A Case of Pseudohypoparathyroidism Type 1b in Pregnancy

Introduction: Pseudohypoparathyroidism (PHP) type 1b is characterized by target organ resistance to PTH leading to hypocalcemia and hyperphosphatemia in the setting of elevated PTH due to abnormal imprinting that affects the regulatory elements of GNAS1. It poses challenges in management during pregnancy and lactation. We report the case of a patient who was diagnosed with PHP type 1b while pregnant. Case Presentation: A 30 year old woman, 16 weeks pregnant was referred for the evaluation of hypocalcemia. She had a history of traumatic fracture of her lower extremity and hypothyroidism treated with levothyroxine. She was noted to have hypocalcemia 1 year prior during routine labs. Family history was significant for hypothyroidism in her sister. On physical examination, she did not have phenotypic features of Albright hereditary osteodystrophy except for short stature. Before pregnancy her labs were significant for Ca 8.1 mg/dL(8.6–10.2), iCa 4.2 mg/dL(4.8–5.6), iPTH 289 pg/mL (14–64), creatinine 0.6 mg/dL(0.8–1.2), 25 vitamin D 22 ng/mL and 24 hr urine Ca 80 mg/24 hr (65-250mg). She was started on a combination of calcium citrate and carbonate 600 mg daily and vitamin D 1000 units daily. Labs while pregnant showed Ca 8.1 mg/dL, iCa 4.1 mg/dL, iPTH 184 pg/mL, PO4 4.9 mg/dL(2.5–3.5), 1,25 Vitamin D 53 pg/mL(18–72) and 25 Vitamin D 38 ng/mL. She had mild paresthesia and muscle cramps. Calcium supplements were increased to 1800 mg daily. While the urine Ca increased to 315 mg/24 hr, other biochemical parameters did not improve. Given her low Ca, high iPTH, high PO4, normal GFR and 25 vitamin D, PHP was suspected. Genetic testing showed loss of methylation at GNAS locus down to 5% (NL >43%) Diagnosis of PHP type 1b was made. Her Ca decreased the next months to a nadir of 7.9 mg/dL despite increased doses of calcium up to 1200 mg BID. Calcitriol 0.25 mcg BID was added. The rest of her pregnancy the serum Ca stayed between 8.1–8.6 mg/dL. She delivered a boy. At birth his Ca was 8.0 mg/ dL and PTH 81pg/mL. Genetic testing showed 41% methylation of GNAS. While breast feeding her Ca was 9.4 mg/dL, her calcitriol and calcium supplements were decreased. She continues to do well on calcium 630 mg daily and calcitriol 0.25 mcg daily with serum Ca between 8.5–8.8 mg/dL. Conclusion: The literature on PHP in pregnancy is scarce due to its rarity and the management is challenging due to altered calcium and vitamin D metabolism during pregnancy and lactation. The fetus draws calcium from maternal circulation and predisposes mother to hypocalcemia. Some patients may become normocalcemic during pregnancy due to placental secretion of 1,25 Vitamin D and PTHrp. There is also increased demand for calcium with lactation. There are genetic implications on the baby as it is inherited in an autosomal dominant mode. It is important to monitor calcium levels closely as there are multiple factors that could influence calcium metabolism in pregnancy.