Management of Atypical Cranial Meningiomas, Part 2

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 356-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Q. Sun ◽  
Chunyu Cai ◽  
Rory K.J. Murphy ◽  
Todd DeWees ◽  
Ralph G. Dacey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND: The efficacies of adjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for atypical meningiomas (AMs) after subtotal resection (STR) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical, histopathological, and radiographic features associated with progression in AM patients after STR. METHODS: Fifty-nine primary AMs after STR were examined for predictors of progression, including the impact of SRS and EBRT, in a retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients (46%) progressed after STR (median, 30 months). On univariate analysis, spontaneous necrosis positively (hazard ratio = 5.2; P = .006) and adjuvant radiation negatively (hazard ratio = 0.3; P = .009) correlated with progression; on multivariate analysis, only adjuvant radiation remained independently significant (hazard ratio = 0.3; P = .006). SRS and EBRT were associated with greater local control (LC; P = .02) and progression-free survival (P = .007). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial LC rates after STR vs STR/EBRT were 60%, 34%, and 34% vs 96%, 65%, and 45%. The 2-, 5-, and 10-year actuarial progression-free survival rates after STR vs STR/EBRT were 60%, 30%, and 26% vs 96%, 65%, and 45%. Compared with STR alone, adjuvant radiation therapy significantly improved LC in AMs that lack spontaneous necrosis (P = .003) but did not improve LC in AMs with spontaneous necrosis (P = .6). CONCLUSION: Adjuvant SRS or EBRT improved LC of AMs after STR but only for tumors without spontaneous necrosis. Spontaneous necrosis may aid in decisions to administer adjuvant SRS or EBRT after STR of AMs.

Gleason pattern 5 as a pathologic predictor of recurrence, development of metastasis, and prostate cancer-specific death for patients receiving salvage radiation therapy following radical prostatectomy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 151-151
Author(s):  
William C. Jackson ◽  
Skyler B. Johnson ◽  
Corey Foster ◽  
Darren Li ◽  
Benjamin Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Risk Stratification ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Gleason Pattern ◽  
The Impact

151 Background: The presence of primary, secondary, and tertiary Gleason pattern 5 (GP5) in prostate cancer has been shown to predict outcomes and improve risk stratification following radical prostatectomy (RP) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). However, the predictive value of GP5 has not been assessed in salvage EBRT (SRT) for a rising PSA after RP. We sought to assess the prognostic capability of the presence of GP5 in this setting. Methods: 575 patients who received SRT at a single institution for biochemical recurrence after RP were retrospectively reviewed in an IRB approved analysis. We assessed the impact of GP5 on biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results: Median follow up was 56.7 months post SRT. On pathologic evaluation, 563 patients had a documented Gleason score (GS). 60 patients (10.7%) had primary, secondary, or tertiary GP5. GP5 was the strongest pathologic predictor of DM (p<0.01 HR: 1.9 [95%CI: 1.3-2.9]) and PCSM (p<0.01 HR: 4.0 [95%CI: 2.1-7.7]) on univariate analysis. The presence of GP5 was a better predictor of BF, DM, PCSM, and OS than stratification by GS8-10. Patients with GP5 had clinically worse outcomes than GS8 patients without GP5. There was no difference in outcome between primary, secondary, and tertiary GP5. On multivariate analysis, GP5 was the strongest pathologic predictor of BF (p<0.01 HR: 2.7 [95%CI: 1.6-4.5]), DM (p<0.01 HR: 11.2 [95%CI: 3.9-32.2]), and PCSM (p<0.01 HR: 6.0 [95%CI: 1.8-19.6]). Conclusions: In SRT, where pathologic factors including extra-capsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, and margin status are known, the presence of GP5 is the strongest pathologic predictor of BF, DM, and PCSM. Traditional GS risk stratification fails to fully utilize the prognostic capabilities of individual GP’s for SRT patients following RP. Intensification of treatment regimens, such as early use of androgen deprivation therapy or adjuvant radiation, may be appropriate for patients with GP5 in this setting.

