Response to “Where Do Patients With Cancer in Iowa Receive Radiation Therapy?”

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. e283-e283 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carryn Anderson ◽  
John M. Buatti
2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 20-25 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia M. Ward ◽  
Fred Ullrich ◽  
Kevin Matthews ◽  
Gerard Rushton ◽  
Roger Tracy ◽  
...  

The authors examine access issues in Iowa and determine a methodology for conducting a national analysis.


2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 7621-7631 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Russell Geyer ◽  
Richard Sposto ◽  
Mark Jennings ◽  
James M. Boyett ◽  
Richard A. Axtell ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate response rate, event-free survival (EFS), and toxicity of two chemotherapeutic regimens for treatment of children younger than 36 months with malignant brain tumors and to estimate control intervals without irradiation in children with no residual tumor after initial surgery and induction chemotherapy and with delayed irradiation in patients with residual tumor or metastatic disease at diagnosis. Patients and Methods Patients were randomly assigned to one of two regimens of induction chemotherapy (vincristine, cisplatin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide v vincristine, carboplatin, ifosfamide, and etoposide). Maintenance chemotherapy began after induction in children without progressive disease. Children with no residual tumors after induction therapy and no metastatic disease at diagnosis were not to receive radiation therapy unless their tumors progressed. Results Two hundred ninety-nine infants were enrolled. Forty-two percent of patients responded to induction chemotherapy. At 5 years from study entry, the EFS rate was 27% ± 3%, and the survival rate was 43% ± 3%. There was no significant difference between the two arms in terms of response rate or EFS. For medulloblastoma, supratentorial primitive neuroectodermal tumor, ependymoma, and rhabdoid tumors, 5-year EFS rates were 32% ± 5%, 17% ± 6%, and 32% ± 6%, and 14% ± 7%, respectively. Fifty-eight percent of patients who were alive 5 years after study entry had not received radiation therapy. Conclusion Intensified induction chemotherapy resulted in a high response rate of malignant brain tumors in infants. Survival was comparable to that of previous studies, and most patients who survived did not receive radiation therapy.


Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kate E. Lee ◽  
David A. Bender ◽  
Lawrence D. Koutcher ◽  
Brigham Hyde ◽  
Chin Hur ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 8 (Suppl_7) ◽  
pp. S-38-S-55 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jennifer M. Hinkel ◽  
Edward C. Li ◽  
Stephen L. Sherman

Management of anemia in patients with cancer presents challenges from clinical, operational, and economic perspectives. Clinically, anemia in these patients may result from treatment (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or surgical interventions) or from the malignancy itself. Anemia not only contributes to cancer-related fatigue and other quality of life issues, but also affects prognosis. From the operational perspective, a patient with cancer who is also anemic may consume more laboratory, pharmacy, and clinical resources than other patients with cancer.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 107327482094599
Author(s):  
Samir H. Patel ◽  
Sasha Ebrahimi ◽  
Donald W. Northfelt ◽  
Timothy E. Mathews ◽  
Farhia M. Omar ◽  
...  

Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course ( P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team’s inability to explain the treatment ( P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility ( P = .02), communication with the RT team ( P = .02), and fear of RT ( P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.


2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 403-409 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anthony J. Paravati ◽  
Isabel J. Boero ◽  
Daniel P. Triplett ◽  
Lindsay Hwang ◽  
Rayna K. Matsuno ◽  
...  

Factors unrelated to the individual patient accounted for the majority of variation in the cost of radiation therapy, suggesting potential inefficiency in health care expenditure.


2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (8) ◽  
pp. 1001-1006 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sara Carney ◽  
Theresa Koetters ◽  
Maria Cho ◽  
Claudia West ◽  
Steven M. Paul ◽  
...  

Purpose This study compared the occurrence rates for and severity ratings of sleep disturbance in patient-family caregiver (FC) dyads. Patients and Methods In total, 102 dyads were recruited from two radiation therapy (RT) departments. Patients and their FCs completed the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) and the General Sleep Disturbance Scale (GSDS) and wore wrist actigraphs to obtain subjective and objective measures of the occurrence and severity of sleep disturbance at the initiation of RT. Match paired t tests were used to evaluate for dyadic differences. Results No differences were found in the occurrence of clinically significant levels of sleep disturbance between patients and their FCs that ranged between 40% and 50% using subjective and objective measures. Few differences were found in the severity of any of the sleep-wake parameters between patients and FCs using both the subjective and objective measures of sleep disturbance. Conclusion The findings from this study suggest that patients with cancer and their FCs experience similar levels of sleep disturbance and that both groups could benefit from interventions that aim to promote restful sleep. In addition to routine and systematic assessment of sleep disturbance by oncology clinicians, interventions are needed that take into account the specific needs of the patient and the FC as well as the potential for partners' sleep patterns to influence one another.


Cancer ◽  
1970 ◽  
Vol 25 (2) ◽  
pp. 343-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
Horace W. Whiteley ◽  
Maus W. Stearns ◽  
Robert H. Leaming ◽  
Michael R. Deddish

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document