scholarly journals SAT-571 Rare Case of Tocilizumab-Induced Severe Hypertriglyceridemia

2020 ◽  
Vol 4 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ankur Modi ◽  
Beth Scholz ◽  
David Wenkert

Abstract Tocilizumab (TCZ) is a monoclonal antibody against the IL-6receptor used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Hypertriglyceridemia is a rare side effect of TCZ, occurring in<1% of cases (1). A 37 year-old woman presented with abdominal pain, nausea and diarrhea. Her past medical history included RA and dyslipidemia; she had no history of diabetes, hypothyroidism, renal disease, alcoholism or recent medication changes. Following failure of other immunosuppressant agents, IV TCZ was initiated. After two and a half years, TCZ formulation was changed to subcutaneous injections for convenience about 6 weeks prior to presentation. Family history included mother with dyslipidemia. Her vital signs were normal on admission with labs remarkable for lipase of 332 and triglycerides (TG) of 5680. Her TG 2months prior to initiating subcutaneous tocilizumab therapy was 1373. CT abdomen demonstrated findings of acute pancreatitis (AP). She was subsequently admitted to the ICU and started on an insulin drip, fibrate, statin and fish oil along with supportive care. TCZ was held. Because her TGs remained severely elevated, she was transferred to our facility for plasmapheresis with subsequent improvement of the same to 768 after two treatments. TCZ was considered the probable etiology of her hypertriglyceridemia with subsequent AP after ruling out other secondary causes. Hereditary hypertriglyceridemia, given her family history, likely contributed to her chronically elevated TG’s. TCZ has been reported to increase TG levels mainly through an increase in VLDL-TG content. TCZ was found to reduce hepatic LDLr expression thus reducing hepatic clearance of TGs and LPL mediated lipolysis of TG-rich lipoproteins (2). Despite the association of TCZ with increased lipid levels, it has a favorable impact on lipid metabolism via improved functionality of HDL-C and no impact in the atherogenic index; patients also experience a favorable response to statin treatment (3). In observational studies, TCZ shows a favorable effect on myocardial infarction compared to other biologic agents for RA, attributed partly to a decrease in lipoprotein(a) levels. Nonetheless, it should be used in caution in those with high cardiovascular risk, especially dyslipidemia (4). 1. Flaig T, Douros A. Tocilizumab-induced pancreatitis:case report and review of data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System. Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2016, 41:718-721. 2. Strang A, Bisoendial R. Atherosclerosis 229(2013):174-181. 3. Garcıa-Gomez C, Martın-Martınez M. Lipoprotein(a) concentrations in rheumatoid arthritis on biologic therapy:Results from the CARdiovascular inrheuMAtology study project. Journal of Clinical Lipidology (2017) 11:749-756. 4. CastagnéB, Viprey M. Cardiovascular safety of tocilizumab: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(8):e0220178.

2014 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 249-261 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tessa Sanderson ◽  
Jo Angouri

The active involvement of patients in decision-making and the focus on patient expertise in managing chronic illness constitutes a priority in many healthcare systems including the NHS in the UK. With easier access to health information, patients are almost expected to be (or present self) as an ‘expert patient’ (Ziebland 2004). This paper draws on the meta-analysis of interview data collected for identifying treatment outcomes important to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Taking a discourse approach to identity, the discussion focuses on the resources used in the negotiation and co-construction of expert identities, including domain-specific knowledge, access to institutional resources, and ability to self-manage. The analysis shows that expertise is both projected (institutionally sanctioned) and claimed by the patient (self-defined). We close the paper by highlighting the limitations of our pilot study and suggest avenues for further research.


