Single-arm phase II study of low-dose paclitaxel and pembrolizumab in platinum-refractory metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 433-433
Author(s):  
Rhonda L. Bitting ◽  
Donald Charles Vile ◽  
Janet A. Tooze ◽  
Christopher Y. Thomas ◽  
Morgan Neve ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Immune Cell ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Intention To Treat ◽  
Definitive Therapy ◽  
Platinum Refractory

433 Background: Single agent checkpoint inhibition is effective in a small proportion of platinum-refractory UC patients but improvements are needed. UC is highly inflammatory, and low-dose chemotherapy may enhance the response to immunotherapy. We evaluated whether combination therapy with low-dose paclitaxel and pembrolizumab is more efficacious than single-agent pembrolizumab which had an objective response rate (ORR) of 21% in a similar patient population in the KEYNOTE-045 study. We also incorporated multiple novel biomarker studies to explore immune regulatory mechanisms in UC. Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm phase II trial (NCT02581982) of pembrolizumab combined with low-dose paclitaxel in patients with platinum-refractory metastatic UC. Key inclusion criteria included measurable progression of disease within 12 months of platinum therapy and ECOG ≤1. Patients received pembrolizumab 200mg day 1 and paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle for up to 8 cycles unless clinical or radiographic disease progression or unacceptable adverse events (AEs) were observed. Responding patients could remain on pembrolizumab maintenance for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was ORR; key secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), 6-month progression free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: Twenty-seven patients were treated between 4/2016 - 6/2020, with a median follow up of 9.9 months. At baseline, the median age was 68 years (range 49-80), with 81% men and 78% non-Hispanic white. The majority (59%) were ECOG 1. Twenty-one of 27 (78%) received prior definitive therapy: chemoradiation in 24% and surgery in 76%. The majority (78%) of patients received prior cisplatin. 70% progressed on a cisplatin-based regimen while 30% progressed on carboplatin-based regimen within 12 months of study entry. The ORR by intention to treat was 9 of 27 patients (33%) and in patients evaluable for response by imaging was 9 of 25 (36%), including 3 with complete response. Disease control rate in evaluable patients was 72%. Six-month PFS was 46.8% (95% CI: 27.2%, 64.2%) and median OS was 11.7 months (95% CI: 8.7 mo, NR). Common ≥ grade 2 AEs were anemia (44%), lymphopenia (37%), hyperglycemia (33%), and fatigue (33%). Possible treatment-related at least grade 3 or 4 AEs occurred in 56% of subjects, including 2 immune-mediated AEs (pneumonitis and nephritis) resulting in therapy cessation but a durable partial response. There were no grade 5 events. Conclusions: This study illustrates that the addition of low-dose paclitaxel to pembrolizumab improves outcomes in patients with platinum-refractory UC, relative to single-agent pembrolizumab. No unanticipated safety signals emerged. Exploratory analyses including PDL1 status, tumor mutational burden, and change in circulating microRNAs and in immune cell populations are ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT02581982.

scholarly journals Phase II trial of the IDO pathway inhibitor indoximod plus pembrolizumab for the treatment of patients with advanced melanoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (6) ◽  
pp. e002057
Author(s):  
Yousef Zakharia ◽  
Robert R McWilliams ◽  
Olivier Rixe ◽  
Joseph Drabick ◽  
Montaser F Shaheen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Advanced Melanoma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Programmed Death ◽  
Evaluable Population

BackgroundThe indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO) pathway is a key counter-regulatory mechanism that, in cancer, is exploited by tumors to evade antitumor immunity. Indoximod is a small-molecule IDO pathway inhibitor that reverses the immunosuppressive effects of low tryptophan (Trp) and high kynurenine (Kyn) that result from IDO activity. In this study, indoximod was used in combination with a checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) pembrolizumab for the treatment for advanced melanoma.MethodsPatients with advanced melanoma were enrolled in a single-arm phase II clinical trial evaluating the addition of indoximod to standard of care CPI approved for melanoma. Investigators administered their choice of CPI including pembrolizumab (P), nivolumab (N), or ipilimumab (I). Indoximod was administered continuously (1200 mg orally two times per day), with concurrent CPI dosed per US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved label.ResultsBetween July 2014 and July 2017, 131 patients were enrolled. (P) was used more frequently (n=114, 87%) per investigator’s choice. The efficacy evaluable population consisted of 89 patients from the phase II cohort with non-ocular melanoma who received indoximod combined with (P).The objective response rate (ORR) for the evaluable population was 51% with confirmed complete response of 20% and disease control rate of 70%. Median progression-free survival was 12.4 months (95% CI 6.4 to 24.9). The ORR for Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1)-positive patients was 70% compared with 46% for PD-L1-negative patients. The combination was well tolerated, and side effects were similar to what was expected from single agent (P).ConclusionIn this study, the combination of indoximod and (P) was well tolerated and showed antitumor efficacy that is worth further evaluation in selected patients with advanced melanoma.

