Risk-Adapted Melphalan with Stem Cell Transplant (Sct) and Adjuvant Dexamethasone (Dex) +/- Thalidomide (Thal) Achieves Low Treatmentrelated Mortality and High Hematologic Response Rates

Author(s):  
B Clark ◽  
A Cohen ◽  
M Stubblefield ◽  
H Hassoun ◽  
P Zhou ◽  
...  
Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 1742-1742 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Richardson ◽  
Sundar Jagannath ◽  
Andrzej Jakubowiak ◽  
Sagar Lonial ◽  
Noopur Raje ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Bortezomib (VELCADE®, Bz) is approved for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Lenalidomide (Revlimid®, Len) plus dexamethasone (Dex) is approved for the treatment of relapsed MM pts following ≥ 1 prior therapy. In a phase 1 study, Len/Bz (maximum tolerated dose [MTD] 15 mg/1.0 mg/m2) with or without Dex (20–40 mg) was well tolerated and resulted in a response rate (CR+PR+MR) of 58% in relapsed and/or refractory MM pts. The aim of this multi-center phase 2 study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Len/Bz/Dex (RVD) at the phase 1 MTD. Methods: Pts with relapsed or relapsed and refractory MM with 1–3 prior lines of therapy received up to eight 21-day cycles of Bz 1.0 mg/m2 (days 1, 4, 8, 11) Len 15 mg (days 1–14) and Dex 40/20 mg (cycles 1–4/5–8) on days of/after Bz dosing. After cycle 8, pts with stable or responding disease received maintenance therapy on a 21-day cycle; Bz (days 1 and 8) and Len (days 1–14) at the dose levels tolerated at the end of cycle 8, with Dex at 10 mg (days 1, 2, 8, 9) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Pts received concomitant anti-thrombotic (aspirin 81 or 325 mg/day) and anti-viral prophylaxis. Pts with Grade (G) ≥ 2 peripheral neuropathy (PNY) were excluded. Response was assessed according to modified EBMT and Uniform Criteria with toxicities assessed using NCI CTCAE v3.0. Primary end point was time to progression (TTP). Results: 64 pts have been enrolled; 38 (59%) with relapsed and 26 (41%) with relapsed and refractory MM. Median number of prior therapies was two, including Len (8%), Bz (55%), Dex (92%), thalidomide (77%), and stem cell transplant (SCT; 36%). Pts received a median of 8 cycles; 31 (48%) completed 8 cycles, 24 continue on maintenance. 4 pts proceeded to stem cell collection (median CD34+ yield of 4.58x106/kg after median of 8 cycles of therapy) and 3 pts proceeded to stem cell transplant, with the 4th pt currently undergoing salvage therapy to restore disease control. 19 pts discontinued prior to completing 8 cycles due to: progressive disease (10), toxicities (3) or other reason (2). Toxicities were manageable, consisting primarily of G1–2 myelosuppression. Attributable non-hematologic toxicities included deep vein thrombosis (two pts; attributed to Len, both pts remain on-study after antithrombotic therapy), and two episodes of atrial fibrillation (G3) prompting Dex dose reduction. G3 PNY was reported in one pt attributed to Bz and leading to treatment discontinuation despite Bz dose reduction. Dose reductions were required for: Len (13 pts); Bz (9 pts) and Dex (26 pts). One on-study death (thought to be due to fungal pneumonia) was reported during cycle 3: this was not attributed to either Bz or Len, but possibly Dex. In 63 response-evaluable pts, the overall response rate (CR/nCR+VGPR+ PR+ MR) is currently 86%, including 24% CR/nCR and 67% CR/nCR/VGPR/PR. Response rates according to baseline cytogenetics, disease stage, and prior therapies showed no significant differences according to adverse risk (Table). Similarly, analysis of evaluable pts with chromosome 13 deletion by FISH showed no significant difference in response rate compared to those without. Median DOR in responding pts is 21 weeks; range 6–72 weeks. Median TTP and overall survival have not yet been reached. Conclusions: RVD is very active and well tolerated in pts with relapsed and/or refractory MM, including pts who have received prior Len, Bz, thalidomide, and