Radiation Therapy for Residual or Recurrent Atypical Meningioma

Neurosurgery ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-32 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Q. Sun ◽  
Chunyu Cai ◽  
Rory K.J. Murphy ◽  
Todd DeWees ◽  
Ralph G. Dacey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Tumor Progression ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Atypical Meningioma ◽  
Locoregional Control ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Brain Invasion

Abstract BACKGROUND Optimal use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) vs external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for treatment of residual/recurrent atypical meningioma is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze features associated with progression after radiation therapy. METHODS: Fifty radiation-naive patients who received SRS or EBRT for residual and/or recurrent atypical meningioma were examined for predictors of progression using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (64%) received adjuvant radiation after subtotal resection, 12 patients (24%) received salvage radiation after progression following subtotal resection, and 6 patients (12%) received salvage radiation after recurrence following gross total resection. Twenty-one patients (42%) received SRS (median 18 Gy), and 7 (33%) had tumor progression. Twenty-nine patients (58%) received EBRT (median 54 Gy), and 13 (45%) had tumor progression. Whereas tumor volume (P = .53), SRS vs EBRT (P = .45), and adjuvant vs salvage (P = .34) were not associated with progression after radiation therapy, spontaneous necrosis (hazard ratio [HR] = 82.3, P &lt; .001), embolization necrosis (HR = 15.6, P = .03), and brain invasion (HR = 3.8, P = .008) predicted progression in univariate and multivariate analyses. Tumors treated with SRS/EBRT had 2- and 5-year actuarial locoregional control rates of 91%/88% and 71%/69%, respectively. Tumors with spontaneous necrosis, embolization necrosis, and no necrosis had 2- and 5-year locoregional control rates of 76%, 92%, and 100% and 36%, 73%, and 100%, respectively (P &lt; .001). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that necrosis may be a negative predictor of radiation response regardless of radiation timing or modality.

PSA doubling time of ≤6 months as the optimal cutoff for predicting clinically relevant outcomes for men receiving salvage radiation therapy post radical prostatectomy.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (6_suppl) ◽  
pp. 167-167
Author(s):  
William C. Jackson ◽  
Skyler B. Johnson ◽  
Benjamin Foster ◽  
Corey Foster ◽  
Yeohan Song ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Predictive Value ◽  
Doubling Time ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Psa Doubling Time ◽  
The Impact

167 Background: Short PSA doubling time (PSADT) after biochemical recurrence (BR) post radical prostatectomy (RP) is known to predict worse outcomes following salvage external beam radiation therapy (SRT). The ideal PSADT cut-off, however, in this context remains uncertain. In this study, we sought to identify the best PSADT cut-off for predicting clinical outcomes following SRT for BR after RP. Methods: 575 patients who received SRT at a single institution for BR after RP were retrospectively reviewed in an IRB approved analysis. The impact of PSADT on biochemical failure (BF), distant metastasis (DM), prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM), and overall survival (OS) was assessed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards models. Results: Median follow up was 56.7 months post SRT. PSADTs could be calculated for 277 patients. PSADT strongly predicted BF, DM, PCSM, and OS on univariate analysis regardless of cut-off point. There was no statistical difference in BF, DM, PCSM, or OS between patients with PSADT <3 (n=40) and 3-6 months (n=61) or between 6-10 (n=62) and >10 months (n=114). A difference existed in BF (p<0.01 HR: 2.2 [95%CI: 1.4-3.5]) and DM (p=0.02 HR: 2.2 [95%CI: 1.2-4.3]) between PSADT of 3-6 and 6-10 months. PSADT ≤6 had the largest positive predictive value (PPV) for BF (70%), DM (36%), and PCSM (13%) at 5 years. There was no difference in negative predictive value between a PSADT >10 vs. >6 months for BF, DM, PCSM, and OS with 5 year rates of (60% vs. 60%, 86% vs. 86%, 99% vs. 98%, and 95 vs. 94% respectively). On multivariate analysis PSADT ≤6 was a strong predictor of BF (p<0.01 HR: 2.1 [95%CI: 1.5-3.0]), DM (p=0.01 HR: 2.0 [95%CI: 1.2-3.4]), and PCSM (p=0.04 HR: 2.3 [95%CI: 1.1-5.2]), with a trend towards predicting OS (p=0.12 HR: 1.5 [95%CI: 0.9-2.6]). Conclusions: A PSADT ≤6 months was the best predictor of outcomes in our data set, particularly for DM and PCSM. Currently, the most common predictive nomogram for SRT uses PSADT <10 months as the cut-off point for BF. These results suggest that using a PSADT of ≤6 months may improve the ability to predict clinically significant outcomes and hence identify men who may benefit from additional therapy.