A phase II, multicenter study of bendamustine HCl plus rituximab in relapsed indolent B-cell and mantle-cell non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL)

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7528-7528 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. E. Williams ◽  
P. Cohen ◽  
A. Tulpule ◽  
R. H. Van der Jagt ◽  
J. A. Herst ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Multicenter Study ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Mitotic Catastrophe ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Mantle Cell

7528 Background: Bendamustine HCl, a novel alkylating hybrid agent, has single-agent activity in multiple hematologic and solid tumors. In vitro data have demonstrated the multifunctional mechanisms of bendamustine by which cell death occurs via both apoptosis and mitotic catastrophe. Bendamustine has shown activity in NHL cell lines that are refractory to conventional alkylator chemotherapies. The combination of bendamustine and rituximab has shown a synergistic effect on NHL cells. The efficacy and safety of bendamustine in combination with rituximab in patients with relapsed NHL were evaluated. Methods: This phase II, multicenter study enrolled adult patients with relapsed, indolent, rituximab-sensitive B-cell or mantle-cell NHL. Patients received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and bendamustine 90 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3 of a 28-day cycle for 4 to 6 cycles. An additional dose of rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV was given 1 week prior to the first cycle of bendamustine and 4 weeks after the last cycle. Results: The intent-to-treat population included 67 patients (57% males; median age, 60 years) with indolent NHL (81%) or mantle-cell NHL (16%) (data not available [3%]). A total of 81% of patients had stage III/IV disease. Patients had relapsed from a median of 1 prior therapy; 37% had prior treatment with rituximab. In the 57 evaluable patients, the overall objective response rate (ORR) was 87% (complete response [CR], 33%). The ORR for the 9 evaluable mantle-cell NHL patients was 89% (CR, 33%). For all patients, the median duration of response and progression-free survival had not been reached after a median follow-up of 3.7 months (range, 0–14.2 months). This therapy was well tolerated. Most commonly reported nonhematologic toxicities were grade 1/2 gastrointestinal events, with nausea being the greatest (38%). The primary grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was neutropenia (29%), with 1 event of sepsis. Conclusions: Bendamustine in combination with rituximab was well tolerated and produced high response rates in patients with relapsed indolent and mantle-cell NHL. These results suggest bendamustine in combination with rituximab provides a potential benefit over single-agent rituximab therapy. [Table: see text]

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

RAMSETE: A single-arm, multicenter, single-stage phase II trial of RAD001 (everolimus) in advanced and metastatic silent neuro-endocrine tumours in Europe.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4122-4122 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne E. Pavel ◽  
Bertram Wiedenmann ◽  
Jaume Capdevila ◽  
Nicholas Reed ◽  
Juan W. Valle ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Mammalian Target Of Rapamycin ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Mucosal Inflammation ◽  
Duration Of Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Best Response

