dose was 45 Gy. There was no statistically significant difference in the estimated 2-year PFS between the sequential and ‘sandwich’ groups, which were 82% and 82.5%, respectively (p = 0.84). Conclusions: Adjuvant chemoradiation for FIGO stage III endometrial cancer given sequentially or in a ‘sandwich’ fashion appears to offer equally excellent early clinical patient outcomes.

Prognosis and comorbidities in stage III and IV endometrial cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16553-e16553
Author(s):  
K. Wright ◽  
E. Munro ◽  
M. del Carmen ◽  
A. K. Goodman
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Stage Iv ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
Laboratory Values ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Baseline Creatinine

e16553 Background: While endometrial cancer may be associated with many comorbid conditions, none have been characterized as changing overall prognosis. The aim of this study was to identify medical conditions or laboratory values, that may serve as prognostic factors in stage III and IV endometrial cancer. Methods: A retrospective chart review identified 112 women with stage III or IV endometrial cancer between years 1993–1998. Information about medical comorbidities and presenting lab values were collected using electronic medical records. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier survival method and the log rank test. Results: The average age was 64.9 yrs. 79 women (70.5%) had stage III disease and 33 women (29.5%) had stage IV disease. For those with a baseline creatinine <1.2 (n = 91), the PFS and OS were not significantly different from those with a baseline creatinine ≥1.2 (n = 17; p = 0.554 and p = 0.487, respectively). There was a non-significant trend toward worse PFS for the 41 patients with hypertension (HTN) compared to the 62 without (48.0 and 61.2 months, p = 0.191). The overall survival was significantly worse for those with HTN (38.7 months vs. 56.0 months p = 0.046). For those with known coronary artery disease, no significant difference in PFS or OS was found (p = 0.792 and p = 0.312 respectively). Those with diabetes (n = 15) did not have a significantly different PFS compared to those who did not (n = 88; p = 0.728). The OS was worse at 20.1 months for those with diabetes compared to 54.3 months for those without (p = 0.001). Baseline albumin had a significant effect on both PFS and OS. Those with an albumin <3.5 (n = 54) had a PFS of 46.2 months compared to 94.0 months for those with an albumin ≥3.5 (n = 23; p = 0.007), and the OS for those with low albumin was 44.8 months compared to 83.4 months for those with the higher albumin (p = 0.005). Conclusions: These results suggest that past medical history and some baseline laboratory values may be important in considering prognosis. In particular, patients with a history of HTN or diabetes have a worse overall survival. Those with a baseline albumin of <3.5 have a worse PFS and OS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase III study of Æ-941 with induction chemotherapy (IC) and concomitant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage III non- small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCI T99–0046, RTOG 02–70, MDA 99–303)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7527-7527 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Lu ◽  
J. J. Lee ◽  
R. Komaki ◽  
R. S. Herbst ◽  
W. K. Evans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Stage Iiib ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Type I ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Unresectable Stage ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Stage Iii Nsclc

7527 Background: Æ-941 is a shark cartilage extract with antiangiogenic properties. We conducted a placebo-controlled trial testing Æ-941, with IC and CRT, in unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: Eligibility criteria included performance status (PS) < 2, weight loss < 10%. Subjects received one of two treatment regimens depending on site of enrollment: carboplatin (C) (AUC 6) and paclitaxel (P) (200 mg/m2) × 2 cycles followed by CRT (60 Gy/30 fractions) with weekly C (AUC 2) and P (45 mg/m2) × 6 doses or cisplatin (CDDP) (75 mg/m2, d1) and vinorelbine (V) (30 mg/m2, d1 and 8) × 2 cycles followed by CRT (60 Gy/30 fractions) with CDDP (75 mg/m2, day 1) and V (15 mg/m2, d1 and 8) × 2 cycles. Subjects were randomized to receive Æ-941 (Arm A) or placebo (Arm B), 120 mL orally twice daily, at the start of IC and continuing after CRT as maintenance therapy. Randomization was stratified for stage, gender, and type of chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), with a planned sample size of 756 subjects providing 80% power to detect a 25% difference in OS, assuming a control arm median survival time (MST) of 13 months, type I error 0.05. Results: Between 6/00 and 2/06, 384 subjects were enrolled onto the trial and randomized. In 2/06 the trial was closed to new patient entry due to insufficient accrual. This final analysis is based on 379 randomized and eligible subjects (188 arm A, 191 arm B). Subject characteristics: 60% male, median age 63 years (range 37–84), 56% stage IIIB, 58% C-based chemotherapy, median follow-up 3.7 years. There was no significant difference in OS between arms A and B, with MSTs of 14.4 (95% CI 12.6–17.9) and 15.6 (95% CI 13.8–18.1) months, respectively (log-rank p=0.73). OS by pre-specified stratification factors: stage IIIB vs IIIA (MST 13.9 vs. 17.4 months, p=0.25), C vs. CDDP chemotherapy (MST 14.4 vs. 16.7 months, p=0.13), and male vs. female (MST 15.7 vs. 15.1 months, p=0.74). The study drug was well tolerated. Fewer subjects in arm A experienced grade 3 or higher adverse events (66% vs. 77%, p=0.018). Conclusions: The addition of Æ−941 to IC and CRT does not improve OS in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Association of Lunate Morphology With Carpal Instability in Scapholunate Ligament Injury

Hand ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (4) ◽  
pp. 418-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Quan Pang ◽  
Nathan Douglass ◽  
Robin N. Kamal
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Plain Film ◽  
Ligament Injury ◽  
Type I ◽  
Type Ii ◽  
Scapholunate Ligament ◽  
Ligament Injuries ◽  
Scapholunate Instability ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Chi Square Analysis

