TBS7 Terminology, descriptions and symbols in loading tests in situ of concrete structures

1994 ◽  
pp. 207-216
Author(s):  
Masatoshi Ohuchi ◽  
Osamu Kusakabe ◽  
Toshiyuki Hagiwara ◽  
Shintaro Abe

2020 ◽  
pp. 191-198
Author(s):  
Ryunoshin Yoshinaka ◽  
Takeo Endo ◽  
Naoshige Nomura ◽  
Kazuhiko Yamagishi

2020 ◽  
Vol 2 ◽  
pp. 3-18
Author(s):  
Ali Saberi Varzaneh ◽  
Mahmoud Naderi

Considering the differences between environmental conditions of concrete structures and laboratory conditions, it is important to determine the parameters of the materials at the site of the structure. One of these materials is cement-based repair mortars due to the damage of concrete structures that may arise due to chemical or physical factors, these structures are required to be repaired. For this reason, in this paper, to determine the strength of repair mortars of different ages and under different Curing, Situ methods "Friction-Transfer" and "Pull-off" were used and the relationships between the Flexural Compressive, Tensile and readings obtained from the above methods on cementations mortars are presented. Experiments were performed on mortars at ages 3, 7, 28, 42 and 90 days under the conditions of "waterlogging", "Curing Agent" and "releasing in the outdoor". The results show the high impact of the process on the Flexural Compressive, Tensile of the repair mortars and the results of the "Friction-Transfer" and "Pull-off" methods. Also, a high correlation coefficient was obtained between the mechanical properties of the mortars and the results of the above tests; it is possible to measure the mechanical properties of repair mortars in situ with high confidence and in situ


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wei Zhang ◽  
David Du ◽  
Xiaohong Bai

A series of in situ static loading tests of square footing were carried out on the geobelt-reinforced gravel cushion on soft silt. The reinforced gravel cushion was thin with the depth-to-width ratio of 0.2. A parameters study was conducted by considering the number of geobelt layers, the depth of the first geobelt layer beneath the footing, the vertical spacing between two geobelt layers, the linear density of reinforcement, and the material type of geobelt. The pressure distribution on bottom of the cushion was measured. The test results showed that the bearing capacity of reinforced gravel cushion was significantly larger than that of unreinforced gravel cushion, and the stress diffusion effect of reinforced gravel cushion was also more pronounced than that of the unreinforced cushion. The pressure distribution on bottom of reinforced gravel cushion was in a saddle shape. According to calculation and analysis, the stress diffusion angles of reinforced cushions were all larger than 20°.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document