4122 Background: The mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway is involved in the pathogenesis of neuroendocrine tumors (NET). Everolimus (RAD001), an oral mTOR inhibitor, has antitumor activity in patients (pts) with advanced NET. In this open-label, multicenter, phase II study (RAMSETE), the safety and efficacy of everolimus monotherapy was evaluated in pts with advanced nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET. Methods: Pts with advanced (unresectable or metastatic), progressive, nonsyndromic, nonpancreatic NET received everolimus (10 mg/day) as monotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (proportion of pts with best overall complete response [CR] or partial response [PR] per RECIST v1.0) by central radiologic review. A secondary endpoint included progression-free survival (PFS). Results: By database soft lock (December 1, 2011), 73 pts from 16 European clinics received everolimus (median duration of treatment: 193 days). Fifty-five (75%) pts discontinued; reasons included disease progression (n=23), adverse events (AEs [n=23]), withdrawal of consent (n=4), death (n=3), and protocol deviation (n=2). In the per protocol population (N=60), 32 (53%) pts received prior antineoplastic therapy. The best response by central review was stable disease in 55%. By local review, 3 (5%) pts had a PR, with SD in 39 (65%) pts. Median PFS by central review was 185 days (95% CI: 158-255). Median PFS by local investigator review was 285 days (95% CI: 231-not estimable). 69 (95%) pts reported treatment-related AEs of any grade, including rash (n=28; 38%), diarrhea (n=20; 27%), mucosal inflammation (n=18; 25%), and decreased appetite (n=17; 23%). Treatment-related grades 3 and 4 AEs and serious AEs were reported by 27 (37%) and 18 (25%) pts, respectively. Conclusions: In this open-label trial of everolimus in pts with advanced, nonsyndromic, extrapancreatic NET, a high rate of disease stabilization was achieved after prior tumor progression with favorable median PFS. This study further supports efficacy of everolimus in types of NET other than those studied in RADIANT-3 (pancreatic NET) and RADIANT-2 (NET associated with carcinoid syndrome).

A phase II trial of the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib (P) as single agent or in combination with the same endocrine therapy (ET) received prior to disease progression, in patients (pts) with hormone receptor positive (HR+) HER2 negative (HER2−) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) (TREnd trial).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1002-1002 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luca Malorni ◽  
Giuseppe Curigliano ◽  
Alessandro Marco Minisini ◽  
Saverio Cinieri ◽  
Carlo Tondini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Clinical Data ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Endocrine Resistance ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
P Value ◽  
Open Label

1002 Background: P is approved for treatment of HR+/HER2− mBC combined with ET. There is paucity of clinical data of single-agent P in ET resistant pts. Pre-clinical data suggest P may partially reverse endocrine resistance, though this is yet to be tested in pts. Methods: This Phase II, open-label, multicenter study enrolled post-menopausal pts with HR+ HER2− mBC who progressed on 1 or 2 prior ETs. Pts were randomized to P (125 mg/d 3 w on/1 w off) alone or to continue their current ET (aromatase inhibitor or fulvestrant) in combination with P (same schedule as P arm). The primary endpoint was clinical benefit rate (CBR) [complete response (CR), partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD) for > 6 months (mo)]. Secondary endpoints were adverse events (AE) and additional measures of efficacy. A two-stage optimal design assessed treatment activity in each arm assuming activity as CB≥40% (α and β = 10%). Exploratory comparisons were planned for safety and efficacy endpoints. Results: 115 pts were enrolled (ITT population) 58 in the P arm and 57 in the P+ET arm. In both arms, 67% of pts had the study treatment as second line ET, 33% as third line, and about 1/3 of pts also received 1 prior chemotherapy for mBC. CBR was similar in both arms: 54% (95% CI 42 - 67%) with P+ET, and 60% (95% CI 48 -73%) with P alone. Median duration of CB was longer with P+ET (11.5 mo; 95% CI 8.6 – 17.8) than with P (6 mo; 95% CI 3.9 - 9.9) (HR 0.31, 95% CI 0.1 - 0.7, p-value 0.001, exploratory). Objective response rate (ORR; CR, PR) was 11% (95% CI 3 - 19%) and 7% (95% CI 0.4 -13%) with P+ET and P, respectively. PFS was 10.8 mo (95% CI 5.6 - 12.7) with P+ET and 6.5 mo (95% CI 5.4 - 8.5) with P alone (HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.4 - 1.1, p-value 0.13, exploratory). AEs were in line with previous data. Conclusions: Single agent P has clinical activity in ET pre-treated HR+/HER2– mBC pts. The observed increase in PFS and duration of CB with P+ET may suggest that P could reverse resistance to the prior line of ET. Translational studies are ongoing to explore potential biomarkers in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT02549430.

