ARC-6: A phase 1b/2, open-label, randomized platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etrumadenant (AB928)-based treatment combinations in patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5039-5039
Author(s):  
Sumit Kumar Subudhi ◽  
Johanna C. Bendell ◽  
Michael Anthony Carducci ◽  
Lisa M. Kopp ◽  
Jennifer Scott ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Prostatic Acid Phosphatase ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Radiographic Response ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Composite Response

5039 Background: Standard-of-care (SOC) chemotherapy may contribute to immunosuppression by elevating intratumoral levels of adenosine, activating the A2a and A2b receptors on immune cells. Extracellular adenosine is primarily produced by the enzyme CD73; in prostate cancer, additional adenosine is also produced by the highly expressed protein, prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP). Etrumadenant (etruma) is an orally bioavailable, small-molecule, selective dual adenosine receptor antagonist and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as monotherapy or combined with chemo/immunotherapy. Adenosine axis inhibition combined with SOC regimens and/or immunotherapy may have a synergistic effect on the induction of sustained antitumor immunity against mCRPC. Initial results from the etruma + zimberelimab (zim; anti–PD-1 mAb) + docetaxel (doc) arm are presented herein. Methods: ARC-6 (NCT04381832) is an ongoing, phase 1b/2, open-label, multicohort platform study to evaluate efficacy and safety of etruma combination therapy. All eligible patients (pts) have mCRPC that has progressed on androgen deprivation therapy and are checkpoint inhibitor-naive; additionally, for this arm, pts must be androgen signaling inhibitor (ASI)-experienced and taxane-naive. Study pts receive 150 mg etruma orally once daily + 360 mg zim IV every 3 weeks + SOC doc (EZD). The primary objectives are to evaluate safety and antitumor activity (prostate-specific antigen [PSA], radiographic, and composite response rates) of EZD. PSA levels are assessed every 3 weeks, and radiographic scans are performed every 12 weeks. PSA response-evaluable pts have baseline (BL) + ≥2 consecutive post-BL PSA assessments; radiographic response-evaluable pts have RECIST measurable or non-measurable disease per BL imaging + ≥1 post-BL radiographic assessment. Results: As of 22Jan2021, 17 pts have received EZD in phase 1b; 14 are PSA response-evaluable and 8 are radiographic response-evaluable. 15 (88%) pts reported treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs); the most common ( > 30%) were lymphocyte count decreased and neutrophil count decreased (7 pts each; 41%), and hyponatremia and alopecia (6 pts each; 35%). Grade ≥3 treatment-related TEAEs were reported by 9 pts (53%). As of 22Jan2021, 16 pts were continuing treatment; median time on EZD for all pts was 9.9 weeks (0.1–27.4+ weeks). In response-evaluable pts, PSA response rate was 36% (5/14), radiographic response rate was 38% (3/8; 1 CR), and the composite response rate was 43% (6/14). Conclusions: Phase 1b results indicate that EZD treatment in pts with mCRPC had a manageable safety profile and was associated with clinical benefit. Having met phase 2 advancement criteria, randomized pt enrollment to EZD vs. doc is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT04381832.

A phase II, open-label, single-arm, efficacy, and safety study of MDV3100 in patients with hormone-naïve prostate cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 177-177
Author(s):  
E. S. Baskin-Bey ◽  
G. M. Holtkamp ◽  
M. R. Smith ◽  
T. Ouatas ◽  
D. Phung ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dropout Rate ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety Study ◽  
Psa Response