Background: We examined the relationship between lunate morphology (type 1 without a medial facet; type II with a medial facet) and dorsal intercalated segmental instability (DISI) in patients with scapholunate ligament injuries. We tested the primary null hypothesis that there is no relationship between lunate morphology and development of DISI. Secondary analysis compared the agreement of classifying lunate morphology based on the presence of a medial lunate facet, capitate-to-triquetrum (CT) distance, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with known scapholunate ligament injuries from 2001 to 2016. Posterior-anterior radiographs and MRI, when available, were evaluated. CT distances were measured as a secondary classification method. DISI and scapholunate instability were determined as radiolunate angle >15° and scapholunate angle >60°, respectively. Differences between groups were determined using chi-square analysis with significance set at P < .05. Agreement between plain radiographs, MRI, and CT distance was calculated using the kappa statistic. Results: Our search found 58 of 417 patients who met inclusion criteria; 41 of 58 had type II and 17 of 58 had type I lunates. There was no significant difference between groups in regard to DISI or scapholunate instability. Subanalysis using MRI alone or correcting any discrepancy between plain film and MRI classification, using MRI as the standard, found no difference between groups in regard to DISI or scapholunate instability. Conclusions: In patients with scapholunate ligament injuries, there are no differences in the development of DISI or scapholunate instability between patients with type I and type II lunates.

scholarly journals Atezolizumab, Bevacizumab, and Chemotherapy for Newly Diagnosed Stage III or IV Ovarian Cancer: Placebo-Controlled Randomized Phase III Trial (IMagyn050/GOG 3015/ENGOT-OV39)

2021 ◽  
pp. JCO.21.00306
Author(s):  
Kathleen N. Moore ◽  
Michael Bookman ◽  
Jalid Sehouli ◽  
Austin Miller ◽  
Charles Anderson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Phase Iii Trial ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
To Receive

PURPOSE To evaluate the addition of the humanized monoclonal antiprogrammed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) antibody, atezolizumab, to platinum-based chemotherapy and bevacizumab in newly diagnosed stage III or IV ovarian cancer (OC). METHODS This multicenter placebo-controlled double-blind randomized phase III trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03038100 ) enrolled patients with newly diagnosed untreated International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III or IV OC who either had undergone primary cytoreductive surgery with macroscopic residual disease or were planned to receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy and interval surgery. Patients were stratified by FIGO stage, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, tumor immune cell PD-L1 staining, and treatment strategy and randomly assigned 1:1 to receive 3-weekly cycles of atezolizumab 1,200 mg or placebo (day 1, cycles 1-22), with paclitaxel plus carboplatin (day 1, cycles 1-6) plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg (day 1, cycles 2-22), omitting perioperative bevacizumab in neoadjuvant patients. The co-primary end points were investigator-assessed progression-free survival and overall survival in the intention-to-treat and PD-L1–positive populations. RESULTS Between March 8, 2017, and March 26, 2019, 1,301 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival was 19.5 versus 18.4 months with atezolizumab versus placebo, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.07; stratified log-rank P = .28), in the intention-to-treat population and 20.8 versus 18.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65 to 0.99; P = .038), in the PD-L1–positive population. The interim (immature) overall survival results showed no significant benefit from atezolizumab. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events were neutropenia (21% with atezolizumab v 21% with placebo), hypertension (18% v 20%, respectively), and anemia (12% v 12%). CONCLUSION Current evidence does not support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors in newly diagnosed OC. Insight from this trial should inform further evaluation of immunotherapy in OC.

scholarly journals Primary cytoreductive surgery with or without hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) for FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: OVHIPEC-2, a phase III randomized clinical trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (6) ◽  
pp. 888-892 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Koole ◽  
Ruby van Stein ◽  
Karolina Sikorska ◽  
Desmond Barton ◽  
Lewis Perrin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Epithelial Ovarian Cancer ◽  
Cytoreductive Surgery ◽  
Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Figo Stage ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Stage Iii

BackgroundThe addition of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to interval cytoreductive surgery improves recurrence-free and overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III ovarian cancer who are ineligible for primary cytoreductive surgery. The effect of HIPEC remains undetermined in patients who are candidates for primary cytoreductive surgery.Primary objectiveThe primary objective is to evaluate the effect of HIPEC on overall survival in patients with FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer who are treated with primary cytoreductive surgery resulting in no residual disease, or residual disease up to 2.5 mm in maximum dimension.Study hypothesisWe hypothesize that the addition of HIPEC to primary cytoreductive surgery improves overall survival in patients with primary FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer.Trial designThis international, randomized, open-label, phase III trial will enroll 538 patients with newly diagnosed FIGO stage III epithelial ovarian cancer. Following complete or near-complete (residual disease ≤2.5 mm) primary cytoreduction, patients are randomly allocated (1:1) to receive HIPEC or no HIPEC. All patients will receive six courses of platinum-paclitaxel chemotherapy, and maintenance PARP-inhibitor or bevacizumab according to current guidelines.Major eligibility criteriaPatients with FIGO stage III primary epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer are eligible after complete or near-complete primary cytoreductive surgery. Patients with resectable umbilical, spleen, or local bowel lesions may be included. Enlarged extra-abdominal lymph nodes should be negative on FDG-PET or fine-needle aspiration/biopsy.Primary endpointThe primary endpoint is overall survival.Sample sizeTo detect a HR of 0.67 in favor of HIPEC, 200 overall survival events are required. With an expected accrual period of 60 months and 12 months additional follow-up, 538 patients need to be randomized.Estimated dates for completing accrual and presenting resultsThe OVHIPEC-2 trial started in January 2020 and primary analyses are anticipated in 2026.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03772028

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document