scholarly journals Clinical Trial Participants With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Differ From Patients Treated in Real-World Practice

2015 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. 491-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron P. Mitchell ◽  
Michael R. Harrison ◽  
Mark S. Walker ◽  
Daniel J. George ◽  
Amy P. Abernethy ◽  
...  

Patients with mRCC treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in real-world clinical practice are sicker than those enrolled onto pivotal clinical trials, and more than one third are trial ineligible.

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. e339-e344 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Massari ◽  
Vincenzo Di Nunno ◽  
Veronica Mollica ◽  
Jeffrey Graham ◽  
Lidia Gatto ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 588-599
Author(s):  
Irbaz Bin Riaz ◽  
Rabbia Siddiqi ◽  
Mahnoor Islam ◽  
Huan He ◽  
Anum Riaz ◽  
...  

PURPOSE Multiple large clinical trials have investigated adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to reduce the risk of cancer recurrence and progression to metastasis in high-risk renal cell carcinoma. We sought to maintain living and interactive evidence on this topic, until a high level of certainty is reached for key clinical outcomes such that further updates become unnecessary and unlikely to change clinical practice. METHODS We created a living interactive evidence synthesis platform to maintain a continuously updated meta-analysis on TKI monotherapy in adjuvant renal cell carcinoma. We implemented an automated search strategy with weekly updates to identify randomized phase 2 and 3 clinical trials. Study selection, appraisal, and data extraction were done in duplicate. Cumulative meta-analysis was performed using Analyzer Module in Living Interactive Evidence platform. For each outcome (overall survival [OS], disease-free survival [DFS], and all-cause and treatment-related adverse events), we assessed certainty of evidence using GRADE approach and conducted trial sequential analysis. RESULTS This final update includes five randomized trials including recently updated data from PROTECT trial. Meta-analysis shows that adjuvant TKI monotherapy offers no benefit in OS (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.91 to 1.12, high certainty) or DFS (hazard ratio, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.86 to 1.00, high certainty) and significantly increases adverse event risk. Lack of benefit was consistent across subgroups including highest-risk patients (test for subgroup differences: P = .32). Optimal information size criteria were met, and there was high certainty of evidence for lack of DFS and OS benefit for adjuvant TKIs. CONCLUSION There is no guidance on when to stop maintaining a living review. In this example, we used trial sequential analysis and high certainty of evidence (future clinical trials unlikely to change current conclusions) as a benchmark to conclude a living review in view of convincing evidence.


2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 670-670
Author(s):  
Brian Shinder ◽  
Sinae Kim ◽  
Arnav Srivastava ◽  
Hiren V. Patel ◽  
Tina M. Mayer ◽  
...  

670 Background: Clinical trials are critical for the development of new treatment paradigms for renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The primary objective of this study was to characterize the factors associated with clinical trial participation for patients with RCC. The secondary objective was to examine survival outcomes in the clinical trial and control cohorts. Methods: The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was queried for patients with RCC who were coded as having enrolled in a clinical trial. Trial patients were matched in a 1:5 ratio to controls from the same institution based on clinical stage. Sociodemographic variables were compared between the two groups and univariate and multivariate logistic regression models evaluated factors associated with clinical trial participation. Kaplan-Meier product limit estimate was used to compare overall survival (OS) between the groups. Results: From 2004-2015, 681 patients enrolled in clinical trials were included for analysis. The mean age of trial patients was 56.4 compared to 62 in the matched cohort (p<0.0001). More patients in the trial group had a Charlson-Deyo comorbidity score of 0 (81.6% vs. 73.9%, p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, male patients (OR 1.27; 95%CI 1.06-1.54, p=0.012) and white patients (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.23-2.87; p=0.003) were more likely to participate in a trial. Having Medicaid (OR 0.42; 95%CI 0.27-0.64; p<0.0001) or Medicare (OR 0.6; 95%CI 0.46-0.77; p<0.0001) was negatively associated with clinical trial participation. Median OS was greater among clinical trial participants than that the control cohort (106.61 vs 87.62 months, p<0.0001). Conclusions: In this contemporary analysis of RCC patients from a national hospital registry database, we found that patient sociodemographic factors remain associated with clinical trial participation and that clinical trial participants experienced superior OS. Further work, both qualitative and quantitative, is necessary to identify clinical and non-clinical barriers to research participation in order to improve the validity of RCC trials.


2016 ◽  
Vol 23 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. A76.1-A76
Author(s):  
MS Caparrós Romero ◽  
M Rodríguez Goicoechea ◽  
M Ferrit Martín ◽  
L Gutiérrez Zúñiga ◽  
MA Calleja Hernández

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document