177 Background: MDV3100 is a novel androgen receptor (AR) antagonist in clinical development for the treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). Compared to bicalutamide, MDV3100 has higher in vitro AR binding affinity and no evidence of partial agonism. Preliminary phase I-II data show antitumor activity with MDV3100 in men with advanced PCa who were concurrently using androgen deprivation therapy (ADT; Scher HI, et al. Lancet. 2010;375:1437-46). Phase II and III studies in men with progressive and earlier-stage PCa are ongoing. This abstract describes the design of a phase II study of MDV3100 in men with hormone-naïve PCa (HNPCa) who are candidates for ADT. Methods: This 25-week, open-label, single-arm, efficacy and safety study of MDV3100 (160 mg/d orally) will be initiated at ∼20 investigational sites in late 2010 (planned countries: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Germany). Inclusion criteria include histologically confirmed, locally advanced PCa (all stages), noncastrate testosterone (T; ≥230 ng/dL), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥2 ng/mL (screening), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score of 0, and life expectancy ≥1 year. Exclusion criteria include, among others, previous/current hormonal therapy or chemotherapy for PCa. The primary endpoint is PSA response, defined as an ≥80% decrease from baseline to wk 25. A binary PSA response per patient (wk 25) will be determined, allowing for generation of a PSA response rate (95% CI) from all patients for the study. Secondary endpoints include: PSA dynamics; pharmacokinetics; change in gonadotropin, T, dihydrotestosterone, estradiol, sex-hormone binding globulin, and prolactin levels; and safety/tolerability. Exploratory endpoints include changes in bone mineral density, bone turnover markers, metabolic parameters, and quality of life. Results: The planned enrollment is 60 patients. With a 20% dropout rate, the study will have 80% power to reject the unwanted PSA response rate of ≤50% (5% significance). Efficacy and safety data will be published later. Conclusions: Previous data were in men with castrate levels of T (≤50 ng/dL). This trial will be the first to investigate the use of MDV3100 monotherapy in HNPCa. [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Rucaparib in Men With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Harboring a BRCA1 or BRCA2 Gene Alteration

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (32) ◽  
pp. 3763-3772 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
David Campbell ◽  
Jeremy Shapiro ◽  
Alan H. Bryce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Brca2 Gene ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

PURPOSE BRCA1 or BRCA2 ( BRCA) alterations are common in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and may confer sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors. We present results from patients with mCRPC associated with a BRCA alteration treated with rucaparib 600 mg twice daily in the phase II TRITON2 study. METHODS We enrolled patients who progressed after one to two lines of next-generation androgen receptor–directed therapy and one taxane-based chemotherapy for mCRPC. Efficacy and safety populations included patients with a deleterious BRCA alteration who received ≥ 1 dose of rucaparib. Key efficacy end points were objective response rate (ORR; per RECIST/Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 3 in patients with measurable disease as assessed by blinded, independent radiology review and by investigators) and locally assessed prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response (≥ 50% decrease from baseline) rate. RESULTS Efficacy and safety populations included 115 patients with a BRCA alteration with or without measurable disease. Confirmed ORRs per independent radiology review and investigator assessment were 43.5% (95% CI, 31.0% to 56.7%; 27 of 62 patients) and 50.8% (95% CI, 38.1% to 63.4%; 33 of 65 patients), respectively. The confirmed PSA response rate was 54.8% (95% CI, 45.2% to 64.1%; 63 of 115 patients). ORRs were similar for patients with a germline or somatic BRCA alteration and for patients with a BRCA1 or BRCA2 alteration, while a higher PSA response rate was observed in patients with a BRCA2 alteration. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event was anemia (25.2%; 29 of 115 patients). CONCLUSION Rucaparib has antitumor activity in patients with mCRPC and a deleterious BRCA alteration, but with a manageable safety profile consistent with that reported in other solid tumor types.

A phase Ib/II open-label study of tazemetostat (TAZ) plus enzalutamide (E) or abiraterone/prednisone (A/P) in chemotherapy-naive patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS255-TPS255
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Thomas Paul Bradley ◽  
Arash Rezazadeh ◽  
Lawrence Ivan Karsh ◽  
Ashley Ross ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Second Generation ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Phase 2 ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Open Label Study ◽  
Label Study ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS255 Background: The histone methyltransferase EZH2 is overexpressed in many cancers. In prostate cancer (PC), EZH2 inhibition may reverse acquired resistance to androgen inhibitors (AIs). Pts may initially respond to AIs, but pts who progress have limited treatment options. In phase 2 trials, TAZ, a selective, orally bioavailable, investigative small molecule EZH2 inhibitor, has demonstrated encouraging objective responses in B-cell lymphomas and molecularly defined solid tumors and a favorable safety profile. In PC preclinical models, TAZ + E or A/P showed a greater reduction in tumor growth than either drug alone. This study will evaluate the safety and efficacy of TAZ + E or A/P vs E or A/P alone in mCRPC. Methods: This phase 1b/2 study will enroll pts ≥18 years with progressive mCRPC, with or without prior second-generation AI treatment, and no prior chemotherapy. Phase 1b will identify the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of TAZ when combined with E (160 mg/day) or A/P (A: 1000 mg/day; P: 5 mg twice-daily [BID]) and evaluate the safety and tolerability of each combination in treatment-naïve pts and pts previously treated with a second-generation AI. Using a modified 3+3 design (up to 48 pts: 18 for TAZ+A/P and 30 for TAZ+E), TAZ dosing will start at 400 mg BID, escalating to 800 mg BID in the TAZ+A/P group or 1600 mg BID in the TAZ + E group, if no dose-limiting toxicities are observed. Phase 2 will begin once the RP2D for each combination is determined. Efficacy and safety results from phase 1b will inform the final design for phase 2. Phase 2 will be an open label study where pts will be randomized to either E or A/P alone or in combination with TAZ. TAZ will be administered at the RP2D in continuous 28-day cycles for as long as pts tolerate treatment and continue AI therapy. Tumor assessments will be performed every 9 weeks for 6 months and every 12 weeks thereafter. Efficacy assessments include radiographic progression-free survival (primary endpoint), prostate-specific antigen (PSA) ≥50% response rate, time to PSA progression, time to subsequent systemic therapy, and objective response rate. Safety is a secondary endpoint.