SCT. Responses appeared independent of adverse cytogenetics, advanced disease stage at diagnosis, prior treatment, and being refractory to prior therapy. Durable responses have been observed. Surrogates and correlative studies are in progress. Response rates* by baseline cytogenetics, disease stage at diagnosis, and prior treatment Cytogenetics (n= 60) ORR (≥ MR) ≥ PR ≥ VGPR CR/nCR * Response assessed by Uniform Criteria. †Abnormal cytogenetics by metaphase analysis Normal (n=38) 84% 63% 29% 18% Abnormal† (n=22) 91% 73% 41% 32% ISS disease stage (n=44) Stage l (n=15) 80% 67% 40% 33% Stage ll (n=15) 87% 67% 20% 13% Stage lll (n=14) 86% 71% 57% 36% Response to RVD according to type of prior therapy Bortezomib (n=35) 77% 57% 31% 17% Len/Thalidomide (n=54) 81% 57% 22% 15% Response by Relapsed/Refractory Relapsed (n=38) 84% 66% 34% 26% Relapsed/Refractory (n=26) 85% 65% 31% 19%


Blood ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 112 (11) ◽  
pp. 3329-3329 ◽  
Author(s):  
James E. Hoffman ◽  
Hani Hassoun ◽  
Heather Landau ◽  
Elizabeth Hoover ◽  
Adam Cohen ◽  
...  

Abstract High-dose melphalan (MEL) with autologous stem cell transplant (SCT) is an effective therapy for systemic light-chain amyloidosis (AL) and a risk-adapted approach to MEL dosing minimizes transplant-related mortality (BJH2007; 139). The depth and duration of hematologic response to treatment with SCT or conventional chemotherapy have been shown to correlate with overall survival (OS). Patients who do not achieve a complete hematologic response (CR) after SCT and are initially observed have a median OS of 24 months (Leukemia Lymphoma2000;37:245). In an effort to improve the OS of those not achieving CR, and based partly on trials in multiple myeloma showing benefit, we have explored adding early adjuvant therapy (AT) to the treatment of AL patients with persistent clonal plasma cell disease post-SCT. We have enrolled patients on two consecutive SCT+AT protocols, the first utilizing adjuvant dexamethasone (Dex) +/− Thalidomide (Thal) and the second Dex + Bortezomib (Bort). AT was added at 2 or 3 months post-SCT for those with partial hematologic response or stable hematologic disease. We assessed the outcomes on these protocols with respect to AT-related mortality, hospitalizations in the first year post-SCT, immune recovery and OS. Sixty-four patients enrolled on these trials and 59 survived 2 to 3 months post-SCT to be evaluated for hematologic response. Seventeen were observed without AT while 42 received AT (10 Dex, 21 Dex+Thal, 11 Dex+Bort). There were no deaths due to AT. Thirteen of the 42 patients receiving AT (31%) were hospitalized during the first year post-SCT (6 with pneumonia [5 viral, 1 fungal]; 1 with sinusitis and S. pneumo bacteremia; 3 with congestive heart failure; 2 with pulmonary emboli; 1 with avascular necrosis of the hip) as compared to 2 hospitalizations (1 with engraftment syndrome; 1 with diarrheal illness) in the 17 patients not receiving AT (12%; p= 0.23 by χ2). At 1 year post-SCT median absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) and IgG levels were lower in the AT group (ALC: 1.0 (0.4–2.9) vs 1.7 (0.9–5.1), p=0.01; IgG: 569 (205–1650) vs 867 (635–1200), p=0.04, two-tailed Mann-Whitney), and IgA recovery at 1 year was impaired in the AT group as well (p=0.07). Twenty-four of the 42 patients receiving AT (57%) had improved hematologic responses, including 10 of 11 patients receiving Dex+Bort, with 13 of 42 achieving CR (31%). Median overall survival has not been reached for those with CR to SCT and is 59 months for those who received AT (p=0.06). In sum, AL patients in this series receiving early AT post-SCT were more frequently hospitalized in the first year and had impaired immune recovery. However, over half of the AT patients had improved hematologic responses and, as a cohort, the median overall survival of AT patients was more than twice that of historical controls receiving SCT followed by observation alone.


Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 1985-1985 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giovanni Palladini ◽  
Paolo Milani ◽  
Marta Vidus Rosin ◽  
Andrea Foli ◽  
Giampaolo Merlini

Abstract Two recent reports by the Mayo Clinic and UK groups showed that the combination of cyclophosphamide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (CyBorD) grants a high rate of complete response (CR) and very good partial response (VGPR) in AL amyloidosis. In the two papers a total of 30 patients who received CyBorD upfront were reported, 63% of whom achieved CR. This combination has the further advantage of sparing stem cells, allowing second-line autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). In the present study we treated with frontline CyBorD 56 consecutive newly diagnosed patients with AL amyloidosis, diagnosed between 2010 and 2012, who were transplant candidates and refused the procedure frontline or had potentially reversible contraindications to ASCT. Main exclusion criteria from the present study were age ≥70 years, NT-proBNP >8500 ng/L, systolic blood pressure <100 mmHg, and glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) <15 mL/min. The patients received weekly cyclophosphamide 300 mg/m2, bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2, and dexamethasone (40 mg). The dose of dexamethasone was reduced to 20 mg in 13 patients (23%) who were cardiac stage 3. Starting in September 2012, bortezomib was administered subcutaneously. Hematologic response was assessed every 2 cycles. Median age was 55 years. The kidney was involved in 41 patients (73%), the heart in 39 (70%), and the liver in 5 (9%). Cardiac stage was I in 17 patients (30%), II in 26 (46%), and III in 13 (33%). Five subjects (9%) had eGFR <30 mL/min. Eleven patients (20%) experienced severe adverse events, namely fluid retention and worsening heart failure (4, 7%), cytopenia (4, 7%), worsening renal failure (2, 4%), and deep venous thrombosis (1, 2%). Additionally, 4 patients (7%) died on treatment due to progressive cardiac amyloidosis, before the first evaluation of response. Overall, 63% of patients responded (95%CI: 49-75%). Best hematologic response by intent-to-treat, was CR in 16 patients (29%), VGPR in 8 (14%), and partial response (PR) in 11 (19%). All responders achieved at least PR by cycle 2, and best response was reached by cycle 6 in all cases. Cardiac response was achieved in 13/39 subjects (33%) and in 3/41 (7%) there was a renal response. So far, 10 patients, 6 non-responders, 3 attaining PR, and 1 in VGPR with progressing proteinuria were transplanted. Response data are available for 4 of these subjects, 3 of whom responded to ASCT (1 CR, 1 VGPR, 1 PR). With a median follow-up of living patients of 15 months, 11 patients (20%) died. Median survival was not reached and 78% of patients are projected to be alive at 1 year. The main baseline determinant of patients’ outcome was cardiac stage, with 100% 1-year survival in stage I, and 70% in stage II and III patients. This is the largest study on frontline CyBorD in AL amyloidosis reported so far. In this homogeneous patient population including low/intermediate-risk subjects with potentially reversible contraindication to ASCT, 43% of patients achieved CR/VGPR and cardiac dysfunction improved in one third of cases. Second-line ASCT was feasible in subjects with suboptimal responses. Though good, the response rate to CyBorD observed in the present study was lower than that reported in the 2 previously published studies, indicating that randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the efficacy of this combination in AL amyloidosis. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Bortezomib in AL amyloidosis. Merlini:Millennium-Takeda: Honoraria; Pfizer: Honoraria.


Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 1342-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benyam Muluneh ◽  
Katie Buhlinger ◽  
Allison M. Deal ◽  
Joshua F. Zeidner ◽  
Matthew C. Foster ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction: Salvage chemotherapy regimens for patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) are associated with complete response rates of 30 - 60%. Determining the superiority of one treatment over another is difficult due to the lack of comparative data. There are no data comparing treatments with cladribine and clofarabine based salvage regimens to each other. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study of GCLAC (clofarabine 25 mg/m2 IV days 1-5, cytarabine 2 gm/m2 IV days 1-5, and G-CSF) and CLAG (cladribine 5 mg/m2 IV days 1-5, cytarabine 2 gm/m2 IV days 1-5, and G-CSF). Methods: We identified 41 consecutive patients with pathologically diagnosed relapsed or refractory AML who received either GCLAC or CLAG between 2011 and 2014. The primary outcome was the complete response rate (CRp or CR) as defined by the International Working Group. Secondary outcomes included the percentage of patients who underwent allogenic stem cell transplant, relapse free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon Rank Sum tests were used to compare patient characteristics and response rates. The Kaplan Meier method and Log Rank tests were used to evaluate RFS and OS. Results: We found no significant differences in the baseline characteristics of patients treated with GCLAC (n=22) or CLAG (n=19) including age, race, gender, organ function, or cytogenetic risk group (table 1). There were also no significant differences in the percentage of relapsed patients (36% vs. 21%), the average duration of the previous remission (28.6 vs. 19.4 months) or in their previous therapy. An anthracycline-based "7+3" regimen was given to 82% of the GCLAC patients and to 90% of the CLAG patients. The outcomes with these two regimens were also not significantly different. Patients treated with GCLAC had a 64% CR/CRp rate compared with 47% for CLAG patients (p= 0.36). 45% GCLAC patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplant compared with 26% of CLAG patients (p= 0.32). The median RFS on GCLAC and CLAG respectively was 1.59 years [0.41, non-estimable (NE)] and 1.03 years [0.49, 1.03], (p= 0.75). The median OS was 1.03 years [0.52, NE] and 0.70 years [0.28, 1.11], (p= 0.08). Given the similarities of these regimens, we combined the data sets to compare the OS for patients with refractory AML to relapsed AML. The OS for patients with refractory AML was not significantly worse than patients with relapsed AML (0.94 years [0.36, 1.3] vs.1.11 years [0.46, not evaluable]; p=0.49). Conclusion: We find no significant differences in outcomes using GCLAC or CLAG for relapsed/refractory AML patients. The trends in outcome that favored GCLAC are likely explained by trends in patient populations (e.g. longer first remission for GCLAC patients). Since our results are similar to the published reports describing these regimens, we feel the choice of regimen can be based on other considerations such as cost. We do find the efficacy of both regimens in refractory AML to be encouraging. However, we recognize that overall survival of one year is not acceptable and that most relapsed/refractory patients should be entered into clinical trials. Table 1.Baseline CharacteristicsGCLAC (n=22)CLAG (n=19)p ValueAge (years)54.75 ± 11.552.9 ± 12.50.69Race (C vs Non C)18 (82%)12 (63%)0.21Gender (M)11 (50%)11 (58%)0.76Risk group Favorable4 (19%)2 (11%)0.48  Int-12 (10%)4 (22%)  Int-27 (33%)3 (17%)  Adverse8 (38%)9 (50%)Salvage attempt  120 (91%)15 (79%)0.39  >12 (9%)4 (21%)Relapse vs Refractory  Relapse8 (36%)4 (21%)0.32Primary Refractory14 (64%)15 (79%)OutcomesGCLAC (n=22)CLAG (n=19)p ValueCRp or CR14 (64%)9 (47%)0.36Transplant9 (45%)5 (26%)0.32Median RFS (years)1.59 (0.41,NE)1.03 (0.49, 1.03)0.75Median OS (years)1.03 (0.52, NE )0.70 (0.28, 1.11)0.083RelapseRefractoryp ValueOS (years) of relapse vs refractory patients*1.11 (0.46, NE)0.94 (0.36, 1.34)0.49*All GCLAC and CLAG patients combined Disclosures Foster: Celgene: Research Funding.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document