Sintilimab for relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma: Extended follow-up on the multicenter, single-arm phase II ORIENT-1 study.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7533-7533
Author(s):  
Hang Su ◽  
Yongping Song ◽  
Wenqi Jiang ◽  
Xiuhua Sun ◽  
Wenbin Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
High Rate ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Hematopoietic Stem

7533 Background: Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma (cHL) is characterized by chromosome 9p24.1 alterations and PD-1 ligand overexpression. Sintilimab, a programmed death-1 checkpoint inhibitor, has demonstrated efficacy in relapsed/refractory cHL after the primary analysis of the ORIENT-1 study. Here, we report the updated safety and efficacy prolines after extended follow-up. Methods: ORIENT-1 is a multicenter, single-arm, phase II study in China. Classical Hodgkin’s lymphoma patients who had failed ≥2 lines of systemic therapy, including autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) were enrolled. Sintilimab, 200 mg IV was given every 3 weeks, until disease progression, death, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal from study. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by an independent radiological review committee (IRRC) according to 2007 IWG criteria. Results: 96 patients were treated. As of the data cutoff on 16 October, 2018 72.9% of patients were continuing treatment with a median follow-up of 14 months. Median number of treatment cycles was 20 (range: 1 to 26). ORR was 85.4% (82/96, 95%CI: 76.7 to 91.8) based on IRRC review. Twenty-eight patients (29.2%) achieved complete response (CR) by PET scan. At the time of analysis, 59 out of 82 patients who had achieved complete or partial response continued to have an on-going response. The median duration of response (DoR) and progression free survival (PFS) have not been reached. The most common treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) was pyrexia (40.6%, 39/96), 92.3% of which was grade 1 or 2. The most common grade 3 or 4 TRAEs were pyrexia (3.1%) and anemia (3.1%). One death occurred which was not considered treatment related. Conclusions: ORIENT-1 study has the largest cohort of cHL patients in China treated with a PD-1. In addition to a high rate of response, sintilimab also demonstrated durable efficacy and favorable long-term safety profile after extended follow-up. Clinical trial information: NCT03114683.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Therapy Option ◽  
Grade 3

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

Phase II Study of Avelumab in Patients With Mismatch Repair Deficient and Mismatch Repair Proficient Recurrent/Persistent Endometrial Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (30) ◽  
pp. 2786-2794 ◽  
Author(s):  
Panagiotis A. Konstantinopoulos ◽  
Weixiu Luo ◽  
Joyce F. Liu ◽  
Doga C. Gulhan ◽  
Carolyn Krasner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Mismatch Repair ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Mmr Proteins

PURPOSE Despite the tissue-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab in mismatch repair deficient (MMRD) solid tumors, important unanswered questions remain about the role of immune checkpoint blockade in mismatch repair–proficient (MMRP) and –deficient endometrial cancer (EC). METHODS This phase II study evaluated the PD-L1 inhibitor avelumab in two cohorts of patients with EC: (1) MMRD/ POLE (polymerase ε) cohort, as defined by immunohistochemical (IHC) loss of expression of one or more mismatch repair (MMR) proteins and/or documented mutation in the exonuclease domain of POLE; and (2) MMRP cohort with normal IHC expression of all MMR proteins. Coprimary end points were objective response (OR) and progression-free survival at 6 months (PFS6). Avelumab 10 mg/kg intravenously was administered every 2 weeks until progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS Thirty-three patients were enrolled. No patient with POLE-mutated tumor was enrolled in the MMRD cohort, and all MMRP tumors were not POLE-mutated. The MMRP cohort was closed at the first stage because of futility: Only one of 16 patients exhibited both OR and PFS6 responses. The MMRD cohort met the predefined primary end point of four ORs after accrual of only 17 patients; of 15 patients who initiated avelumab, four exhibited OR (one complete response, three partial responses; OR rate, 26.7%; 95% CI, 7.8% to 55.1%) and six (including all four ORs) PFS6 responses (PFS6, 40.0%; 95% CI, 16.3% to 66.7%), four of which are ongoing as of data cutoff date. Responses were observed in the absence of PD-L1 expression. IHC captured all cases of MMRD subsequently determined by polymerase chain reaction or genomically via targeted sequencing. CONCLUSION Avelumab exhibited promising activity in MMRD EC regardless of PD-L1 status. IHC for MMR assessment is a useful tool for patient selection. The activity of avelumab in MMRP/non- POLE–mutated ECs was low.