A phase Ib/II, open-label, platform study evaluating the efficacy and safety of AB928-based treatment combinations in participants with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS272-TPS272
Author(s):  
David R. Wise ◽  
Olivia Gardner ◽  
Houston N. Gilbert ◽  
Aimee Rieger ◽  
Melissa Constance Paoloni ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Small Molecule ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
The United States ◽  
Experimental Therapy ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Castrate Resistant

TPS272 Background: The tumor microenvironment contains high levels of immunosuppressive adenosine, which binds to and activates the A2a and A2b receptors (R) on immune cells, resulting in an ineffective anti-tumor immune response. Extracellular adenosine is primarily produced by the enzyme CD73. In prostate cancer (PC), the activity of prostatic acid phosphatase produces additional adenosine. AB928 is the first clinical-stage small molecule dual antagonist of both A2aR and A2bR, which is highly potent, pharmacodynamically active, and has been well tolerated in dose escalation studies as a single agent or in combination with chemo/immunotherapy. Targeting the adenosine pathway in combination with standard of care regimens may have a more profound effect on activating and inducing sustained anti-tumor immunity. Methods: This Phase 1b/2, open-label, multi-cohort platform study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of AB928 combination therapy in participants with metastatic castrate resistant PC (mCRPC). Each cohort will independently assess AB928 plus AB122 (anti-PD-1 antibody) in combination with standard of care (SOC; enzalutamide, docetaxel) or AB928 plus AB680 (CD73 inhibitor) with or without AB122. Cohort eligibility is informed by prior treatment history. In Ph1b, up to 15 participants will receive investigational products at the single-agent recommended dose with SOC per label guidance. Provided safety and activity stopping criteria are not met, further accrual will proceed in Ph2 and, depending on treatment cohort, may involve randomization to enzalutamide or docetaxel; crossover to experimental therapy will be allowed following progression on control treatment. Investigator-assessed antitumor response (radiologic, prostate specific antigen) will follow PCWG3 criteria. Conclusions: This Ph1b/2 study is the first to target the adenosine axis using a dual A2aR/A2bR antagonist (AB928) together with a small molecule CD73 inhibitor (AB680), anti-PD-1 antibody (AB122), and SOC for mCRPC. Study enrollment is proceeding in the United States; results will be shared in upcoming scientific conferences.

A study of two ODM-201 formulations with a safety and tolerability extension phase in patients with metastatic chemotherapy-naive castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

2014 ◽  
Vol 32 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 115-115 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Massard ◽  
Teuvo L. J. Tammela ◽  
Egils Vjaters ◽  
Vilnis Lietuvietis ◽  
Petri Bono ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Capsule Formulation ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Psa Response ◽  
Effect Of Food ◽  
Extension Period ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

