Genomic analysis of circulating tumor DNA in 3,334 patients with advanced prostate cancer to identify targetable BRCA alterations and AR resistance mechanisms.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 25-25
Author(s):  
Hanna Tukachinsky ◽  
Russell Madison ◽  
Jon Chung ◽  
Lucas Dennis ◽  
Bernard Fendler ◽  
...  

25 Background: Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) by next-generation sequencing (NGS) of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from plasma provides a minimally invasive method to identify targetable genomic alterations (GAs) and resistance mechanisms in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). The circulating tumor fraction in patients with mCRPC and the clinical validity of GAs detected in plasma remain unknown. We evaluated the landscape of GAs using ctDNA-based CGP and assessed concordance with tissue-based CGP. Methods: Plasma from 3,334 patients with advanced prostate cancer (including 1,674 mCRPC screening samples from the TRITON2/3 trials and 1,660 samples from routine clinical CGP) was analyzed using hybrid-capture-based gene panel NGS assays. Results were compared with CGP of 2,006 metastatic prostate cancer tissue biopsies. Concordance was evaluated in 837 patients with both tissue (archival or contemporaneous) and plasma NGS results. Results: 3,127 patients [94%] had detectable ctDNA. BRCA1/2 were mutated in 295 patients [8.8%]. In concordance analysis, 72/837 [8.6%] patients had BRCA1/2 mutations detected in tissue, 67 [93%] of whom were also identified by ctDNA, and 20 patients were identified using ctDNA but not tissue [23% of all patients identified using ctDNA]. ctDNA detected subclonal BRCA1/2 reversions in 10 of 1,660 [0.6%] routine clinical CGP samples. AR alterations, including amplifications and hotspot mutations, which were detected in 940/2,213 patients [42%]. Rare AR compound mutations, rearrangements, and novel in-frame deletions were identified. Altered pathways included PI3K/AKT/mTOR [14%], WNT/β-catenin [17%], and RAS/RAF/MEK [5%]. Microsatellite instability was detected in 31/2,213 patients [1.4%]. Conclusions: In the largest study of mCRPC plasma samples conducted to date, CGP of ctDNA recapitulated the genomic landscape detected in tissue biopsies, with a high level of agreement in detection of BRCA1/2 alterations. It also identified patients who may have gained somatic BRCA1/2 alterations since archival tissue was collected. ctDNA detected more acquired resistance GAs than tissue, including novel AR-activating variants. The large percentage of patients with rich genomic signal from ctDNA, and the sensitive, specific detection of BRCA1/2 alterations position liquid biopsy as a compelling clinical complement to tissue CGP for patients with mCRPC.

2021 ◽  
pp. clincanres.CCR-20-4805-E.2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hanna Tukachinsky ◽  
Russell W. Madison ◽  
Jon H. Chung ◽  
Ole Gjoerup ◽  
Eric A Severson ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 14 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred Saad ◽  
Christina Canil ◽  
Antonio Finelli ◽  
Sebastien J. Hotte ◽  
Shawn Malone ◽  
...  

Introduction: The management of advanced prostate cancer (PCa) continues to evolve with the emergence of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. As a result, there are multiple areas in this landscape with a lack of high-level evidence to guide practice. Consensus initiatives are an approach to establishing practice guidance in areas where evidence is unclear. We conducted a Canadian-based consensus forum to address key controversial areas in the management of advanced PCa. Methods: As part of a modified Delphi process, a core scientific group of PCa physicians (n=8) identified controversial areas for discussion and developed an initial set of questions, which were then reviewed and finalized with a larger group of 29 multidisciplinary PCa specialists. The main areas of focus were non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), oligometastatic prostate cancer, genetic testing in prostate cancer, and imaging in advanced prostate cancer. The predetermined threshold for consensus was set at 74% (agreement from 20 of 27 participating physicians). Results: Consensus participants included uro-oncologists (n=13), medical oncologists (n=10), and radiation oncologists (n=4). Of the 64 questions, consensus was reached in 30 questions (n=5 unanimously). Consensus was more common for questions related to biochemical recurrence, sequencing of therapies, and mCRPC. Conclusions: A Canadian consensus forum in PCa identified areas of agreement in nearly 50% of questions discussed. Areas of variability may represent opportunities for further research, education, and sharing of best practices. These findings reinforce the value of multidisciplinary consensus initiatives to optimize patient care.


2020 ◽  
pp. 222-232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie M. Frigault ◽  
Aleksandra Markovets ◽  
Barrett Nuttall ◽  
Kyoung-Mee Kim ◽  
Se Hoon Park ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Some gastric cancers harbor MET gene amplifications that can be targeted by selective MET inhibitors to achieve tumor responses, but resistance eventually develops. Savolitinib, a selective MET inhibitor, is beneficial for treating patients with MET-driven gastric cancer. Understanding the resistance mechanisms is important for optimizing postfailure treatment options. PATIENTS AND METHODS Here, we identified the mechanisms of acquired resistance to savolitinib in 3 patients with gastric cancer and MET-amplified tumors who showed a clinical response and then cancer progression. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) is useful for monitoring resistance during treatment and progression when rebiopsy cannot be performed. RESULTS Using a next-generation sequencing 100-gene panel, we identified the target mechanisms of resistance MET D1228V/N/H and Y1230C mutations or high copy number MET gene amplifications that emerge when resistance to savolitinib develops in patients with MET-amplified gastric cancer. CONCLUSION We demonstrated the utility of ctDNA in gastric cancer and confirmed this approach using baseline tumor tissue or rebiopsy.


2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e24287-e24287
Author(s):  
Victoria M. Raymond ◽  
Tanisha M. Mojica ◽  
Elizabeth V. Harris ◽  
Richard B. Lanman ◽  
Celestia S. Higano

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e17556-e17556
Author(s):  
Baijun Dong ◽  
Liancheng Fan ◽  
Bin Yang ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Yonghong Li ◽  
...  

e17556 Background: The genomic landscape of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is dynamic with the application of multiple treatments. The circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), which reveals germline and somatic alterations, provides a mini-invasive tool for monitoring tumor evolution. Methods: We performed an exploratory analysis of 299 ctDNA samples from 8 centers through application of multiple-gene deep targeted sequencing. Results: The most common recurrent genomic alterations were in AR(34.7%), TP53(18.9%), CDK12(15.4%), BRCA2(13.3%), and the majority of these clinically actionable gene alterations were identified in somatic level (CDK12 100% in somatic). The results showed the frequency of AR amplification and TP53 defect significantly increased in post-second and later line treatment group compared with treatment-naive group. AR amplification and TP53 or RB1 defect were associated with resistance to abiraterone or docetaxel. CDK12 was more frequently altered in our cohort than those in previous reports which mainly focused on Caucasian population. The patients with CDK12 defect showed rapid resistance to abiraterone and limited efficacy of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). However, these patients seemed to benefit from chemotherapy, especially platinum-based chemotherapy. Conclusions: This multi-institutional real-world study explored the genomic landscape and captured the significant diversity of mCRPC at different treatment stages by liquid biopsy. These findings established genomic drivers associated with resistance to multiple treatments (including PARPi and platinum-based chemotherapy) in mCRPC. Hence, ctDNA targeted sequencing can help guide clinical decision making in mCRPC throughout the whole treatment process. CDK12 might be able to be a novel predictive biomarker to guide treatment selection in mCRPC.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document