Abiraterone acetate (AA) with or without cabazitaxel (CBZ) in treatment of chemotherapy naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 84-84
Author(s):  
Susan F. Slovin ◽  
Karen E. Knudsen ◽  
Susan Halabi ◽  
Mark T. Fleming ◽  
Ana M. Molina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Gene Networks ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Risk Groups ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant

84 Background: Loss of retinoblastoma tumor suppressor (RB) function has been shown to lead to CRPC and is strongly associated with poor outcome. RB functions as a transcriptional repressor; as such, loss of RB causes de-repression of pro-tumorigenic gene networks, including deregulation of the androgen receptor (AR) locus, excessive AR production, and castration-resistant (ligand independent) AR activity that can bypass hormone therapy. Our hypothesis is that leveraging RB status can direct treatment decisions. The primary objective of the trial (NCT02218606) was to determine the radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) of AA/prednisone (AAP) with and without CBZ in mCRPC patients (pts) that have progressed on primary androgen deprivation therapy and no prior AR directed therapy or chemotherapy. Methods: This is a multicenter non-comparative randomized phase 2 trial. Pts were randomized 1:1 to AAP with crossover to CBZ upon AAP failure (Arm 1), or the combination of AAP + CBZ (Arm 2). Randomization was stratified by the CALGB 90401 prognostic risk groups. The primary endpoint was rPFS (time from randomization to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurs first). Arms were analyzed separately. Results: Between October 2014 and March 2019, 93 pts were accrued; 81 were randomized. Median age was 68 years and ECOG performance status was 0 or 1. Endpoints are shown in Table. Therapies were well tolerated. Conclusions: Results of AAP + CBZ (Arm 2) in chemotherapy naïve pts suggest that men may derive benefit from the earlier use of CBZ with acceptable toxicity, supporting further study of this combination in mCRPC pts. Circulating Tumor Cells are being analyzed for changes in RB/AR expression. Managed by: Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium; Funding: Sanofi US; Support: Prostate Cancer Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT02218606. [Table: see text]

Phase II trial of single-agent ganetespib (STA-9090), a heat shock protein 90 (Hsp90) inhibitor in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) post docetaxel-based chemotherapy: Results of a Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Consortium (PCCTC) study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5085-5085 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisabeth I. Heath ◽  
Mark N. Stein ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Emmanuel S. Antonarakis ◽  
Glenn Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Stage 1

5085 Background: Hsp90 is a molecular chaperone required for the proper folding and activation of numerous client proteins and is critical to cell survival and proliferation. Ganetespib (G), a synthetic small molecule that binds to the ATP pocket in the N-terminus of Hsp90 causes the degradation of cellular proteins and ultimately death of cancer cells dependent on these proteins. G displays potent anticancer activity in prostate cancer cells. Methods: Eligible patients were ≥ 18 yrs old with ECOG performance status ≤ 2. Adequate hepatic, renal, and bone marrow function was required. Patients were treated with G 200 mg/m2 intravenously once weekly for 3 consecutive weeks followed by 1 off-week. The primary objective was to evaluate the 6-month progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included overall safety and tolerability of G and overall survival. Exploratory markers including maspin, cytokeratins 8 and 18, and HDAC1 were obtained pre, during, and post G treatment. We sought ≥ 4 patients with ≥ 6 months PFS (a success) in Stage 1 of a 2-stage near-optimal Simon design. Results: 18 patients were enrolled at 4 institutions. The patients’ median age was 68 (range 51-82), 13 were Caucasian, 4 were African American, and 1 was Asian. Median PSA was 210.7 ng/mL (range 25.9 – 3,489 ng/mL). One patient never started therapy. Among the 17 treated patients, the median number of cycles was 2 (range 1-5). The most frequent Grade 3 toxicities were diarrhea (3 patients), fatigue (3), and dehydration (3). Prior therapy included abiraterone (8), sipuleucel-T (4), and other targeted therapy (4). With < 4 successes in Stage 1, the trial was terminated early. Median PFS was 1.9 months (90% CI: 1.7 – 2.7 months); median OS was 10.2 months (90% CI: 2.3 – 18.3 months). Exploratory markers have been evaluated and will be presented. Conclusions: Our study represents the first clinical trial of G in treating mCRPC patients. As a single agent therapy, G did not prolong PFS. Combination therapy is a consideration to improve therapeutic efficacy. Clinical trial information: NCT01270880.