115^ Background: This open phase I trial assessed the bioavailability, and the effect of food on the bioavailability of ODM-201 600mg tablets compared to a 600mg capsule formulation. Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of ODM-201 were studied in the extension period. Methods: The study had two parts: a pharmacokinetic (PK), and a safety and tolerability part. Dosing was 600mg bid with or without food. In the PK part, three single doses of ODM-201 were given over 3 weeks. In the extension part patients could continue treatment until disease progression or until an intolerable adverse event or condition that prevented further dosing of ODM-201. Results: Thirty men with metastatic chemotherapy-naïve castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) were enrolled, the median age was 68. The median prostate-specific antigen (PSA) was 18.2 ng/mL and testosterone 23.1 ng/dL at baseline. Food interaction was observed when ODM-201 formulations were administered after a high fat content breakfast compared to administration at fast. AUC and Cmaxvalues were about 50% lower after fast. Twenty nine patients have completed the 4-week visit. The PSA response rate (50% or more PSA decline) was 86%, with a median PSA decrease of -66% (-96, 5) at week 4 (N=18/21). Most commonly reported adverse events so far are fatigue, abdominal pain, diarrhea, hematuria, and nausea. Conclusions: ODM-201 600mg bid as tablets has comparable PK to capsules used in the phase II ARADES trial. It is well tolerated and has good PSA response in chemotherapy-naïve patients with CRPC . Clinical trial information: NCT01784757.

A phase II trial in progress: Pamiparib, an investigational PARP inhibitor, in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a circulating tumor cell homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) phenotype or BRCA defects.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS328-TPS328
Author(s):  
Simon Chowdhury ◽  
Joaquin Mateo ◽  
Mitchell Gross ◽  
Andrew J. Armstrong ◽  
Marcia Cruz-Correa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Metastatic Disease ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Castration Resistant ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

TPS328 Background: Men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have a BRCA1/2 mutation ( BRCA1/2mut) or mutations in other HRD genes have a poor prognosis. The EPIC liquid biopsy test is a novel assay that can identify circulating tumor cells (CTC) with HRD associated phenotypes. Preliminary studies have shown that these men may respond to treatment with a PARP inhibitor. Pamiparib is an investigational PARP1/2 inhibitor that has shown brain penetration and potent PARP–DNA complex trapping in nonclinical studies. In early phase clinical studies (NCT02361723; NCT03333915), pamiparib was generally well tolerated and showed preliminary antitumor activity; 60 mg orally twice daily (BID) was established as the recommended investigational dose. Methods: This open-label, global, phase 2 study (NCT03712930) will evaluate antitumor activity and safety of pamiparib in mCRPC pts with CTC-HRD, assessed by the EPIC CTC-HRD assay, or deleterious germline/somatic BRCA1/2mut status. Patients must have progressed on/after ≥1 androgen receptor-targeted therapy, have received ≥1 taxane-based therapy, and have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression per PCWG3 criteria. Four cohorts of patients will receive pamiparib 60 mg BID in 28-day cycles. Cohort 1 will include ~50 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease; Cohort 2 will include ~30 pts with CTC-HRD+ +/- BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with bone-only disease; Cohorts 3 & 4 will include ~20 pts with CTC-HRD-/unknown + BRCA1/2mut mCRPC with measurable metastatic disease (Cohort 3), or bone-only disease (Cohort 4). Disease status will be assessed every 8 wks for 24 wks, then every 12 wks; PSA levels will be tested every 4 wks. Co-primary endpoints are radiographic ORR assessed by IRC (pts with measurable disease) and confirmed PSA response rate per PCWG3 criteria (pts +/- measurable disease). Secondary endpoints include ORR, time to PSA response/progression, duration of PSA response, time to symptomatic skeletal event, radiographic progression-free survival, overall survival, and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03712930.

Association of co-occurring gene alterations and clinical activity of rucaparib in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutated (BRCA+) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 80-80
Author(s):  
Wassim Abida ◽  
Akash Patnaik ◽  
David Campbell ◽  
Jeremy David Shapiro ◽  
Alan Haruo Bryce ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Plasma Samples ◽  
Tp53 Mutations ◽  
Measurable Disease ◽  
Psa Response

