The Relative Contribution of Emotional Competence and Cognitive Ability to Individual and Team Performance

2021 ◽  
pp. 219-244
Author(s):  
Lynn R. Offermann ◽  
James R. Bailey ◽  
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos ◽  
Craig Seal ◽  
Mary Sass
2004 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-243 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lynn R. Offermann ◽  
James R. Bailey ◽  
Nicholas L. Vasilopoulos ◽  
Craig Seal ◽  
Mary Sass

2020 ◽  
Vol 49 (8) ◽  
pp. 1573-1590
Author(s):  
Srikanth P.B.

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to conceptually define and empirically investigate the density of work experience along with individual characteristics (cognitive ability, conscientiousness and openness to experience) and examine their influence on human resource (HR) competencies. Design/methodology/approach Regression analysis was used to analyze the data. In total, 140 HR professionals from service industry background and their supervisors participated in the data collection efforts. Findings Data analyses revealed three key findings. Employees’ density of work experience positively relates to HR competencies. Cognitive ability is the strongest predictor of the positive relationship to HR competencies, and density of work experience. Research limitations/implications The author did not assess learning from each role (individual contributor, team lead and manager). Another limitation stems from the measure of density of work experience. The author did not consider the feedback that each incumbent might have received while dealing with challenging activities and the course corrections that may have been made. Practical implications Using an approach of gradually increasing the level of responsibility and involvement in challenging tasks may also help incumbents develop who may not be intellectually gifted. In the process of gradually increasing the level of involvement in challenging tasks, incumbents could develop a nuanced view of the field expertise required to deal with challenges, gain an in-depth understanding of the business, and acquire change management skills. Originality/value The author attempts to know which aspects of personality influence density of work experience the most. In addition, which personality characteristic predicts HR competencies more strongly?


2020 ◽  
pp. 1-16
Author(s):  
Ethan Brownell ◽  
Jonathan Cagan ◽  
Kenneth Kotovsky

Abstract Prior research has demonstrated how the average characteristics of a team impact team performance. The relative contribution of team members has been largely ignored, especially in the context of engineering design. In this work, a behavioral study was conducted to uncover whether the most or least proficient member of a configuration design team had a larger impact on overall performance. It was found that a configuration design team is most dependent on the proficiency of its most proficient member. The most proficient member had a significant positive effect on how quickly the team reached performance thresholds and the other members of the team were not found to have the same positive impact throughout the design study. Behavioral heuristics were found using hidden Markov modeling to capture the differences in behavior and design strategy between different proficiency members. Results show that high proficiency and low proficiency team members exhibit different behavior, with the most proficient member's behavior leading to topologically simpler designs and other members adopting their designs, leading to the most proficient member driving the team design and thus the team performance. These results underscore the value of the relative contribution model in constructing engineering teams by demonstrating that different team members had unequal effects on team performance. It is shown that enhancing the most proficient member of a team is more likely to contrubute to increased team performance than enhancing the least proficient member.


Author(s):  
Randy Brou ◽  
Stephanie Doane ◽  
Gary Bradshaw ◽  
J. Martin Giesen ◽  
Mark Jodlowski

Teams often operate in dynamic task environments where the state of the world and the coordinative requirements for optimal performance change rapidly. To build effective teams, it is important to know what factors influence team performance. The present research investigates several factors that may influence team performance in dynamic environments. In this study, participants first completed a battery of cognitive and non-cognitive tests. Results of the tests were used to form three-person teams with varying levels of ability. Team performance was scored in 12 dynamic tasks. Individual differences in cognitive ability and personality characteristics were then used to predict team-level performance. Results indicate that two team member characteristics, cognitive ability and stress tolerance, are important to dynamic task performance, while other characteristics such as achievement motivation play roles in specific circumstances. Implications of these results are discussed


2017 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. 91-105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vera Hagemann

Abstract. The individual attitudes of every single team member are important for team performance. Studies show that each team member’s collective orientation – that is, propensity to work in a collective manner in team settings – enhances the team’s interdependent teamwork. In the German-speaking countries, there was previously no instrument to measure collective orientation. So, I developed and validated a German-language instrument to measure collective orientation. In three studies (N = 1028), I tested the validity of the instrument in terms of its internal structure and relationships with other variables. The results confirm the reliability and validity of the instrument. The instrument also predicts team performance in terms of interdependent teamwork. I discuss differences in established individual variables in team research and the role of collective orientation in teams. In future research, the instrument can be applied to diagnose teamwork deficiencies and evaluate interventions for developing team members’ collective orientation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document