Trends in total and out-of-pocket cost of cancer care around the first year of diagnosis for the four most common cancers among privately insured nonelderly adults: 2009-2016.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (28_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5-5
Author(s):  
Ya-Chen T. Shih ◽  
Ying Xu ◽  
Cathy Bradley ◽  
Sharon H. Giordano ◽  
James C. Yao ◽  
...  

5 Background: To provide a comprehensive evaluation of the trends in treatment pattern, total and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs of cancer care for in the period between 2-month before and 12-month after cancer diagnosis for the privately insured non-elderly adults diagnosed with female breast, colorectal, lung, or prostate cancer. These four cancers represent the four most prevalent cancers in the United States and the 14-month duration captures the most expensive care phase in the cost trajectory of cancer. Methods: We constructed incident cohorts using claims data from the Health Care Cost Institute between 2009 and 2016. We identified treatment modality (cancer-related surgery, systemic therapy, radiation, and other hospitalizations) and calculated associated total and OOP (sum of deductible, coinsurance, and copayment) costs from payment variables. For each cancer, we examined healthcare utilization and cost trends based on the year of diagnosis and conducted logistic regressions to assess the trend in utilization and generalized linear models to evaluate the trend in costs. All estimates are reported in 2020 US dollars. Results: The cohorts consisted of 105,255 breast, 23,571 colorectal, 11,321 lung, and 59,197 prostate cancer patients. Between 2009 and 2016, use of systemic therapy and radiation significantly increased, except for lung cancer. Cancer surgeries significantly increased for breast and colorectal cancer but decreased for prostate cancer, whereas hospitalizations for reasons other than cancer declined for all cancers (p < 0.001). Costs increased for nearly all treatment modalities except for systemic therapy in colorectal and radiation in prostate cancer. Total mean costs per patient had the largest increase in breast cancer (29%, $109,544 to $140,743), followed by lung (11%) and prostate (4%) cancer. Cost increase in colorectal cancer was not statistically significant (P = 0.089). Similar trends were found in median costs. Although not every cancer had significant increase in total costs over time, OOP costs increased > 15% for all cancers, with deductibles accounting for an increasingly proportion. Conclusions: Rising costs of cancer treatments, compounded with increasing cost-sharing increased OOP costs for privately insured, non-elderly cancer patients. Policy initiatives to mitigate financial hardship should consider cost containment as well as insurance reform.

2002 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 130
Author(s):  
L Morris ◽  
J Margolis ◽  
SC Henderson ◽  
H von Allmen

Author(s):  
Caitlin C. Murphy ◽  
Linda C. Harlan ◽  
Jennifer L. Lund ◽  
Charles F. Lynch ◽  
Ann M. Geiger

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (8) ◽  
pp. 1997-2010
Author(s):  
Sharon Odeo ◽  
Amsalu Degu

Introduction Prostate cancer is recognized as the leading cause of malignancy-related incidence and mortality in the male population. The treatment regimens have long-term effects detrimental to the patient's quality of life. Hence, this review was aimed to determine the overall HRQOL and its associated among prostate cancer patients. Methods The review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The databases searched were PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cumulative Index to the Nursing and Allied Literature (CINAHL), which provided articles that were critically examined, yielding 52 studies that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review. Results Out of 52 studies, 30 studies reported poor overall HRQOL in various domains after prostate cancer treatment. Contrastingly, 15 studies reported good overall quality of life after treatment. Among the various domains, sexual function was the most grossly affected functional score by the treatment modalities of prostate cancer. Nonetheless, seven studies showed that the absence of a significant change in the overall quality of life after treatment. According to the studies, older age, comorbidities, higher clinical stage, higher Gleason score, greater cancer severity, African American race, impaired mental health, neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and lower level of education were the major poor predictors of HRQOL among prostate cancer patients. Conclusion The overall HRQOL in prostate cancer patients was generally poor in various functional domains after treatment. Among the various domains, sexual function was the most grossly affected functional score by the treatment modalities of prostate cancer.


2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia Trosman ◽  
Christine Weldon ◽  
Sheetal Kircher ◽  
William Gradishar ◽  
Al Benson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document