Efficacy of enobosarm, a selective androgen receptor (AR) targeting agent, correlates with the degree of AR positivity in advanced AR+/estrogen receptor (ER)+ breast cancer in an international phase 2 clinical study.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1020-1020
Author(s):  
Carlo Palmieri ◽  
Hannah M. Linden ◽  
Stephen Birrell ◽  
Elgene Lim ◽  
Lee S. Schwartzberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Activating Agent

1020 Background: The AR is expressed in up to 90% of ER+ breast cancer where it acts as a tumor suppressor. Historically, therapy with synthetic androgens had efficacy, but virilizing side effects and toxicity limited their use. Enobosarm is a selective AR activating agent that does not cause masculinization and has positive attributes such as promotion of bone and improvement of physical function. In a phase 2 study, correlation between the degree of AR staining and antitumor activity in AR+/ER+ patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was examined. Methods: A phase 2, open label, parallel design randomized study was conducted in 136 patients to evaluate the efficacy and safety of enobosarm in heavily pretreated women with AR+/ER+ MBC. Patients were randomized to 9 mg (n=72) or 18 mg (n=64) of oral daily enobosarm. AR expression (%AR nuclei staining) in breast cancer samples was determined centrally by immunohistochemistry. The correlation between %AR staining and clinical outcomes was examined with a focus on the 9mg dose, selected for the phase 3 study and the optimal %AR staining established. Results: Tumor objective outcomes correlated with percent AR staining (Table). Further, using a 40% AR staining cutoff in patients with measurable disease, the clinical benefit rate (CBR) for ≥40% AR is 80% and <40% is 18% (p<0.0001). Best objective tumor response (BOR) in patients with ≥40% AR is 48% and <40% is 0% (p<0.0001). At ≥40% AR, median radiographic progression free survival (rPFS) is 5.47 and mean is 7.15 months vs <40% AR where the median rPFS is 2.72 and mean is 2.7 months. Similar %AR staining correlation was observed in the 18mg cohort. Enobosarm treatment was well tolerated with significant positive effects on quality of life measurements. Conclusions: Enobosarm is a novel oral selective AR activating agent in which a higher % AR staining correlates with a greater antitumor activity. By targeting and activating AR, enobosarm may represent a new hormone treatment approach for AR+/ER+ MBC. The phase 3, ARTEST trial will commence in early 2021 and randomize patients with AR+/ER+/HER2- heavily treated MBC that have progressed on a non-steroidal aromatase inhibitor, fulvestrant and CDK 4/6 inhibitor to receive enobosarm or standard endocrine therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02463032 .[Table: see text]

Phase II randomized, open-label study of YM155 (sepantronium bromide) plus docetaxel versus docetaxel alone as first-line treatment for HER2 negative metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 548-548
Author(s):  
Michael R. Clemens ◽  
Anne Therese Keating ◽  
Oleg Gladkov ◽  
Fei Jie ◽  
Joyce Steinberg ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Prior Therapy

548 Background: YM155 (YM) is a small molecule survivin suppressant. In a phase I/II study of YM plus docetaxel (D) in solid tumors evidence of anti-tumor activity was observed in women with human epidermal growth factor 2 non-overexpressing (HER2 negative) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Methods: This was a randomized study of YM plus D versus D as 1st line treatment in subjects with HER2 negative mBC. Eligibility criteria were: ECOG < 1, no prior chemotherapy for mBC, and at least one measurable lesion. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints were: objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate (CBR), time to response (TTR) and safety. YM was administered at 5 mg/m2/day as a 168 hr continuous infusion followed by 14 Day (d) observation and D was administered at 75 mg/m2over 1 hr on d1 every 21d. In the control arm, D was dosed per investigator choice q 21d. Results: 101 subjects were randomized (50 YM + D; 51 D). Median (m) age 55 (range: 25 – 79), 25% had triple negative disease, > 60% had bone and lymph mets, 86% had prior therapy for BC. mPFS (days) was 251 (95%CI: 176 – 333) YM + D vs 252 (95%CI: 202-433) D (p=0.34). ORR, CBR and TTR (YM+D; D): 26% vs. 25.5%; 82% vs. 84.3% and 45 vs 59 d. OS data are immature but showed no difference (p=0.911). Adverse events [AEs (> 25%)] [YM + D% vs D %]: neutropenia 83 vs 84, alopecia 62.5 vs 53, fatigue 50 vs 41.2, nausea 35.4 vs 41.2, leucopenia 27 vs 33 and dyspnoea 33 vs 14. Common (>10%) serious AEs [YM + D% vs D%]: febrile neutropenia 21 vs 8 and neutropenia 10 vs 8. Conclusions: Preclinical and clinical evidence suggested the combination of YM + D may offer additional benefit to D alone in subjects with mBC. This study showed no difference in efficacy, but the combination appeared to be well tolerated. Clinical trial information: NCT01038804.