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Akshaya Srikanth Bhagavathula ◽  
Abdullah Shehab ◽  
Anhar Ullah ◽  
Jamal Rahmani

Background: The increasing incidence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) threatens the Middle Eastern population. Several epidemiological studies have assessed CVD and its risk factors in terms of the primary prevention of CVD in the Middle East. Therefore, summarizing the information from these studies is essential. Aim: We conducted a systematic review to assess the prevalence of CVD and its major risk factors among Middle Eastern adults based on the literature published between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2018 and carried out a meta-analysis. Methods: We searched electronic databases such as PubMed/Medline, ScienceDirect, Embase and Google Scholar to identify literature published from January 1, 2012 to December 31, 2018. All the original articles that investigated the prevalence of CVD and reported at least one of the following factors were included: hypertension, diabetes, dyslipidaemia, smoking and family history of CVD. To summarize CVD prevalence, we performed a random-effects meta-analysis. Results: A total of 41 potentially relevant articles were included, and 32 were included in the meta-analysis (n=191,979). The overall prevalence of CVD was 10.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 7.1-14.3%, p<0.001) in the Middle East. A high prevalence of CVD risk factors, such as dyslipidaemia (43.3%; 95% CI: 21.5-68%), hypertension (26.2%; 95% CI: 19.6-34%) and diabetes (16%; 95% CI: 9.9-24.8%), was observed. The prevalence rates of other risk factors, such as smoking (12.4%; 95% CI: 7.7-19.4%) and family history of CVD (18.7%; 95% CI: 15.4-22.5%), were also high. Conclusion: The prevalence of CVD is high (10.1%) in the Middle East. The burden of dyslipidaemia (43.3%) in this region is twice as high as that of hypertension (26.2%) and diabetes mellitus (16%). Multifaceted interventions are urgently needed for the primary prevention of CVD in this region.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-357
Author(s):  
Jalpa Patel ◽  
Dina Fakhouri ◽  
Mohamed Noureldin ◽  
Iris Kovar-Gough ◽  
Francis A. Farraye ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Varitsara Mangkorntongsakul ◽  
Kevin Phan ◽  
Saxon D. Smith

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bin Liu ◽  
Xiang Meng ◽  
Yanfang Ma ◽  
Huizhen Li ◽  
Yuqi Liu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Total glucosides of paeony (TGP), an active compound extracted from the roots of Paeonia lactiflora Pallas, has been increasingly used as the adjunctive therapy for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Though TGP could mitigate the unanticipated adverse effects during the conventional treatment of RA, high-quality evidence-based meta-analysis data on this subject are still insufficient. The objective of this study is to evaluate the clinical safety of TGP adjuvant therapy in the RA treatment. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, China Network Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), SinoMed and WanFang Data were retrieved for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort study about TGP adjuvant therapy in patients with RA up to 28 January 2021. Literatures with eligibility criteria and information were screened and extracted by two researchers independently. The RevMan5.3 software was used for data analysis with effect estimates as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results A total of 39 studies involving 3680 RA participants were included. There were 8 comparisons: TGP plus methotrexate (MTX) therapy versus MTX therapy, TGP plus leflunomide (LEF) therapy versus LEF therapy, TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy versus MTX plus LEF therapy, TGP plus tripterygium glycosides (TG) therapy versus TG therapy, TGP plus meloxicam (MLX) therapy versus MLX therapy and TGP plus sulfasalazine (SSZ) therapy versus SSZ therapy, TGP plus iguratimod (IGU) therapy versus IGU therapy, TGP plus prednisone acetate tablets (PAT) therapy versus PAT therapy. The meta-analysis results showed that the occurrence of hepatic adverse effect (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.23–0.41, P < 0.00001) and leukopenia (RR = 0.41, 95% CI = 0.26–0.66, P = 0.0002) in TGP adjuvant therapy was significant decreased compared with non-TGP therapy. However, only TGP plus LEF therapy (RR = 0.22, 95% CI = 0.08–0.60, P = 0.003) and TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy (RR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.22–0.42, P < 0.00001) had statistical difference in the subgroups of hepatic adverse effect. In leukopenia, TGP plus MTX and LEF therapy (RR = 0.47, 95% CI = 0.25–0.87, P = 0.02) had statistical difference. Conclusions This meta-analysis indicated that TGP adjuvant therapy might alleviate the incidence of hepatic adverse effect and leukopenia for the RA treatment compared to non-TGP therapy. The clinical safety of TGP adjuvant therapy warrant further investigation in experimental studies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document