Postoperative irradiation for subtotally resected meningiomas

1994 ◽  
Vol 80 (2) ◽  
pp. 195-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian J. Goldsmith ◽  
William M. Wara ◽  
Charles B. Wilson ◽  
David A. Larson
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Subtotal Resection ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Total Resection ◽  
Benign Meningioma ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cerebral Necrosis

✓ The authors retrospectively analyzed 140 patients treated at the University of California, San Francisco, from 1967 to 1990 to evaluate the results of radiation therapy (median 5400 cGy) given as an adjuvant to subtotal resection of intracranial meningioma. Of the 140 meningiomas, 117 were benign and 23 were malignant. The median follow-up period was 40 months. The overall survival rate at 5 years was 85% for the benign and 58% for the malignant tumor groups (p = 0.02); the 5-year progression-free survival rates were 89% and 48%, respectively (p = 0.001). For patients with benign meningioma, the 10-year overall and progression-free survival rates were 77%. An improved progression-free survival rate in that group was not related to tumor size but was associated with a younger age (p = 0.01) and treatment after 1980 with innovative technologies (p = 0.002); none of those variables affected the progression-free survival rate in the patients with malignant meningioma. Increased progression-free survival in the benign tumor group was also significantly associated with increasing the minimum radiation dose (p = 0.04). The 5-year progression-free survival rate for patients with benign meningioma treated after 1980 (when computerized tomography or magnetic resonance imaging was used for planning therapy) was 98%, as compared with 77% for patients treated before 1980 (p = 0.002). There were no second central nervous system tumors. Morbidity (3.6%) included sudden blindness or cerebral necrosis and death. When total resection of benign meningioma is not feasible, subtotal resection combined with precise treatment planning techniques and adjuvant radiation therapy can achieve results comparable to those of total resection.

Significant interaction between testosterone recovery (TR) and biochemical progression-free survival (BPFS) in intermediate- and high-risk patients with prostate cancer treated with radiation therapy (RT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 202-202
Author(s):  
D. Shasha ◽  
T. Nabhani ◽  
S. J. Rauth ◽  
R. Salant ◽  
L. B. Harrison
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cox Regression Analysis ◽  
High Risk Prostate Cancer ◽  
Risk Prostate Cancer

202 Background: To examine the interaction testosterone-recovery-free survival (TRFS) and BPFS in patients with intermediate and high-risk prostate cancer treated with combined external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), prostate implant (PI), and ADT. Methods: We prospectively collected data between 1998 and 2010 from 1,564 patients with clinically localized prostate cancer treated by a single physician (DS). 294 patients with NCCN intermediate or high-risk prostate cancer were treated with EBRT, PI, and ADT. 60% of these patients had intermediate-risk disease. Initial prostate-specifc antigen (PSA), Gleason Score (GS), AJCC tumor stage (TStage), and RT parameters were recorded. PSA, and testosterone (T) were measured at each follow-up visit. BPFS was scored using the Phoenix definition. Testosterone recovery occurred when the serum T level rose above 150ng/ml. TR was dichotomized at 2 years. Survival was evaluated using Cox-regression analysis. Results: Median age was 66 yrs-old, intraquartile range (IQR) was 60-71. Median ADT duration (ADTD) was 1.31 years (IQR 0.25-2.35). Testosterone recovery (TR) was seen in 73% of patients. Median TRFS was 3.1 years (IQR 1.94-4.12). Median BPFS was 4.96 years (IQR 3.39-9.12). Overall BPFS was 90% in this patient population. Three patients experienced metastatic failure. There were no prostate cancer deaths. On univariate analysis ADTD (p=0.05), TRFS (p=0.04), GS (p=0.02), and PSA (p=0.05) were significantly associated with BPFS. On multivariable analysis TRFS (p=0.009), TStage (p=0.02), GS (p=0.02), and PSA (p=0.04) were significantly associated with BPFS. Conclusions: Prolonged testosterone suppression after combination EBRT/PI/ADT is strongly associated with improved BPFS. The physiological implications of this finding warrant further study. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Radiation response and survival time in patients with glioblastoma multiforme

1996 ◽  
Vol 84 (3) ◽  
pp. 442-448 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fred G. Barker ◽  
Michael D. Prados ◽  
Susan M. Chang ◽  
Philip H. Gutin ◽  
Kathleen R. Lamborn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Glioblastoma Multiforme ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Cox Model ◽  
Univariate Analysis ◽  
Extent Of Resection ◽  
Radiation Response ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
The Impact