Significantly Longer Progression-Free Survival Withnab-Paclitaxel Compared With Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (22) ◽  
pp. 3611-3619 ◽  
Author(s):  
William J. Gradishar ◽  
Dimitry Krasnojon ◽  
Sergey Cheporov ◽  
Anatoly N. Makhson ◽  
Georgiy M. Manikhas ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Statistical Significance ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Prolongation

PurposeIn patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC), nab-paclitaxel produced significantly higher antitumor activity compared with patients who received solvent-based paclitaxel. This phase II study examined the antitumor activity and safety of weekly and every 3 week (q3w) nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel as first-line treatment in patients with MBC.Patients and MethodsIn this randomized, multicenter study, patients (N = 302) with previously untreated MBC received nab-paclitaxel 300 mg/m2q3w, 100 mg/m2weekly, or 150 mg/m2weekly or docetaxel 100 mg/m2q3w.Resultsnab-Paclitaxel 150 mg/m2weekly demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS) than docetaxel by both independent radiologist assessment (12.9 v 7.5 months, respectively; P = .0065) and investigator assessment (14.6 v 7.8 months, respectively; P = .012). On the basis of independent radiologist review, both 150 mg/m2(49%) and 100 mg/m2(45%) weekly of nab-paclitaxel demonstrated a higher overall response rate (ORR) than docetaxel (35%), but this did not reach statistical significance. This trend was supported by statistically significant investigator ORR for both weekly nab-paclitaxel doses versus docetaxel. nab-Paclitaxel q3w versus docetaxel was not different for PFS or ORR. On the basis of both the independent radiologist and investigator review, disease control rate was significantly higher for patients receiving either dose of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel. Grade 3 or 4 fatigue, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia were less frequent in all nab-paclitaxel arms. The frequency and grade of peripheral neuropathy were similar in all arms.ConclusionThis randomized study in first-line MBC demonstrated superior efficacy and safety of weekly nab-paclitaxel compared with docetaxel, with a statistically and clinically significant prolongation of PFS (> 5 months) in patients receiving nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2weekly compared with docetaxel 100 mg/m2q3w.

scholarly journals Subgroup Analyses from a Phase 3, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Eribulin Mesylate versus Capecitabine in Pretreated Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. BCBCR.S39615 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Twelves ◽  
Ahmad Awada ◽  
Javier Cortes ◽  
Louise Yelle ◽  
Galina Velikova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Eribulin Mesylate ◽  
Epidermal Growth

Purpose and Methods Our secondary analyses compared survival with eribulin versus capecitabine in various patient subgroups from a phase 3, open-label, randomized study. Eligible women aged ≥18 years with advanced/metastatic breast cancer and ≤3 prior chemotherapies (≤2 for advanced/metastatic disease), including an anthracycline and taxane, were randomized 1:1 to intravenous eribulin mesylate 1.4 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 or twice-daily oral capecitabine 1250 mg/m2 on days 1–14 (21-day cycles). Results In the intent-to-treat population (eribulin 554 and capecitabine 548), overall survival appeared longer with eribulin than capecitabine in various subgroups, including patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (15.9 versus 13.5 months, respectively), estrogen receptor-negative (14.4 versus 10.5 months, respectively), and triple-negative (14.4 versus 9.4 months, respectively) disease. Progression-free survival was similar between the treatment arms. Conclusions Patients with advanced/metastatic breast cancer and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-, estrogen receptor-, or triple-negative disease may gain particular benefit from eribulin as first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapies. Trial Registration (Primary Study) This study reports the subgroup analyses of eribulin versus capecitabine from a phase 3, open-label, randomized study ( www.clinicaltrials.gov ; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00337103).

scholarly journals Phase II study of metronomic treatment with daily oral vinorelbine as first-line chemotherapy in patients with advanced/metastatic HR+/HER2− breast cancer resistant to endocrine therapy: VinoMetro—AGO-B-046

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Slavomir Krajnak ◽  
Thomas Decker ◽  
Lukas Schollenberger ◽  
Christian Rosé ◽  
Christian Ruckes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Oral Vinorelbine ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Abstract Purpose Metronomic chemotherapy (MCT) is an increasingly used treatment option in hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2−) advanced/metastatic breast cancer (MBC) after failure of endocrine-based therapies. Methods VinoMetro was a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase II study of metronomic oral vinorelbine (VRL; 30 mg/day) as a first-line chemotherapy (CT) in patients with HR+/HER2− MBC after endocrine failure. The primary endpoint was the clinical benefit rate (CBR) at 24 weeks. Results Between January 2017 and April 2019, nine patients were enrolled. The CBR was 22.2% (90% confidence interval [CI] 4.1–55.0), p = 0.211. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.0 weeks (95% CI 11.3–12.7). Grade 3–4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 22.2% of patients. One patient died of febrile neutropenia. Conclusion VinoMetro (AGO-B-046) was closed early after nine patients and occurrence of one grade 5 toxicity in agreement with the lead institutional review board (IRB). Metronomic dosing of oral VRL in HR+/HER2− MBC as first-line CT after failure of endocrine therapies showed only limited benefit in this population. Trial registration number and date of registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03007992; December 15, 2016.