80 Background: The poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor rucaparib was granted accelerated approval by the US Food and Drug Administration for patients with BRCA+ mCRPC based on results from the phase 2 TRITON2 study (NCT02952534). The TP53 tumor suppressor gene is among the most frequently mutated genes in human cancers, including mCRPC, and alterations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 are associated with poor prognosis in patients with prostate cancer and other tumor types. We present data on co-occurring alterations in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC treated with rucaparib in TRITON2. Methods: Patients had progressed on 1–2 lines of androgen receptor-directed therapy and 1 taxane-based chemotherapy and were treated with rucaparib 600 mg BID. Tissue and/or cell-free DNA extracted from plasma samples were profiled comprehensively for genomic alterations using Foundation Medicine, Inc., next-generation sequencing assays. Objective response rate (ORR) was assessed per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and Prostate Cancer Working Group 3 criteria by independent radiologic review of patients with measurable disease. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rate (≥50% decrease from baseline) was assessed in all patients. Results: Tissue and/or plasma samples were available for 114/115 patients with BRCA+ mCRPC (visit cutoff date: Dec. 23, 2019). Among patients with BRCA+ mCRPC who had samples available for comprehensive genomic profiling, 36.8% (42/114) had a co-occurring alteration in TP53. Deleterious alterations in PTEN were observed in 34.2% (39/114) of patients, 44% (17/39) of which were homozygous deletions of PTEN. RB1 loss was observed in 12.3% (14/114) of patients and was seen more frequently in patients with measurable disease (18.0%, 11/61) than in patients with non-measurable disease (5.7%, 3/53). Although patients with and without TP53 mutations had generally similar baseline demographics and disease characteristics, visceral disease was more prevalent in patients with TP53 mutations (54.8%; 23/42) than in those without them (29.2%; 21/72). Similar ORR and PSA response rates were seen in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC with or without TP53 mutation, with a non-significant trend towards lower response rates in patients with co-occurring TP53 alterations. Conclusions: Results from TRITON2 showed antitumor activity for rucaparib in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC associated with or without co-occurring alterations in TP53. Demographics and additional efficacy analyses in genomic subgroups with co-occurring alterations in TP53, PTEN, and RB1 will be reported. Clinical trial information: NCT02952534. [Table: see text]

Docetaxel and curcuminoids (CCM) combination in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): A phase II study.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16021-e16021
Author(s):  
Hakim Mahammedi ◽  
Mélanie Pouget ◽  
Eloise Planchat ◽  
Herve Cure ◽  
Xavier Durando ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
First Line ◽  
Combination Methods ◽  
Psa Response

e16021 Background: Prostate cancer is a major problem in the aging male population. Docetaxel, the first-line reference treatment in CRPC induces a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response in 45% of patients and an objective tumor response in 12%. Preclinical studies suggested that curcuminoids inhibit tumor metastasis, invasion and angiogenesis and reverse drug resistance. We wanted to potentiate docetaxel by curcuminoïds in CRPC first line. Our previous phase I study showed the safety and the tolerability of CCM associated to docetaxel for advanced breast cancers. We have conducted in 2009-2010 a phase II study to assess the response of CRPC to this combination. Methods: Patients (n=30) with progressing CRPC and rising PSA were enrolled to receive the experimental treatment. Docetaxel was given in standard conditions (75mg/m², 1h i.v infusion every 3 weeks for 6 cycles + prednisolone) with CCM orally at the dose of 6gr/day (7 days by cycle: d-4 to d+2). The primary endpoint was response rate assessed by biological and paraclinical examinations. The secondary endpoints included safety, time to progression and compliance. Twenty nine patients were evaluable on PSA assessment and 15 on RECIST criteria. Results: 26 patients received the treatment totality and 4 withdrew prematurely. No patient withdrew for toxicity (2 deaths and 2 PSA progressions). A PSA response was observed in 17/29 patients (59%) (4 complete and 13 partial) observed rapidly (before the 3rd cycle) for 15 patients. The median time to subsequent PSA progression (TTP) was 5.8 months. Six patients (40%) had a partial objective response and 9 (60%) a stable disease. The median TTP on targets was 7.85 months (n=13/15). The regimen was well tolerated, with uncommon grade 3/4 toxicity; no adverse event was attributed to CCM. Of 169 cycles, 150 (89%) were completed with perfect compliance. Overall survival was 19 months (mean) and 24 months (median) with 17 events as of december 2012. Conclusions: These results are promising in improving the response rate to docetaxel in terms of both PSA decrease and objective response, with good tolerability and acceptability of CCM. A randomized trial is necessary to confirm this results. Clinical trial information: NCT01012141.