A phase Ib/II trial of indomethacin and enzalutamide to treat castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS394-TPS394 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chong-xian Pan ◽  
Primo Lara ◽  
Christopher P. Evans ◽  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
Ralph de Vere White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Androgen Synthesis ◽  
Psa Response

TPS394 Background: Enzalutamide (Enza) and abiraterone (Abi) are commonly used to treat CRPC. Resistance is the most common cause of treatment failure. We discovered that a critical steroidogenic enzyme AKR1C3 was significantly elevated and contributed to intratumoral androgen synthesis in Enza-resistant prostate cancer cells and tumors. Overexpression of AKR1C3 induced androgen receptor variant 7 (AR-V7) expression, while inhibition of AKR1C3 downregulated AR-V7. We then discovered that indomethacin (Indo) inhibited AKR1C3 activation and sensitized resistant CRPC cells to Enza and Abi. One patient accidentally took Indo and achieved biochemical as well as radiological response of his prostate cancer. These findings prompted us to design a clinical trial to test the combination of Indo with Enza for the treatment of CRPC and to study the underlying mechanisms of action and resistance. Methods: This investigator-initiated single-arm Phase Ib/II trial enrolls patients with progressive CRPC after Abi, adequate vital organ function, ECOG performance status 0-2, and serum testosterone < 50 ng/dl. Major exclusion criteria include prior Enza treatment, brain metastasis and history of seizure. In the Phase Ib cohort, patients receive Enza 160 mg po qd and Indo 50 mg po tid to determine toxicity. The Phase II expansion will enroll 26 patients with 21 evaluable patients. This sample size provides 90% power to detect, at the 0.05 level (1-sided), the difference between a PSA response rate of 50% expected with the study treatment and a historical control of 20% with Enza alone. Co-primary endpoints are safety and PSA response of ≥50% decrease. Secondary endpoints include overall response rate as determined by the Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria (PCWG2), progression-free survival and overall survival. Molecular correlative studies are exploratory endpoints. Serum and intratumoral androgen levels, full-length AR, AR-V7 and AKR1C3 will be measured to assess the effect of the combination therapy. To date, 4 patients have been enrolled to the trial (clinicaltrials.gov Identifier No: NCT02935205; this trial is funded by DoD Prostate Cancer Research Program IMPACT award). Clinical trial information: NCT02935205.

ARCHES: Efficacy of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) with enzalutamide (ENZA) or placebo (PBO) in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5048-5048
Author(s):  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Russell Zelig Szmulewitz ◽  
Daniel Peter Petrylak ◽  
Jeffrey M. Holzbeierlein ◽  
Arnauld Villers ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3

5048 Background: ENZA has demonstrated benefit in men with metastatic and nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). ARCHES assessed the efficacy of ENZA with ADT in men with mHSPC, including pre-specified subgroups based on prior therapy. Methods: ARCHES, a multinational, double-blind, Phase 3 study (NCT02677896), randomized patients (pts) with mHSPC 1:1 to ENZA (160 mg/day) + ADT or PBO + ADT, stratified by disease volume (CHAARTED criteria) and prior docetaxel (doce) use. Primary endpoint was radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS; centrally assessed radiographic progression or death within 24 weeks of treatment discontinuation). Secondary endpoints included time to initiation of new antineoplastic therapy and overall survival (OS). Treatment continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 1150 men were randomized to ENZA (n = 574) or PBO (n = 576). Overall, 63% had high-volume disease, 18% had prior doce, and 91% had prior ADT or orchiectomy (orch). Median follow-up was 14.4 mo. ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS (Table); significant improvements in rPFS were also reported in prior treatment subgroups. Secondary endpoints improved with ENZA + ADT (Table), with no significant impact in time to deterioration in urinary symptoms. OS data are immature. Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) were reported in 23.6% of ENZA pts vs. 24.7% of PBO pts with no unexpected AEs. Conclusions: ENZA + ADT significantly improved rPFS and other efficacy endpoints vs. PBO + ADT in men with mHSPC. Preliminary safety analysis appears consistent with the safety profile of ENZA in previous CRPC clinical trials. Clinical trial information: NCT02677896. [Table: see text]