scholarly journals Treatment of early-stage breast cancer with percutaneous thermal ablation, an open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial: rationale and design of the THERMAC trial

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (9) ◽  
pp. e052992
Author(s):  
Elles M F van de Voort ◽  
Gerson M Struik ◽  
Linetta B Koppert ◽  
Adriaan Moelker ◽  
Reno Debets ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Thermal Ablation ◽  
Surgical Excision ◽  
Maximum Diameter ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Complete Ablation ◽  
Study Results ◽  
Screening Trial

IntroductionBreast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed malignancy worldwide but almost half of the patients have an excellent prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of 98%–99%. These patients could potentially be treated with thermal ablation to avoid surgical excision, reduce treatment-related morbidity and increase patients’ quality of life without jeopardising treatment effectiveness. Previous studies showed highest complete ablation rates for radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation. However, due to heterogeneity among studies, it is unknown which of these three techniques should be selected for a phase 3 comparative study.Methods and analysisThe aim of this phase 2 screening trial is to determine the efficacy rate of radiofrequency, microwave and cryoablation with the intention to select one treatment for further testing in a phase 3 trial. Additionally, exploratory data are obtained for the phase 3 trial. The design is a multicentre open-label randomised phase 2 screening trial. Patients with unifocal, invasive breast cancer with a maximum diameter of 2 cm without lymph node or distant metastases are included. Triple negative, Bloom-Richardson grade 3 tumours and patients with an indication for neoadjuvant chemotherapy will be excluded. Included patients will be allocated to receive one of the three thermal ablation techniques. Three months later surgical excision will be performed to determine the efficacy of thermal ablation. Treatment efficacy in terms of complete ablation rate will be assessed with CK 8/18 and H&E staining. Secondary outcomes include feasibility of the techniques in an outpatient setting, accuracy of MRI for complete ablation, patient satisfaction, adverse events, side effects, cosmetic outcome, system usability and immune response.Ethics and disseminationThis study protocol was approved by Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Study results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals.Trial registration numberNL9205 (www.trialregister.nl); Pre-results.

A phase 2 study of pamiparib in the treatment of patients with locally advanced or metastatic HER2-negative breast cancer with germline BRCA mutation.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Tao Sun ◽  
Yanxia Shi ◽  
Jiuwei Cui ◽  
Yongmei Yin ◽  
Quchang Ouyang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Brca Mutation ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Her2 Breast Cancer

1087 Background: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, with up to 37% of patients (pts) harboring germline BRCA1/2 mutations (g BRCA1/2m) that appear to be sensitive to poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase proteins 1 and 2 (PARP1/2) inhibition. Pamiparib is an orally administered selective PARP1/2 inhibitor that has the potential to cross the blood-brain barrier. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of pamiparib in pts with locally advanced/metastatic human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) breast cancer, with deleterious or suspected deleterious g BRCA1/2m, who received ≤ 2 prior lines of chemotherapy. Methods: In this open-label, phase 2, multi-center study in China (NCT03575065), pts with locally advanced/metastatic HER2- breast cancer with deleterious or suspected deleterious g BRCA1/2m triple negative breast cancer (TNBC cohort) or hormone receptor-positive (HR+)/HER2- breast cancer (HR+ cohort) were enrolled. Pts received pamiparib 60 mg orally twice daily in 28-day cycles. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1) by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included duration of response (DOR) and progression free survival (PFS) by IRC, overall survival (OS), safety and tolerability. Results: 88 pts were enrolled (median age 45.5 years), 76 pts (TNBC cohort n = 55; HR+ cohort n = 21) had measurable disease at baseline per IRC. 60 pts (68.2%) received 1 or 2 prior lines of chemotherapy; 42 pts (47.7%) were treated with platinum previously. Median follow-up was 13.77 months (TNBC cohort, 10.87 months; HR+ cohort, 18.45 months). In the TNBC cohort: confirmed ORR was 38.2% (95% CI: 25.4–52.3); median DOR (mDOR) was 6.97 months (95% CI: 3.94–not estimable[NE]); median PFS (mPFS) was 5.49 months (95% CI: 3.65–7.33); median OS (mOS) was 17.08 months (95% CI:13.70–NE). In the HR+ cohort: confirmed ORR was 61.9% (95% CI: 38.4–81.9); mDOR was 7.49 months (95% CI: 5.55–14.75); mPFS was 9.20 months (95% CI: 7.39–11.93); mOS was not reached (NR; 95% CI 18.10–NE). ≥ Grade 3 treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 54 pts (61.4%); anemia was the most common TEAE, occurring in 77 pts (87.5%). Dose reduction due to TEAEs occurred for 57 pts (64.8%); discontinuations due to TEAEs occurred for 2 pts (2.3%). Conclusions: Pamiparib showed a promising response in pts with locally advanced/metastatic HER2- breast cancer with a g BRCA1/2m. The safety profile of pamiparib was considered acceptable and was generally consistent with therapies in the same class. Clinical trial information: NCT03575065 .[Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document