Phase 1b/2 keynote-365 trial: Pembrolizumab (pembro) combination therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. TPS5089-TPS5089 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evan Y. Yu ◽  
Haiyan Wu ◽  
Charles Schloss
Keyword(s):  
Response Rate ◽  
Parp Inhibitor ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Abiraterone Acetate ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
End Points ◽  
Phase 1B

TPS5089 Background: Approved treatments for mCRPC (eg, enzalutamide and docetaxel) may increase programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and facilitate neoantigen release. In phase 1b and 1/2 trials, pembro, an anti–PD-1 antibody, has produced antitumor responses in previously treated mCRPC as monotherapy and in combination with enzalutamide. Olaparib, a PARP inhibitor, has shown activity in mCRPC with DNA-repair defects. The nonrandomized, multicohort, open-label KEYNOTE-365 study (NCT02861573) will evaluate the safety and efficacy of pembro with olaparib (cohort A), docetaxel + prednisone (cohort B), or enzalutamide (cohort C) in mCRPC. Methods: Cohort allocation depends upon prior treatment: cohort A requires prior docetaxel (treatment with 1 other chemotherapy and ≤2 second-generation hormonal manipulations is allowed); cohort B requires prior abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide (but not both); cohort C requires prior abiraterone acetate. Additional eligibility criteria include confirmed prostate adenocarcinoma, disease progression (PD) ≤6 months before screening, ongoing androgen deprivation (serum testosterone < 50 ng/dL), and provision of nonirradiated tumor sample. Pembro 200 mg will be given every 3 weeks (Q3W) with either olaparib 400 mg twice daily (cohort A), docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W + prednisone 5 mg twice daily (cohort B), or enzalutamide 160 mg once daily (cohort C). Pembro treatment will continue for up to 35 cycles or until PD or unacceptable adverse events (AEs). Patients in cohort B may receive a maximum of 10 cycles of docetaxel + prednisone. Patients who discontinue 1 of 2 drugs in a combination because of a treatment-related AE may continue to receive the other drug until PD. Response will be evaluated by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels Q3W and by imaging Q9W for the first year and Q12W thereafter. Primary end points are safety and PSA response rate (decline of ≥50% from baseline twice ≥3 weeks apart). Secondary end points include time to PSA progression, progression-free survival, overall survival, and overall response rate. Enrollment will continue until 70 patients are enrolled for each cohort. Clinical trial information: NCT02861573.

Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in chemotherapy-naïve patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and prior diethylstilbestrol (DES) therapy: Preliminary results.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 235-235
Author(s):  
Diogo Assed Bastos ◽  
Marcos Tobias Machado ◽  
Renato Panhoca ◽  
Giovani Thomaz Pioner ◽  
Gustavo Werutsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Group Performance ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Prospective Trial ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Specific Antigen ◽  
Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Psa Response

235 Background: AAP is approved for patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC, but the population with previous use of DES was not studied before. DES is a commonly used hormone therapy for mCRPC in second and plus lines, especially in developing countries, due to lack of access to novel and efficacious therapies. The objective of this trial is to describe the efficacy and safety of AAP after DES treatment in patients who are chemotherapy-naïve, potentially affecting chemotherapy onset. This is the first and only prospective trial to show this data. Methods: This phase 2 multicenter, open-label single-arm study evaluated 46 patients receiving AA (1000 mg daily) + low-dose prednisone (P; 10 mg daily) and androgen deprivation therapy in patients with DES–refractory mCRPC enrolled from Oct 2014 to Oct 2015. The primary efficacy endpoint was time to prostate-specific antigen progression (PSAP) by Prostate Cancer Working Group (PCWG2) criteria. Secondary endpoints included PSA response (≥50% reduction), overall survival, and safety. Results: At baseline, median age was 69 years, median PSA was 40 ng/mL, there were no visceral metastases, 98% of patients had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status 0-1, and 44% had Gleason scores ≥7. Thirty two subjects (71.1%) had PSAP. PSA response was achieved by 47% of patients at week 12 and 56% at any time. Three patients remain on study drug and 4 are in follow-up. AA treatment continued until PSAP, clinical progression, consent withdrawal, or unacceptable toxicity. The median duration of study treatment was 8.6 months. The median time to PSAP was 7.4 months (95% CI = 5.6-9.4) and the median overall survival was 25.6 months (95% CI = 15.7-NE). Treatment-related adverse events included hypertension (19.6%), hyperglycemia (19.6%), fatigue (17.4%), and hypokalemia (4.5%); most grade 1-2. Conclusions: The present study confirmed that AAP provides PSA responses even in heavily treated patients, showing clinical benefit post-DES in chemotherapy-naive mCRPC patients. It also confirmed tolerability of AAP, with an easily manageable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02217566.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document