Pilot study of veliparib (ABT-888) with temozolomide (TMZ) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 224-224 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maha Hussain ◽  
Michael Anthony Carducci ◽  
Susan F. Slovin ◽  
Jeremy Paul Cetnar ◽  
Jiang Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Type I Error ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Type I ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Clinically Significant

224 Background: Castration-resistant PC tumors exhibit increased PARP activity (critical enzymes for DNA damage repair). Veliparib is a novel, oral, potent inhibitor of PARP-1 and PARP-2. Preclinically, resistance to oral TMZ treatment in the PC3-Luc prostate cancer mouse model was reversed when mice were treated with veliparib. Based on the synergistic interaction, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of veliparib + TMZ in mCRPC pts. Methods: Eligible pts had mCRPC, PSA>2 ng/mL, progressed on at least one docetaxel based therapy and adequate organ function. Pts received veliparib 40 mg BID Days (D) 1-7 and TMZ D1-5 in 28D cycle (C) until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicities. Tumor response was assessed every 8 weeks. Primary objective: Efficacy based on rate of PSA decline of 30% or greater. Secondary objectives: safety, RECIST objective response rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and biomarker analyses. A sample size of 25 pts provided 76% power to differentiate between PSA response rates of 5 and 20% at 1-sided type I error rate of 0.1. Results: 26 pts were enrolled; median age 67 years [55, 81]; median baseline PSA 107 ng/ml (6.9, 4584.4); 7/26 (27%) had 2 prior therapies. Median Cs of veliparib + TMZ received were 2 (range 1–9). Most frequent treatment related adverse events (AE) were fatigue (50%), nausea (38%) and constipation (23%). Grade 3/4 AEs in >10% of pts was thrombocytopenia (15%). All pts are off therapy. 25 pts were PSA response evaluable; 2 pts had a confirmed PSA response; 1 pt had a 37% decrease in PSA while the other pt had a 96% decrease in PSA and a 40% reduction in tumor size. 4/25 pts had stable disease for a minimum of 4 months (m). Median PFS was 2.1 m [95% CI: 1.8, 3.9]; 11/26 pts have died with median OS of 9.1 m [95% CI: 5.5, 11.7]. There was a negative correlation between change from baseline in circulating tumor cells and PFS. Conclusions: Veliparib + TMZ were well tolerated with evidence of some activity. Due to lack of activity of TMZ in CRPC,veliparib-induced potentiation of TMZ may not be clinically significant. Other combinations will be explored with higher doses of veliparib. Biomarker data will be presented.

Meaningful survival after cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): The Spanish experience.

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Iria Gonzalez Maeso ◽  
Daniel E. Castellano ◽  
Begona Campos Balea ◽  
Emilio Esteban ◽  
Quionia Pérez Arnillas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiographic Progression ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Specific Treatment ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Adequate Treatment ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Castration Resistant

235 Background: New emerging therapies for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), such as cabazitaxel (CBZ), have prompted the need to identify appropriate patients (pts) for each specific treatment. We describe preliminary data on the experience with CBZ in patients (pts) with mCRPC in Spain. Methods: Medical records from docetaxel-resistant mCRPC pts receiving CBZ at 15 centers in Spain were reviewed retrospectively. Baseline characteristics, PSA response, overall survival (OS), radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS), and toxicity were collected. Results: Data from 79 consecutive pts (median age 70) were reviewed: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) zero to one (87.3%), Gleason score of 7 to 10 (87.1%), visceral involvement (24.1%), pain (74.7%), and radiological progression (68.4%) at CBZ initiation. Median duration of response to first-line androgen deprivation therapy was 20.8 months (mo). Most pts received less than or equal to two hormonal lines (72.2%) and only one docetaxel line (74.7%) before CBZ. Thirty-five (44.3%) pts had progressed on docetaxel. Progression less than six mo or greater than six mo after last docetaxel treatment was observed in 23 (29.1%) and 21 (26.6%) pts, respectively. New hormonal agents (abiraterone or enzalutamide) were given before CBZ in 2.5% of pts and after CBZ in 17.7%. Pts received a median of seven cycles (range 2 to 22) of CBZ. CBZ dose-reductions or -delays for any cause occurred in eight (10.1%) and 20 (25.3%) pts, respectively. Prophylactic G-CSF was given in 32 (40.5%) pts. A PSA decrease of greater than or equal to 50% and greater than or equal to 30% was reached in 41.2% and 48.6% of pts treated with CBZ. Median OS from first CBZ cycle was 16.2 [CI: 10.4;-] mo and median clinical and/or radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) was 9.9 mo [CI: 7.4; 13.1]. Fourteen (17.7%) pts experienced at least one grade greater than or equal to 3 treatment-related AE, the most common being neutropenia (n=4), febrile neutropenia (n=2), asthenia (n=4), and diarrhoea (n=2). No grade greater than or equal to 3 peripheral neuropathy was reported. An analysis of factors predicting outcome will be presented. Conclusions: CBZ administered in real-life practice and in the adequate treatment setting in Spain is associated with meaningful PFS and OS and an acceptable safety profile. Dose delays and reductions were low. Prophylactic G-CSF use in 4 out of 10 pts may have contributed to these good results.

