Study on the earth pressure distribution of excavation chamber in EPB tunneling

Author(s):  
T Song ◽  
S Zhou
2021 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-82
Author(s):  
Taku Muni ◽  
Dipika Devi ◽  
Sukumar Baishya

In the present study two-dimensional finite element analysis has been carried out on cantilever sheet pile wall using ABAQUS/Standard software to study the effect of different friction angles and its related parameters such as dilation angle, the interfacial friction coefficient between soil-wall on earth pressure distribution, and wall deformation. From the results obtained, it is found that there is a significant decrease in wall deformation with an increase in the angle of internal friction and its related parameters. The earth pressure results obtained from the finite element analysis shared a unique relationship with that of a conventional method. Both the results showed similar linear behavior up to a certain percentage of wall height and then changed drastically in lower portions of the wall. This trend of behavior is seen in both active as well as in passive earth pressure distribution for all the frictional angle. Hence, after comparing the differences that exist in the results for both methods, from the analysis a new relationship between the earth pressure coefficients from a conventional method and the finite element method has been developed for both active and passive earth pressure on either side of the sheet pile wall. This relationship so derived can be used to compute more reasonable earth pressure distributions for a sheet pile wall without carrying out a numerical analysis with a minimal time of computation. And also the earth pressure coefficient calculated from this governing equation can serve as a quick reference for any decision regarding the design of the sheet pile wall. Doi: 10.28991/cej-2021-03091638 Full Text: PDF


1992 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-38
Author(s):  
P. Gaffran ◽  
D. C. Sego ◽  
A. E. Peterson

The performance of a 6 m high anchored steel sheet pile retaining wall, constructed to allow CN Rail to twin its main-line track, is presented. The instruments installed gave measurement of the load and its variation along the tieback anchors; the distribution of the strain along the height of the wall which allowed an earth-pressure distribution to be postulated; and the lateral deflection of the wall. The earth-pressure distributions, inferred from the field measurements, were adequately predicted using the Terzaghi and Peck recommendation coupled with the Boussinesq procedure to account for the train loads. The best-fit lateral pressure distributions were in turn used to calculate displacement profiles by modelling the wall as a beam. The results matched the measured profiles reasonably well, thus endorsing a simplified technique for predicting displacements of an anchored wall. Key words : retaining wall, tieback, earth-pressure distribution, wall deflection, railway.


2010 ◽  
Vol 168-170 ◽  
pp. 200-205
Author(s):  
Fei Song ◽  
Jian Min Zhang ◽  
Lu Yu Zhang

The evaluation of earth pressure is of vital importance for the design of various retaining walls and infrastructures. Experimental studies show that earth pressures are closely related to the mode and amount of wall displacement. In this paper, based on the reveal of the formation mechanism of earth pressures against rigid retaining wall with RTT mode, a new method is proposed to calculate the earth pressure distribution in such conditions. Finally, the effectiveness of the method is confirmed by the experimental results.


1972 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 384-406 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. D. Scott ◽  
N. E. Wilson ◽  
Gunther E. Bauer

The paper is divided into two parts. The first part deals with the systematic program of measurements undertaken on an open braced cut in dense sand at the Greenway Pollution Control Centre in London, Ontario. In the second part, the experimental data are analyzed and a new solution is presented based on Dubrova's analysis, which related qualitatively and quantitatively the active earth pressure distribution to the mode of deformation of a retaining structure.The roughly L-shaped excavation measured 68 × 42 ft (20.7 × 12.8 m) for the longest leg, the other leg was 30 × 23 ft (9.1 × 7.0 m). The temporary bracing system consisted of interlocking steel sheet piles (Larssen IIIN), and wales and struts from wide-flanged steel sections. The maximum depth of the cut was 50 ft (15.2 m) below ground elevation of 722 ft (220.1 m). The soil consisted of fine uniform dense sand having a relative density varying from medium to very dense. The natural water level was approximately 20 ft (6.1 m) below the ground surface prior to construction.The instrumentation program was carried out during the 6-month construction period (January–June 1964) and consisted of measuring: (1) The strut loads with a mechanical strain indicator (Whitmore gauge) over 8 in. (20.3 cm) gauge lengths, (2) The deformation of the north wall in a horizontal and a vertical plane, (3) The water levels and water pressures from borehole and standpipe observations, and (4) The active and passive earth pressures over the cut with 'Geonor vibrating-wire pressure transducers mounted flush on two adjacent sheet piles of the north wall.Field and laboratory tests supplied the necessary soil data.Comprehensive measurements of this kind in deep cuts in sand, prior to this London investigation, had only been made in Berlin, Munich, and New York. But at London, for the first time the actual distribution of earth pressures in sand were measured on a full-scale braced wall.The analysis of the experimental data showed that the earth pressure distribution can be approximated by the extended Dubrova’s solution. The agreement between the total active earth pressure obtained from the pressure cells and the corresponding Coulomb values varied from excellent (upper bound) to good (lower bound).An experimental relationship between the horizontal soil strain and the variation of K-values over the depth of the cut was established.The different theories for predicting Ko-values do not seem to apply to over consolidated dense sand deposits. The experimental Ko-values, rather, agree with other published experimental values for similar soils.The strut load readings were somewhat erratic, not necessarily corresponding to the excavation progress. The total strut loads were lower than the corresponding forces from the earth pressure cells or the corresponding Coulomb values.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document