Phase II trial of sorafenib in esophageal (E) and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer: Response observed in adenocarcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 41-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. Ilson ◽  
Y. Y. Janjigian ◽  
M. A. Shah ◽  
L. H. Tang ◽  
D. P. Kelsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Gastroesophageal Junction ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Node Disease ◽  
Grade 3

41 Background: Sorafenib is a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFr, PDGFr, Raf and other pathways. Encouraging response and survival were observed in a phase II trial combining sorafenib with chemotherapy in GE cancer (J Clin Oncol 27:2947;2010). We are studying single agent sorafenib in a phase II trial with the primary endpoint to assess progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include response and therapy tolerance. Methods: Patients (pts) with measurable metastatic E and GEJ cancer with no more than 3 prior chemotherapy regimens were treated with sorafenib 400 mg BID. CT scans were performed monthly for the first 2 months, then every 2 months. Results: Sixteen of 35 pts have been accrued and 14 are currently evaluable. 13 male, 3 female, median KPS 80%, age 58, GEJ 7, E 9, squamous 2, adenocarcinoma (AC)14. An ongoing complete response (11+ months) was observed in a pt with biopsy proven metastatic neck lymphadenopathy (E primary AC, recurrence after prior chemoradiotherapy and surgery). A second pt (GEJ AC) had protracted stable disease in bulky celiac node disease (15+ months). Grade 3 toxicity was limited to skin rash (1 pt), hand foot reaction (1 pt), and fatigue (1 pt). Only 3 of 14 pts (21%) had early disease progression at 2 months or less. Median PFS 4 mos, 4 patients (29%) continue on therapy for more than 7 months. The majority of tumors tested positive for phospho-erk by immunohistochemistry (11/14, 79%). Conclusions: The observation of a durable complete response and protracted stable disease to sorafenib in E cancer is remarkable. Further accrual continues to define PFS. Supported by a grant from Bayer. [Table: see text]

Safety and efficacy of MET inhibitor tivantinib (ARQ 197) combined with sorafenib in patients (pts) with NRAS wild-type or mutant melanoma from a phase I study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8519-8519 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Ann Means-Powell ◽  
Alex A. Adjei ◽  
Igor Puzanov ◽  
Grace K. Dy ◽  
Laura Williams Goff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antitumor Activity ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Met Inhibitor ◽  
Unacceptable Toxicity

8519 Background: The MET receptor tyrosine kinase is implicated in tumor cell proliferation, invasion, and metastasis, and is activated in NRAS mutant melanoma. Tivantinib is an oral, selective MET inhibitor currently in phase II/III clinical trials. Tivantinib plus sorafenib exhibited synergistic antitumor activity vs single-agent activity in several tumor models. This phase I dose-escalation study assessed the safety of tivantinib plus sorafenib in pts with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Endpoints were safety, the recommended phase II dose (RP2D) of tivantinib plus sorafenib, and antitumor activity. Dose escalation previously established the RP2D as tivantinib 360 mg twice daily (BID) plus sorafenib 400 mg BID. Extension cohorts enrolled ≤ 20 pts each with melanoma or other tumors. Pts were treated until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Results: 16 pts with melanoma (median age, 66 yr) received treatment at the RP2D, and 3 pts are still on study. 12 pts received ≥ 1 previous systemic anticancer treatment (median, 1.2; range, 0-5) including ipilimumab (2 pts) or MEK inhibitor (1 pt). Common adverse events (≥ 25%) were rash (50%), diarrhea and fatigue (44% each), anorexia (38%), stomatitis and nausea (31% each), and anemia, weight decrease, and hypophosphatemia (25% each). Best responses were complete response (CR) in 1 pt, partial response (PR) in 3 pts, and stable disease (SD) in 3 pts. 4 pts had progressive disease and 5 pts were not evaluable (3 pts had not reached first assessment time, 1 pt withdrew consent, and 1 pt had unacceptable toxicity). The overall response rate and disease control rate were 25% and 44%, respectively. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 5.3 mo (95% CI, 1.6-12.9 mo). Among 8 pts with NRAS mutations, mPFS was 9.2 mo (95% CI, 5.3-12.9 mo) and responses were 1 CR, 1 PR, and 2 SD. Conclusions: Tivantinib plus sorafenib combination therapy was well tolerated and exhibited preliminary anticancer activity in pts with melanoma. Dual inhibition of MET and angiogenesis may be an effective treatment strategy in NRAS-mutant melanoma.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document