scholarly journals A multicentre analysis of abiraterone acetate in Canadian patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 583 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ravinder Clayton ◽  
Jackson Wu ◽  
Daniel Y Heng ◽  
Scott A North ◽  
Urban Emmenegger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Study Results

Introducton: The COU-AA-301 trial showed that abiraterone acetate (abiraterone), an oral cytochrome p450 CYP17 inhibitor, improved survival for men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing after docetaxel. To better understand the non-clinical trial experience with abiraterone, we undertook a multicentre retrospective analysis of Canadian mCRPC patients treated with abiraterone.Methods: Consecutive patients with mCRPC who received abiraterone post-docetaxel were identified using centralized pharmacy records. These patients came from 5 Canadian tertiary cancer centres. Patients who received abiraterone for approved indications were included. Demographics, prognostic factors, treatment outcomes and adverse events were abstracted.Results: We included 187 patients who initiated abiraterone between January 2011 and June 2012. The median age at diagnosis and abiraterone start was 65 and 73 years, respectively. Seventy-three (39%) patients had metastatic disease at diagnosis. The Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, 2 and 3 was noted in 17, 96, 39 and 8 patients, respectively. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) at abiraterone start was 132, with a median PSA doubling time of 2.8 months. The median follow-up of patients still on active follow-up was 13 months. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% PSA reduction was 64/177 (36%). PSA progression-free survival was 3.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0, 4.0). Median overall survival from start of abiraterone was 11 months (95% CI, 8.0, 13) and 38 months (95% CI, 31, 41) from date of mCRPC. Anemia and fatigue were the most commonly reported adverse events.Conclusions: This study carries the inherent limitations of a retrospective chart review. The outcomes in this series of men treated with abiraterone in a non-trial setting were expected, considering previous clinical trials. Our results, therefore, support the generalizability of the COU-AA-301 study results.

Is the duration of castration resistance predictive for sequential treatment responses in the metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer setting?

2020 ◽  
pp. 107815522095161
Author(s):  
Özgecan Dülgar ◽  
Deniz Tataroğlu Özyükseler ◽  
Mustafa Başak ◽  
Seval Ay ◽  
Deniz Tural ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistance ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
One Year

Objective Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer death in men. Androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) has been the primary therapeutic approach for treatment of prostate cancer. However,nearly all patients develop the castration-resistant disease . We evaluated real-world data with abiraterone and enzalutamide treatment. By this data, we aimed to analyze whether that prior short response to ADT could predict response to subsequent therapy with androgen receptor axis targeted agent (ARATA). Material and Method We collected data from two cancer centers, 151 consecutive patients with treated abiraterone or enzalutamide in the first line of metastatic castration resistant prostat cancer (mCRPC) setting were included. The patients who received docetaxel in castration naive setting is also included. Time to castration resistance (TTCR) was defined as the duration from the initial to failure of primary ADT. Results Patients with treated ARATA were divided into two groups according to the time to castration resistance (TTCR). Patients who became resistant to ADT up to one year had a median PFS of 6.6 months, compared to median PFS of 13.3 months for patients who responded ADT for more than 1 year. (p = 0.002). In the post-docetaxel setting, median PFS is 12.6 months of patients with treated ARATA who had TTCR for more than one year, and median PFS is 6.6 months in those who had TTCR less than one year (p = 0.007).Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the clinical factors on ARATA outcomes. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status(PS), median prostate-specific antigen(PSA) and time to CRPC were significantly predicted outcomes of ARATA on multivariate analysis. Conclusion TTCR is also a predictor for PFS of the patients who were treated ARATA both whole cohort and post-docetaxel.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document