✓ To determine the value of radiographically assessed response to radiation therapy as a predictor of survival in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the authors studied a cohort of 301 patients who were initially treated according to uniform clinical protocols. All patients had newly diagnosed supratentorial GBM and underwent the maximum safe resection followed by external-beam radiation treatment (60 Gy in standard daily fractions or 70.4 Gy in twice-daily fractions of 160 cGy). The radiation response and survival rates were assessable in 222 patients. The extent of resection and the immediate response to radiation therapy were highly correlated with survival, both in a univariate analysis and after correction for age and Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score in a multivariate Cox model (p < 0.001 for radiation response and p = 0.04 for extent of resection). A subgroup analysis suggested that neuroimaging obtained within 3 days after surgery served as a better baseline for assessment of radiation response than images obtained later. Imaging obtained within 3 days after completion of a course of radiation therapy also provided valid radiation response scores. The impact of the radiographically assessed radiation response on survival time was comparable to that of age or KPS score. This information is easily obtained early in the course of the disease, may be of value for individual patients, and may also have implications for the design and analysis of trials of adjuvant therapy for GBM, including volume-dependent therapies such as radiosurgery or brachytherapy.

Management of Atypical Cranial Meningiomas, Part 1

Neurosurgery ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 75 (4) ◽  
pp. 347-355 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sam Q. Sun ◽  
Albert H. Kim ◽  
Chunyu Cai ◽  
Rory K.J. Murphy ◽  
Todd DeWees ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cox Regression ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Brain Invasion ◽  
Predictors Of Recurrence ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
The Impact

Abstract BACKGROUND: Indications for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) for atypical meningiomas (AMs) remain unclear. OBJECTIVE: To analyze features associated with recurrence in AM patients after gross total resection (GTR) and to assess the relative benefit of EBRT in a retrospective cohort study. METHODS: One hundred fifty-one primary AMs after GTR (88 female patients; median follow-up, 45.0 months) were examined for possible predictors of recurrence (age, sex, location, volume, bone involvement, brain invasion). The Fisher exact and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used to analyze the association between these predictors and use of EBRT. The impact on recurrence for these predictors and EBRT was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression. RESULTS: Of 151 patients, 13 (8.6%) experienced recurrence after GTR (median, 47.0 months). Multivariate analysis identified elevated mitotic index (P = .007) and brain invasion (P = .002) as predictors of recurrence. Larger volume (P = .96) was not associated with recurrence but was more likely to prompt EBRT (P = .001). Recurrences occurred in 11 of 112 with GTR (9.8%; median, 44 months) and 2 of 39 with GTR/EBRT (5.1%; median, 133 months). The 2-, 5-, and 10-year progression-free survival rates after GTR vs GTR/EBRT were 97%, 86%, and 68% vs 100%, 100%, and 78%. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in progression-free survival or overall survival after GTR vs GTR/EBRT (P = .8, P &gt; .99). CONCLUSION: Brain invasion and high mitotic rates may predict recurrence. After GTR of AMs, EBRT appears not to affect progression-free survival and overall survival, suggesting that observation rather than EBRT may be indicated after GTR.

Adjuvant Radiation for Gynecologic Cancers

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joanne Jang
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Vulvar Cancer ◽  
Vaginal Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
Adjuvant Radiation ◽  
Gynecologic Cancers ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Postoperative Setting

Radiation therapy plays a significant role in the treatment of nearly all gynecologic cancers, including endometrial cancer, cervical cancer, vaginal cancer, and vulvar cancer. Radiotherapy can be given as the primary modality for curative treatment of gynecologic cancers, most often for cervical, vaginal, and vulvar cancers, but can also be used adjuvantly in the postoperative setting. Radiation can be delivered in the form of external beam radiation therapy or as gynecologic implants for brachytherapy, which is radiation that is delivered internally. This review highlights the data supporting radiation therapy for gynecologic cancers and explains the different methods of radiation delivery. This review contains 5 figures, and 4 tables, and 40 references.  Key Words: adjuvant treatment, brachytherapy, cervical cancer, endometrial cancer, IMRT, ovarian cancer, radiation therapy, vaginal cancer, vulvar cancer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document